Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export

128

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
128
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Shale Market in North America to 2016 - Motivated by SurplusGas Production, Global Energy Players Eyeing Lucrative AsianMarkets for ExportReport Details:Published:September 2012No. of Pages: 142Price: Single User License – US$3500GBI Research, a leading business intelligence provider, has released its latest research, “ShaleMarket in North America to 2016 - Motivated by Surplus Gas Production, Global Energy PlayersEyeing Lucrative Asian Markets for Export”. The study, which is an offering from the company’sEnergy Research Group, provides an in-depth analysis of the most significant shale plays in NorthAmerica, such as Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Fayetteville Shale, HaynesvilleShale/Bossier Shale, Marcellus Shale and Woodford Shale. The report provides detailedinformation and analysis on the operational overview of all of these shale plays, detailing keycharacteristics, production trends during 2006–2016, and cost trends, which includes well cost,finding and development cost, drilling activity, and planned rigs. The report also containscompetitive analysis, analyzing major companies by both acreage and production, and theplanned capital expenditure for 2012 by major companies. It also details the major merger andacquisition activities in these shale plays.Scope•An operational overview of shale plays such as Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Haynesville Shale/Bossier Shale, Marcellus Shale and Woodford Shale.•Key characteristics, detailing the geographic and economic characteristics of the shale plays.•Production trends during 2006–2016, and cost trends, which includes well cost and finding and development cost, drilling activity, and planned rigs by major companies for 2012.•An overview of the competitive landscape of the top companies by acreage and production in these shale plays.•Discussion of the cost per well and finding and development costs of the companies in these shale plays.•Drilling activity for all of the shale plays mentioned above.•Planned capital expenditure by major companies for 2012 for each of the shale plays.•Information on the major mergers and acquisitions.Reasons to buy
  • 2. •Develop business strategies with the help of specific insights into the most significant shale plays in North America, such as Bakken Shale, Barnett Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, Fayetteville Shale, Haynesville Shale/Bossier Shale, Marcellus Shale and Woodford Shale.•Identify opportunities and challenges in these shale plays in North America.•Plan your strategies based on expected developments of these shale plays in North America.•Understand the competitive landscape of the companies in the shale plays.•Keep yourself informed of the key developments in this potentially game changing market.Get your copy of this report @http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/195906-shale-market-in-north-america-to-2016-motivated-by-surplus-gas-production-global-energy-players-eyeing-lucrative-asian-markets-for-export.htmlMajor points covered in Table of Contents of this report includeTable of Contents1 Table of Contents 81.1 List of Tables 111.2 List of Figures 132 Introduction 143 North America Shale Plays, Overview 153.1 Shale Plays, North America 153.2 Shale Gas Development 164 Bakken Shale 174.1 Bakken Shale, Background 174.1.1 Bakken Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 194.2 Bakken Shale, Operational Overview 204.2.1 Bakken Shale, Initial Production Rates 204.3 Bakken Shale, Production Trends 214.3.1 Bakken Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2006–2016 214.4 Bakken Shale, Cost Trends 224.4.1 Well Cost 224.4.2 Finding and Development Cost 244.5 Bakken Shale, Drilling Activity 254.5.1 Bakken Shale, Drilling Activity, North Dakota, 2012 254.5.2 Bakken Shale, Montana Drilling Activity 264.6 Bakken Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 274.7 Bakken Shale, Competitive Landscape 284.7.1 Bakken Shale, Major Companies by Acreage 284.7.2 Bakken Shale, Major Companies by Production 304.7.3 Bakken Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 314.8 Bakken Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 325 Barnett Shale 415.1 Barnett Shale, Background 415.1.1 Barnett Shale, Key Characteristics 42
  • 3. 5.2 Barnett Shale, Operational Overview 435.2.1 Barnett Shale, Initial Production Rates 435.3 Barnett Shale, Production Trends, 2000–2016 445.3.1 Barnett Shale, Historic and Forecast Production Trends, 2000–2016 445.3.2 Barnett Shale Gross Production as a Share of Texas’ Total Gross Gas Production 465.3.3 Barnett Shale, Gross Gas Production by County, 2011 475.4 Barnett Shale, Cost Trends 495.4.1 Well Cost 495.4.2 Finding and Development Cost 495.5 Barnett Shale, Drilling Activity 505.5.1 Barnett Shale, Drilling Permits Issued 505.6 Barnett Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 525.7 Barnett Shale, Competitive Landscape 535.7.1 Barnett Shale, Major Companies by Acreage 535.7.2 Barnett Shale, Major Companies by Production 545.7.3 Barnett Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 