The UN-REDD initiative

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    The UN-REDD initiative - Presentation Transcript

    1. The UN REDD Programme What Are the Principles & Mechanisms to Ensure the Protection and Strengthening of Rights? Rights, Forests & Climate Change Conference Oslo, Norway, 1 6 Oct 2008 Charles McNeill, UNDP on behalf of FAO & UNEP
    2. Background on the UN REDD Programme
    3. ORIGIN OF UN REDD
      • In response to:
      • UNFCCC Decision in Bali 2/CP.13
      • Requests from governments in the Coalition for Rainforest Nations
      • Requests from other governments – and UN Secretary General -- for joint UN action – “Delivering as One UN”
    4. ORIGIN OF UN REDD
      • Dec 07 - UNFCCC COP 13 – Initial discussions among FAO, UNDP, UNEP (Bali)
      • Jan-Feb 08 – More discussions among agencies & agreement on collaboration and creation of ‘multi-donor trust fund’ (MDTF)
      • Mar 08 – Coalition for Rainforest Nations invites FAO, UNDP, UNEP to support them, in collaboration with WB’s FCPF (Berlin)
      • May-Jun 08 - Numerous consultations with potential pilot countries, UNFCCC, WB FCPF, GEF, potential donors
      • Jul 08 –MDTF signed by 3 agencies/Norway
      • Mar-Oct 08 – Initial discussions with IPs & local communities (UNPFII, CSD, CBD COP9, WCC, etc)
      • 24 Sept 08 - Official Launch of UN REDD by UN SG & Norway’s Prime Minister
    5. UN REDD’S ADDED VALUE
      • ‘ All Hands On Deck’ : Challenge of REDD will require everything we can give to it!
      • UN Agencies Bring Unique Capacities to REDD : FAO,UNDP, UNEP strengths complement World Bank, GEF and others
      • Diversity of Approaches : Assist forest countries and international community gain experience with a range of risk management formulae and payment structures
    6. KEY PRINCIPLES
      • Country-driven programmes (one national REDD program that builds on existing processes of UNFCCC, World Bank, GEF, etc.)
      • Demonstration activities to contribute to a successful post-2012 UNFCCC process
      • Delivering as “One UN”
    7. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
      • Utilizing UN Country Team mechanisms and UN national programmes
      • Building on comparative advantages of FAO, UNDP, and UNEP
      • Using well-established “Multi-Donor Trust Fund” modality
    8. GLOBAL SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
      • UN REDD will support:
      • D evelopment and testing of standards, methods and guidelines for assessment, monitoring, accounting, reporting and verifying (e.g. M&V workshop Sept 08)
      • Knowledge sharing between countries
      • Other global functions where we can provide a useful role (e.g. REDD awareness, data availability & interpretation, co-benefits? Coordinated with WB)
    9. COUNTRY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
      • UN REDD will support demonstration activities and capacity building for:
      • REDD dialogue and consultations
      • REDD assessment and monitoring (data collection and management, reporting, etc.)
      • National REDD strategy development (readiness strategies, needs assessments, etc.)
      • REDD payment structuring and distribution options
    10. CRITERIA FOR PHASE I PILOT COUNTRIES
      • Request for Quick Start action
      • Existing collaboration with UN partners in related areas for rapid progress
      • Emission reduction potential
      • Degree of REDD readiness potential
      • Regional, biome and socio-economic representation
      • Coordination with international REDD initiatives
      • Leadership potential in sub-regional experience sharing
      • Ability to contribute experiences to UNFCCC negotiations and development of REDD mechanisms
    11. PHASE I PILOT COUNTRIES
      • Africa : Democratic Republic of the Congo, Tanzania, Zambia
      • Asia & Pacific : Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Vietnam
      • Latin America & Caribbean : Bolivia, Panama, Paraguay
    12. COORDINATION WITH OTHER REDD-RELATED INITIATIVES
          • Framework for cooperation with World Bank’s FCPF (at global & national levels)
          • GEF Tropical Forest Account
          • World Bank’s Forest Investment Program (FIP)
          • Bilateral programs (Australia’s IFCI, Germany, UK, etc.)
    13. Principles and Mechanisms to Ensure Protection and Strengthening of Rights
    14. PRINCIPLES & MECHANISMS
