SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Research question                                                        Date: 12/02/2013

Whether any amendment by law regarding change in penal provisions but not
altering the maximum punishment & penalty, whether such provisions would
affect the right of accused, whether that to be considered as violative of art. 21
and art. 20(1) of Indian Constitution?

Authorities cited:

U.S. position with regard to expost facto law

Calder v. Bull1, Justice Chase, in his opinion,
“I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the
prohibition”
1. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was
    innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action.
2. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed.
3. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the
    law annexed to the crime, when committed.
4. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony,
    than the law required at the time of the commission of the offence, in order to convict the
    offender.


Dobbert V. Florida2,
Fact: Ernest Dobbert murdered two of his children between December 31,1971, and April
8,1972. On July 17,1972, the Supreme Court of Florida, pursuant to Furman v. Georgia, l
invalidated the death penalty provision of the murder statute Z in effect at the time of
Dobbert's crimes. Five months later, the Florida Legislature enacted a revised death penalty
statute for murder in the first degree.' In accordance with the provisions of the 1972 revised
statute, dobbert was convicted in 1974 of first degree murder in the Fourth Circuit court of
Florida and sentenced to die notwithstanding a jury recommendation of life imprisonment.

Held: “The first argument was that the procedure under the new death penalty statute, which
allowed the trial judge to overrule a jury's recommendation of life imprisonment, violated the
ex-post facto clause because it worked to Dobbert's disadvantage in that such a
recommendation could not have been overruled under the old statute." Relying on Hopt
v.Utah3, the Court rejected this argument by concluding that even if the change ultimately
worked to the defendant’s particular disadvantage it was generally an ameliorative procedural
change and hence did not constitute an ex post facto law4.
A second argument was that the lengthening of the minimum parole eligibility time for life
imprisonment under the new statute made the whole statute more onerous than the old one
and therefore unconstitutional in its application to Dobbert." 5 The Court dismissed this
argument by holding that, since Dobbert was not sentenced to life imprisonment, the increase

1
    3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 (1798)
2
    432 U. S. 282 (1977)
3
  110 U.S. 574 (1884)
4
  432 U.S. at 292-97
5
  Id. at 298
in parole eligibility time had no bearing on his particular punishment and thus did not work to
his disadvantage.6
The third of the ex post facto arguments required the Court to determine what effect should
be given to the fact that the old death penalty provision was invalidated and a new one
enacted during the interim between Dobbert's criminal acts and the date of his trial mu The
argument was that, inasmuch as the old death penalty provision was later declared
unconstitutional, there was technically no valid death penalty in effect when the crimes were
committed, and hence the new death penalty statute created an unconstitutionally retroactive
increase in punishment. The Court rejected this argument also, relying on Chicot County
Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank7for the proposition that a court does not necessarily
have to give full retroactive effect to a judicial declaration of a statute’s unconstitutionality.
The Court added that the existence of the earlier statute "provided fair warning as to the
degree of culpability which the State ascribed to the act of murder" and therefore provided
"sufficient compliance with the ex post facto provision of the United States Constitution.




India position with regard to expost facto law

Union Of India And Others vs Super Processors8
Bench: B S Manohar
…………. the Supreme Court has expressly stated (in Satwant Singh's case
(supra) that the law relating to changed penalty shall apply provided that the
maximum penalty is not increased. In fact the decision in the case of Commissioner
of Wealth-Tax, Amritsar v. Suresh Seth (supra) has been substantially overruled in
the decision of the Supreme Court in Smt. Maya Rani Punj's case (supra)
although this aspect has not been dealt with by the Supreme Court in the subsequent
case. If these principles are applied to the present case, the revised guidelines of
October 1982 are considered by all parties to be more rational and based on a
sounder footing than the earlier guidelines. The maximum penalty remains unaltered
as this is prescribed by Section 14-B which remains the same. Therefore, when the
exercise of discretion is governed by more rational and generally better guidelines,
such guidelines must be applied from the date when they come into existence
whenever an opportunity arises thereafter for their application………….




6
  Id. at 300-01
7
  308 U.S. 371 (1940)
8
  (1993) IILLJ 203 Bom HC

More Related Content

What's hot

Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)
Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)
Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)Rich Bergeron
 
2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin
2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin
2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossinScott McCrossin
 
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial Grounds
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial GroundsMotion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial Grounds
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial GroundsRich Bergeron
 
Reforma de seguridad y justicia
Reforma de seguridad y justiciaReforma de seguridad y justicia
Reforma de seguridad y justiciaDeyaniraRoldan
 
2009 Maloney V. Cuomo Sotomayor
2009 Maloney V. Cuomo   Sotomayor2009 Maloney V. Cuomo   Sotomayor
2009 Maloney V. Cuomo Sotomayormaldef
 
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021sabrangsabrang
 
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)Edward Premo
 
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8Mauricio Albarracín Caballero
 
