2004-06-24 Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily US SeaWiFS Data for 2000-2002 - Presentation Transcript
Co-retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance: Analysis of Daily US SeaWiFS Data for 2000-2002 Sean Raffuse, Erin Robinson and Rudolf B. Husar CAPITA, Washington University Presented at A&WMA’s 97 th Annual Conference and Exhibition June 22-27, Indianapolis, IN
Radiation detected by satellites
Air scattering depends on geometry and can be calculated (Rayleigh scattering)
Clouds completely obscure the surface and have to be masked out
Aerosols redirect incoming radiation by scattering and also absorb a fraction
Surface reflectance is a property of the surface
SeaWiFS Satellite Platform and Sensors
Satellite maps the world daily in 24 polar swaths
The 8 sensors are in the transmission windows in the visible & near IR
Designed for ocean color but also suitable for land color detection, particularly of vegetation
Chlorophyll Absorption Designed for Vegetation Detection Swath 2300 KM 24/day Polar Orbit: ~ 1000 km, 100 min. Equator Crossing: Local Noon
Aerosol effects on surface color and Surface effects on aerosol color The image was synthesized from the blue (0.412 μm), green (0.555 μm), and red (0.67 μm) channels of the 8 channel SeaWiFS sensor. Air scattering has been removed to highlight the haze and surface reflectance.
Preprocessing
Transform raw SeaWiFS data
Georeferencing – warping data to geographic lat/lon coordinates with a pixel resolution of ~ 1.6 km
Splicing – mosaic data from adjacent swaths to cover entire domain
Rayleigh correction – remove scattering by atmospheric gases and convert to reflectance units
Scattering angle correction – normalize all pixels to remove reflectance dependence on sun-target-sensor angles
Result is daily apparent reflectance, R for all 8 channels
General Approach: Co-Retrieval of Surface and Aerosol Reflectance
Surface Reflectance Retrieval by Time Series Analysis
(Sean Raffuse, MS Thesis 2003)
Aerosol Retrieval over Land
Radiative transfer model + Surface data
Refined Surface Reflectance
Iteration back to 1., 2. …
Scattering angle correction 2
Pixels are normalized to a scattering angle of 150 °
Approach – Time Series Analysis
For any location (pixel), the sensor detects a “clean” day periodically
Aerosol scattering (haze) is near zero
Pixel must also be free of other interferences
Clouds
Cloud shadows
Methodology – Cloud shadows
Clouds are easily detected by their high reflectance values
Cloud shadows are found in the vicinity of clouds
We enlarge the cloud mask by a three-pixel ‘halo’ to remove cloud shadows
Cloud shadows reduce the apparent surface reflectance considerably in all channels
Methodology – Preliminary anchor days
Surface reflectance is retrieved for individual pixels from time series data (e.g. year)
The procedure first identifies a set of ‘preliminary clear anchor’ days in a 17-day moving window
The main interferences (clouds and haze) tend to increase the apparent surface reflectance, especially in the low wavelength channels
The anchor day is chosen as the day with the minimum sum of the lowest four channels
Surface Reflectance in Blue & Red, Illinois
Haze perturbation of the surface reflectance is most pronounced at 0.41 m, ‘blue’
In some cases, haze is evident in blue, but not in red (0.67 m).
Hence, the blue channel is used to identify the anchor days.
For the selected days, the pixel’s reflectance is retained for each of the 8 channels (need better explanation)
Clouds Haze
Methodology – Residual haze reduction
In some regions, aerosol haze is persistent throughout over long periods e.g. Southeast in the summer
Spectral analysis is used to reduce the residual haze over these surfaces
Results – Seasonal surface reflectance, Eastern US April 29, 2000, Day 120 July 18, 2000, Day 200 October 16, 2000, Day 290
Results – Seasonal surface reflectance, Western US April 29, 2000, Day 120 July 18, 2000, Day 200 October 16, 2000, Day 290
Results – Eight month animation
Apparent Surface Reflectance, R
The surface reflectance R 0 is obscured by aerosol scattering and absorption before it reaches the sensor
Aerosol acts as a filter of surface reflectance and as a reflector solar radiation
Aerosol as Reflector: R a = ( e - – 1 ) P R = ( R 0 + ( e - – 1 ) P ) e - Aerosol as Filter: T a = e - Surface reflectance R 0
The apparent reflectance , R , detected by the sensor is: R = ( R 0 + R a ) T a
Under cloud-free conditions, the sensor receives the reflected radiation from surface and aerosols
Both surface and aerosol signal varies independently in time and space
Challenge: Separate the total received radiation into surface and aerosol components
Aerosol Retrieval: Idaho Smoke Event, Aug 2000
Generate daily total reflectance image with air reflectance removed, R
Generate surface reflectance image, R 0
Subtract daily total reflectance image from surface reflectance image to get aerosol optical thickness,
Filter , removing clouds and other interferences
July 10, 2002 July 9, 2002 July 8, 2002 July 7, 2002 July 6, 22002 July 5, 2002
Discussion - Advantages
Resolution independent – adaptable to other datasets that operate at different resolutions that provide appropriate spectral coverage (available bands near 0.4, 0.6, and 0.85 m)
Fully automated, requiring no user input once initiated
Spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution of the sensor data are maintained
Minimal need for a priori aerosol knowledge
Detects surface color change on the order of days/weeks when cloud free data exist
0 comments
Post a comment