• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
 

CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)

on

  • 5,536 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
5,536
Views on SlideShare
5,536
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
198
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) Presentation Transcript

    • A Quick Review of CPTED Strategies (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) By: Russell James, J.D., Ph.D., Asst. Professor, Dept. of Housing & Consumer Economics, University of Georgia
    • Research Surveillance (Will I be seen?)
    • “burglarized houses had less visual access to immediately neighboring houses than did non- burglarized houses” Brown, B. (University of Utah), Altman, B. (University of Utah). 1983. Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: an environmental analysis, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 203-20.
    • “Convenience stores experienced mean annual robbery rate reductions after installation of CCTV systems (-23%); installation of video cameras with monitors (-54%)” C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110
    • Office beverages available with payment on an “honor” system. Picture above payment instructions rotated weekly. Payments were higher when picture of eyes was posted. M. Bateson, D. Nettle & G. Roberts (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real- world setting. Biology Letters 2, 412–414.
    • Two groups with two computer backgrounds. Each person receives $10. Computer question: Do you want to share any of it with another (anonymous) participant? A B K. J. Haley (UCLA), D.M.T. Fessler (UCLA). 2005. Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256
    • Normal Eyes Screen Screen Not Sharing 12% Not Sharing 45% Sharing 55% Sharing 88% K. J. Haley (UCLA), D.M.T. Fessler (UCLA). 2005. Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256
    • Research Access (Can I get in and out)?
    • “Burglarized houses had fewer fences and locked gates surrounding the yard than did non-burglarized houses.” Brown, B., Altman, B. (1983). Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: an environmental analysis, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 203-20.
    • Preventing access by adding chain link fencing and lighting to lower levels of this parking garage led to 50% drop in reported crime. Tseng, C.-H. (Ohio State U.), Duane, J. (Ohio State U.), & Hadipriono, F. (Ohio State U.). 2004. Performance of Campus Parking Garages in Preventing Crime. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 18(1), 21-28.
    • Research Territoriality (Does anyone care what happens here?)
    • “burglarized houses had fewer symbolic barriers characteristic of primary territories (i.e., fewer markers depicting the identity of the territory owners)” Brown, B. (University of Utah), Altman, B. (University of Utah). 1983. Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: an environmental analysis, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 203-20.
    • In a study of 400 convenience store robberies, one significant difference between robbed and non- robbed stores was distance from nearest graffiti S. A. Hendricks, D. P. Landsittel, H. E. Amandus, J. Malcan, & J. Bell. (1999) A matched case- control study of convenience store robbery risk factors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 41(11), 995-1004
    • S urveillance (Will I be seen?) A ccess (Can I get in and out)? T erritoriality (Does anyone care what happens here?)
    • Will I be seen?
    • Surveillance: FAIL
    • Can I get in and out?
    • Access: FAIL
    • Does anyone care what happens here?
    • Territoriality: FAIL
    • Does anyone care what happens here? Territoriality: FAIL
    • Can I get in and out? Access: FAIL
    • Does anyone care what happens here?
    • Territoriality: FAIL
    • Access: Can I get in and out?
    • Territoriality impacts Access If no one cares what happens here, is it less risky to try opening the door with a crowbar or bolt cutter?
    • ACCESS: Does the fence make it harder to get in and out?
    • SURVEILLANCE: Does the fence make it less likely I will be seen when attempting to break in through a back door?
    • Surveillance + Access + Territoriality may impact each other.
    • Does anyone care what happens here?
    • The fence says “Maybe”. Everything else says “No”
    • Does anyone care what happens here?
    • TERRITORIALITY: High level maintenance. Defined borders.
    • Short decorative fencing can enhance territoriality inside the fence without disconnecting from the surrounding neighborhood
    • Short decorative fencing can enhance territoriality inside the fence without disconnecting from the surrounding neighborhood
    • Short fencing, even if solid, creates no surveillance problems.
    • As fences get higher, the access barrier increases, but the risk of visually disconnecting from the neighborhood also grows
    • Does anyone care what happens here INSIDE the fence?
    • Does anyone care what happens here OUTSIDE the fence?
    • High fences may diminish territoriality outside the fence
    • High solid fences • Indicates lack of territoriality Can anyonewalls what outside of see happens outside the fence? • Reduces natural surveillance
    • High solid fences • Indicates lack of territoriality outside of walls Does anyone care what happens outside the fence? • Reduces natural surveillance
    • High solid fences • Indicates lack of territoriality outside of walls High solid fences may create spaces with little • Reduces natural surveillance or territoriality surveillance
    • Some high fences control access, but fail the S.A.T. by (1) Blocking surveillance (2) Sending a clear message that the area is dangerous, crime is accepted, and no one cares what happens outside the wall