555.8 Barnett Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 556 Eagle Ford Shale 596.1 Eagle Ford Shale, Background 596.1.1 Eagle Ford Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 606.2 Eagle Ford Shale, Operational Overview 616.2.1 Eagle Ford Shale, Initial Production Rates 616.3 Eagle Ford Shale, Production Trends 626.3.1 Eagle Ford Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2000–2016 656.4 Eagle Ford Shale, Drilling Activity 676.5 Eagle Ford Shale, Cost Trends, 2011 696.5.1 Well Cost 696.5.2 Finding and Development Cost 706.6 Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 706.7 Eagle Ford Shale, Competitive Landscape 716.7.1 Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage 716.7.2 Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Production, 2011 736.8 Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 756.9 Eagle Ford Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 767 Fayetteville Shale 817.1 Fayetteville Shale, Background 817.1.1 Fayetteville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 827.2 Fayetteville Shale, Operational Overview 827.2.1 Fayetteville Shale, Initial Production Rates 827.3 Fayetteville Shale, Production Trends 837.3.1 Fayetteville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2006–2016 837.4 Fayetteville Shale, Cost Trends 85
  • 4. 7.4.1 Well Cost 857.4.2 Finding and Development Cost 857.5 Fayetteville Shale, Drilling Activity 867.6 Fayetteville Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 877.7 Fayetteville Shale, Competitive Landscape 887.7.1 Fayetteville Shale, Major Companies by Acreage 887.7.2 Fayetteville Shale, Major Companies by Production 897.8 Fayetteville Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 897.9 Fayetteville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 908 Haynesville/Bossier Shale 928.1 Haynesville/Bossier Shale, Background 928.1.1 Haynesville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 938.2 Haynesville/Bossier Shale, Operational Overview 948.2.1 Haynesville Shale, Initial Production Rate 948.3 Haynesville Shale, Production Trends 958.3.1 Haynesville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2000–2016 958.4 Haynesville Shale, Cost Trends 978.4.1 Well Cost 978.4.2 Finding and Development Costs 978.5 Haynesville Shale, Drilling Activity 988.5.1 Haynesville Shale, Drilling Activity, Louisiana 988.5.2 Haynesville Shale, Drilling Activity, East Texas 1008.6 Haynesville Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 1008.7 Haynesville/Bossier Shale, Competitive Landscape 1018.7.1 Haynesville Shale, Major Companies by Acreage 1018.7.2 Haynesville Shale, Major Companies by Production 1038.8 Haynesville Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 1048.9 Haynesville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 1049 Marcellus Shale 1099.1 Marcellus Shale, Background 1099.2 Marcellus Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 1109.3 Marcellus Shale, Operational Overview 1119.3.1 Marcellus Shale, Initial Production Rates 1119.4 Marcellus Shale, Production Trends 1129.4.1 Marcellus Shale, Historic and Forecast Production, 2006–2016 1129.5 Marcellus Shale, Cost Trends 1139.5.1 Well Cost 1139.5.2 Finding and Development Cost 1149.6 Marcellus Shale, Drilling Activity 1159.6.1 Marcellus Shale, Drilling Activity, Pennsylvania 1159.6.2 Marcellus Shale, Drilling Activity, New York 1179.7 Marcellus Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 118
  • 5. 9.8 Marcellus Shale, Competitive Landscape 1199.8.1 Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Acreage 1199.8.2 Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Production 1219.9 Marcellus Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 1229.10 Marcellus Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 12310 Woodford Shale 12710.1 Woodford Shale, Background 12710.2 Woodford Shale, Key Characteristics 12810.3 Woodford Shale, Operational Overview 12910.3.1 Woodford Shale, Initial Production Rates 12910.4 Woodford Shale, Production Trends 13010.4.1 Woodford Shale, Historic and Forecast Production Trends, 2000–2016 13010.5 Woodford Shale, Cost Trends 13110.5.1 Woodford Shale, Well Cost 13110.5.2 Woodford Shale, Finding and Development Cost 13110.6 Woodford Shale, Drilling Activity 13210.6.1 Woodford Shale, Planned Rigs, 2012 13310.7 Woodford Shale, Competitive Landscape 13410.7.1 Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Acreage 13410.7.2 Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Production 13610.7.3 Woodford Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 13710.8 Woodford Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 13711 Appendix 13911.1 Market Definition 13911.2 Abbreviations 13911.3 Bibliography 13911.4 Methodology 14011.4.1 Coverage 14011.4.2 Secondary Research 14111.4.3 Primary Research 14111.4.4 Expert Panel Validation 14111.5 Contact Us 14111.6 Disclaimer 142List of TablesTable 1: Bakken Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 19Table 2: Bakken Shale, Initial Oil and Gas Production Rates by Major Companies (boe/d andMcfe/d), 2012* 20Table 3: Bakken Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2006–2016 22Table 4: Bakken Shale, Cost Per Well by Major Companies ($m), 2012* 23Table 5: Bakken Shale, Finding and Development Cost by Major Companies ($m/boe), 2012* 24Table 6: Bakken Shale, North Dakota, Well Completions, 2012* 25Table 7: Bakken Shale, Montana, Well Permits and Well Completions, 2006–2012* 27
  • 6. Table 8: Bakken Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012* 27Table 9: Bakken Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2012 29Table 10: Bakken Shale, Oil and Gas Production by Major Companies (MMboe), 2011 31Table 11: Bakken Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies ($m), 2012 31Table 12: Bakken Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities 33Table 13: Barnett Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 42Table 14: Barnett Shale, Recent Wells Drilled and Initial Production Rates for EOG Resources,November 2011 43Table 15: Barnett Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000–2016 45Table 16: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Percentage Share of Texas’ Natural Gas GrossProduction, 2005–2011 46Table 17: Barnett Shale, Newark East, Gross Gas Production by County (bcf), 2011 48Table 18: Barnett Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/well), 2012* 49Table 19: Barnett Shale, Finding and Development Cost for Major Companies ($/Mcfe), 2012* 49Table 20: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Number of Drilling Permits Issued, 2004–2011 50Table 21: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Number of Wells Drilled, 1993–2011 52Table 22: Barnett Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012* 52Table 23: Barnett Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies, Acres, 2012* 53Table 24: Barnett Shale, Gross Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011 54Table 25: Barnett Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2012 55Table 26: Barnett Shale, Major Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2010–June 2012 56Table 27: Eagle Ford Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 60Table 28: Eagle Ford Shale, Oil and Gas Initial Production Rates by Major Companies, 2011 61Table 29: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Oil Production (MMbbl), 2008–April 2012 62Table 30: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Gas Production (bcf), 2008–April 2012 63Table 31: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Condensate Production (MMbbl), 2008–April 2012 64Table 32: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (MMboe),2006–2016 66Table 33: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Number of Drilling Permits Issued, 2008–April 2012 67Table 34: Eagle Ford Shale, Cost Per Well by Major Companies ($m), 2012* 69Table 35: Eagle Ford Shale, Finding and Development Cost ($/boe), 2012* 70Table 36: Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012* 70Table 37: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2011 72Table 38: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2011 74Table 39: Eagle Ford Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies ($m), 2012 75Table 40: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2011–June 2012 76Table 41: Fayetteville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 82Table 42: Fayetteville Shale, Initial Gas Production Rates (MMcf/d), 2011 82Table 43: Fayetteville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production (bcf), 2006–2016 84Table 44: Fayetteville Shale, Average First Month Well Production by County (MMcf), 2008–201185Table 45: Fayetteville Shale, Well Completion by Major Companies, 2008–2011 86
  • 7. Table 46: Fayetteville Shale, Annual Well Completions in Major Counties, 2008–2011 87Table 47: Fayetteville Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012* 88Table 48: Fayetteville Shale, Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011 89Table 49: Fayetteville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2006–2011 90Table 50: Haynesville Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 93Table 51: Haynesville Shale, Initial Production Rates of Oil and Gas (boe/d and Mcfe/d), 2012* 94Table 52: Haynesville Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000–2016 96Table 53: Haynesville Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/Well), 2012* 97Table 54: Haynesville Shale, Finding and Development Cost Per Mcfe ($/Mcfe), 2012* 97Table 55: Haynesville Shale Play, Louisiana, Well Activity, July 2011–June 2012* 99Table 56: Haynesville Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012* 100Table 57: Haynesville Shale Play, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies, Acres, 2012* 102Table 58: Haynesville Shale Play, Production of the Leading 10 Companies (bcfe), 2011 103Table 59: Haynesville Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies ($m), 2012 104Table 60: Haynesville Shale, Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2008–2011 104Table 61: Marcellus Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 110Table 62: Marcellus Shale, Initial Oil and Gas Production Rates (boe/d and Mcfe/d), 2012* 111Table 63: Marcellus Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000–2016 112Table 64: Marcellus Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/Well), 2012* 113Table 