Virendra vs state of up
Virendra vs state of upVirendra vs state of up
Virendra vs state of upZahidManiyar
 
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019This Is Reno
 
Notice of intervention. Leandro
Notice of intervention. LeandroNotice of intervention. Leandro
Notice of intervention. LeandroEducationNC
 
The Fourth Amendment Explained
The Fourth Amendment ExplainedThe Fourth Amendment Explained
The Fourth Amendment ExplainedJeremy Duncan
 
Fisc usg motion to resume bulk data spying
Fisc usg motion to resume bulk data spyingFisc usg motion to resume bulk data spying
Fisc usg motion to resume bulk data spyingAnonDownload
 
8055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-2021
8055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-20218055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-2021
8055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-2021ZahidManiyar
 
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...Rich Bergeron
 

What's hot (19)

Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)
Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)
Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)
 
Holcomb Appeals - Part 3
Holcomb Appeals - Part 3Holcomb Appeals - Part 3
Holcomb Appeals - Part 3
 
2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin
2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin
2014-08-11 Police Enforcement of Injunctions - CBA CLC 2014 - Scott McCrossin
 
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial Grounds
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial GroundsMotion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial Grounds
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial Grounds
 
Holcomb Appeals - Part 2
Holcomb Appeals - Part 2Holcomb Appeals - Part 2
Holcomb Appeals - Part 2
 
Reforma de seguridad y justicia
Reforma de seguridad y justiciaReforma de seguridad y justicia
Reforma de seguridad y justicia
 
2009 Maloney V. Cuomo Sotomayor
2009 Maloney V. Cuomo   Sotomayor2009 Maloney V. Cuomo   Sotomayor
2009 Maloney V. Cuomo Sotomayor
 
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
 
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)
Order granting-motions-to-enjoin-9-a-of-exec-o (1)
 
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
Sentencia matrimonio gay Caso California Contra La Prop.8
 
Stvincent.constitution.09
Stvincent.constitution.09Stvincent.constitution.09
Stvincent.constitution.09
 
Virendra vs state of up
Virendra vs state of upVirendra vs state of up
Virendra vs state of up
 
0
00
0
 
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019
Nevada Senate Bill 287, 2019
 
Notice of intervention. Leandro
Notice of intervention. LeandroNotice of intervention. Leandro
Notice of intervention. Leandro
 
The Fourth Amendment Explained
The Fourth Amendment ExplainedThe Fourth Amendment Explained
The Fourth Amendment Explained
 
Fisc usg motion to resume bulk data spying
Fisc usg motion to resume bulk data spyingFisc usg motion to resume bulk data spying
Fisc usg motion to resume bulk data spying
 
8055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-2021
8055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-20218055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-2021
8055 2021 41_42_27238_order_26-mar-2021
 
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Finance Bill, 2016 Summary (Income Tax)
Finance Bill, 2016  Summary (Income Tax)Finance Bill, 2016  Summary (Income Tax)
Finance Bill, 2016 Summary (Income Tax)
 
crest Parapet definition
crest Parapet definitioncrest Parapet definition
crest Parapet definition
 
Right to Life
Right to LifeRight to Life
Right to Life
 
Female foeticide
Female foeticideFemale foeticide
Female foeticide
 
Per incuriam
Per incuriamPer incuriam
Per incuriam
 
ngo_report
 ngo_report ngo_report
ngo_report
 
Proxy voting
Proxy votingProxy voting
Proxy voting
 
Interpretation of sec 50 ndps act
Interpretation of sec 50 ndps actInterpretation of sec 50 ndps act
Interpretation of sec 50 ndps act
 
Project report critical analysis of sahara judgment
Project report  critical analysis of  sahara judgmentProject report  critical analysis of  sahara judgment
Project report critical analysis of sahara judgment
 
How a bill becomes a law
How a bill becomes a lawHow a bill becomes a law
How a bill becomes a law
 
Bhoomi internship report by deepanjali
Bhoomi internship report by deepanjaliBhoomi internship report by deepanjali
Bhoomi internship report by deepanjali
 
Internship diary by ronak
Internship diary by ronakInternship diary by ronak
Internship diary by ronak
 
Electronic evidence
Electronic evidenceElectronic evidence
Electronic evidence
 
Fdi in india
Fdi in indiaFdi in india
Fdi in india
 
Ch. 5 - How a Bill Becomes a Law
Ch. 5 - How a Bill Becomes a LawCh. 5 - How a Bill Becomes a Law
Ch. 5 - How a Bill Becomes a Law
 
How A Bill Becomes A Law
How A Bill Becomes A LawHow A Bill Becomes A Law
How A Bill Becomes A Law
 
NGO Internship Report - AASRA
NGO Internship Report - AASRA NGO Internship Report - AASRA
NGO Internship Report - AASRA
 
How a bill become law
How a bill become lawHow a bill become law
How a bill become law
 
Summer Internship Report 2009
Summer Internship Report 2009Summer Internship Report 2009
Summer Internship Report 2009
 
Credit control by_central_bank
Credit control by_central_bankCredit control by_central_bank
Credit control by_central_bank
 

Similar to Expost facto doctrine

K. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. Burris
K. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. BurrisK. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. Burris
K. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. BurrisKrizia Toledo
 
DPS Bhullar Case Judgement
DPS Bhullar Case JudgementDPS Bhullar Case Judgement
DPS Bhullar Case Judgementsikhsiyasat
 
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdf
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdfLAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdf
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdfmarkandalaw
 
Final exam review
Final exam reviewFinal exam review
Final exam reviewMike Wilkie
 
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docxjeremylockett77
 
Constutional Law I - session 30.pptx
Constutional Law I - session 30.pptxConstutional Law I - session 30.pptx
Constutional Law I - session 30.pptxketan349068
 
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pages
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pagesSection 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pages
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pagesUmesh Heendeniya
 
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...Rich Bergeron
 
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered Sanctions
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered SanctionsReply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered Sanctions
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered SanctionsRich Bergeron
 
Chapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docx
Chapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docxChapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docx
Chapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docxchristinemaritza
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipBrandon L. Blankenship
 
Plea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian System
Plea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian SystemPlea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian System
Plea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian SystemAbsar Aftab Absar
 
Res judicata
Res  judicataRes  judicata
Res judicatapshreyap
 
Portfolio assignment legal ethics FD
Portfolio assignment legal ethics FDPortfolio assignment legal ethics FD
Portfolio assignment legal ethics FDAmanda Talbert
 
Carlisle Letter to Supreme Court
Carlisle Letter to Supreme CourtCarlisle Letter to Supreme Court
Carlisle Letter to Supreme CourtHonolulu Civil Beat
 

Similar to Expost facto doctrine (20)

K. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. Burris
K. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. BurrisK. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. Burris
K. Toledo_Seminar Paper 2014_Prof. Burris
 
Commonwealth v. Andino
Commonwealth v. AndinoCommonwealth v. Andino
Commonwealth v. Andino
 
DPS Bhullar Case Judgement
DPS Bhullar Case JudgementDPS Bhullar Case Judgement
DPS Bhullar Case Judgement
 
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
 
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdf
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdfLAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdf
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP By PC MARKANDA (1).pdf
 
Final exam review
Final exam reviewFinal exam review
Final exam review
 
EXTRACT_LEGAL REPORT
EXTRACT_LEGAL REPORTEXTRACT_LEGAL REPORT
EXTRACT_LEGAL REPORT
 
December 2011 update
December 2011 updateDecember 2011 update
December 2011 update
 
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx
1 (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER T.docx
 
Constutional Law I - session 30.pptx
Constutional Law I - session 30.pptxConstutional Law I - session 30.pptx
Constutional Law I - session 30.pptx
 
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pages
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pagesSection 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pages
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pages
 
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...
 
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered Sanctions
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered SanctionsReply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered Sanctions
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered Sanctions
 
Chapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docx
Chapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docxChapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docx
Chapter 3 Due Process, Equal Protection, and Civil Rights Those .docx
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
 
Plea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian System
Plea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian SystemPlea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian System
Plea bargaining and its applicability in the Indian System
 
Res judicata
Res  judicataRes  judicata
Res judicata
 
Portfolio assignment legal ethics FD
Portfolio assignment legal ethics FDPortfolio assignment legal ethics FD
Portfolio assignment legal ethics FD
 
Carlisle Letter to Supreme Court
Carlisle Letter to Supreme CourtCarlisle Letter to Supreme Court
Carlisle Letter to Supreme Court
 
Sc13 552
Sc13 552Sc13 552
Sc13 552
 

More from Ronak Karanpuria

Look out circular bail or arrest
Look out circular bail or arrestLook out circular bail or arrest
Look out circular bail or arrestRonak Karanpuria
 
After review petition: curative jurisdiction
After review petition: curative jurisdictionAfter review petition: curative jurisdiction
After review petition: curative jurisdictionRonak Karanpuria
 
Review jurisdiction of supreme court
Review jurisdiction of supreme courtReview jurisdiction of supreme court
Review jurisdiction of supreme courtRonak Karanpuria
 
Internet censorship by ronak
Internet censorship by ronakInternet censorship by ronak
Internet censorship by ronakRonak Karanpuria
 
Substantive patent law treaty
Substantive patent law treatySubstantive patent law treaty
Substantive patent law treatyRonak Karanpuria
 

More from Ronak Karanpuria (10)

Look out circular bail or arrest
Look out circular bail or arrestLook out circular bail or arrest
Look out circular bail or arrest
 
After review petition: curative jurisdiction
After review petition: curative jurisdictionAfter review petition: curative jurisdiction
After review petition: curative jurisdiction
 
Why where and when
Why where and whenWhy where and when
Why where and when
 
Review jurisdiction of supreme court
Review jurisdiction of supreme courtReview jurisdiction of supreme court
Review jurisdiction of supreme court
 
Banking law module_2_2012
Banking law module_2_2012Banking law module_2_2012
Banking law module_2_2012
 
A.loans & advances
A.loans & advancesA.loans & advances
A.loans & advances
 
Unfair labour practices
Unfair labour practicesUnfair labour practices
Unfair labour practices
 
Internship diary by ronak
Internship diary by ronakInternship diary by ronak
Internship diary by ronak
 
Internet censorship by ronak
Internet censorship by ronakInternet censorship by ronak
Internet censorship by ronak
 
Substantive patent law treaty
Substantive patent law treatySubstantive patent law treaty
Substantive patent law treaty
 

Expost facto doctrine

  • 1. Research question Date: 12/02/2013 Whether any amendment by law regarding change in penal provisions but not altering the maximum punishment & penalty, whether such provisions would affect the right of accused, whether that to be considered as violative of art. 21 and art. 20(1) of Indian Constitution? Authorities cited: U.S. position with regard to expost facto law Calder v. Bull1, Justice Chase, in his opinion, “I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition” 1. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offence, in order to convict the offender. Dobbert V. Florida2, Fact: Ernest Dobbert murdered two of his children between December 31,1971, and April 8,1972. On July 17,1972, the Supreme Court of Florida, pursuant to Furman v. Georgia, l invalidated the death penalty provision of the murder statute Z in effect at the time of Dobbert's crimes. Five months later, the Florida Legislature enacted a revised death penalty statute for murder in the first degree.' In accordance with the provisions of the 1972 revised statute, dobbert was convicted in 1974 of first degree murder in the Fourth Circuit court of Florida and sentenced to die notwithstanding a jury recommendation of life imprisonment. Held: “The first argument was that the procedure under the new death penalty statute, which allowed the trial judge to overrule a jury's recommendation of life imprisonment, violated the ex-post facto clause because it worked to Dobbert's disadvantage in that such a recommendation could not have been overruled under the old statute." Relying on Hopt v.Utah3, the Court rejected this argument by concluding that even if the change ultimately worked to the defendant’s particular disadvantage it was generally an ameliorative procedural change and hence did not constitute an ex post facto law4. A second argument was that the lengthening of the minimum parole eligibility time for life imprisonment under the new statute made the whole statute more onerous than the old one and therefore unconstitutional in its application to Dobbert." 5 The Court dismissed this argument by holding that, since Dobbert was not sentenced to life imprisonment, the increase 1 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 (1798) 2 432 U. S. 282 (1977) 3 110 U.S. 574 (1884) 4 432 U.S. at 292-97 5 Id. at 298
  • 2. in parole eligibility time had no bearing on his particular punishment and thus did not work to his disadvantage.6 The third of the ex post facto arguments required the Court to determine what effect should be given to the fact that the old death penalty provision was invalidated and a new one enacted during the interim between Dobbert's criminal acts and the date of his trial mu The argument was that, inasmuch as the old death penalty provision was later declared unconstitutional, there was technically no valid death penalty in effect when the crimes were committed, and hence the new death penalty statute created an unconstitutionally retroactive increase in punishment. The Court rejected this argument also, relying on Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank7for the proposition that a court does not necessarily have to give full retroactive effect to a judicial declaration of a statute’s unconstitutionality. The Court added that the existence of the earlier statute "provided fair warning as to the degree of culpability which the State ascribed to the act of murder" and therefore provided "sufficient compliance with the ex post facto provision of the United States Constitution. India position with regard to expost facto law Union Of India And Others vs Super Processors8 Bench: B S Manohar …………. the Supreme Court has expressly stated (in Satwant Singh's case (supra) that the law relating to changed penalty shall apply provided that the maximum penalty is not increased. In fact the decision in the case of Commissioner of Wealth-Tax, Amritsar v. Suresh Seth (supra) has been substantially overruled in the decision of the Supreme Court in Smt. Maya Rani Punj's case (supra) although this aspect has not been dealt with by the Supreme Court in the subsequent case. If these principles are applied to the present case, the revised guidelines of October 1982 are considered by all parties to be more rational and based on a sounder footing than the earlier guidelines. The maximum penalty remains unaltered as this is prescribed by Section 14-B which remains the same. Therefore, when the exercise of discretion is governed by more rational and generally better guidelines, such guidelines must be applied from the date when they come into existence whenever an opportunity arises thereafter for their application…………. 6 Id. at 300-01 7 308 U.S. 371 (1940) 8 (1993) IILLJ 203 Bom HC