Homeownership Plans among Hispanic Renters: Ethnic Differences or Geographic Differences?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Homeownership Plans among Hispanic Renters: Ethnic Differences or Geographic Differences? - Presentation Transcript

    1. Homeownership Plans among Hispanic Renters: Ethnic Differences or Geographic Differences?
      Russell N. James III
      Jorge H. Atiles
      University of Georgia
    2. U.S. Hispanic demographics
      The U.S. has the 2nd largest Hispanic population of any nation at 45.5 million in 2007 (Spain 40.4 million; Mexico 108.7 million)
      By 2020, approximately 15% of all United States households will be Hispanic (Masnick and Belsky 2006).
    3. U.S. Hispanic homeownership
      In 1980, 1990, and 2000, Hispanic households in the United States had the lowest rate of homeownership of any major ethnic group, falling below non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Asian, and other non-Hispanic households (Cortes, et al. 2006).
      Conversely, more recent data suggest that since 2000, Hispanic homeownership levels grew faster than either non-Hispanic white or non-Hispanic black homeownership levels (Cortes, et al. 2006).
    4. Factors motivating PRS tenants to become homeowners
      Personal, family, and cultural norms can set expectations or norms for tenure (Morris & Winter, 1978).
      Environmental realities also affect these preferences.
      For example, to the extent that homeownership is seen as a profitable investment strategy, renters may be more motivated to purchase.
      Appreciation is a key factor separating owning from renting.
    5. Ethnic differences in appreciation?
      Simple differences in population distributions throughout the country may lead to different appreciation expectations based upon the appreciation experiences in particular regions.
      Mixed evidence on the direct impact of homeowner or neighborhood ethnicity on appreciation (Flippen, 2004; Coate and Vanderhoff, 1993)
    6. Study
      Examined the homeownership plans of tenants in the PRS from 1995-2007
      Nationally-representative dataset (Survey of Consumer Finances)
    7. Initial findings
      Data indicate that Hispanic renters experienced a dramatic upsurge in saving for homeownership – relative to renters of other ethnic backgrounds – during the 1998, 2001, and 2004 surveys.
      This relatively higher propensity to save for homeownership largely disappeared in the 2007 survey
    8. Percentage of renters listing “buying own house” as one of the top two most important reasons to save
    9. Hispanic status predicting currently planning for a home purchase (whether saving or not) among renters
      Control variables included : Single male, Single female, Number of household members, liquid assets, Income, <High school diploma, Some college, Bachelor’s degree, Graduate degree, Age, Minor child in household, Years at current job
    10. Hispanic status predicting presence of saving for a home purchase among renters
      Control variables included : Single male, Single female, Number of household members, liquid assets, Income, <High school diploma, Some college, Bachelor’s degree, Graduate degree, Age, Minor child in household, Years at current job
    11. Explanation for the trend
      One possibility is differential price appreciation
      The SCF dataset has no public data on location of respondents
      However, we can project typical Hispanic housing appreciation observations based on state-level data
    12. States with the highest percentage of Hispanic population (over 10%)
      New Mexico 579,224 (38.2%)
      California 7,687,938 (25.8%)
      Texas 4,339,905 (25.5%)
      Arizona 688,338 (18.8%)
      Colorado 424,302 (12.9%)
      New York 2,214,026 (12.3%)
      Florida 1,574,143 (12.2%)
      Nevada 124,419 (10.4%)
    13. 2004 housing price appreciation
    14. 2007 housing price appreciation
    15. Discussion
      The “bubble” in Hispanic renter homeownership plans corresponded with relative housing price appreciation trends in states with large Hispanic populations such as Southern California and South Florida.
      This suggests that the move to homeownership planning may have been more of a regional economic trend, rather than an ethnic one.
    16. Future of renting and owning
      Post-crash housing demand suggests a systemic shift in preference from homeownership to renting.
      Higher mortgage default experience
      More stringent future mortgage underwriting obligations
      All suggest a higher demand for renting in the future.
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Russell JamesRussell James Nominate

    custom

    66 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation from 2009 Housing Education and Resear more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 66
      • 66 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories