Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this document? Why not share!

Chapter 04 Sale Of Goods Act

on

  • 66,192 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
66,192
Views on SlideShare
66,188
Embed Views
4

Actions

Likes
13
Downloads
3,085
Comments
1

3 Embeds 4

http://search.mywebsearch.com 2
http://www.blogger.com 1
http://atikablurk.blogspot.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • how to copy all dis matter?
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Chapter 04   Sale Of Goods Act Chapter 04 Sale Of Goods Act Document Transcript

  • CHAPTER 4 SALE OF GOODS ACT 1930  Originally, the law relating to sale of goods was contained in Chapter VII of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The same was repealed and re-enacted by the Sale of Goods Act, III of 1930. 4.1 FORMATION OF THE CONTRACT OF SALE Definition (Section 4) A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for pricequot;. ESSENTIALS OF CONTRACT OF SALE From the above definition, the following essentials of a contract of sale may by noted: 1. There must be at least two parties 2. Transfer or Agreement to transfer the ownership of goods. 3. The subject matter of the contract must necessarily be 'goods'. 4. The consideration is Price. 5. A Contract of sale may be absolute or conditional 6. All other essentials of a valid contract must be present. `SALE` AND 'AGREEMENT TO SELL' DISTINGUISHED Sale:  It is a contract where the ownership in the goods is transferred by seller to the buyer immediately at the conclusion contract. Thus, strictly speaking, sale takes place when there is a transfer of property in goods from the seller to the buyer. A sale is an executed contract.  It must be noted here that the payment of price is immaterial to the transfer of property in goods. Ex - A sells his Yamaha Motor Bicycle to B for Rs. 10,000. It is a sale since the ownership of the motorcycle has been transferred from A to B. Agreement to sell:  It is a contract of sale where the transfer of property in goods is to take place at a future date or subject to some condition thereafter to be fulfilled. Ex- (i) A agreed to buy from B a certain quantity of nitrate of soda. The ship carrying the nitrate of soda was yet to arrive. This is `an agreement to sale`. In this case, the ownership of nitrate of soda is to be to transferred to A on the arrival of the ship containing the specified goods (i.e. nitrate of soda) [Johnson V Mcdonald (1842) 9 M & W 600, 60 RR 838] (ii) On 1st March 1998, A agreed to sell his car to B for Rs. 80,000. It was agreed between themselves that the ownership of the car will transfer to B on 31st March 1998 when the car is got registered in B`s name. It is an agreement to sell and it will become sale on 31st March when the car is registered in the name of B. Other points of distinction between a sale and an agreement to sell are: Sale Agreement to sell 1. A sale is an executed contract. 1. An Agreement to sell is an executory contract. 2. In a sale, since the property has passed to the buyer, 2. In an agreement to sell, in case of breach, the seller the seller can sue the buyer for the price of the goods. can only sue for damages, unless the price was 3. A sale creates a right in rem. payable at a stated date. 4. In case of loss of goods, the loss will fall on the buyer, 3. An agreement to sell creates a right in personam. even though the goods are in the possession of the 4. The loss in this case shall be borne by the seller, seller. It is because 'Risk' is associated with even though the goods are in the possession of the ownership. buyer. 4. In case buyer pays the price and the seller thereafter becomes an insolvent, the buyer can claim the goods 5. In these circumstances, the buyer cannot claim the from the Official Receiver or Assignee. goods but only a rateable dividend for the money 6. If the buyer becomes an insolvent without paying the paid. price, the ownership having passed to the buyer, the 6. In these circumstances, the seller can refuse to seller shall have to deliver the goods to the Official deliver the goods to the Official Assignee or Re- Assignee or Receiver except where he has a lien over ceiver. the goods. Sale and Hire Purchase Agreement Hire Purchase Agreement
  • IIPM 25 CH. – 4 SALE OF GOODS ACT  It is an agreement for hire, with an option to purchase.  The hirer, under this agreement, is required to pay every month a particular sum of money, and if he pays in that way for a fixed number of months, the hirer will become the owner of the goods on the payment of the last instalment.  But, if the hirer fails to pay any particular instalment, the owner can terminate the contract and take away the goods, because the ownership continues to remain in the owner. A quot;Hire-purchase agreementquot; is distinct from quot;Salequot; in which price is payable by instalments  A 'Hire-purchase agreement,' does not result in passing of the property unless the option to purchase is exercised, usually by payment of all the instalments. Till such time, it constitutes bailment. Sale  ln case of sale, the property passes as soon as sale is made though price has not been fully paid.  In determining as to whether a particular contract belongs to one type or the other, regard shall have to be paid to the fact whether the hirer has merely an option to purchase, or whether he has bought or agreed to buy the goods. 4.2 GOODS Definition of `GOODS` under the Act  'Goods' means every kind of moveable property and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land, which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.  