• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Pilot plant scale up for tablets
 

Pilot plant scale up for tablets

on

  • 9,766 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
9,766
Views on SlideShare
9,147
Embed Views
619

Actions

Likes
4
Downloads
503
Comments
0

9 Embeds 619

http://www.allfordrugs.com 253
http://newdrugapprovals.wordpress.com 189
http://newdrugapprovals.org 112
http://generic410.rssing.com 47
http://drugs1126.rssing.com 7
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 4
http://cloud.feedly.com 3
http://www.newsblur.com 3
https://newdrugapprovals.org 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Pilot plant scale up for tablets Pilot plant scale up for tablets Presentation Transcript

    • BY:-Robin Gulati
    •  Introduction Objectives of the Pilot Plant Significance of pilot plant Pilot plant design for tablets ◦ Typical unit operations
    •  Defined as a part of the pharmaceutical industry where a lab scale formula is transformed into a viable product by the development of liable practical procedure for manufacture.” R&D Pilot Plant Produ- ction
    • Scale up Art of designing of prototype using the data obtained from the pilot plant model.
    • To produce physically and chemically stabletherapeutic dosage forms.Review of the processing equipment.Guidelines for productions and process control.Evaluation and validation.To identify the critical features of the process.To provide master manufacturing formula.
    • Examination of formulae.Review of range of relevant processing equipment.Production rate adjustment.Idea about physical space required.Appropriate records and reports to support GMP.Identification of critical features to maintain quality.
    •  Each stage considered carefully from experimental lab batch size to intermediate and large scale production. Same process, same equipment but different performance when amount of material increased significantly. May involve a major process change that utilizes techniques and equipment that were either unavailable or unsuitable on a lab scale.
    •  Material handling Dry blending Granulation Drying Reduction of particle size Blending ◦ Dry blending ◦ Direct compression ◦ Slugging (Dry granulation)
    •  Granulation handling and feed system Compression Tablet coating
    •  In lab: materials scooped, dumped or poured by hand. May work well for small or intermediate scale productions. Large scale productions: mechanical means necessary. Simple means: post hoist devices, devices for lifting, and tilting drums. Sophisticated: vacuum loading systems, screw feed systems and meter pumping systems.
    •  Type of system selected depends on the characteristics of the material, e.g., density. Material handling system should cause no/minimum loss of material. Lengthy transfer more material loss. If one system being used for more than one material  cross contamination should be avoided. Accomplished by using validated cleaning procedures.
    • Vacuum Loading Machine
    •  Powders granulated prior to tabletting well blended to ensure proper mixing. Inadequate blending  drug content uniformity variation (more when drug conc/n is low)  high or low potency. Large batch blended in batches ensuring no lump and agglomerate formations.
    •  Problems of improper blending:- ◦ Flow problem through the equipment ◦ Non-reproducible compression ◦ No content uniformity. Screening and/or milling of the ingredients prior to blending done to make the process more reliable and reproducible.
    •  Equipment used for blending are: ◦ V- blender ◦ Double cone blender ◦ Ribbon blender ◦ Slant cone blender ◦ Bin blender ◦ Orbiting screw blenders vertical and horizontal high intensity mixers. Scale up considerations ◦ Time of blending . ◦ Blender loading. ◦ Size of blender.
    • V-cone Blender Double Cone Blender
    • Ribbon Blender
    •  The most common reasons given to justify granulating are: a) To impart good flow properties to the material, b) To increase the apparent density of the powders, c) To change the particle size distribution, d) Uniform dispersion of active ingredient. Traditionally, wet granulation has been carried out using: ◦ Sigma blade mixer ◦ Heavy-duty planetary mixer (100-200kgs)
    • Sigma Blade Mixer
    • Planetary Mixer
    •  Wet granulation can also be prepared using tumble blenders equipped with high-speed chopper blades.
    •  These greatly affect the granulating time as well as the granulating fluid relative to that used in experimental laboratories trials. High shear mixers often more effective in densifying light powders, but require large amount of energy and have limited load size. Now-a-days equipment involving continuous process are in use.
    •  Advantages:- ◦ Less space and manpower. ◦ Less handling of materials since they are closed systems. ◦ Reduce danger of personnel exposure to potent materials. ◦ Prevent from potentially hazardous substances.
