• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year.
 

Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year.

on

  • 442 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
442
Views on SlideShare
442
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science is published by the group of young academic and industrial researchers with 12 Issues per year. Document Transcript

    • RESEARCH INVENTY: International Journal of Engineering and ScienceISSN: 2278-4721, Vol. 1, Issue 7 (November 2012), PP 56-61www.researchinventy.comThe Effect of Variable Designs of the Central Receiver to Improve the Solar Tower Efficiency 1 Miqdam Tariq Chaichan,2,Khalil Ibrahim Abaas,3,Hussain A Kazem 1 (University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq) 2 (Sohar University, Sohar, Oman)Abstract - Concentrated solar power (CSP) is a method of electric generation fueled by the heat of the sun, anendless source of clean, free energy. This study has focused on the feasibility of improving concentrating solarpower (CSP) plant efficiency, by manufacturing a diminished prototype. Three states were studied, coloring thecentral target with a selective black color, fixing a reflector with arc form behind the target, and using these twochanges together. The results showed an improvement in the thermal storage varie d from month to month. Themaximum stored energy was gained at August with increments about 56.1%, 58.63%, 62.23 and 64.69% forordinary target, black painting, using reflector alone and black target with reflector together, respectivelycompared with stored energy for March.Keywords - Concentrated solar power, target, reflectors, stored energy, glass transmissivity I. Introduction The most important objectives of mankind these days are calming climate change and achievingstabilization of greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations. It will require large reductions in global emissionsof energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. It will be needed to developing and spreading new low-carbonenergy technologies [1]. Renewable energy sources offer a great potential fo r satisfying mankind’s energy needswith neglig ible at mospheric CO2 emissions. They are also contrary to fossil fuels inexhaustible, and morewidely spread over the earth’s surface [2]. A wide nu mber of technologies and sources such as: bio mass,hydraulics, ocean thermal energy, ocean tides and waves, solar heating and cooling, solar photovoltaic, solarthermal electricity and wind are encompassing as renewable. Sources of renewable energy, such as solar andwind power can generate more energy than the immediate demand. Large-scale production of solar electricity isstill technically and economically challenging. For solar energy, concentrating solar power (CSP) plants offerways to store this energy on a large scale, either thermally or as chemical fuels [3 & 4].Th is abundance of solarenergy makes concentrating solar power p lants an attractive alternative to traditional power plants, which burnpolluting fossil fuels, such as oil and coal. Fossil fuels also must be continually purchased and refined to u se.Unlike tradit ional power plants, concentrating solar power systems provide an environmentally benign source ofenergy, produce virtually no emissions, and consume no fuel other than sunlight.The only impact concentratingsolar power plants have on the environment is land use. Although the amount of land a concentrating solarpower plant occupies is larger than that of a fossil fuel p lant, both types use approximately the same amount ofland, because fossil fuel plants use additional land for mining as well as road building to reach the mines [5 &6].Concentrating solar power systems generate electricity with heat. Concentrating solar collectors use mirrorsand lenses to concentrate and focus sunlight onto a thermal receiver, similar to a boiler tube. The receiverabsorbs and converts sunlight into heat. The heat is then transported to a steam generator or engine where it isconverted into electricity [7].There are three main types of concentrating solar power systems: parabolictroughs, dish/engine systems, and central-receiver systems. These technologies can be used to generateelectricity for a variety of applications, ranging from remote power systems as small as a few kilowatts (kW) upto grid-connected applications of 200-350 megawatts (MW) or more. A concentrating solar power system thatproduces 350 MW of electricity displaces the energy equivalent of 2.3 million barrels of oil [8, 9 &10]Centralreceiver (solar tower) systems use a circular array of large indiv idually -t racking mirrors (heliostats) toconcentrate the sunlight on a central receiver mounted on top of a tower, with heat transferred for powergeneration through a choice of transfer media. After an intermed iate scaling up to 30 MW capacity, solar towerdevelopers now feel confident that grid-connected tower power plants can be built up to a capacity of 200 MW 56
