Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5




Iceland's Creation of an

Iceland's Creation of an
Endangered Species Trade



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment


  • RENEGADE WHALING:Icelands Creation of anEndangered Species Trade
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTSEIA would like to thank Tomo for helping with theresearch for this report and OceanCare forfinancially contributing to EIAs investigation. 1 INTRODUCTIONReport design 2 ICELAND’S WHALING HISTORYJuly 2011ISBN: 0-9540768-9-3 3 ICELAND’S 21ST CENTURY WHALING 5 HVALUR – HALF A CENTURY HUNTING FIN WHALES 7 FIN WHALE TRADE INVESTIGATION 10 WHALE SALES ONLINE 12 REQUIRED ACTIONS BY THE US AND EU 13 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY (EIA)62/63 Upper Street, London N1 0NY, UKTel: +44 (0) 20 7354 7960Fax: +44 (0) 20 7354 7961email: ukinfo@eia-international.orgwww.eia-international.orgWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETYBrookfield House, 38 St Paul StreetChippenham, Wiltshire SN15 1LJ, UKTel: (44) (0)1249 449500Fax: (44) (0)1249 449501email: info@wdcs.orgwww.wdcs.orgCOVER:© Jonas Freydal
  • © WDCS/Nicola Hodgins INTRODUCTIONThe Icelandic whaling company Hvalur hf The investigation has confirmed thehas killed 273 endangered fin whales, and involvement of the Japanese scientificexported more than 1,200 tonnes of fin whaling company Kyodo Senpaku in thewhale meat and blubber to Japan since distribution of Icelandic fin whale2008. These shipments, worth an estimated products. This is a key concern givenUS$17 million, and Iceland’s escalating its dominance within Japan’s whalewhale hunts, are clear abuse of the meat market and effective control ofInternational Whaling Commission (IWC) an extensive distribution well as the Convention on InternationalTrade in Endangered Species of Wild Iceland’s killing and exporting ofFauna and Flora (CITES), to which Iceland internationally protected and endangeredis a signatory. They are carried out with whales is clearly undermining the IWCthe full knowledge of Icelandic authorities, and CITES; unless Iceland ceases theseand are evidence of Iceland’s disregard for hunts and trade, economic sanctionsinternational environmental treaties. should be enacted directly against the commercial interests of Hvalur.With Japan’s whaling on the decline anda mountain of unwanted whale meat and For the past three years, the IWC hasother whale products in storage, it is been tied up in futile negotiations withfair to ask why Iceland and Hvalur the whaling countries in a supposedpersist in the killing and trading across attempt to control their renegadeborders of an endangered whale species whaling. This process has been markedprotected by the IWC and CITES. The by a reluctance on the part ofreal question however, is why do other conservation-minded governments toIWC/CITES signatories continue to speak out against Iceland and othertolerate these abuses of international whaling nations in fear of being seen toconservation accords? harm the negotiations. In response, however, Iceland has set ever higherA new EIA investigation into the whaling quotas, and has dramaticallyinternational trade in fin whale products expanded its export of CITES Appendix 1in Japan paints a distressing picture of listed whales, not only to Japan but toincreasing distribution and sale of several other countries.Icelandic-caught fin whales. This dynamicis fuelled by artificially low prices If the IWC is not to become theinfluenced by Icelandic businessman, dysfunctional body that the whalingand Hvalur boss, Kristján Loftsson in his countries work tirelessly to bring about,determination to expand Iceland’s whaling. the Commission must assert its authorityCombined with the special status of fin and publicly condemn Iceland’s escalatingwhales as the most desirable whale commercial whaling and whale exports.product in Japan and the absence of fin It is time for Parties to secure anwhales from Japan’s own whale hunts, this immediate cessation of Iceland’s whalinghas given Loftsson the opportunity to sell activities and its international trade inhundreds of tonnes of Icelandic fin whale, whale products.already profiting a Japan-based importcompany he helped establish by as muchas US$8 million.Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) and Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS)July 2011 1
  • © Jonas Freydal ICELAND’S WHALING HISTORY ABOVE: In the long and bloody history of legally to have accepted it. Indeed, Fin whale killed in 2006. commercial whale hunting, Iceland is Iceland officially ceased commercial one of the most notorious and persistent whaling in 1985 in accordance with the protagonists, killing more than 35,000 moratorium decision, but swiftly began whales since the late 19th century and exploiting the clause in the IWC’s opposing or circumventing efforts by the founding treaty, the International international community to regulate Convention for the Regulation of whaling and prevent the decimation of Whaling (ICRW), which allows whaling whale populations.1 for ‘scientific purposes’.5 The main stage for Iceland’s infamy In the first years of the moratorium, has been the International Whaling Iceland submitted several research Commission (IWC), of which it was a proposals to the IWC, even seeking founding member. Because of the refusal ‘experimental catches’ for blue and of whaling nations to comply with its humpback whales which had been restrictions on where, when and how protected since the 1960s.6 Between many whales could be hunted, the IWC 1986 and 1989, Icelandic whalers killed failed for decades to prevent the 292 fin whales and 60 sei whales - all devastating impacts of illegal and legal ostensibly in the name of science but yet unsustainable, commercial whaling. really intended for commercial export to Unable to prevent Parties, including Japan.7 Even after the IWC adopted a Iceland, killing undersized individuals or Resolution in 19868 recommending the targeting protected species,2 the IWC meat and other products be “utilised eventually recognised that nothing less primarily for local consumption” following than a total ban would be sufficient to the completion of “scientific treatment” allow time for whales to begin to rebuild (which was interpreted with Iceland’s their depleted populations. In 1982, the agreement to mean that up to 49 per Commission adopted the ‘moratorium’, cent of whale products could be prohibiting the hunting of all the ‘great exported), Iceland continued to submit whales’3 for commercial purposes from research proposals to the IWC that 1986 onwards. would generate thousands of tonnes of meat, far more than its domestic market Although Iceland voted against the could absorb, and continued to export moratorium decision in 1982, following a the majority to Japan. An EIA investigation bitter debate in its Parliament it did not in 1991 demonstrated that Iceland register a formal objection to the decision exported between 58 and 77 per cent of at the time and, unlike the Soviet Union, its whale meat to Japan during the Japan4 and Norway, was thus deemed four-year scientific whaling programme, in contravention of the Resolution.9 THE IWC AND SCIENTIFIC WHALING Ultimately, it took a public boycott of Since the adoption of the moratorium on commercial whaling, the Icelandic fish in Europe and the US Commission has passed more than 30 Resolutions censuring various special and the threat of trade sanctions by permit operations by Iceland, Japan, Norway and Korea, and expressing the US to persuade Iceland to call it the view that such special permit research should only be permitted in a day when its special permit exceptional circumstances,11 meet critically important research needs,12 be programme concluded in 1989.10 consistent with the IWC’s conservation policy13 and use non-lethal techniques.14 Iceland left the IWC in 1992, having ceased whaling entirely. 2
  • ICELAND’S 21ST CENTURY WHALINGLess than a decade later, Iceland was whaling for commercial purposes despiteback. In 2000, it joined the Convention the moratorium on commercial whaling”,on International Trade in Endangered and stating that “Article VIII of theSpecies of Wild Fauna and Flora Convention is not intended to be exploited(CITES) with a reservation which in order to provide whale meat for commercialexempts it from a ban on international purposes and shall not be so used”.18commercial trade in whale products and Clearly aimed at Iceland’s plans, theenables it to trade legally with Norway Resolution urged “any country …and Japan, which also hold reservations considering the conduct of Special Permitfor whales. It then tried the same tactics whaling to terminate or not commence suchat the IWC, rejoining in 2002 with a activities and to limit scientific research to‘reservation’ to the moratorium which, it non-lethal methods only”. Undaunted byclaimed, revoked its previous acceptance this condemnation, Iceland’s specialof the ban.15 permit operation went ahead. Ultimately, the programme targeted only minkeMany IWC parties asserted that whales - killing a total of 200 - but wasIceland’s reservation is incompatible extended from two to five years.19with the object and purpose of the ICRWand was, therefore, not permissible In 2006, before any findings from theunder international law, but Iceland’s special permit hunt were published,membership was nevertheless accepted Iceland resumed commercial whalingby the Commission in 2002.16 Iceland under its disputed reservation, settingwasted no time; although its ‘reservation’ itself a hunting quota of 30 minkestated that it would not start commercial whales and nine fin whales, the latterwhaling until 2006, within eight months recognised as an endangered species.20of rejoining the IWC it announced a new The same year, Iceland signalled itsspecial permit (scientific) program to kill intention to resume international trade50 sei whales, 100 fin whales and 100 in whale products when it presentedminke whales annually for two years.17 an antagonistic proposal to the Animals Committee of CITES seekingAt the following IWC meeting in 2003, to include the Central North Atlanticthe Commission adopted its most strongly stock of fin whales in a review of theworded Resolution against special CITES Appendices.21permit whaling, expressing “deep concernthat the provision permitting special permit Iceland killed six minkes in its BELOW:whaling enables countries to conduct commercial hunt in 2007, 38 in 2008 Fin whale landed in 2010. © EIA 3
  • and no fin whales, but this was just the beginning.22 Rather than condemning Iceland’s whaling programmes, the IWC, led by a US Chairman, pursued a long-term negotiation with Iceland, Norway and Japan to bring their renegade hunts back under IWC control and curtail their trade in whale products.23 The negotiations, which ultimately fell apart at the 2010 annual IWC meeting, failed to draw any concessions from Iceland; in fact, the negotiations seemed only to encourage Iceland’s ambitions. In 2009, shortly before the collapse of Iceland’s Government in the wake of an economic crisis, Iceland’s outgoing fisheries minister, Einar K Guðfinnsson, dramatically increased the whaling quotas to at least 150 fin and 100 minke whales from 2009 to 2013; quotas based not on advice from the IWC but rather from Iceland’s own Marine Research MINKE WHALES, ICELAND’S OTHER TARGET Institute (HAFRO).24 Subsequently, Icelandic whalers killed 126 fin whales and 81 minke whales in 2009, and The minke whale is the smallest of the great whales; due to its small size, 148 fin whales and 60 minke whales hunting for minke whales was not regulated in Iceland until 1974, while IWC in 2010.25 quotas were not set for North Atlantic minkes until 1977. When minke whaling resumed in 2003, the meat initially sold poorly, but the industry has engaged Iceland has ignored all diplomatic in increasing public relations and marketing efforts to increase sales of criticism of its whaling, including several strongly worded official diplomatic whale meat in Iceland, including to tourists. By 2010, two minke whaling protests from a wide range of countries© Joanne Weston | companies were operating in Iceland, and sales of whale meat continued to in 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2011.26 In improve with more than 100 shops and restaurants throughout the country December 2010, WDCS filed a petition offering minke whale meat.39 However, the long-term goal of the minke on behalf of 19 conservation and animal whalers mirrors that of the Hvalur company; Gunnar Bergmann Jonsson, welfare organisations collectively representing tens of millions of head of the Minke Whalers Association, declared that the company was Americans, requesting that the US begin looking to “sell 90 percent of the meat to Japan".40 to evaluate potential domestic responses to Iceland’s ongoing whaling and trade. A decision is expected imminently on a proposed US embargo of fish products caught, processed or exported by TABLE 1. Icelandic whale catches, 1980 -2010 Icelandic companies connected to its whaling industry and executives. Year Total Fin Sei Sperm Minke Conservation and animal welfare groups are aiming at the same targets, 1980 increasing pressure on retailers not to 638 236 100 101 201 buy Icelandic fish ‘tainted with the 1981 597 254 100 43 200 blood of whales’.27 1982 564 194 71 87 212 1983 448 144 100 204 In early May 2011 the Director of 1984 440 167 95 178 Hvalur, Iceland’s fin whaling company, 1985 announced a delay to the start of its 344 161 38 145 whaling season, citing uncertainty 1986 116 76 40 arising from March’s devastating 1987 100 80 20 earthquake and tsunami in Japan – its 1988 78 68 10 main market.28 In contrast, the minke 1989 68 68 whale hunt commenced on schedule. 1990-2002 To many, this suggests that this small 0 country, still in the depths of recession 2003 37 37 and acutely dependent on fish exports, 2004 25 25 is waiting to see how forcefully the US 2005 39 39 is prepared to act. 2006 68 7 61 2007 In June 2011, even after the delay to the 45 45 2011 season, Iceland announced yet 2008 38 38 another increase to its whaling quota - 2009 206 125 81 154 fins (far higher for this endangered 2010 208 148 60 species than the IWC’s Scientific Source: Hafrannsóknastofnun Committee considers sustainable) and 337 minke whales.29 4
