Accidental sundural injection case report

2,014 views
1,692 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,014
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
31
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Accidental sundural injection case report

  1. 1. ACCIDENTAL SUBDURAL INJECTION Presenter :- Dr Teena Chaudhary Moderator :- Dr Avnish Bhardwaj
  2. 2. CASE REPORTAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2010,Vol 38, No. 1D Agarwal, M Mohta, A Tyagi, AK SethiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, UniversityCollege of Medical Sciences and Guru TegBahadur Hospital, Delhi, India
  3. 3.  A 32-year-old primigravid woman at 41 weeks gestation was admitted to the hospital for induction of labor. She requested an epidural block for pain relief. Before the procedure, an intravenous infusion of lactated Ringer’s solution 500 ml was given. With the patient in a left lateral decubitus position, the L1-2 epidural space was easily identified using the loss of resistance to air technique with an 18-gauge Tuohy needle with the bevel oriented cephalad.
  4. 4.  An epidural catheter with an open end and three lateral eyes was threaded through the needle with minimal resistance without eliciting paresthesia or other discomfort. An estimated 5 cm was left in the presumed epidural space and aspiration revealed no blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A test dose of 3 ml of 0.67% lidocaine and fentanyl 3 µg/ml with 1:300,000 epinephrine was injected and the epidural catheter was secured.
  5. 5.  The test dose produced no detectable sensory or motor changes after 3 minutes and subsequently 12 ml of the same mixture was given by slow incremental injection over 8 minutes after the patient turned to the supine position. Fifteen minutes after loading dose was given, the parturient felt that contraction pains were much improved without any motor block.
  6. 6.  Maternal vital signs and the fetal heart beat recording were within the normal ranges. Thirty minutes later, the patient began to notice numbness in both arms. Testing of sensation to cold revealed sensory block from T10 to C6. No significant motor weakness was found. The conjunctiva were injected, and she complained of a stuffy nose. However, neither ptosis nor miosis was noted.
  7. 7.  There was no loss of consciousness or impairment of respiration and speech. Vital signs and fetal heart rate remained stable. Over the next 60 minutes the block slowly regressed and labor pains ensued. The obstetrician then decided to perform a cesarean section due to failure of labor progression. Because of the unusual block pattern, the anesthesiologist decided to perform spinal anesthesia at a lower level with enough space for betadine skin cleansing
  8. 8.  The catheter was retained to facilitate further investigation. After placing the patient in the right lateral position, a lumbar puncture was performed via the paramedian approach at the L3-4 level using a 26-gauge Greene spinal needle with the bevel aligned parallel to the long axis of the meninges
  9. 9.  When free flow of CSF was confirmed, 0.5% heavy bupivacaine solution 2.2 ml was slowly injected without barbotage. A dense lower extremity motor blockade was obtained and the patient reported sensory block up to the C6 level without ventilatory impairment. The operation proceeded smoothly and a vigorous male baby, body weight 3660 g, was delivered.
  10. 10. •On the secondpostoperative day, with thepatient’s permission andconsent, 10 ml of nonioniccontrast medium, iotrolan,was injected through thecatheter to investigate thecatheter position.•The spread of the dye wasshown to extend exclusivelyin the cephalic directionwith some delineation of theroots which is characteristicof subdural injection.Subsequent computed Lateral post-contrast image suggestingtomographic (CT)scanning subdural spread (black arrow pointing to “convex anterior bulging” consistentconfirmed the dye was with subdural spread patternswithin the subdural space
  11. 11.  The patient had an uneventful recovery after the cesarean section and was discharged with no neurological deficits.
  12. 12. ANATOMY OF SUBDURAL SPACE The subdural space is a narrow potential space between the arachnoid mater and the dura mater containing a minute quantity of serous fluid. It extends into the cranial cavity throughout the distribution of the meninges, covering all neural structures. The space ends distally at the lower border of the second sacral vertebra S2, where the filum terminale becomes invested closely by the dura mater.
  13. 13. •The spinal subdural space has greater potential capacity dorsally and laterally•It is widest in the cervical region and most narrow in the lumbar region.•The usual sparing of sympathetic and motor functions associated with asubdural block is due to the anatomy of this space•The space is known to extend laterally like a cuff over the exiting dorsal nerveroots.•The arachnoid mater is fixed proximal to the dorsal ganglia and the dura materdistal to it, thereby also extending the subdural space over the dorsal rootganglia The dura and arachnoid mater are attached together on the ventral rootand hence the potential space is much smaller ventrally.•Subdural injections thus usually pool in the posterior segment, sparing theanterior nerve roots that carry the sympathetic and motor nerve fibres
  14. 14. •Under electronmicroscopy,subdural space hasbeen studied,wherein thearachnoid mater had an outercompact laminar portion attachedto the inside of the dural sac and aseparate inner trabeculatedportion•Between the laminar arachnoidportion and the dura, acompartment termed the dura-arachnoid interface was seen.•This dura arachnoid interface wasseen to be composed ofneurothelial cells having relativelyfew intercellular joints and largeintercellular lacunae filled with anamorphous material
  15. 15. •This suggested thatiatrogenic dissection ofthis cellular plane canoccur if neurothelial cellsbreak up on application ofpressure by mechanicalforces such as air or fluidinjection.•Thus fissures can becreated within the dura-arachnoid interface, withconsiderable variability inform
  16. 16. INCIDENCE The first case of radiologically confirmed accidental subdural block was published in 1975 Although a number of case reports of accidental subdural injection have been published since then, the incidence of this complication after epidural is usually considered low. A retrospective study of 2182 consecutive lumbar epidurals showed an incidence of 0.82% Most of the reported cases of accidental subdural blockade have been in obstetric patients receiving neuraxial analgesia for labour
  17. 17.  According to their findings, up to 7% of epidural needles may be partly placed in the subdural space during the performance of an epidural block.Thus the actual incidence may be much higher than reported in studies using only clinical criteria for diagnosis.
  18. 18. PREDISPOSING FACTORS Difficult block placement Rough handling and rotation of an epidural needle in the epidural space (dural laceration) Subdural placement may occur however, independently of the level of experience of the operator Patients having previous back surgery were . potentially more prone to accidental subdural injection, because of altered anatomy secondary to scarring and retraction and possible obliteration of the epidural space
  19. 19.  A recent lumbar puncture : CSF may leak through the dural rent and distend the subdural space. Any attempt to inject local anaesthetics at the same intervertebral space may cause deposition in the subdural space Use of multi hole epidural catheters. Long-bevelled needles used during subarachnoid block.
  20. 20. PRESENTING FEATURES A subdural block can have a variable presentation depending upon the extent of the spread of local anaesthetic, which in turn is dictated by the highly variable anatomy of the space itself. The onset of the block is somewhat intermediate between that of a subarachnoid and epidural block, because the nerves in the subdural space are covered with pia and arachnoid maters, as compared to the subarachnoid space where the nerves are sheathed by pia mater only and the epidural space where arachnoid, pia and dura mater envelop
  21. 21.  The block is thus often characterised by a slow onset (approximately 15 to 20 minutes after drug injection) and usually lasts for up to two hours, followed by a full recovery The sensory block produced by subdural injection is usually high and disproportionate to the volume of drug injected, as the limited capacity of the space results inextensive spread moderate
  22. 22.  There is usually sparing of, or minimal effect on sympathetic and motor functions, due to the relative sparing of the ventral nerve roots Thus, hypotension is likely to be only moderate.
  23. 23.  Development of motor weakness is slow and less profound, with progressive respiratory inco-ordination rather than sudden apnoea. This presentation helps to distinguish an unexpectedly high sensory level due to subdural placement from that caused by an inadvertent subarachnoid placement during epidural anaesthesia, wherein the onset is fast with complete, bilateral sympathetic, sensory and motor blockade below a certain level
  24. 24. unusual presentations of subdural blockade Significant motor weakness in the intercostal muscles and upper extremities A faster than usual onset of block A delayed onset of up to 30 minutes with unduly prolonged blockade
  25. 25. Subdural blockade leading to significant hypotension has also been observed These differences could be explained by the amount of drug actually injected into the subdural space and interpatient variation in the anatomy and distensibility of the space. Unilateral blocks are common with subdural injection
  26. 26.  Permanent neural damage : can occur as a result of unintentional subdural injection due to the compression of nerve roots or the radicular arteries traversing the space, causing ischaemia of neural tissues. Unconsciousness and apnoea : Because the subdural space extends intracranially, local anaesthetic block of the brainstem is also possible
  27. 27.  Horner’s syndrome and trigeminal nerve palsy : A trigeminal nerve palsy is a more serious consequence than Horner’s syndrome, because this could signify cephalad spread of the anaesthetic agent into the cranial cavity.
  28. 28. MECHANISMSThe various mechanisms by which an accidental subdural block can occur while performing central neuraxial blockade include the following: subdural placement of intended epidural catheters ,well known An epidural or spinal needle may pierce the dura as well as the arachnoid, such that it lies partly in both the subarachnoid and the subdural spaces
  29. 29.  In this scenario, drug injection distributes preferentially to the subdural rather than the subarachnoid space despite the ability to aspirate CSF. this may be due to the CSF leaking into and distending the subdural space. Following initial successful epidural analgesia, subsequent subdural migration has been reported.
  30. 30.  The catheter position relative to the dura and the pressures used during injection of the drug may affect the orifice from which the drug is ejected. Thus, a particular dose of local anaesthetic may produce a composite subarachnoid, subdural and/or extradural blockade, depending upon the pressure used to inject the drug.