    •  Binders: ◦ Used in tablet formulations to make powders more compressible and to produce tablets that are more resistant to breakage during handling. ◦ In some instances the binding agent imparts viscosity to the granulating solution (when dissolved in granulating solution) as a result transfer of fluid becomes difficult. ◦ This problem can be overcome by adding some or all binding agents in the dry powder prior to granulation.
    •  Gelatin Acacia Tragacanth Methylcellulose Ethylcellulose Hydroxypropyl cellulose Polyvinylpyrolidone
    •  Some granulation, when prepared in production sized equipment, take on a dough-like consistency and may have to be subdivided to a more granular and porous mass to facilitate drying. This can be accomplished by passing the wet mass through an oscillating type granulator with a suitably large screen or a hammer mill with either a suitably large screen or no screen at all.
    •  The most common conventional method  circulating hot air oven, which is heated by either steam or electricity. Scale-up considerations for an oven drying operation are: ◦ airflow ◦ air temperature, and ◦ the depth of the granulation on the trays.
    •  Too deep or too dense bed makes the drying process inefficient, and if soluble dyes are involved, migration of the dye to the surface of the granules. Drying times at specified temperatures and airflow rates must be established for each product, and for each particular oven load.
    •  Fluidized bed dryers are an attractive alternative to the circulating hot air ovens. The important factor considered as part of scale up fluidized bed dryer are optimum loads, rate of airflow, inlet air temperature and humidity.
    • Uniformity of Content tablet weight uniformity Compressibility Tablet hardness Compression Tablet colorFlowability factors uniformity
    •  Problems due to improper particle size: ◦ Too large particle size- insufficient filling of the die cavity- weight variation ◦ For colored granulation- coarser the granulation- mottling ◦ Too many fines- flowability problems- wt variation ◦ Capping (also occurs if speed of the press in increased).
    • Oscillating granulator (for not too hard oversized granulation)Equipments Hammer mill Mechanical sieving device Screening device
    • Speed of the mill Control factors Rate of Type ofmaterial feed equipment
    • Oscillating type granulator Hammer mill
    •  Use of lubricants & glidants: ◦ In lab: added to the final blend ◦ Scale up: added to the dry granulation during size reduction ◦ This is done because additives like magnesium stearate, agglomerate when added in large quantities to the granulation in a blender. ◦ Over mixing or under mixing should be avoided.
    • Blender Mixing loads speed MixingDesign Control time factors
    • Particle size Mixing Shape Hardness Density Dynamics of the mixing actionSegregation
    •  Characteristics of the material: ◦ Fragile particles or agglomerates: more readily abbraided  more fines  improper mixing  flow problems, fill problems, content uniformity problems. ◦ Particle abbraision is more when high-shear mixing with spiral screws or blades are used. ◦ Tumble blenders: for prolonged mixing ◦ Bulk density of raw materials considered in selection of the blender and determining optimum blender load. ◦ Excessive granulation: poor content uniformity, poor lubrication & improper color dispersion.
    •  “Direct Compression” is defined as the process by which tablets are compressed directly from powder mixture of API and suitable excipients. No pretreatment of the powder blend by wet or dry granulation procedure is required. Direct compression is one of the most advanced technologies to prepare tablets. Requires only blending and compression of excipients. Economical process. Suitable for heat and moisture sensitive API. Not suitable for very low and very high dose drugs.
    • Particle characteristics (mixing & segregation): size,size distribution, shape, static chargeBlender loadOptimum mixing speedBlending timeOptimizing the process and validation of itsperformance
    •  Order of addition of components to the blender Mixing speed: can be varied with the original direction as necessary. Mixing time: excessive mixing may fracture the fragile excipients and ruin their compressibility. Use of auxiliary dispersion material within the mixer (chopper blade in a twin shell mixer): ◦ Increase efficiency ◦ Reduce agglomerates
    •  Mixing action: ◦ Determined by the mechanics of the mixer. ◦ Changed by converting from one blender to the other or by modifying the blender through addition of baffles or plates, which would alter the mixing characteristics. Blender load: affects efficiency ◦ Overload: reduced free flow of granules and reduced efficiency ◦ Localized concentration: content uniformity ◦ Small load: sliding and rolling of powders in the blender, no proper mixing & increased time for mixing.
    • 1. Simple2. Requires least complicated equipment3. Requires minimum amount of handling and operator time4. Modification in the process is easy5. Free flowing granules can be obtained without the granulating solution.6. Saves time and energy necessary to volatilize the solvent used in conventional granulation powders
    • 7. Suitable for thermolabile and moisture sensitive API’s8. Chances of batch-to-batch variation are negligible, because the unit operations required for manufacturing processes is fewer.9. Particle size uniformity
    •  Excipient Related 1. Problems in the uniform distribution of low dose drugs. 2. High dose drugs having high bulk volume, poor compressibility and poor flowability are not suitable for direct compression. For example, Aluminium Hydroxide, Magnesium Hydroxide 3. Direct compression diluents and binders must possess both good compressibility and good flowability. 4. Many active ingredients are not compressible either in crystalline or amorphous forms. 5. May lead to unblending because of difference in particle size or density of drug and excipients. Similarly the lack of moisture may give rise to static charges, which may lead to unblending. 6. Non-uniform distribution of colour, especially in tablets of deep colours.
    •  Process Relatedi) Capping, lamination, splitting, or layering of tablets related to air entrapment during direct compression. When air is trapped, the resulting tablets expand when the pressure of tablet is released, resulting in splits or layers in the tablet.ii) In some cases require greater sophistication in blending and compression equipment.iii) Expensive equipment
    •  For dry powder blend that cannot be directly compressed because of poor flow or compression properties. Done on a tablet press designed for slugging. Pressure of 15 tons; normal: 4 tons or less Speed is slow since poorly flowable powders require more time to be compressed. Diameter of slugs: ◦ 1 inch for more easily slugged material ◦ ¾ inch for materials difficult to compress
    • Upper feed hopper Vertical screw Horizontal feed screwPressure applied Feed & recycle Pre-break Compaction rolls Granulator Screen Screener Recycle system Original powder feed Lower hopper Finished product Recycle
    •  Materials of very low density require roller compaction to achieve a bulk density sufficient to allow encapsulation or compression. E.g.- densification of aluminium hydroxide
    •  Additional handling can affect content uniformity of the drug and the particle size distribution. Segregation due to static charges may lead to flow problems through tablet press hoppers and feed frames. This affects tablet weight, thickness and hardness. Finally poor content uniformity. More sophisticated equipment  cleaning problem. Equipment to be engineered for efficient and total cleaning. Well written, documented and validated cleaning procedures are essential for such systems.
    •  Functions of a tablet press:1. Filling of empty die cavity with granulation.2. Precompression of granulation (optional).3. Compression of granules.4. Ejection of the tablet from the die cavity and take- off of compressed tablet. Potential problems such as sticking to the punch surface, tablet hardness, capping, and weight variation detected.
    •  Control factors while selecting the speed of the press:1. Granulation feed rate.2. Delivery system should not change the particle size distribution.3. System should not cause segregation of coarse and fine particles, nor it should induce static charges. The die feed system must be able to fill the die cavities adequately in the short period of time that the die is passing under the feed frame. The smaller the tablet , the more difficult it is to get a uniform fill at high press speeds.
    •  Slowing down the press speed or using larger compression rollers can often reduce capping in a formulation. High level of lubricant or over blending can result in a soft tablet, decrease in wettability of the powder and an extension of the dissolution time. Binding to die walls can also be overcome by designing the die to be 0.001 to 0.005 inch wider at the upper portion than at the center in order to relieve pressure during ejection.
    • Single Rotary Double Rotary Press Press
    •  The tablets must be sufficiently hard to withstand the tumbling to which they are subjected in either the coating pan or the coating column. Some tablet core materials are naturally hydrophobic, and in these cases, film coating with an aqueous system may require special formulation of the tablet core and/or the coating solution. A film coating solution found to work well with a particular tablet in small lab coating pan may be totally unacceptable on a production scale.
    •  This is because of increased pressure & abrasion to which tablets are subjected when batch size is large & different in temperature and humidity to which tablets are exposed while coating and drying process.
    • THANK YOU!