P.E.O.P.L.E. framework for thinking about brands
•Download as PPT, PDF•
87 likes•6,854 views
The document introduces a framework called P.E.O.P.L.E. for how brands can interact with consumers in a more human-like way. It discusses how brands have traditionally tightly controlled their image but now people are more trusting of others' opinions than brands. It suggests that successful future brands will act as a platform for social interaction and empower consumers to become advocates instead of just fans. The framework involves participating in conversations, embracing how others interact with the brand, becoming transparent, and listening closely to consumer feedback.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to P.E.O.P.L.E. framework for thinking about brands
Similar to P.E.O.P.L.E. framework for thinking about brands (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
P.E.O.P.L.E. framework for thinking about brands
- 1. P.E.O.P.L.E. Introducing a basic framework for thinking about brands by Ross Popoff-Walker www.annoyingdesign.org/blog
- 2. Brands are like living things.
- 3. Brands have value and meaning to people.
- 4. Companies create their brand’s equity and value from the ground up .
- 5. And keep tight control of their brand.
- 6. But online… people don’t trust websites from big brands.
- 7. 81% percent of consumers say they do not trust branded websites. Source: Forrester Research’s NACTAS Q2 2006 Survey
- 8. But we do trust each other.
- 9. 71% of people say they trust the opinion of family, friends and colleagues as a source of information on products and services. Source: Forrester Research
- 10. Companies need to listen to what individual voices are saying.
- 11. And tap into the conversations that are already happening about their brands.
- 12. Brands like Scion get this.
- 13. They embrace it by connecting their web properties to user communities.
- 14. But many big brands still need to let go. (please, let go)
- 15. Because people all over are creating substitutions for what these brands are not providing. Here’s a real example…
- 18. What if Nike helped Melz organize their “New Sneaker Wednesdays”… … and for just a day , instead of promoting Kobe or LeBron…
- 20. … what if Nike enabled Melz to spread his love of the Nike brand to the world…
- 21. NEW SNEAKER WEDNESDAY - Melz, 17, NYC
- 23. It is our nature to congregate around things we believe in . Things we value. Things like brands.
- 24. Successful brands of tomorrow will act as a platform for our social nature.
- 25. As a sounding board for our voices.
- 26. P.E.O.P.L.E. By structuring brands to interact with consumers like real human beings, like people, brands can enable consumers to share and communicate.
- 30. COURIC: And, Mr. Manager, you know, these--these ID shoes are advertised as being about quote, "Freedom to choose and freedom to express who you are." By censoring what can be written on the shoes, aren't you res-restricting someone's individual freedom? Mr. MANAGER: Well, not at all. Again, I think that there are always limitations, to certain degree, of speech. Obviously, again, here's a copy of the shoe itself, and this is where the ID would go. We have no obligation to put on a shoe information that we would consider to be derogatory or defamatory to our company and our product. COURIC: Mm-hmm.
- 40. Thank You Want to learn more? Drop me a line… Ross Popoff-Walker blog: annoyingdesign.org /blog/ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/rosspw Twitter: twitter.com/rosspw email: [email_address] Ross Popoff-Walker Interactive UX + Youth Design Analyst