    • Making the chain link fence opaque blocks surveillance and permits graffiti showing a lack of external territoriality.
    • With proper design and maintenance, high fences can limit access without damaging surveillance or territoriality
    • A high fence blocking access without damaging surveillance or territoriality
    • Spikes can add a visceral element of access reduction that is still decorative and residential
    • Of course, you can go too far with anything!
    • Window bars limit access, but may also send a negative territoriality message about neighborhood safety.
    • Glass block can create security similar to window bars but without the stigma
    • Most burglary entries do not occur through the front door, often because of natural surveillance.
    • Open access to side or rear entry points where there is no natural surveillance make for more attractive burglary entrances.
    • Access barriers to side or rear entrance can reduce the risk
    • A very short barrier may provide insufficient access control
    • As barriers rise, access is reduced
    • Tall opaque barriers limit access, but may also eliminate natural surveillance
    • The line of sight for entry points is critical.
    • Am I visible to outsiders here?
    • Am I visible to outsiders here?
    • Am I visible to outsiders here?
    • Am I visible to outsiders here?
    • Consider the sight-lines in this aerial shot of a new group of duplexes
    • Front Entrance / Windows Side Windows Rear Entrance / Windows What are the sight lines for the potential entry points in this unit?
    • 10 residences What are the have sight sight lines for lines to the potential the rear entry points in entry this unit?
    • 16 residences What are the have sight sight lines for lines to the the potential front entry entry points in this unit?
    • 11 residences What are the have sight sight lines for lines to the potential side entry points in window this unit?
    • Rear Entrance / Side Entrance/ Windows Windows Front Entrance / Windows What are the sight lines for the potential entry points in this unit?
    • 2 residences What are the have sight sight lines for lines to the potential rear entry points in entrance this unit?
    • 0 residences have sight What are the lines to sight lines for side the potential window entry points in this unit?
    • Zone outside residence where sight What are the lines are sight lines for covered by the potential wooded area entry points in with link to this unit? walking trail
    • Which residence has better SAT scores?
    • What natural surveillance issue best predicted convenience store robberies? C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110
    • C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110 Visibility from outside the store to inside the store was the most important sight line
    • C. Casteel (UCLA) & C. Peek-Asa (UCLA). 2000. Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18, 99-115, p. 110 Visibility from outside the store to inside the store was a more significant predictor of convenience store robberies than the number of clerks or the proximity to drug traffic, gangs, or subsidized housing.
    • At night, surveillance depends on lighting.
    • Of course, surveillance can be blocked by both darkness and solid barriers.
    • • line of site; access out Lighting alone may not overcome natural barriers to surveillance
    • Lighting can also be important during the day, especially where lines of sight are limited
    • What signals do you get that territoriality appears weak here?
    • Closed stairwells have low natural surveillance and easy access for both entry and escape
    • Combined with territoriality deficiencies, stairwells can create CPTED problem areas.
    • Design solutions can improve the natural surveillance for stairwells
    • Open stairwells have strong natural surveillance properties
    • All ranges of natural surveillance levels are possible for stairwells depending upon the design solution chosen
    • “replacing bathroom entrance doors with right-angle entrances permit the warning sounds of crime to travel more freely and reduce the sense of isolation” Sommer, R. (1983). Social design: Creating buildings with people in mind. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    • Cul-de-sacs may limit access, making visiting cars more noticeable
    • Cul-de-sacs make automobile escape more problematic as there is only one exit route
    • Street closures can provide similar access results
    • Pedestrian traffic can also be limited with street closures
    • High rise buildings provide weaker surveillance of street level activity because of structural separation, distance separation, and sound separation. This separation also limits the sense of territoriality over street level activities.
    • Mid rise balconies create stronger surveillance and territoriality, connecting residents with street level.
    • Mid-rise balcony neighborhoods create safer street level areas with high levels of perceived surveillance and perceived territoriality
    • Presentation by Russell James III, J.D., Ph.D., Asst. Professor, Dept. of Housing & Consumer Economics, University of Georgia. Dr. James’ research has been published in a variety of housing and design related academic journals including: Environment & Behavior; Housing Policy Debate; Journal of Urban Planning & Development (ASCE); Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities (ASCE); Housing, Theory, and Society; Housing & Society; Journal of the Community Development Society Please feel free to use any of these slides for any non-commercial purposes. All pictures used in this presentation are creative commons licensed, have been purchased with rights to allow this usage, are from MS PowerPoint or are the author’s own photographs. Citations for all creative commons licensed photos are in the notes to each slide.