Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

05. Concept mapping decision matrix for L2 teaching

648
views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
648
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/ Concept mapping decision matrix JALTCALL June 6, 2009
  • 2.  
  • 3. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Software vs. tangibles -tangibles first, because quick, and to encourage revisions (paper is cheap) -software for presentation, sharing, editing, beauty _______________________________ Training -extensive contained warmups -for Teacher's observation -L's need support? -L's need constraint? -for peer commenting -look quickly at shapes only -look carefully at node content and links Mapping type mind maps / relation maps (Novakian) / structure maps 1. Mind maps -for amassing 'thoughts' -relations only by association -for rearranging, clustering, prioritizing (software good for this) 2. Relation maps (Novakian maps) -for relating concepts in articulately related pairs -CMC debate going on now about declarative reading or not (cf. Tifi) 3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps) -for representation of syntactic structures at the level of -sentence -paragraph -short technical summary articles -not necessarily one unified map -background information may be -a separate map -a layer (font color, sidebar, etc.) -persuasion may be 'picture frames' or title bars or submaps Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitations 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint
  • 4. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Software vs. tangibles -tangibles first -because quick -to encourage revisions (paper is cheap) -software for presentation, sharing, editing, beauty Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint
  • 5. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Training -extensive contained warmups -for Teacher's observation -L's need support? -L's need constraint? -for peer commenting -look quickly at shapes only -look carefully at node content and links Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint
  • 6. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type -mind maps -relation maps (Novakian) -structure maps Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  • 7. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 1. Mind maps -for amassing 'thoughts' -relations only by association -for rearranging, clustering, prioritizing (software good for this) Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  • 8. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 2. Relation maps (Novakian maps) -for relating concepts in articulately related pairs -CMC debate going on now about declarative reading or not (cf. Tifi) Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  • 9. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Mapping type 3. Structure maps (e.g. ISmaps) -for representation of syntactic structures at the level of -sentence -paragraph -short technical summary articles -not necessarily one unified map -background information may be -a separate map -a layer (font color, sidebar, etc.) -persuasion may be 'picture frames' or title bars or submaps Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint mind maps relation maps structure maps
  • 10. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitations 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint structural rhetorical relational
  • 11. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 1. Architectural constraint - by size - by content Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint architectural rhetorical relational
  • 12. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 2. Rhetorical constraint -by rhetorical device limitations Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint architectural rhetorical relational
  • 13. Mapping Decision Matrix 0904002 ________________________ Constraint 3. Relational constraint -by Novakianism Software vs. tangibles Training Mapping type Constraint architectural rhetorical relational