          • UN Mandate for 3 Pillars: Development, Peace and Security, Human Rights & SG’s current focus on mainstreaming Human Rights into UN’s work (2005)
          • UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (2002)
          • UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)
          • UN Development Group (UNDG) Guidelines, Action Plan & Resource Kits on UN Declaration & Indigenous Peoples Issues (2008)
          • UNDP Policy on Engagement with Indigenous Peoples (2001)
          • UNDP CSO Advisory Committee and Liaison Committee on Indigenous Peoples (2001-2008)
    15. UN’s Commitment and Work on Governance and Local Empowerment
    16. GOVERNANCE AND LOCAL EMPOWERMENT WORK
          • UN REDD may be recent, but body of work underpinning it is not …
          • ‘ Governance’ as UNDP’s primary Practice Area
          • Oslo Governance Centre
          • Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor
          • Support for CSOs and Local Empowerment since 1987 (PDP, Africa 2000, LIFE, etc)
          • ‘ Local Empowerment’ as Pillar of UNDP’s Environment & Energy Group
          • UNDP-GEF Small Grants Programme, Equator Initiative, Community Water Initiative, etc.
          • FAO and UNEP could tell similar story.
    17. IP & Local Community Consultation Process for UN REDD: What Have We Heard and How We Plan to Proceed
    18. INFORMAL CONSULTATIONS HELD SO FAR
          • 7 th UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (Apr 08, UN HQ)
          • 16 th UN Commission on Sustainable Development (May 08, UN HQ)
          • Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties (May 08, Bonn)
          • Forum on Readiness (May, Jun, Aug, WDC, Bonn, Ghana)
          • World Conservation Congress (Oct 08, Barcelona)
    19. MESSAGES HEARD SO FAR (IP & COMMUNITY INPUT)
          • Need for access to information
          • Uncertainty around mechanism for IP inclusion
          • Cultural disconnect around monetization
          • Fear of further marginalization (e.g. biofuels, little benefit from CDM)
          • Skepticism around market mechanism incentives
          • Need for non-market-based REDD mechanisms
          • Need for consideration of retroactive benefits
    20. MESSAGES HEARD SO FAR (OTHER STAKEHOLDERS)
          • Country’s governance capacity is key to success or failure of REDD
          • Experience (SFM, PAs, PES, etc) should inform REDD process
          • Challenge of rising commodity prices
          • IP inclusion in REDD may reduce risks from business perspective
          • Developing countries with already low deforestation rates need to benefit
          • Need for collaborative approach with local communities and IPs
    21. UPCOMING GLOBAL IP / CSO CONSULTATION ON UN REDD
          • Baguio City, Philippines
          • 12-14 November 2008
          • Organized by UNU, SCBD, Tebtebba and UN REDD
    22. Your Guidance Needed on These Issues
    23. LESSONS FROM YOUR EXPERIENCE
          • What is important to you vis a vis UN REDD? What concerns do you have? What mistakes should we be sure to avoid?
          • What additional principles, standards, guidelines, approaches, should UN REDD adopt?
          • What are you counting on UN REDD to do or deliver?
          • What experience with other forest finance-related activities should inform us? (both good and bad practice)
    24. MAKING REDD WORK
          • What mechanisms / processes to follow for national level stakeholder consultations?
          • How to ensure legitimate representation in consultations?
          • How to ensure CSO representation on UN REDD Policy Board
          • How to monitor if REDD or UN REDD is working for CSOs?
          • What recourse if civil society undermined by REDD or UN REDD?
          • What role for UN REDD in facilitating/mediating IP/civil society-government dialogue?

    + rightsandclimaterightsandclimate, 2 years ago

    custom

    2223 views, 1 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Charles McNeill, Environment Program Team Manager a more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2223
      • 2211 on SlideShare
      • 12 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 55
    Most viewed embeds
    • 11 views on http://rightsandclimate.org
    • 1 views on http://lingkunganaceh.blogspot.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 11 views on http://rightsandclimate.org
    • 1 views on http://lingkunganaceh.blogspot.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories