Writing, Editing and Grammar Tips for Lawyers

2,107 views

Published on

In this program, Gary Kinder, of WordRake, answers questions about grammar lawyers have always wanted someone else to ask. He teaches lawyers how to remove unnecessary words to ensure their writing is concise, and shows lawyers how to enliven their sentences.

Published in: Education, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,107
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
823
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
21
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Writing, Editing and Grammar Tips for Lawyers

  1. 1. The 7 All-Time Questions about Grammar You Always Wanted Someone Else to Ask
  2. 2. 7 Lay/Lie
  3. 3. 7 the confusion: Lay/Lie
  4. 4. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay”
  5. 5. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie”
  6. 6. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable
  7. 7. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay
  8. 8. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay the brief on the desk.
  9. 9. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay
  10. 10. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay down in the hammock.
  11. 11. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay
  12. 12. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay the brief on the desk.
  13. 13. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay the brief on the desk. Right now.
  14. 14. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay
  15. 15. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay down in the hammock.
  16. 16. 7 Lay/Lie the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable I lay down in the hammock. Yesterday.
  17. 17. 7 present tense Lay/Lie
  18. 18. 7 Lay/Lie present tense I __ down and ___ my head on the pillow.
  19. 19. 7 Lay/Lie present tense I lie down and ___ my head on the pillow.
  20. 20. 7 Lay/Lie present tense I lie down and lay my head on the pillow.
  21. 21. 7 past tense Lay/Lie
  22. 22. 7 Lay/Lie past tense I ___ down and ____ my head on the pillow.
  23. 23. 7 Lay/Lie past tense I lay down and ____ my head on the pillow.
  24. 24. 7 Lay/Lie past tense I lay down and laid my head on the pillow.
  25. 25. 7 remember: Lay/Lie
  26. 26. 7 Lay/Lie remember: to lay - requires an object
  27. 27. 7 Lay/Lie remember: to lay - requires an object to lie - never has an object
  28. 28. 7 Lay/Lie remember: to lay - requires an object - past tense is laid to lie - never has an object
  29. 29. 7 Lay/Lie remember: to lay - requires an object - past tense is laid to lie - never has an object - past tense is lay
  30. 30. 6
  31. 31. 6 Me/Myself
  32. 32. 6 Me/Myself Never use “myself” in place of “I.”
  33. 33. 6 Me/Myself Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which myself and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
  34. 34. 6 Me/Myself Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which myself and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
  35. 35. 6 Me/Myself Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which I and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
  36. 36. 6 Me/Myself Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which the General Manager and I explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
  37. 37. 6 Me/Myself Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which the General Manager and I explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.
  38. 38. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object
  39. 39. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.”
  40. 40. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.”
  41. 41. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on myself and Paul.
  42. 42. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on myself and Paul.
  43. 43. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on Paul and myself.
  44. 44. 6 Me/Myself Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on Paul and myself.
  45. 45. 5
  46. 46. 5 Can/May
  47. 47. 5 can Can/May
  48. 48. 5 Can/May can - capability
  49. 49. 5 Can/May can - capability He can fix a leak with a paper clip.
  50. 50. 5 Can/May can - capability He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may
  51. 51. 5 Can/May can - capability He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may - permission
  52. 52. 5 Can/May can - capability He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may - permission You may not come in here.
  53. 53. 5 Can/May School Can Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California can deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
  54. 54. 5 Can/May School Can Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California can deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
  55. 55. 5 Can/May School May Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California may deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
  56. 56. 5 Can/May School May Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California may deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.
  57. 57. 4
  58. 58. 4 Fewer/Less
  59. 59. 4 fewer Fewer/Less
  60. 60. 4 Fewer/Less fewer – numbers
  61. 61. 4 Fewer/Less fewer – numbers – can be separated
  62. 62. 4 Fewer/Less fewer – numbers – can be separated less
  63. 63. 4 Fewer/Less fewer – numbers – can be separated less – measurement
  64. 64. 4 Fewer/Less fewer – numbers – can be separated less – measurement – cannot be separated
  65. 65. 4 Fewer/Less
  66. 66. 4 Fewer/Less fewer trees
  67. 67. 4 Fewer/Less fewer trees - less shade
  68. 68. 4 Fewer/Less fewer trees fewer drops - less shade
  69. 69. 4 Fewer/Less fewer trees - less shade fewer drops - less water
  70. 70. 4 Fewer/Less Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid:
  71. 71. 4 Fewer/Less Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means less trips to the gas station.
  72. 72. 4 Fewer/Less Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means less trips to the gas station.
  73. 73. 4 Fewer/Less Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means fewer trips to the gas station.
  74. 74. 4 Fewer/Less Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means fewer trips to the gas station.
  75. 75. 3
  76. 76. 3 Who/Whom
  77. 77. 3 who Who/Whom
  78. 78. 3 who – subject Who/Whom
  79. 79. 3 who – subject whom Who/Whom
  80. 80. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object
  81. 81. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Who did you wish to see?
  82. 82. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Who did you wish to see? Whom shall I say is calling?
  83. 83. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Who Did you wish to see she? Whom shall I say is calling?
  84. 84. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Who Did you wish to see her? Whom shall I say is calling?
  85. 85. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Whom did you wish to see? Whom shall I say is calling?
  86. 86. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Whom did you wish to see? Whom shall I say is calling?
