The value of multi-stakeholder consultation at the national level

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    The value of multi-stakeholder consultation at the national level - Presentation Transcript

    1. Ghana's VPA process: Some tactical lessons for multi-level, multi-stakeholder engagement for national rights and governance reform
    2. Ghana’s forest sector • 150 years of repressive elite expropriation of communal resources for corporation: • resource devastation; • deepening rural poverty & alienation • massive accumulation of private wealth • growing corruption & weakening state legitimacy • growing internecine conflict • brilliant rhetoric and formally decent institutions • Complacent “international community” 2
    3. VPA process • VPA de jure • timber trade agreement • state-state bilateral • focus on illegal logging • certification arrangement • VPA de facto • Vehicle of pro-community forces in state and civil society in both jurisdictions in engaging the “wall of capital” 3
    4. Achievements: Process • Most substantial CS participation in (Ghana) history • Representation • Steering Committee 0 > ±1 > 1 > 2 > 2.5 = 200% • Negotiating Committee = 0 > 2 • Working Groups – 4/4 (including 2 chairs) • Policy subcommittee 1 / 8 • Direct SC engagement with NGOs (FWG & non-FWG), GAWU & TWU, RAOs, Traditional Leaders, District & Regional Forest Forums • Improved informal channels • GOG commitment to institutionalise & expand 4
    5. Achievement: substantive • Formal of governance objectives - statement • 3 – year participatory process towards policy, regulatory and institutional reform supporting Governance Objectives • Now benchmarks for NREG multi-donor support – threatened by FCPF
    6. Achievement: Political • Substantial CS mobilisation around forest & community rights agenda • Greater public awareness of forest crisis and its importance • Collapse of State-Industry consensus 6
    7. Ghana Context • EU buyers & EU have disproportionate leverage over GOG/GTI • Network’s of CSOs in Europe, Asia and Africa worked in tandem • CSOs cultivated important allies amongst GOG & EU negotiators 7
    8. Lessons • levers for intervention & even “soft” \"conditionalities\" often exist – not “black or white” • Malaysia process stuck on participation and rights • Ghana process will lead to “best practice” statement that applies to others • Issue is political will. 8
    9. Lessons • political will can be strengthened by organised & strategically focused CSOs engaging with clear objectives – e.g. EU – Ghana NGO engagement • gave cover to EU officials • gave cover to Ghanaian officials
    10. Lessons • involves using formal legal arguments • Constant expansion of participation is crucial – tactics must compliment not substitute for peoples’ struggle 10
    11. THANK YOU

    + rightsandclimaterightsandclimate, 2 years ago

    custom

    489 views, 1 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Kyeretwie Opoku, Coordinator, Civic Response, Ghana more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 489
      • 483 on SlideShare
      • 6 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 9
    Most viewed embeds
    • 6 views on http://rightsandclimate.org

    more

    All embeds
    • 6 views on http://rightsandclimate.org

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories