Designing baseline surveys for impact analysis and evaluation of progress
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Designing baseline surveys for impact analysis and evaluation of progress

on

  • 333 views

“Designing baseline surveys for impact analysis and evaluation of progress” presented by Kristin Penn, USAID/BFS at the ReSAKSS-Asia Conference, Nov 14-16, 2011, in Kathmandu, Nepal.

“Designing baseline surveys for impact analysis and evaluation of progress” presented by Kristin Penn, USAID/BFS at the ReSAKSS-Asia Conference, Nov 14-16, 2011, in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
333
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
333
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Designing baseline surveys for impact analysis and evaluation of progress Designing baseline surveys for impact analysis and evaluation of progress Presentation Transcript

    • FTF Monitoring and Evaluation: An Overview
    • The FTF Big Picture • At the G-8 Summit in July 2009, the President pledged to provide at least $3.5 billion over the next three years (FY 2010 to FY 2012) to attack the root causes of global hunger through accelerated agricultural development and improved nutrition. • The overall goal of the President’s Feed the Future (FTF) initiative is to accelerate progress towards achieving the first Millennium Development Goal (MDG 1) of halving by 2015 the proportion of people living in extreme poverty and suffering from hunger. • The USG commitment leveraged more than $18 billion in support from other donors.
    • FTF on the Forefront of Implementing • USAID FORWARD, changing the way the Agency does business—with new partnerships, local capacity building, an emphasis on innovation and a relentless focus on results as a way to achieve high-impact development. • USAID’s new evaluation policy that links systematic monitoring of performance and evaluation of impact in all program design, budgeting and strategy work.
    • Monitoring versus Evaluation 4 Monitoring Evaluation Performance monitoring of changes in performance indicators reveals whether desired results are occurring and whether implementation is on track. In general, the results measured are the direct and near-term consequences of project activities. the systematic collection of information about the characteristics and outcomes of Development Objectives, projects, or activities in order to make judgments, improve effectiveness, and/or inform decisions about current and future programming.
    • The Balancing Act Utilization of complex research methods Efficient M&E management and implementation
    • Gather Empirical Evidence Provide Accountability (show results) Improve Program Design FTF Monitoring and Evaluation Approach
    • M & E System Components FTF Strategy & Project Development - FTF MYS - AADs - PADs Monitoring - PMP or M&E Plan - Indicators (Collection & Targets, CBA) - Portfolio Reviews - Reporting (FACTS Info/FTFMS) Evaluation - PMP or M&E Plan - Hypotheses and Questions - Performance Eval - Impact Eval - Learning Agenda Knowledge Management - M&E Plan - Dissemination Methods (Reports, Presentations, Workshops)
    • The M&E System Generate Development Hypotheses and Results Framework Design Interventions (and evaluations) Build Performance Management Plan/ Select indicators and set targets Collect Baseline Data for Monitoring and Evaluation Monitor, Evaluate, and Report Utilize M&E findings in strategy and project (re)design
    • # Custom Indicators 28 project level 8 WoG, required if applicable 13 IR level, required if applicable 8 high-level required FTF Performance Monitoring Indicators Total of 57 FTF indicators 8 required 21 required if applicable (1) 13 – Intermediate Result level 8 - whole of government 27 recommended standard M&E Contractor will collect data for 13 of the high-level and IR-level indicators (next session) All other indicators collected by Implementing Partners or from secondary sources
    • Why Evaluate? •Accountability (Show results): Measure and provide findings related to project effectiveness, relevance, and efficiency. •Learning: Systematically generate knowledge about project performance, outcomes, and impact to inform project and strategy design and implementation.
    • Impact and Performance Evaluations address different questions: Performance Evaluation - No Inherent Causality – Is the program being implemented as designed? – Could the operations be more efficient? – Are the benefits getting to those intended? Impact Evaluation - Causality – What difference did the intervention make? – Were the desired results achieved? – Was it the intervention that caused these results? Performance vs. Impact Evaluation
    • USAID Evaluation Standards… Minimized Bias Relevant to Future Decisions Based on Best Methods Reinforcement of Local Capacity Commitment to Transparency Integrated into Design …are FTF Evaluation Standards 1 2 3 4 5 6
    • Building Local Capacity through Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Local Capacity-Building Investments for Data Collection and Use • All countries require valid and reliable statistics to measures a country’s status and welfare. • The agriculture sector is at the center of critical global issues: food security, feed-stocks for biofuels, climate change. • In many FTF focus countries, responsible entities to collect and use data to build effective policy responses to complex development problems and to monitor progress toward economic and social objectives is limited. USG will be a strong advocate for investment in strengthening national statistical systems/capacity in four ways.
    • Global Strategies to Improve Statistics 1. Support the GLOBAL STRATEGY to improve agriculture statistics launched by United Nations Statistical Commission based on common concerns, with following goals: – Help countries develop and implement a strategic vision for agriculture and rural statistics. – Build on existing institution and groups - national & international statistical agencies and data users. – Promote a set of core data across countries, coordination across national statistical system, and sustainability through statistical capacity building
    • Promotion at Donor Platforms 2. USG is using multiple donor platforms to promote strengthening national statistical systems/capacity including CAADP, AFSI, G8/G20. – Data collection and use to inform policy, budget allocations, and program design for both agriculture and nutrition sectors; – Sex- and age-disaggregated data collection in agriculture and nutrition to better monitor and analyze gender dynamics, adjust programming where necessary to improve positive impact across family members; – Promote common tools for data collection against performance indicators, such as household surveys (e.g. LSMS) or population sampling (e.g. LQAS) among local groups or host government agencies.
    • Coordinating Support to Improve Ag. Statistics at the National Level 3. Coordinating Support to Improve Ag. Statistics at the National Level: •Accurate measures of national food security and economic growth status and trends; •Relevant and timely agricultural and nutrition statistics are needed to analyze implications for government policy related to trade, social safety nets, stockpiles; •Timely and accurate information is also required for efficient functioning of agricultural markets; •LINK TO FTF - Strong national data systems are required to access progress toward the higher level agriculture and health objectives in FTF.
    • Local Providers of M&E Services 4. Engage local firms and institutions to carry out FTF M&E services and to formulate impact evaluation priorities • FTF’s M&E strategy urges missions to contract with and provide grants to more and varied local partners. • Build metrics into M&E contractor deliverables to maximize opportunities to sub-contract with local firms or direct contract with local institutions to capitalize on local knowledge and capabilities and build local capacity.
    • Way Forward and Best Practices Next steps to consider: 1.USAID explore what is current situation in country with agricultural statistics 2.If not adequate, initiate an outside detailed agricultural statistics capacity assessment  Typically a two week visit by two senior statisticians with experience in operational statistical programs  Recommendations on organizational, procedure, methodology, and capacity building issues would be provided 3.Depending on assessment recommendations, consider a statistical capacity improvement project
    • Thank You! Kristin Penn, Feed the Future/USAID