  • HVALUR – HALF A CENTURY © Börkur Sigurbjörnsson HUNTING FIN WHALESIn 1948, the Hvalur hf company and has been the largest shareholderconverted the former World War II ever since.”34 A WHALINGUS naval base at Hvalfjörður into awhaling station. The company owns four In 2010, HB Grandi was the number one DYNASTYwhaling vessels, only two of which - the fisheries quota-holder in Iceland. TheHvalur 8 and Hvalur 9 - are currently links between HB Grandi and whaling The current CEO of Hvalur hfoperational. The Hvalur head office is are long-standing and overt, and the is Kristján Loftsson, whoselocated in Hafnarfjõrður, where it also company has played an active role in father Loftur Bjarnasonowns and operates a freezer facility Iceland’s whaling industry, both promoting helped to found the company(‘Frystihús Hvals’).30 whaling and providing its fish-processing in 1948. Hvalur board member, facilities for the processing of fin whale Arni Vilhjlámsson, is son ofThere are long-standing connections meat for the export market.35between several individuals and companies another founding memberin Iceland and Iceland’s whaling industry. Following the 2006 commercial fin of Hvalur hf, VilhjálmurThese corporate and familial connections whale hunt, HB Grandi rented space at Arnason. Both Loftsson andhave been in existence for decades and its Akranes fish processing facility to Vilhjálmsson are on theinvolve some of the country’s major Hvalur hf and has continued to do so in board of HB Grandi. Kristjánfirms. Hvalur hf, in addition to its each of the following seasons in which Loftsson regularly attendswhaling activities, is one of the largest commercial fin whaling has taken place. meetings of the IWC as partinvestment companies in Iceland with The fin whale meat is taken from the of the Icelandic Governmentequity at the end of 2009 listed as Hvalur whaling station in Hvalfjörður delegation, and is Iceland’s13 billion krona (ISK), approximately and transported by truck to Akranes highest profile proponentUS$112.9 million.31 In addition to its where it is cut, packaged, boxed andshareholdings in Nyherji, a well-known readied for export.36 As investigative of commercial whaling andIcelandic communications technology trips to Iceland by both EIA and WDCS the export of whale meatfirm, Hvalur hf is also the largest in 2010 found, the facility where the fin to Japan.38shareholder in Vogun hf which is in turn whale meat is processed is centrallya principle investor in numerous other located within the HB Grandi complexcompanies in Iceland, ranging from in Akranes; an HB Grandi-associatedhealth equipment to waste-oil firms.32 logo can be seen on a wall in the processing area.37The whaling company is also linked tothe Hampiðjan Group, one of the largestfishing gear and rope manufacturers in INTERNATIONAL TRADE OFthe world.33 However, Hvalur’s largestsingle asset is its controlling interest in ICELANDIC FIN WHALEIceland’s leading fishing company, HBGrandi. In a 2007 interview printed in PRODUCTS TO JAPANthe Icelandic newspaper Morgunblaðið,Kristján Loftsson, identified as “the CEO After an experimental export in 2008,of Hvalur and a member of the board of the export of fin whale products fromHB Grandi” said, “Anyone who follows the Iceland to Japan began in earnest inbusiness scene in Iceland knows that January 2010. By April 2011, more thanVogun, a subsidiary company of Hvalur hf, 1,200 tonnes of ‘other frozen whalebought the largest part of Grandi in 1988 product’ – fin whale meat and blubber – 5
  • had been shipped to Tokyo, worth an Both Japan and Iceland use the estimated 1.95 billion ISK or US$16.8 Harmonized Commodity Description million.41 The March 2011 shipment of and Coding System (HS) to classify their 289 tonnes was the largest single products. However each country uses export of whale product from Iceland different codes with respect to the trade since resuming its whaling and in Icelandic fin whale.43 While the international trade. exports from Iceland to Japan in 2010 and 2011 were described as ‘other Between October 2008 and May 2011, frozen whale products’ (HS code Japan imported 637 tonnes of whale 02084002), Japan’s customs authorities meat and 290 tonnes of whale blubber, have imported the frozen whale product in total 926 tonnes. While this figure is under two separate HS codes, representing lower than the reported total of 1,200 whale meat and whale blubber. tonnes exported, the discrepancy is likely a result of the delay between Japan’s import statistics show export and import and the time needed simultaneous imports of ‘whale meat’ for customs procedures to take place.42 (HS 020840011) and ‘fats and oils of marine mammals’ (HS 150430090). The Fisheries Agency of Japan has confirmed TABLE 2. Icelandic Export Statistics of ‘other frozen whale products’ that whale blubber (‘unesu’ in Japanese) (HS 02084002) to Japan (other than June 2008 export is classified as marine mammal fats/oil44 which was exported as ‘whale meat’) and it is assumed that the entire import under this code represents fin whale Month of export Kilos Value ISK US$ Euro blubber since there have been no other marine mammal exports from Iceland to Japan. Between 2008 and May 2011, 2008 - June 81,774 94,038,488 1,265,038 814,052 fin whale blubber represented about 30% of the total fin whale shipment 2010 - Jan 134,026 308,215,584 2,483,607 1,732,729 reaching Japan. 