Power, Structure and Control - Presentation Transcript
Power, Structure and Control in Human Service Organizations
Why are there Human Service Organizations?
To meet mounting needs, several factors lead to the bureaucratization of the welfare state. 1. Mechanisms to ensure eligibility, fairness and equity in service 2. Complexity of needs and sophistication of services lead to specialization. 3. Establish new social controls when households ceased to be a place of work and could not control behavior (Janowitz, 1978).
Max Weber’s Bureaucratic Model 1. Division of labor & functional specialization 2. A hierarchy of command 3. Formal rules and procedures 4. Maintenance of files and records 5. Professionalism
Economic Military Political THE POWER ELITE
The person is aware of what’s expected.
The threat is considered real
What the person values vs. the sanction
Convinced the threat is not idle
Conditions of Sanctions
HSOs are Loosely Coupled Systems
HSOs face turbulent environments with multiple interest groups, and pursue multiple often conflicting goals
HSOs incorporate ill-defined tasks and activities
HSOs technologies difficult to monitor and evaluate staff
Staff-client relationships are not readily subject to organizational control
Tasks are weakly connencted and coordinated – not logically derived from a clearly defined technology.
Weak system of control over staff activities – staff have considerable discretion and lack monitoring.
Weak, multiple and often conflicting systems of authority, with units often autonomous and insulated
What do you think meetings accomplish?
You may think that they are required if are
to be decisions made & goals accomplished.
However …
Meetings are symbolic displays of the constitution of organizational hierarchy
The most visible and important sites of organizational power
The symbolic structuring of power
Reification of organizational hierarchy
Those who occupy positions of power in the organizational hierarchy signify their power, and reaffirm their status
(Mumby, P. 68).
How many forms of power exist in HSOs?
Eight forms of power used in HSOs: Formal Expertise Associational Resource Procedural Personal Habitual Sanction Nuisance Marion Peters Angelica, 1999
The HSO leader must be creative about how to equalize power in a conflict situation. Three phases of dealing with conflict: 1. Analyzing it, 2. Designing a resolution process, and 3. Managing the resolution dialogue Understanding power differences is essential in problem solving in HSOs (Agelica, P. 36).
1. Technological ambiguities in roles various staff members should assume. 2. Low task visibility and observability. 3. Evaluation criteria ambiguous, vague and lack wide acceptance. 4. Constraints by civil services regulations restrict rewards or sanctions to employees. HSOs experience considerable difficulty in developing an effective control system
Ensuring that tasks are performed in
accordance with organizational specifications
specific job specifications
reduced worker discretion
extensive use of forms limits information & monitor’s workers’ behavior - vulnerable to manipulation.
coordination by plan
Supervision (can be manipulated by either supervisors or subordinates
Indoctrination to operating norms to elicit ritualistic adherence to norms.
Behavioral Control
is ensuring that the consequences of staff activities meet the organization’s output goals. recruitment of expertise rely on credentials substitute for objective criteria Ideological compatibility is required coordinating work by feedback from clients and coworkers Team approach Socialization to the practice ideologies Output Control
0 comments
Post a comment