Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Choice Watch Presentation for Magnet Schools of America National Conference - Hartford, Connecticut - May 17, 2014

863

Published on

Part 1 of Presentation Entitled, "Who Chooses Magnet Schools and How? Findings from Three Studies in Hartford, CT. …

Part 1 of Presentation Entitled, "Who Chooses Magnet Schools and How? Findings from Three Studies in Hartford, CT.

Robert Cotto, Jr., Hartford Board of Education, Elected Member
“Choice Watch” – CT School Choice Enrollment Data.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
863
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Choice Watch: Access and Diversity in Connecticut’s School Choice Programs Robert Cotto, Jr. May 17, 2014 Hartford Board of Education Trinity College - Hartford, CT
  • 2. The Report Robert Cotto, Jr. & Kenny Feder (CT Voices for Children) • Source: CT State Department of Education, 2011-12 enrollment data. (October 2011) • Pre-K – grade 12 counts for all CT schools, including charter, interdistrict magnet, & technical schools. • Comparisons of demographics to local school districts by ELL, SWD, FRPM, race/ethnicity. • Analysis of data with regard to relevant diversity laws.
  • 3. Background • CT school choice programs: technical schools, agricultural science & technology centers, Open Choice, interdistrict magnet schools, & charter schools. • All voluntary enrollment programs. • CT law promotes reduction of racial, ethnic, & economic isolation through all programs except technical schools. • Interdistrict magnet schools have desegregation standards, enrollment rules, and/or financial support towards this goal.
  • 4. CT School Choice Programs in 2011-12 Type of School/Program Number of Children Number of Schools Grade levels (varies) All Public Schools 553,861 1,134 PK-12 Interdistrict Magnet 27,170 63 PK-12 Technical 10,656 16 9-12 Charter 6,097 17 PK-12 Agricultural Science and Tech. Center 3,245 19 9-12 Open Choice 2,086 — PK-12
  • 5. Framework for Thinking About Choice Erika Frankenberg and other researchers point out, choice can help reduce racial, ethnic, and economic isolation, yet “choice without equity” can undermine educational opportunity for many children and their families. - Frankenberg and Orfield, 2013.
  • 6. Research Questions • What is the demographic composition of Connecticut’s school choice programs? • Which programs meet their respective goals of reducing racial/ethnic/economic isolation? • How does their enrollment of emerging bilingual students & students with disabilities compare to local school districts?
  • 7. Key Findings Our analysis of CT SDE enrollment data for school choice programs - charter, interdistrict magnet, & technical schools: • Higher proportion of students of color & low-income students; • Majority of interdistrict magnet & technical schools are numerically desegregated by race/ethnicity. • Majority of these three types of schools could be considered “integrated” by free/reduced lunch status. • Relatively lower proportion of emerging bilingual & students with disabilities compared to local districts.
  • 8. CT School Choice Demographics 39% 35% 6% 12% 90% 71% 5% 8% 70% 55% 5% 9% 47% 41% 3% 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Minority Percent FRPM Eligible Percent ELL Percent Special Education PercentofStudentsEnrolled All Public Schools Charter Magnet Technical
  • 9. Charter & Magnet Enrollment by City 1437 1249 1622 311 1478 774 6444 7863 1496 10593 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Bridgeport Hartford New Haven Stamford All Other Towns NumberofStudentsEnrolled Charter Magnet Sources: CT State Department of Education, 2012 (2011-12 School Year). Cotto & Feder 2014
  • 10. Analysis: Racial/Ethnic Segregation 65% 12% 18% 6% 0%2% 33% 62% 3% 0% 19% 0% 56% 19% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% PercentofSchools Charter Interdistrict Magnet Technical
  • 11. Analysis: Socioeconomic Integration 6% 41% 53% 0% 0% 6% 5% 81% 8% 0%0% 0% 88% 13% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Hypersegregated FRPM Moderately Segregated FRPM Integrated Moderately Segregated non- FRPM Hyper Segregated non-FRPM Percentofschools Charter Interdistrict Magnet Technical
  • 12. Analysis: Emerging Bilingual (ELL) Choice Compared w/District Percentage Point Differential Charter Schools Interdistrict Magnet Schools Technical Schools Substantially Lower ELL 5 or higher 13 (76%) 42 (67%) 9 (56%) Somewhat lower ELL Between 1 and 5 2 (12%) 11 (18%) 5 (31%) Within 1 percentage pt. 1 (6%) 7 (11%) 0 Somewhat Higher ELL Between 1 and 5 1 (6%) 1 (2%) 1 (6%) Substantially Higher ELL 5 or higher 0 2 (3%) 1 (6%)
  • 13. Comparison: Emerging Bilingual (ELL) 13% 18% 14% 13% 2% 3% 9% 0% 1% 5% 6% 7% 2% 5% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% Bridgeport Hartford New Haven Stamford PercentofStudentsIdentifiedasELL District Charters Magnet Technical
  • 14. Analysis: Students with Disabilities Choice Compared w/District Percentage Point Differential Charter Schools Interdistrict Magnet Schools Technical Schools Substantially Lower SWD 5 or higher 6 (35%) 24 (38%) 10 (63%) Somewhat lower SWD Between 1 and 5 6 (35%) 27 (43%) 4 (25%) Within 1 percentage pt. 1 (6%) 5 (8%) 0 Somewhat Higher SWD Between 1 and 5 2 (12%) 5 (8%) 2 (13%) Substantially Higher SWD 5 or higher 2 (12%) 2 (3%) 0
  • 15. Recommendations • Account for demographic differences between choice programs & local schools. • All school choice programs and systems should have clear, quantifiable, and enforced integration standards, and sufficient resources to comply. • Investigate barriers to enrolling ELL students and students with disabilities in choice programs - take action to remove any barriers identified. • Investigate disincentives to enroll these children - take action to alleviate them.
  • 16. Additional Resources Full report, appendices, & additional resources can be found at The Cities, Suburbs & Schools Project site: http://commons.trincoll.edu/cssp/ Contact: Robert.Cotto@trincoll.edu Thanks to CT State Department of Education; CT Voices for Children - Kenny Feder & Ellen Shemitz, J.D.

×