2010 - March 88,191 152,626,830 1,182,053 874,777 2010 - April 149,192 216,675,981 1,710,462 1,259,655 The reason for Japan using an additional HS code is not clear, although there is 2010 - August 129,600 210,273,467 1,749,218 1,340,499 a tariff for marine mammal fat /oil of 2010 - September 129,915 209,255,604 1,748,898 1,364,850 3.5 per cent plus value added tax whereas whale meat and whale oil carries no 2010 - October 133,348 197,344,751 1,756,049 1,276,526 tariff.45 A representative of the Icelandic 2011 - March 289,134 463,820,820 4,005,361 2,899,674 Directorate of Customs stated to 2011 - April 129,600 98,382,018 858,932 604,442 WDCS that an exporter “often uses one tarif [sic] number to cover the consignment, but upon inspection or TOTAL 1,264,780 1,950,633,543 $16,759,617 €12,167,203 through knowledge the goods in the consignment are often reclassified and Source: (Currency conversions use historical currency rates.) maybe into several tarif numbers.”46 TABLE 3. Japanese Import Statistics - whale products imported from Iceland Whale meat Marine mammal fat/oil and Total whale Total value HS Code 020840011 fractions thereof (blubber) product HS Code 150430090 Month of import Kilos Value Kilos Value Kilos (1000 yen) US$ Euro (1000 yen) (1000 yen) 2008 - October 66,573 120,651 0 0 66,573 120,651 1,137,653 809,329 2008 - December 0 0 13,866 51,605 13,866 51,605 550,846 436,073 2010 - June 33,405 32,460 68,802 163,257 102,207 195,717 2,146,783 1,749,940 2010 - July 21,600 21,964 64,740 95,525 86,340 117,489 1,344,347 1,078,825 2010 - September 109,104 100,504 19,490 48,725 128,594 149,229 1,766,237 1,378,382 2010 - November 255,000 322,312 0 0 255,000 322,312 3,995,375 2,877,401 2011 - January 86,400 72,378 43,173 77,552 129,573 149,930 1,847,566 1,379,759 2011 - May 64,425 131,083 79,892 105,825 144,317 236,908 2,922,599 2,026,066 TOTAL 636,507 801,352 289,963 542,489 926,470 1,343,841 $15,711,406 € 11,735,776 Source: (Currency conversions use historical currency rates.)6
  • FIN WHALE TRADE INVESTIGATIONA two-and-a-half week undercover the Japanese market and that the initialinvestigation by EIA in Japan during reluctance of some traders to potentiallyFebruary and March 2011 revealed that reduce the market for Japanese whaleHvalur has secured a market in Japan products has been overcome.and established a relatively stable whalemeat import business, with strong Miyagipotential to expand. EIA spoke with the President of Kinoya company, one of the largest whaleEIA interviewed about 20 wholesalers, canning companies in Japan. He toldmiddle traders and processing companies EIA that Icelandic fin whale formedin seven areas of Japan either known to about three per cent of his product significant whale-consuming regions He confirmed that the importing companyor advertising whale meat online: Iwate, had been set up at the request of peopleMiyagi, Tokyo, Osaka, Wakayama, in Iceland. He further stated that thereHyogo and Shimonoseki. was a problem with the quality of the meat, and they would not necessarilyEIA investigators identified the company continue with what he termed “animporting Iceland’s fin whale products experiment”. Kinoya company canningand conducted a series of recorded facilities were severely affected byinterviews with a director of the the about the trade. OsakaSeveral major traders who bought In Osaka north wholesale fishmarket,Icelandic fin whale products told EIA several traders were selling Icelandic finthey sourced it direct from the importing whale red meat in one kg boxes producedcompany. Many indicated there was just by a company called Tonichi in Otsuchi,one importer and several mentioned that Iwate. The whale meat was supplied tothe importing company had been set up them via the Uoichi wholesale companyas a favour to the Icelandic whaling which supplies the various Osaka-basedcompany, Hvalur. Eventually, a major wholesale markets. One Osaka trader,trader in Hyogo gave EIA the name Tanabe, which was selling a largeand contact details of the importing number of boxes of Icelandic fin whale,company, which