Atmospheric Aerosols R.B. Husar, Washinton University HTAP Meeting, June 10, 2008, Washington DC
Dimensions of Gaseous Pollutants: X, Y, Z, T Dimensions of Aerosols: Particle Size, Composition, Shape
Bad News: Aerosol Characterization is Challenging
PM is characterized by many sensors, sampling methods and tools
Each sensor covers only a fraction of the 6-Dim PM data space .
The 6 D data space is extrapolated from sparse measured data
Or deconvoluted from integral measurements
For integral sensors, the integral samples need to be separated into components
Good News
Once the aerosol is characterized, opportunities exists for extracting information about the aerosol sources, transformations, etc from the data directly.
Satellite-Integral
Phase II HTAP Goal: Integration of Emissions, Models and Observations
Aerosols are Indicators of Many Earth System Processes Including Human-induced Perturbations Volcanoes Dust storms Fires Anthropogenic Pollution EPA NAAQS PM2.5, O3 Exceptional Event Rule Exclusion of data when it is strongly influenced by “exceptional events" (EE), such as smoke from wildfires or windblown dust or LRTP.
Visibility from Ships, 1938
Ship observations cataloged in 1938 indicate qualitatively similar pattern to the 1990 AVHRR values
McDonald 1938
AVHRR satellite optical depth data over the oceans Husar et al, 1997.
The oceanic aerosol pattern is highly regional and and seasonal
The highest oceanic aerosol optical thickness (AOT, 1989-91) is over the tropical regions
The oceanic AOT around N. America, Europe and E. Asia is small compared to Africa and Asia
Continental Surface Visibility (7000+ Human Observers) Low Visibility High Visibility
Continental Surface Extinction Coefficient Climatology Dec, Jan, Feb Jun, Jul, Aug Sep, Oct, Nov Mar, Apr, May India Husar et al, 2000
Fusion of Satellite and Surface Visibility Data
Needed: Reconciliation with Models, Emissions
Vertical Distribution of Aerosols – Space-borne Lidar
Long rang transport occurs mostly in elevated layers
Elevated layers mix with BL air
Cloud interaction is clearly discernable
Winker et., al. 1995
Everglades, FL Big Bend, TX G. Smoky Mtn. Sahara Dust - July Mex. Smoke-May
Emission: Green Modeling: Green Observations: Green
The number of satellite-fire pixels Jul-Aug (1997-99)
The daily fire counts shows significant day to day fluctuation
Central American Smoke Plume Surface PM2.5 Ozone
Kansas Agricultural Smoke, April 12, 2003 Fire Pixels Organics 35 ug/m3 max Ag Fires SeaWiFS, Refl Smoke Emission April 11: 87 T/day April 10: 1240 T/d Assuming Mass Extinction Efficiency: 5 m 2 /g
Emission: Red Modeling: Yellow Observations: Yellow
Aerosol Nitrate Anomaly – Every 3 Days
Seasonal PM25 by Region Sulfate-driven Jul-Aug peak Feb-Mar peak, of unknown origin
Seasonal Average Fine Dust (VIEWS database, 1992-2002)
Fine soil concentration is highest in the summer over Mississippi Valley, lowest in the winter
In the spring, high concentrations also exists in the arid Southwest (Arizona and Texas)
Evidently, the summer Mississippi Valley peak is Sahara dust while the Spring peak is from local (and Asian) sources
Origin of Fine Dust Events over the US Gobi dust in spring Sahara in summer Fine dust events over the US are mainly from intercontinental transport
Supporting Evidence: Transport Analysis Satellite data (e.g. SeaWiFS) show Sahara Dust reaching Gulf of Mexico and entering the continent. The air masses arrive to Big Bend, TX form the east (July) and from the west (April)
Sahara PM Events over the Eastern US PM10 July 5, 1992 PM10 June 21, 1997 PM10 June 30 1993 Sahara Dust Sahara Dust TOMS, July Aerosol Index
Asian Dust Cloud over N. America On April 27, the dust cloud arrived in North America. Regional average PM10 concentrations increased to 65 g/m 3 In Washington State, PM10 concentrations exceeded 100 g/m 3 Asian Dust 100 g/m 3 Hourly PM10
~50% of the variability in springtime PM 2.5 in the Western U.S. can be explained by changes in Asian dust (Fischer et al., 2008)
0 comments
Post a comment