    • The Effect of Variable Designs of the Central Receiver To… solar-only units [11 & 12]. Use of thermal storages will increase their flexibility. Although centralreceiver plants are considered to be further from co mmercialization than parabolic trough systems, solar towershave good longer term prospects for high conversion efficiencies. Projects are in various stages of development(fro m assessment to implementation) in Spain, South Africa and United States. In the future, central receiverplant projects will benefit fro m similar cost reductions to those expected from parabolic trough plants. Theanticipated evolution of total electricity costs is that they will d rop to 5 cents/kWh in the mid to long term [13,14 & 15].Iraq can be considered retarded in solar electric technology, because of the 100% dependence on fossilfuels to produce electricity. Iraq is distinguished as a rich country in solar energy. The solar radiation availablefor long times, in view of fact that Iraq has about 3600 sunn y hours per year [15 & 16]. Many valuables Iraqiresearches [17, 18, 19 & 20] clarified and confirmed the excellent activ ity of using sun in electrical powergeneration. Iraq posses about 3000 sunny hour per year, and the hourly solar intensity at (Baghda d city as anexample) changes from 416 W/ m2 at Jan. to 833 W/ m2 at June [21 & 22]. The aim of this article is to study theeffect of variable designs of the central receiver (target) to improve the solar tower efficiency in Iraqi weathers. II. EXPERIMENTAL S ETUP The concentrated solar power plant is a solar optical concentration technology that uses a towerreceivers and extremely closely spaced reflectors to allow a high delivered output from an area of roof orground. It uses the annual solar beam radiat ion s triking an area of ground or roof that can be captured andefficiently converted into useful electrical, thermal or cooling energy by using this technology . A small prototype was manufactured with 4 rows of reflectors arranged in an arc form, the innerdiameter was 0.25 m, and the outer diameter was 1 m. The rows were d istributed as arcs with angle 150° at itscentre facing south. The heliostats made up from 2.0×2.0 cm2 mirrors. The first row heliostats were fixed 3 cmheight from the ground. The second heliostats row was fixed 4 cm height fro m the ground and departed fromfirst row 25 cm. The third heliostats row was fixed 6 cm height fro m the g round and departed fro m second row25 cm. The forth heliostats row was fixed 8 cm height from the ground and depa rted from third ro w 25 cm.These arrangements were taken to enhance reflected radiat ion aiming to target by mirrors. Fig. 1, Photographic picture for the prototype assembly Fig. 2, Photographic picture for the prototype assembly with black target and reflector The aiming strategy in which successive rows of rays reflected fro m the mirrors are directed to thereceiver at different day time. Figs. 1 and 2 show the photographic pictures for the used assembly.The receiverwas made of a cylindrical wrought iron rod with 6 cm dia meter, 10 cm height and 2.8 kg mass. Target specificheat is (Cp= 0.46kJ/kg °C), and its thermal conductivity is (k=59 W/ m °C) [24]. The target was put at a heightof 30 cm above ground level. It was covered by a glass cover box (25 cm×25 cm×25cm) to preserve all theincident radiation, to prevent heat transfer by convection with ambient air, and to utilize the greenhous e effect.Three calibrated thermocouples were used to measure the receiver temperature at any time. One thermocouplewas fixed at the top of the receiver, wh ile the second one was fixed at its bottom, and the last one was fixed inthe middle. Another target sample was prepared with the same specifications, except it was painted with aselective black color, to study the effect of this painting on collecting efficiency. Fig. 2 represents the prototypeassembly. To collect the scattered radiations, an alu minum reflector was manufactured and prepared. It wasfixed behind the target rod departed 17.67 cm fro m it. Ground coverage can be increased to high levels by usinga reflector behind the receiver fro m the north side. This high ground coverage maximizes the c ollectable energyfro m a given availab le roof or ground space. This reflector was prepared by covering a piece of alu minu m sheet 57
    • The Effect of Variable Designs of the Central Receiver To… with alu minu m reflecting paper, and it was shaped as an arc. This reflecting arc was put (12 cm farfro m the target assembly) facing the heliostats in such a manner that it reflected the incident rays coming fro mthe holists directly to the receiver. Fig 3 depicts the prototype assembly in case of black target with reflector.A calibrated mercury thermo meter was used to read the ambient air temperature every hour. It was fixed inshadow. The thermal efficiency of the system fro m inco ming solar beam was calculated using the followingequations: The saved energy in target at each hour, Qact , is Qact  m  C p  T (kJ/hr) (1)While the theoretical energy supposed to reach the target every hour fro m sun rise until sunset, Qtheo , iscalculated by the equation:Qtheo  I h r   g ab  Ap  N (2)The hourly efficiency  h was calculated by the equation: Qacth  (3) QtheoTests ProcedureThe field was divided into three groups of mirro rs. The first gro up was aimed to the target every half an hour,starting from the first morn ing up to eleven (11:00) o’clock. The second group was aimed to target every half anhour starting fro m 11:00 o’clock until 14:00 o ’clock. The last group (which is on the right hand side of thetarget) was aimed to the target every half an hour starting from 14:00 o’clock until sunset. This procedure wasused to get rid of the crit ical angles of sun radiations.The prototype was examined for four cases:1. The sun rays were aimed to target.2. The sun rays were aimed to black colored target.3. The sun rays were aimed to target with alu minum reflector behind it.4. The sun rays were aimed to black target with alu minum reflector behind it.The tests were conducted in AL Al-Shaab city north of Baghdad, Iraq. These tests were conducted starting fromMarch 2012 t ill end of August 2012. Every test was conducted in one shiny day starting from day break tillsunset. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSS IONS Fig’s (4, 5 & 6) reveal the measured temperature variation of th e four cases compared to airtemperature at Iraqi springtime (March, April and May). The air temperature rises during these months, themaximu m temperature recorded for March was 20°C, for April was 27°C and for May was 33°C. The solarintensity increased in these days causing the target temperature to be higher with days advancing. These figuresillustrate a fixed trend for measured temperatures variation. The lo wer measured temperature range was for theordinary target. The maximu m temperature range was for black target with reflector. Black target temperaturesexceeded the ordinary target temperatures, but it delayed from the ordinary target with reflector.These figuresshow that coloring the target with selective black colo r increased the collected energ y due to black colorabsorption. Adding reflector to the assembly increased the collected energy. The reflector acted as a gatheringelement that collects the scattering radiation due to sun movement. So metimes, the solar energy use causesinstability in its readings due to the effect of clouds or dust. In April curves, it can be observed that black colortemperatures reduced and approached to ordinary target temperatures. Fig. 3, Various target temperatures variations with time on Fig. 4, Various target temperatures variations with time March on April 58
    • The Effect of Variable Designs of the Central Receiver To… Fig. 5, Various target temperatures variations with time on Fig. 6, Various target temperatures variations with time May on June The stored energy variation with day time for the four tested cases at Iraqi springtime (March, April &May, respectively) is demonstrated in Fig’s (10, 11 & 12). These figures illustrate the sequence of stored energyincrements started by ordinary target, black target, target with reflector and the maximu m values always forblack target with reflector. This sequence is always correct, except for some variat ions. As an example in Fig.10 at April tests, the black target curve comes near the target with reflector, also in May; the two curvesapproached each others before sunset. Fig. 7, Various target temperatures variations with time Fig. 8, Various target temperatures variations with time on July on August Fig’s (13, 14 & 15) man ifest the stored energy variations at day time at Iraqi su mmert ime (June, Ju ly &August respectively). These curves clarify the former sequence without any approaches between the curves.Also, these figures indicate that when the atmosphere is clear, then the black target with reflector will collectand store the maximu m energy. The stability of solar intensity in Iraqi su mmert ime made the stored energycurves taking this order, while the instability of solar intensity in Iraqi springtime caused the black target curveapproaching to target with reflector some times. The hourly incident radiation varies through daytime (where itincreases starting fro m daybreak till it reaches its maximu m value at noon, then it falls down after that). As aresult, the stored energy in the target took the same trend. Fig. 9, Various targets stored energies variations Fig. 10, Various targets stored energies variations with time on March with time on April 59
    • The Effect of Variable Designs of the Central Receiver To… Fig. 12, Various targets stored energies variations Fig. 11, Various targets stored energies variations with with time on June time on May Fig. 13, Various targets stored energies variations with time Fig. 14, Various targets stored energies variations with time on July on August In view of the fact that the black target with reflector gains and stores the maximu m energy co mparedto the other cases, the hourly efficiency for th is case was studied, as illustrated in figures 16 & 17 for Iraqispring and summert ime. The hourly efficiency increased from month to month and approached its maximu mvalues at August. These figures show that the maximu m efficiencies will be reached at 12 AM and 1 PM, whenthe solar intensity reached its maximu m values. These results clarify the possibility of improving the thermalstorage of solar station by using any of the tested cases. Fig. 15, Various targets hourly efficiency variations Fig. 16, Various targets hourly efficiency variations with time on springtime with time on summertime IV. CONCLUS ION A prototype of concentrated solar energy station was designed and constructed. The variation of thetarget state was studied. Four cases were studied: using ordinary target, selective black colored target, ordinarytarget with reflector and black colored target with reflector. The tests were conducted at Iraqi weathers inspringtime (March, April and May) and summert ime (June, July and August) 2012. The results clarified thefollowing conclusions: 60
    • The Effect of Variable Designs of the Central Receiver To…1. The Iraqi weathers are suitable for this type of systems. It is possible to attain high target temperatures which can operate power station.2. The maximu m temperatures and stored energies reached were at July and August; this indicates the relationship between the solar intensity and resultant temperatures.3. Coloring the target with a selective black co lor increased the target absorption which increases its temperatures and stored energy.4. Using a reflector behind the target to collect the scattered rays and reaming it to the target increased the target temperature as well as it increased the stored energy.5. The use of black colored target with reflector behind it gave the maximu m temperatures and stored energy results, indicating its preference. REFERENCES[1] Roeb M and Müller-Steinhagen H, Concentrating on Solar Electricity and Fuels, Science, 329 (13), 2010.[2] Kroposki B, Margolis R and Ton D, Harnessing the sun An Overview of Solar Technologies, may/June 2009[3] Braendle S, Benefits of metal reflective surfaces for concentrating solar applications, Power and Energy Magazine 2010, American Solar Energy Society, first published in the SOLAR 2010 Conference Proceedings.[4] DOE, Reducing water consumption of concentrating solar power electricity generation. U.S. Department of Energy. Report to Congress. 2010.[5] EIA, Monthly electric sales and revenue report with state distributions report. U.S. Energy Information Administration, form EIA- 826, 2010[6] Johnson G, Plugging into the sun, National Geographic magazine, Sept. 2009.[7] Kearney A T, Solar thermal electricity 2025; (2010), available on: www.atkearney.com[8] Piemonte V, De Falco M, T arquini P and Giaconia A, Life cycle assessment of a high temperature molten salt concentrated solar power plant. Presented at 20th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 2010.[9] Ummel K, Concentrating solar power in China and India: a spatial analysis of technical potential and the cost of deployment. Working Paper No. 219, Center for Global Development, Washington, D.C., USA, 2010.[10] Clifford K H and Kol G J, Incorporating uncertainty into probabilistic performance models of concentrating solar power planet s, Proceedings of Energy Sustainability 2009, July 19-23, San Francisco, California, USA, 2009.[11] DESERT EC Foundation; Clean Power from Deserts, 2009. Available on: www.desertec.org[12] Zhang Y, Smith S J, Kyle G P & Stackhouse P W, Modeling the potential for thermal concentrating solar power technologies. Energy Policy, 38 (12), 2010, 7884-7897.[13] Popp D, Newell R G and Jafie A B, Energy, the environment, and technological change. In Hall, B. H. and Rosenberg, N., editors, Elsevier, Handbook of the economics of innovation, 1, 2010, 366-382.[14] Clifton J & Boruff B J, Assessing the potential for concentrated solar power development in rural Australia, Energy Policy, 38, 2010, 5272–5280.[15] Al-Rawi A M, An experimental and theoretical study to improve the performance of a solar water heater of pyramidical right triangular cross-sectional area, M Sc thesis, UOT, Baghdad, Iraq, 2007.[16] Hussein A Kazem and Miqdam T Chaichan, Status and Future Prospects of Renewable Energy in Iraq, Elsevier -Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, USA, 16 (8), October 2012, 6007-6012.[17] Chaichan M T & Kazem H A, Thermal storage comparison for variable basement kinds of a solar chimney prototype in Baghdad - Iraq weathers, International Journal of Applied Sciences IJAS, 2 (2), 2011, 12-20.[18] Ahmed S T & Chaichan M T. A study of free convection in a solar chimney, Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 28, No.21, 2011.[19] Mohamad-Rassol H F, Theoretical and experimental study of using solar energy to produce hydrogen gas”, M.Sc. Thesis, University of T echnology, 2008.[20] Al-Rawi A M, An experimental and theoretical study to improve the performance of a solar water heater of pyramidical right triangular cross-sectional area,M Sc thesis, UOT, Baghdad, Iraq, 2007.[21] Miqdam Tariq C., Khalil I. A, Hussein A Kazem, Feras Hasoon, Hakim S. Sultan Aljibori, Ali A K Alwaeli, Firas S Raheem4, and Ali H A Alwaeli, “Effect of Design Variation on Saved Energy of Concentrating Solar Power Prototype”, International Multi- Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS), London-UK, 4-6 July 2012, 1989-1993.[22] Sintone C W, Glass and Energy, Chapter in Encyclopedia of Energy, vol. 3, Published by Elsevier Inc., 2004. NOMENCLATURE m (target mass) = 2.8 kg Cp (target specific heat (Cp) = 0.46 kJ/kg °C T (temperature differences between every two hours from sun rise until sunset) = °C/hr Ih solar intensity for every hour of the day, these data were taken from the Iraqi Metallurgy Organization. Ap single mirror area (m2 ) N Mirrors numbers g The of transmissivity the glass surrounding the target =(90%) r Mirrors reflection efficiency = (75%) [21]  ab Target absorptive = (0.8) [22] h The hourly efficiency 61