65: Marcellus Shale, Finding and Development Cost Per Mcfe ($/Mcfe), 2012* 114Table 66: Marcellus Shale, Well Permits Issued, Pennsylvania, January 2011–January 2012 116Table 67: Marcellus Shale, Wells Drilled, Pennsylvania, January 2011–January 2012 117Table 68: Marcellus Shale, Planned Rigs by Companies, 2012* 118Table 69: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Total Net Acreage (Acres), 2012* 120Table 70: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Production (bcfe), 2011 121Table 71: Marcellus Shale, Planned Capital Expenditure by Companies, 2012 122Table 72: Marcellus Shale, Major Merger and Acquisition Activities, 2011–June 2012 123Table 73: Woodford Shale, Key Characteristics, 2011 128Table 74: Woodford Shale, Oil Initial Production Rates by Newfield Exploration Company (boe/d),2012* 129Table 75: Woodford Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2000–2016131Table 76: Woodford Shale, Cost Per Well for Major Companies ($m/Well), 2012* 131Table 77: Woodford Shale, Well Completions, Oklahoma, 2009–2011 133List of FiguresFigure 1: Shale Plays, Lower 48 States, The US 15Figure 2: Schematic Geology of Natural Gas Resources 16Figure 3: Bakken Shale Formation, 2011 17Figure 4: Bakken Shale Formation, Stratigraphic Column, 2011 18Figure 5: Bakken Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2006–2016 21Figure 6: Bakken Shale, North Dakota, Well Completions, 2012* 25Figure 7: Bakken Shale, Montana, Well Permits and Well Completions, 2006–2012* 26
  • 8. Figure 8: Bakken Shale, Net Acreage of Major Companies (Acres), 2012 28Figure 9: Bakken Shale, Oil and Gas Production by Major Companies (MMboe), 2011 30Figure 10: Barnett Shale Location Map, Texas, 2012 41Figure 11: Barnett Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2006–2016 44Figure 12: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Percentage Share in Texas’ Natural Gross GasProduction, 2005–2011 46Figure 13: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Gross Gas Production by Major Counties (bcf), 2011 47Figure 14: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Drilling Permits Issued, 2004–2011 50Figure 15: Barnett Shale (Newark East), Well Count, 2000–2011 51Figure 16: Barnett Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012* 53Figure 17: Barnett Shale, Gross Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011 54Figure 18: Eagle Ford Shale, The US 59Figure 19: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Oil Production (MMbbl), 2008–April 2012 62Figure 20: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Gas Production (bcf), 2008–April 2012 63Figure 21: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Condensate Production (MMbbl), 2008–April 2012 64Figure 22: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (MMboe),2006–2016 65Figure 23: Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, No. of Drilling Permits Issued, 2008–May 2012 67Figure 24: Eagle Ford Shale, The US, Oil and Gas Wells Permitted and Completed, May 2012 68Figure 25: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2012 71Figure 26: Eagle Ford Shale, Major Companies by Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2011 73Figure 27: Fayetteville Shale, Location Map, Arkansas 81Figure 28: Fayetteville Shale, Historic and Forecast Production (bcf), 2006–2016 83Figure 29: Fayetteville Shale, Average First Month Well Production by County (MMcf), 2008–201184Figure 30: Fayetteville Shale, Well Completion by Major Companies, 2008–2011 86Figure 31: Fayetteville Shale, Annual Well Completions in Major Counties, 2008–2011 87Figure 32: Fayetteville Shale, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012* 88Figure 33: Fayetteville Shale, Gas Production by Major Companies (bcfe), 2011 89Figure 34: Haynesville Shale, The US, Location Map 92Figure 35: Haynesville Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000–2016 95Figure 36: Haynesville Shale Play, Louisiana, Well Activity, July 2011–June 2012* 98Figure 37: Haynesville Shale Play, East Texas, Well Activity, 2012* 100Figure 38: Haynesville Shale Play, Total Net Acreage by Major Companies (Acres), 2012* 101Figure 39: Haynesville Shale Play, Production of the Leading 10 Companies (bcfe), 2011 103Figure 40: Marcellus Shale, The US, Location Map 109Figure 41: Marcellus Shale, Historic and Forecast Gas Production (bcfe), 2000–2016 112Figure 42: Marcellus Shale, Well Permits Issued, Pennsylvania, January 2011–January 2012 115Figure 43: Marcellus Shale, Wells Drilled, Pennsylvania, January 2011–January 2012 116Figure 44: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Total Net Acreage (Acres), 2012* 119Figure 45: Marcellus Shale, Major Companies by Production (bcfe), 2011 121Figure 46: Woodford Shale, Location Map 127
  • 9. Figure 47: Woodford Shale, Historic and Forecast Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2000–2016130Figure 48: Woodford Shale, Drilling Activity, Oklahoma 132Figure 49: Woodford Shale, Well Completions, Oklahoma, 2009–2011 132Figure 50: Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Net Acreage (Acres), 2012* 134Figure 51: Woodford Shale, Major Companies by Oil and Gas Production (MMboe), 2011 136Contact: sales@reportsandreports.com for more information.

×