  87. 87. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Whom did you wish to see? Whom Shall I say her is calling?
  88. 88. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Whom did you wish to see? Whom Shall I say she is calling?
  89. 89. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Whom did you wish to see? Who shall I say is calling?
  90. 90. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object Whom did you wish to see? Who shall I say is calling?
  91. 91. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to _____ is in charge. That depends on _____ you want to go.
  92. 92. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to Him is in charge. That depends on _____ you want to go.
  93. 93. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to He is in charge. That depends on _____ you want to go.
  94. 94. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to whoever is in charge. That depends on _____ you want to go.
  95. 95. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to whoever is in charge. That depends on _____ you want to go.
  96. 96. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to whoever is in charge. That depends on Do you want he to go.
  97. 97. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to whoever is in charge. That depends on Do you want him to go.
  98. 98. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to whoever is in charge. That depends on whom you want to go.
  99. 99. 3 Who/Whom who – subject whom – object I am writing this to whoever is in charge. That depends on whom you want to go.
  100. 100. 2
  101. 101. 2 Possessives
  102. 102. 2 Possessives singular
  103. 103. 2 Possessives singular add ’s
  104. 104. 2 Possessives singular add ’s the plaintiff’s brief
  105. 105. 2 Possessives singular add ’s the plaintiff’s brief plural
  106. 106. 2 Possessives singular plural add ’s add ’ the plaintiff’s brief
  107. 107. 2 Possessives singular plural add ’s add ’ the plaintiff’s brief the plaintiffs’ brief
  108. 108. 2 Possessives singular
  109. 109. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s)
  110. 110. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s) add ’s
  111. 111. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s) add ’s Andrews’s brief
  112. 112. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s) add ’s Andrews’s brief plural
  113. 113. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s) add ’s Andrews’s brief plural (not ending in s)
  114. 114. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s) add ’s Andrews’s brief plural (not ending in s) add ’s
  115. 115. 2 Possessives singular (ending in s) add ’s Andrews’s brief plural (not ending in s) add ’s the people’s rights
  116. 116. 2 Possessives one BIG exception:
  117. 117. 2 Possessives one BIG exception: its
  118. 118. 2 Possessives one BIG exception: its (possessive pronoun)
  119. 119. 2 Possessives one BIG exception: its (possessive pronoun) it’s
  120. 120. 2 Possessives one BIG exception: its (possessive pronoun) it’s (contraction for “it is”)
  121. 121. 1
  122. 122. 1 That/Which
  123. 123. 1 that That/Which
  124. 124. 1 That/Which that – restrictive
  125. 125. 1 That/Which that – restrictive which
  126. 126. 1 That/Which that – restrictive which – nonrestrictive
  127. 127. 1 That/Which that – restrictive – essential which – nonrestrictive
  128. 128. 1 That/Which that – restrictive – essential which – nonrestrictive – nonessential
  129. 129. 1 That/Which that – restrictive – essential – distinguishes which – nonrestrictive – nonessential
  130. 130. 1 That/Which that – restrictive – essential – distinguishes which – nonrestrictive – nonessential – merely adds information
  131. 131. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM.
  132. 132. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks?
  133. 133. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one.
  134. 134. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about?
  135. 135. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine.
  136. 136. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine. The clause restricts us to that bank.
  137. 137. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine. The clause restricts us to that bank. This is essential information.
  138. 138. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM.
  139. 139. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks?
  140. 140. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one.
  141. 141. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it?
  142. 142. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine.
  143. 143. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks;
  144. 144. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks; it merely adds information,
  145. 145. 1 That/Which The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks; it merely adds information, non-essential information.
  146. 146. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words
  147. 147. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it
  148. 148. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it that
  149. 149. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it that in
  150. 150. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it that in of
  151. 151. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it that in of .
  152. 152. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it that in of . as
  153. 153. 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words it that in of . as or
  154. 154. It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  155. 155. It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  156. 156. It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  157. 157. It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  158. 158. The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  159. 159. The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  160. 160. The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  161. 161. The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.
  162. 162. The Appendix does not include the transcripts.
  163. 163. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:
  164. 164. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:
  165. 165. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:
  166. 166. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:
  167. 167. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:
  168. 168. The provisions in Section 604 state:
  169. 169. The provisions in Section 604 state:
  170. 170. The provisions in Section 604 state:
  171. 171. The provisions state:
  172. 172. The provisions in Section 604 state:
  173. 173. The provisions in Section 604 state:
  174. 174. Section 604 provides:
  175. 175. Section 604 provides:
  176. 176. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .
  177. 177. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .
  178. 178. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .
  179. 179. This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  180. 180. This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  181. 181. This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  182. 182. This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  183. 183. This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  184. 184. This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  185. 185. This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides . . . .
  186. 186. This memorandum summarizes German trade law. The first part provides . . . .
  187. 187. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:
  188. 188. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:
  189. 189. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:
  190. 190. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
  191. 191. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
  192. 192. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
  193. 193. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree:
  194. 194. At or about the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  195. 195. At or about the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  196. 196. At or about the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  197. 197. At the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  198. 198. At or about the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  199. 199. At or about the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  200. 200. About the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.
  201. 201. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations
  202. 202. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs
  203. 203. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am
  204. 204. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is
  205. 205. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was
  206. 206. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were
  207. 207. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were are
  208. 208. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were are been
  209. 209. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were are been be
  210. 210. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were are been be being
  211. 211. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were are been be being of
  212. 212. 3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations to be verbs am is was were are been be being of ion
  213. 213. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
  214. 214. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
  215. 215. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
  216. 216. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.
  217. 217. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.
  218. 218. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.
  219. 219. French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
  220. 220. French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
  221. 221. French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
  222. 222. French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”
  223. 223. French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
  224. 224. French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
  225. 225. French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
  226. 226. French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”
  227. 227. French law does not define “inventor.”
  228. 228. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
  229. 229. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
  230. 230. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
  231. 231. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
  232. 232. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.
  233. 233. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.
  234. 234. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.
  235. 235. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  236. 236. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  237. 237. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  238. 238. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  239. 239. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  240. 240. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  241. 241. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  242. 242. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  243. 243. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  244. 244. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  245. 245. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  246. 246. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  247. 247. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  248. 248. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  249. 249. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  250. 250. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.
  251. 251. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  252. 252. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  253. 253. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  254. 254. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  255. 255. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  256. 256. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  257. 257. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  258. 258. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  259. 259. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  260. 260. This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  261. 261. Our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  262. 262. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  263. 263. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.
  264. 264. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  265. 265. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  266. 266. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  267. 267. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  268. 268. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  269. 269. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  270. 270. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  271. 271. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-àvis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  272. 272. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  273. 273. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  274. 274. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  275. 275. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  276. 276. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  277. 277. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  278. 278. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  279. 279. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.
  280. 280. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).
  281. 281. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).
  282. 282. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).
  283. 283. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
  284. 284. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
  285. 285. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
  286. 286. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.
  287. 287. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

×