  31. 31. DIAGNOSIS Accidental injection into the subdural space should be suspected if a less than distinct loss of resistance is felt on inserting the needle into the epidural space or if the patient complains of a frontal headache (due to the intracranial displacement of CSF at the time of drug injection). Lubenow et al described two major and three minor clinical criteria for the diagnosis of a subdural block.
  32. 32.  Major criteria included: A) negative aspiration test B) unexpected extensive sensory block. Minor criteria included : A) a delayed onset by 10 minutes or more of a sensory or motor nerve block B) a variable motor block and C) sympatholysis out of proportion to the administered
  33. 33. four-step diagnostic algorithm to detect subdural block FIRST STEP : determine whether the block is FIRST STEP : determine whether the block is presumed to be the epidural or subarachnoid space based on the tactile feel during the insertion and the presence or absence of CSF SECOND STEP : dermatomal spread is assessed as excessive, restricted or neither THIRD STEP : minor criteria such as onset >20 minutes, cardiovascular stability, motor sparing, patchy or asymmetrical spread, respiratory failure and cranial involvement are applied
  34. 34. •FOURTH STEP : RadiologicalConfirmation using X-raycomputed tomography scan ormagnetic resonance imagingAs the subdural space is apotential space and normallynot visible on scans, thepresence of deliberatelyinjected contrast media orfluid in the space is required toconfirm the subduralplacementThe subdural injection ofcontrast media is seen as adense collection confined tothe posterior aspect of thespinal canal, spreading mainly ina cephalad direction. A small AP post-contrast image suggestingamount of contrast may extend subdural injection with contra-lateral (blacklaterally, delineating the nerve arrows) and lateral (white arrows) spread of contrast within the dural sleeveroots
  35. 35.  The spread is not affected by a change in posture and can be unilateral. On an anteroposterior view of the lumbar spine X-ray, the appearance of subdural contrast medium is similar to subarachnoid contrast media. However, on lateral view and computed tomography scan the difference is appreciable. Contrast in the subarachnoid space rapidly descends in the CSF with gravity and outlines the exiting nerve roots.
  36. 36. The CSF dilutes contrast andit appears less opaque thansubdural contrast. Withepidural injection of contrastmedia, a wide distribution isseen which tends to flowoutward through theintervertebral foramina. CT sagittal reconstruction demonstrating a left subdural spread (white arrow)
  37. 37.  CT and MRI are not always possible. Electrical stimulation of the epidural catheter has been used to diagnose subdural placement. The fluid injected into the subdural space can spread a considerable distance, thus a diffuse motor response involving multiple segments can potentially be elicited at a low current (<1 mA).
  38. 38. MANAGEMENT There are no clear guidelines for the management of a potential subdural catheter. A patient with an accidental subdural block should be monitored closely and managed according to the signs and symptoms. If a high sensory level develops, in conjunction with cardiovascular and respiratory support, patients should be considered for intubation and mechanical ventilation and pressor
  39. 39.  If a subarachnoid block is planned, enhanced cephalad spread of local anaesthetic should be anticipated, because of the potential compression of the subarachnoid space by the subdural injection If general anaesthesia is administered, succinylcholine should be used with caution as it may induce severe bradycardia in the presence of a high sympathetic block
  40. 40.  Also, the presence of a catheter in the subdural space may cause arachnoid rupture, particularly on injection of a large dose, leading to the risk of a post- dural puncture headache and leakage of local anaesthetic producing a subarachnoid block
  41. 41. PREVENTION Unrecognised subdural placement of epidural needle or catheter may account for many complications. A number of precautions can be taken in order to avoid or detect subdural placement: Care should be taken when rotating a Tuohy needle once it has entered the epidural space. There should be a high index of suspicion of subdural placement in patients with difficult block or previous back surgery.
  42. 42.  Once the dura mater has been punctured, it may be advisable to choose another interspace if a repeat neuraxial block is required on the same occasion. During continuous epidural catheter techniques, every top-up should be given in a fractionated manner, as per usual safe practice. Single orifice catheters may be preferable to multiple orifice catheters
  43. 43. CONCLUSION All anaesthetists should be aware of the possibility of subdural block during central neuraxial anaesthesia. The differential diagnosis of a possible subdural injection should be considered in cases of extensive sensory blockade despite apparently small volumes of epidurally administered local anaesthetics, unexpected failure of block or atypical presentations following otherwise uncomplicated regional block.
  44. 44.  Once subdural injection is suspected, it is advisable to avoid further local anaesthetic injections through the catheter and the patient should be monitored carefully for any adverse effects
  45. 45. REFERENCES Review article ,anaethesia n intensive care, vol 6,2010. Miller’s anaesthesiology
  46. 46. Thanks… 

×