Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/ Concept mapping decision matrix JALT...
 
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Software vs. tangibles -tangibles first, because quick, and to en...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Software vs. tangibles -tangibles first -because quick -to encour...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Training -extensive  contained  warmups -for Teacher's observatio...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type -mind maps  -relation maps (Novakian)  -structure ma...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 1. Mind maps -for amassing 'thoughts' -relations onl...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 2. Relation maps (Novakian maps) -for relating conce...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps) -for representation ...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content  2....
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content Sof...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitat...
Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching

666

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
666
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching

  1. 1. Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/ Concept mapping decision matrix JALTCALL June 6, 2009
  2. 3. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Software vs. tangibles -tangibles first, because quick, and to encourage revisions (paper is cheap) -software for presentation, sharing, editing, beauty _______________________________ Training -extensive contained warmups -for Teacher's observation -L's need support? -L's need constraint? -for peer commenting -look quickly at shapes only -look carefully at node content and links Mapping type mind maps / relation maps (Novakian) / structure maps 1. Mind maps -for amassing 'thoughts' -relations only by association -for rearranging, clustering, prioritizing (software good for this) 2. Relation maps (Novakian maps) -for relating concepts in articulately related pairs -CMC debate going on now about declarative reading or not (cf. Tifi) 3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps) -for representation of syntactic structures at the level of -sentence -paragraph -short technical summary articles -not necessarily one unified map -background information may be -a separate map -a layer (font color, sidebar, etc.) -persuasion may be 'picture frames' or title bars or submaps Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitations 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint
  3. 4. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Software vs. tangibles -tangibles first -because quick -to encourage revisions (paper is cheap) -software for presentation, sharing, editing, beauty Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint
  4. 5. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Training -extensive contained warmups -for Teacher's observation -L's need support? -L's need constraint? -for peer commenting -look quickly at shapes only -look carefully at node content and links Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint
  5. 6. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type -mind maps -relation maps (Novakian) -structure maps Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  6. 7. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 1. Mind maps -for amassing 'thoughts' -relations only by association -for rearranging, clustering, prioritizing (software good for this) Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  7. 8. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 2. Relation maps (Novakian maps) -for relating concepts in articulately related pairs -CMC debate going on now about declarative reading or not (cf. Tifi) Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  8. 9. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps) -for representation of syntactic structures at the level of -sentence -paragraph -short technical summary articles -not necessarily one unified map -background information may be -a separate map -a layer (font color, sidebar, etc.) -persuasion may be 'picture frames' or title bars or submaps Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  9. 10. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitations 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint structural rhetorical relational
  10. 11. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint architectural rhetorical relational
  11. 12. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitations Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint architectural rhetorical relational
  12. 13. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint architectural rhetorical relational
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×