Peer-based Enterprise Document Workflow John Rhoton Master Technologist HP Services
Outline
Enterprise Content Management
Formal vs. Informal
Managing Cost and Speed
Adaptive Workflow Framework
Peer driven quality control
Adaptive workflow paths
HP Knowledge Brief Viewer
System Architecture
Framework in Action
June 9, 2009
Enterprise Content Management
Formal Content
Established quality control
Lengthy process
Cost of service
Informal Content
Speed of information
Diverse structure
Lack of quality standard
June 9, 2009 Formal vs Informal Content
Knowledge Culture
A knowledge culture is where everyone understands their responsibilities to contribute to our collective knowledge
Technologists generate, refine, and contribute knowledge
Managers encourage their teams to contribute
Everyone takes pride in what they contribute
Everyone has something to share
Today, we have too many “knowledge absorbers” and too few “knowledge generators”
Progression through technical carreer requires people to become knowledge generators
HP Knowledge Brief Program A case study
Response to need to get technical knowledge out quickly
Technical Paper publishing, integration with
Professions
Technical Career Path
KBs Breakthrough Technologist Wider audience TCP review board Profession
Objectives of Knowledge Briefs
Capture field knowledge and experience in a modular and systematic fashion
Provide HP technologists with a way to publish information and grow writing ability
Not a replacement for patents or white papers
KBs:
Cover a wide variety of focus areas
Range from conceptual primers to how-to guides and case studies
Are easy to read and easy to write
Ensure reasonable accuracy and relevance through peer-review cycle
Are HP internal documents and not available to customers without prior approval
Costs-benefit Analysis Hours required to generate a KB 32 Time for Review/Tech-edit/Publication 8 Cost per hour (estimated worldwide average) $100.00 Total KBs generated 3’689 Total cost of KB generation $14’756’000 Total cost of staffing for KB system (since 2001) $2’000‘000 Cost of KM systems deployed to support KBs $500’000 Total Cost of KBs $17’256’000 Number of downloads 1’284’179 Hours saved by HP staff per download 0.2 Hours saved through KBs 256’836 Total Benefit (at hourly cost of $100) $25’683’580 ROI: 48%
Incentives
Reuse of Intellectual Property
Increased visibility within community/profession
Can be included as evidence of continuity of contribution in promotion packages
Publication Experience – something that leading technologists should consider
Knowledge Brief Awards
Frequent Contributors (Bronze, Silver, Gold)
Technical Journal Selection
Most Popular Downloads
Metrics drive behaviour!
Reviews
Provide an additional perspective
Help to catch any errors
Facilitate inter-organizational collaboration
Improve overall KB quality
Author selects peer reviewers
We identify technical/editorial reviewers
Publication involves final copy-editing – but not a complete rewrite
HP Labs Social Networking
Identify and Display Subject Matter Experts
Identify Document Clusters
Identify User Communities
Recommended KBs you haven’t yet read
Focus Area Experts
June 9, 2009 Integrating with Enterprise Content Management Framework
Popularity brought issues
Increasing volume
Hard to find qualified reviewers
Lack of Review Tracking
Draft content invisible
Reviews relied on same people
Quality concerns
Pre-workflow data Co-ordination effort 1 FTE Non-reviewed KBs 10% Technical Reviewers 50 Editorial reviewers 5
Old review process Draft KB Submission Technical Reviews Publication Bottlenecks slow process, impede scalability Reviewer assignment is not optimal, appears inconsistent
Our Solution
Platform for structured and unstructured reviews
Formal review process with designated pool of reviewers
0 comments
Post a comment