Actionable claims and money are not included in the definition of goods.  Thus, goods include every kind of moveable property other than actionable claim or money. Example - goodwill, copyright, trademark, patents, water, gas, and electricity are all goods and may be the subject matter of a contract of sale.  The test is if the property on shifting its situation, does not lose its character, the said property shall be movable and fall within the definition of `Goods`. Which documents are considered as `DOCUMENTS OF TITLE TO GOODS`  A document of title to goods may be described as any document used as proof of the possession or control of goods, authorising or purporting to authorise, either by endorsement or by delivery, the possessor of the document to transfer or receive goods thereby represented.  The following are documents of title to goods:  Bill of Lading;  Dock Warrant;  Warehousekeeper's Certificate;  Wharfinger's Certificate;  Railway Receipt;  Warrant or order for the delivery of goods; and  any other document used in the ordinary course of business as a document of title . CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS Goods may be classified into: 1. Existing Goods - Existing goods are those, which are owned or possessed by the seller at the time of the contract. Instances of sale of goods possessed but not owned by the sellers fire sales by agents and pledgees. Existing goods may be either: (a) Specific and Ascertained - goods identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made; or (b) Generic and Unascertained - goods arc goods indicated by description and not specifically identified. 2. Future Goods - Future goodsquot; means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after making the contract of sale. 3. Contingent Goods - Contingent goods are the goods the acquisition of which by the seller depends upon a contingency which mayor may not happen. Contingent goods are a part of future goods. 4.3 PRICE  'Price' means the money consideration for sale of the goods. 'Price' is an integral part of a contract of sale. If it is not fixed or is not capable of being fixed, the whole contract is void ab-initio.  The Act provides that the price may be fixed (I) either by the contract or (II) may be agreed to be fixed in a manner provided by the contract, e.g., by a valuer, or (III) it may be determined by the course of dealings between the parties. (IV) in case, price is not capable of being fixed in any of the above ways, the buyer is bound to pay reasonable price. What is reasonable price will vary from case to case. 4.4 CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
  • IIPM 26 CH. – 4 SALE OF GOODS ACT [Sections 11-17]  In a contract of sale, parties make certain stipulations, i.e., agree to certain terms. Some of them may be intended by the parties to be of a fundamental nature, e.g., quality of the goods to be supplied. The stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiated. Such stipulations are known as `Conditions`.  In contrast, some may be intended by the parties to be binding, but of a subsidiary or inferior character, e.g., time of payment. Thus, stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a claim for damages but not to a right to reject the goods. Here the stipulations are known as `warranties'. DISTINCTION BETWEEN 'CONDITION' AND 'WARRANTY' Condition Warranty 1. A condition is a stipulation (in a contract), which is 1. A warranty is a stipulation, which is only collateral or essential to the main purpose of the contract. subsidiary to the main purpose of the contract. 2. A breach of condition gives the aggrieved party a 2. A breach of warranty gives only the right to sue for right to sue for damages as well as the right to damages. The contract cannot be repudiated. repudiate the contract.  3. A breach of condition may be treated as a breach of 3. A breach of warranty cannot be treated as a breach warranty in certain circumstances. of condition. Ex- A man buys a particular horse, which is warranted quiet to ride and drive. If the horse turns out to be vicious, the buyer's only remedy is to claim damages. But if instead of buying a particular horse, a man asks a dealer to supply him with a quiet horse and the horse turns out to be vicious, the stipulation is a condition and the buyer can reject the horse, or keep the horse and claim damages. WHEN CONDITION TO BE TREATED AS WARRANTY [SECTION 13]  Under the following circumstances a breach of condition is to be treated as a breach of warranty, i.e., the right to repudiate the contract is deemed to have been lost: 1. Waiver of Condition 2. Compulsory treatment of breach of condition as breach of Warranty. EXPRESS AND IMPLIED CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES  Conditions and Warranties may be either express or implied.  They are said to be quot;expressquot; when the terms of the contract expressly provide for them. They are said to be 'implied' when the law deems their existence in the contract even without their actually having been put in the contract. (A) IMPLIED CONDITIONS  The following are the implied conditions (1) Condition as to Title (2) Sale by Description (3) Condition as to Quality or Fitness (4) Merchantable Quality Sale by sample - A contract of sale is a contract for sale by sample where there is a term in the contract, express or implied, to that effect.  In a sale by sample, the following are the implied conditions: 1. The bulk shall correspond with the sample in quality; 2. That the buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the sample; and 3. That the goods shall be free from any defects rendering them unmerchantable, which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample. Ex- (i) Certain shoes were sold by sample for the French Army. The shoes were found to contain paper not discoverable by ordinary inspection. Held, the buyer was entitled to the refund of price plus damages. (ii) In a contract for the sale of brandy by sample, the brandy that was supplied had been coloured with a dye. Held, the buyer was not bound by the contract, though the bulk corresponded with sample, since the defect could not have been located on reasonable examination of the sample [Mody v. Gregson (1868) L.R.4Ex. 49.]. (B) IMPLIED WARRANTIES  There are two implied warranties. These are: 1. Warranty of Quiet Possession 2. Warranty of Freedom from Encumbrances LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
