Yan Zhang Diagnostic Interview

Uploaded on


More in: Education , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Yan Zhang EDCI 5372
  • 2. Literature Review  Purpose: provide assessors with students’ conceptual knowledge and reasoning during problem solving (Huinker, 1993)  Conflict in paper-and-pencil test:  students get the right answer, but have basic misunderstanding  students make computational errors, but reveal a better conceptual understanding of procedure (Labinowicz, 1987)
  • 3. Literature Review (cont.)  Advantages (Huinker, 1993) :  delve deeply into student’s thinking and reasoning  better determine their level of understanding  diagnose misconceptions and missing connections  assess their verbal ability to communicate mathematical knowledge
  • 4. Literature Review (cont.)  Questioning techniques (Ralph, 1999a, 1999b) :  preparing important questions ahead of time  delivering questions clearly and concisely  posing questions to children that stimulate thought  giving children enough time to think about and prepare an answer
  • 5. Literature Review (cont.)  Three different levels of questioning techniques (Moyer and Milewicz, 2002)  checklisting: jump from one question to another with little regard to student’s response  instructing rather than assessing: use leading questions that directed student’s response, or they disregard the strategy of questioning and attempt to teach the solution  use probing and follow-up questions: competent questions that specifically and consistently probe student’s answer
  • 6. Clinic Interview Reflection  Interviewee: a 7th Grade student  Purpose: assess student’s understanding of perimeter and area  Process:  describe perimeter and area in his own word  find the perimeter and area for two different rectangles  build a new rectangle with different perimeter/ area but same area/ perimeter  make judgment on a statement: the rectangle with large area also will have a large perimeter
  • 7. Clinic Interview Reflection (cont.)  Student’s strength:  confident of mental arithmetic skills  develop appropriate strategies for different problems  good understanding of perimeter and area  Student’s weakness:  lack of verbal ability to communicate mathematical knowledge  find factors  Using mathematical tools to work through problems
  • 8. Clinic Interview Reflection (cont.)  Self-reflection on design and process of the interview  I interrupted the student several times during the interview. When the student had difficulty to express himself, I did not give him enough time to think and tried to provide the answer.  The entire interview looks more like a teaching process instead of assessing. Although the student’s response indicated that his understanding was quite decent, it seemed that I leaded him to the right answer step by step.