391 evaluations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

391 evaluations

on

  • 209 views

Presentation on writing evaluations and preparing production files for MAC 391 (2011)

Presentation on writing evaluations and preparing production files for MAC 391 (2011)

Statistics

Views

Total Views
209
Views on SlideShare
209
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    391 evaluations 391 evaluations Presentation Transcript

    • The (dreaded) Evaluation
      …..and other stuff
    • What’s happening, when?
      Production files TODAY
      Playbacks next week
      The evaluation 26th May to library
    • Production File
      Evidences what you have done
      But include:
      Updated proposal
      Research
      Planning / diaries / calendars / schedules
      Scripts / Running orders / editing logs
      Audience / market / genre research
      Risk Assessments
    • And also…...
      Copyright
      Contributor permissions / releases
      Correspondence
      Credits / cast list / contributors
      Online billing
      Compliance
    • Playbacks
      You + supervisor + 2nd marker
      = Lots and lots of lovely feedback
      Listen to 30 minutes
      Whole thing, part of it, highlights disc
      Discuss
    • Evaluation
      Hand in 2 copies of a 2000-2500 word individual report
      Reference it
      Support your assertions or ideas
      Show what you did (group work)
      Structure it
      Spend time on it
    • 1) Explain and Justify
      A justification of the style and content of your programme and the slot
      An explanation of any changes made since the project was pitched
      Comparative analysis with similar types of professional broadcast programmes
    • 2) Review it
      Did it do what it was supposed to do?
      Strengths / weaknesses
      What *could* you have done?
      What did you nearly do?
      Be clear on your creative/actual input
    • 3) Learning Points
      Relate to the ‘real world’
      How did you perform? Your team?
      Links to theoretical, historical, institutional contexts
      Does it fit into accepted styles, formats, genres?
    • How to get it right….
      Critical NOT descriptive
      Explain reasons behind decisions
      Be honest and analytical
      Reference
      Organiseit and write clearly and concisely
      Use examples and evidence