  • IIPM 27 CH. – 4 SALE OF GOODS ACT Ex – A purchased a second hand typewriter from B. A used it for sometime and also spend some money on its repairs. The typewriter turned out to be stolen one and as such A had to return it to the true owner. It was held that A could recover damages from B amounting to the price paid and the cost of repair [Mason v. Burmingham (1949) 2 KB 545] 4.5 DOCTRINE OF caveat emptor  Caveat Emptor is a fundamental principle of the law of sale of goods. It means quot;Caution Buyerquot;, i.e. quot;Let the buyer bewarequot;.  In other words, it is not the duty of the seller's duty to point out defects of his own goods. The buyer must inspect the goods to find out if they will suit his purpose. Ex- Pigs were sold quot;subject to all faultsquot;, and these pigs, being infected, caused typhoid to other healthy pigs of the buyer, it was held that the seller was not bound to disclose that the pigs were unhealthy. The rule of the law being 'Caveat Emptor'. [Goddard v. Hobbs 1878, 4 App. Cas. 13]. Exceptions 1. Where the seller makes a false representation and buyer relies on that representation. The rule of quot;Caveat Emptorquot; will not apply and the buyer will be entitled to the goods according to that representation; 2. Where the seller actively conceals a defect in the goods, so that on a reasonable examination the same could not be discovered; 3. Where the buyer makes known to the seller the purpose for which he is buying the goods, and the seller happens to be a person whose business is to sell goods of that description, then there is an implied condition that the goods shall be reasonably fit for such purpose. The rule of Caveat Emptor will not apply; 4. In case of sale by description, there is implied condition as to their being of merchantable quality. However, if the buyer has examined the goods, this condition of quot;merchantabilityquot; extends only to hidden or latent defects. The defects, which such examination ought to have revealed, are not covered, i.e., the rule of Caveat Emptor will be applicable. Ex - In Donoghue v. Stevenson (the `snail in the ginger-beer `case) it was held that manufacturers owed a duty to the ultimate consumer to take care in making their goods where there is no likelihood of their being examined before they reach the ultimate consumer. When does property pass from the seller to the buyer (a) Specific or Ascertained goods - the property in the good is transferred to the buyer at such times the parties to the contract intend to be transferred or when something has to be done by the seller to put them in a deliverable state, property passes only when such thing is done, and the buyer has notice thereof. Ex- The whole of the contents of a cistern of oil were sold, and the seller had to put the oil in casks to be then delivered to the buyer. Held, the property did not pass until the oil was actually put into casks ready for delivery and the buyer was notified accordingly. [Rugg v. Minett, 1809,11 East 2.101]. (b) Unascertained or Future Goods - property in the goods is not transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. Ex- X agrees to sell Y 200 quintals of wheat out or a larger quantity lying in X's store. The agreed price is to be paid on the day appointed under the contract. Unless and until the required quantity of 200 quintals is separated from the larger quantity and the goods have thus been ascertained, -property cannot pass from the seller to the buyer. 4.6 TRANSFER OF TITLE BY NON-OWNERS [Sections 27-30]  The general rule is that only the owner of goods can transfer a good title. No one can give a better title than he himself has. This rule is expressed by the maxim quot;Nemo dat quod non habetquot; which means quot;that no one can give what he himself has notquot;  If the seller, therefore, has no title, or a defective title, the buyer's title will be equally wanting or defective as the case may be, though he may be a purchaser - bonafide and for value. Ex- A finds a ring of B and sells it to a third person who purchases it for value and in good faith. The true owner, i.e., B can recover from that person, for A having no title could pass none the better. [Faruquaharson v. King (1902) A.C. 324.). Exceptions to the Rule 1. Sale by Mercantile Agent 2. Sale by a Joint-owner 3. Sale by a Person in Possession under a Voidable Contract LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
  • IIPM 28 CH. – 4 SALE OF GOODS ACT 4. Sale by the Seller in Possession of Goods after Sale - Where a seller having sold goods, continues in possession thereof or of documents or title to the goods, such seller will pass a good title to the (second) buyer, if that buyer has acted in good faith and without notice of the previous sale. 5. Sale by an unpaid seller - a seller who has exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit can, resell the goods and convey a valid title to another buyer, though no notice of re-sale has been given to the original buyer. DUTIES OF THE SELLER AND BUYER Duty of the seller a) To deliver the goods, in accordance with the terms of the contract of sale. b) Delivery and payment of price are concurrent conditions. c) The seller of goods has the duty of giving delivery according to the terms of the contract. Duty of the buyer a) Pay for the goods; b) Accept delivery; and c) Pay compensation to the seller in case he wrongfully refuses to accept delivery. DELIVERY  It has been defined as a voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another..  Delivery of the goods may, be: I. Physical or Actual Delivery 2. Symbolic Delivery - e.g., delivery of a railway receipt properly endorsed, or delivery of the key of a warehouse; 3. Constructive Delivery or Attornment - only an acknowledgement by the person in possession that he holds them on behalf of another. Rules regarding delivery 1. The seller is not bound to deliver goods till the buyer applies for delivery in terms of the contract. 2. Place of Delivery - goods sold are to be delivered at the place agreed for delivery in the contract. 3. Time of Delivery – as per contract otherwise within reasonable time. 4. The expenses of and incidental to putting the goods into a deliverable state shall be borne by the seller, as per the terms of the contact. 5. Demand and tender must be at a reasonable hour - What is a reasonable hour is a question of fact. 6. Delivery of Wrong Quantity - Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods less than he contracted to sell, the buyer may reject them. But, if the buyer accepts the goods so delivered he shall be required to pay for them at the contracted rate. 7. Instalment Deliveries - The buyer is not bound to accept delivery by instalment, unless otherwise agreed. 8. Delivery to the Carrier or Wharfinger - Delivery of goods by the seller to a carrier for transmission to buyer or to wharfinger for safe custody is prima facie deemed to be a delivery of the goods to the buyer. As regards insurance, the seller’s duty is only to give sufficient notice to the buyer to enable him to insure the goods. Alternatively it may be agreed to send the goods c.i.f. or ex-ship. 9. Buyer not bound to return rejected goods - when the goods are delivered to a buyer on sale or return basis and the buyer refuses to accept them, he is not bound to return them to the seller, but it is his duty to inform the seller that he has refused them; otherwise after lapse of a reasonable time, he will be deemed to have accepted them. 10. Liability of the Buyer - When the seller is ready and willing to deliver the goods and requests the buyer to take delivery and the buyer does not within a reasonable time takes delivery of the goods, he is liable to the seller for any loss occasioned by his neglect or refusal to take delivery, and also for a reasonable charge for the care and custody of the goods. 4.7 UNPAID SELLER AND HIS RIGHTS  A contract is comprised of reciprocal promises, in a contract of sale, if seller is under an obligation to deliver goods; buyer has to pay for it. In case buyer fails or refuses to pay, the seller, as an unpaid seller, shall have certain rights. Who is an unpaid seller  An unpaid seller of goods is a person who has not been paid the whole of the price or to whom the whole of the price has not been tendered. The term quot;sellerquot; includes an agent of the seller.  The seller of goods is deemed to be an quot;unpaid sellerquot; if: (a) the whole of the price, has not been paid or tendered; (b) when a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as conditional payment, and the condition on which it was received has not been fulfilled by reason of the dishonour of the instrument or otherwise. . Rights of an unpaid seller  Rights of an unpaid seller may broadly be classified under two heads namely: 1. Rights against goods  An unpaid seller has the following rights against the goods: LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH
  • IIPM 29 CH. – 4 SALE OF GOODS ACT (a) Lien on the goods (b) A right of stoppage in transit (c) A right of re-sale 2. Rights Against the Buyer Personally  An unpaid seller, besides his rights against goods, has the following rights against the buyer personally: (i) Right to sue for the price; and (ii) the right to sue the buyer for damages for non-acceptance. 4.8 SALE BY AUCTION (Section 64)  In the case of sale by auction the following rules apply: 1. When the goods are put up for sale in lots, each lot is deemed, prima facie, to be the subject matter of a separate contract of sale; 2. At an auction, the sale is complete when the auctioneer announces its completion by the fall of the hammer or in other customary manner; until such completion any bidder may withdraw his bid. 3. A right to bid may be reserved expressly by or on behalf of the seller and where such right is expressly so reserved, but not otherwise, the seller or any person on his behalf may bid at the auction; 4. Where the sale is not notified to be subject to a right to bid on behalf of the seller, it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid for himself or to employ any person to bid at such sale, or for the auctioneer knowingly to take any bid from the seller or any such person, Any sale contravening this rule shall be treated as fraudulent; 5. The sale may be notified to be subject to a reserved or upset price; 6. If the seller makes use of pretended bidding to raise the price, sale is voidable at the option of the buyer. [Thornett v. Haines. 1846, 15 M. & W. 367]. LECTURES BY PROF. S N GHOSH