• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Supporting Open Education Policymaking by Higher Education Institutions in The  Netherlands: Lessons Learned
 

Supporting Open Education Policymaking by Higher Education Institutions in The Netherlands: Lessons Learned

on

  • 453 views

In 2013 nine workshops were conducted at HEIs in The Netherlands to support policy making on Open Education. In this presentation more details about these workshops and the results are presented. It ...

In 2013 nine workshops were conducted at HEIs in The Netherlands to support policy making on Open Education. In this presentation more details about these workshops and the results are presented. It was given at the Open Courseware Consortium Global Meeting 2014, 24 April, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

More information can be found in the paper: http://bit.ly/1iWoPa5

Statistics

Views

Total Views
453
Views on SlideShare
439
Embed Views
14

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 14

http://robertschuwer.nl 9
http://www.robertschuwer.nl 5

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Supporting Open Education Policymaking by Higher Education Institutions in The  Netherlands: Lessons Learned Supporting Open Education Policymaking by Higher Education Institutions in The Netherlands: Lessons Learned Presentation Transcript

    • BEN JANSSEN (OUNL), HESTER JELGERHUIS (SURF), ROBERT SCHUWER (OUNL) SUPPORTING OPEN EDUCATION POLICYMAKING beeld: CC-BY-SA, opensourceway
    • Agenda 1. Goals 2. Structure of a workshop 3. Results 4. Lessons learned 5. Q&A 2
    • GOALS foto: CC-BY, Paul Bowman 3
    • WHY these workshops? Motivation: •Survey ‘OER in the Dutch educational landscape’ (October 2012). Goals: •Facilitate in developing a vision or policy on open education •Sharing expertise and knowledge 4
    • HOW does it look like? •Emphasis on (1) inform, (2) opinion creation or (3) design. •One coördinator for all workshops •Several moderators and speakers •Tailor-made, based on an intake •Minimum 10 and maximum 45 participants > mixed group •Duration: half day 5
    • EXAMPLE: questions intake •What is your motivation to organise a workshop? •Which goals do you want to achieve with this workshop? •What target groups do you invite for the workshop? •Can you formulate the key questions to be answered in this workshop? •What is the administrative context? •What results are to be achieved? •What is the knowledge of and experience with OER / open education for the participants? 6
    • Example: program 7 Duration (m) Activity 10 Welcome by a member of the Executive Board, a Dean or director of education 5 Introduction by the coordinator 45 Plenary presentation: what are Open Educational Resources, what is Open Education, and how can it influence higher education? 60 Interactive brainstorming session in groups on a specific question. E.g.: What is the potential impact of open and online education on the institution itself? 15 Plenary reporting of results from the groups 60 Second brainstorming session on concrete lines of action. Is there any room for experiments? What projects can be started? 10 Conclusion with feedback on results, and agreements regarding follow- up
    • SOME RESULTS CC-BY-SA, nima; hopographer 8
    • Open Education: perceived opportunities • Increasing quality of learning materials • Increasing quality of education • Means of innovation of education • Tool to increase flexibility of the educational program • Tool for widening the educational offerings • Increase visibility • Regional, national and international profiling • Useful for informing and (self)orientation future students • Reaching new target groups • Attract international students and staff • Cost reduction • Better use of internal and external knowledge 9 Improve quality education Improve efficiency Improve visibility and attractiveness
    • Open Education: perceived threats • Lack of vision on open and online education • Not part of the policy of the institution • Is not part of our mission • Organisation is not prepared • Openness is threatening • Fear for loss of identity • Visibility means increasing vulnerability • Accreditation can become problematic • How to recoup investment? • Is there still a position for us? 10 Not for us Too early and threatening Financial worries
    • Open Education: start practicing • Start small: • Stimulate use of OER by teachers for enrichment and enlargement • Stimulate teachers to take a MOOC or another form of open education • Organise that teachers curate open resources for their students • Start sharing resources with collegues of different institutions • Cooperate with companies to develop and reuse OER • Organise hybrid forms of education and a dialogue around open content • Facilitate experiments (with time and money) 11
    • Open Education: develop vision and policy • Bottom-up and a top-down approach to open and online education. • Start experimenting to learn from experience • Create a vision and policy on Open Education • Professionalisation of lecturers in the field of open and online education is crucial. • The professionalisation process does not happen automatically, but needs to be instigated by the institution • Open and online education provides opportunities for collaboration between institutions, • e.g. in matters involving remedial courses (courses that students need to pass in order to take another course) and transitional programmes 12
    • Process • Doing nothing is no option! • From MOOCs to Open Education • Approach: combination of bottom-up and top-down. • Start experiencing and at the same time developing vision and policy • Develop but also reuse • Critical factors: - Enthusiasm - Management backing - Financial aspects - Scalability - Professionalization - Facilitating 13
    • LESSONS LEARNED CC-BY Hester Jelgerhuis 14 CC-BY Hester Jelgerhuis LESSONS LEARNED
    • Lessons learned on the approach •Structure of workshop is effective •Intake is efficient for a tailor-made workshop •Key is involvement of all levels in the institution •SURF as a neutral body is essential for acceptance •Positive attitude of both the (voluntary!) organisers as the institution 15
    • REFLECTIE OP DE UITKOMSTEN CC-BY-SA, nima; hopographer 16
    • W Ben Janssen & Hester Jelgerhuis & Robert Schuwer ben.janssen@ou.nl hester.jelgerhuis@surf.nl robert.schuwer@ou.nl @benOUNL @OER_NL @fagottissimo Ben Janssen Hester Jelgerhuis Robert Schuwer ben.janssen51 hesterjelgerhuis bassoonvenlo http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Dutch-Special-Interest-Group-Open-3681051 www.surfspace.nl/oer of www.surf.nl/oer Ben Janssen Hester Jelgerhuis Robert Schuwer +31 – 6 5235 1717 +3130 - 234 66 67 +31 – 6 1446 9300 beschikbaar onder de licentie Creative Commons Naamsvermelding 3.0 Nederland. www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/nl