allowed EIA to obtain stated that large whales species werefirst-hand information on the import of more popular than smaller whales, andIcelandic fin whale products. noted that Japan was not catching many large whales.It became clear during the investigationthat while some traders were sourcing In Osaka central fishmarket, Hiraidirect from the importing company, Shouten company said althoughothers were sourcing Icelandic fin whale Icelandic fin whale had been circulatingvia Kyodo Senpaku, including Tsukiji for two years, it had only just startedfishmarket-based Toushoku. Toushoku is buying it, at the request of some of itsJapan’s largest intermediary wholesaler customers who had seen it on sale inwith an estimated 30-40 per cent share other places. It purchased Icelandic finof Japan’s wholesale whale meat market.47 whale from several wholesalers, including BELOW:Several traders predicted that Kyodo Uoichi company. It said the fin whale Boxes of Icelandic finSenpaku could become more involved in was not that popular but was cheap, whale meat on sale inthe trade, and perhaps start to import and that the quality of the meat was a Osaka wholesale fishmarket.directly from Iceland. The fact that theAntarctic whaling fleet had just returnedearly with only a few hundred whaleswas mentioned by traders in predicting amore profitable future for the Icelandicfin whale trade.Traders repeatedly told EIA thatIcelandic fin whale was being soldcheaply and that it could becomepopular since fin whale is widely viewedas the most desirable whale speciesamong consumers in Japan. Manytraders noted serious concerns with thequality of the meat however, andindicated that some of the meat had tobe thrown away. Despite this, theinvestigation concluded that fin whale © EIAfrom Iceland is increasingly available in 7
  • problem because it was not frozen on he had to throw it away. Despite this, fin board the ship. whale is considered a premium product and still sells; he said: “…most of the Iwate whales Japan catches nowadays are minke. EIA visited the Tonichi factory in Iwate That is why Icelandic whale can compete (located in Otsuchi port) as it had been against Japanese whale”. He confirmed identified as the processor of the that Kyodo Senpaku is trading in some Icelandic fin whale meat on sale in large Icelandic fin whale, purchased from the quantities in Osaka. The manager of the importing company. He predicted that factory was unwilling to discuss its Kyodo Senpaku might get more deeply business and referred EIA to its involved in the future. Tokyo-based headquarters. When EIA visited the Tokyo headquarters, the Shimonoseki representative denied any knowledge of Four traders were selling whale products whale products, and initially referred at the Karato wholesale fishmarket in© EIA EIA to the Iwate-based factory. He then Shimonoseki when EIA visited. The agreed to ask the owner to call EIA, but seller at Fujino Shoten company, the ABOVE: no call was ever received and EIA was largest in terms of floor space, told EIA Icelandic fin whale and other unable to contact the owner directly. he had purchased 300kg of Icelandic fin whale two years before, but had thrown whale products on sale in Wakayama 100-200kg away because it was bad Tsukiji fishmarket. In general Wakayama based traders quality. He further stated that he could were unwilling to speak about the whale never sell the meat as sashimi (i.e. for trade at all, most likely due to the consuming raw). controversial dolphin hunting situation in Taiji. Four Wakayama based traders EIA interviewed the President of (three in Taiji) with whom EIA spoke Marukou company, which is the only said they could buy Icelandic fin whale large whale wholesaler left in from the Taiji development local Shimonoseki. Marukou employs 70 government cooperative, however they people and deals mostly with whale did not know or did not want to say products but has diversified to include where the whale meat originated. some fish species. Marukou sells whale Two traders suggested it was from from scientific research (purchased Kyodo Senpaku, but this could not from Kyodo Senpaku) but also Japanese be confirmed. coastal whaling. He said Icelandic fin whale had gradually started to circulate Hyogo in Japan but complained about the EIA interviewed the President of quality, stating that he could not know Marugei company, a major processing if it was good or bad quality until the firm based in Himeji which sells to meat was defrosted. Overall the Tokyo and other central fishmarkets as Marukou President did not see Icelandic well as other trading companies. The fin whale as a stable business (due to President gave EIA the name and the quality problem, and because address of the importing company and Iceland wanted to join the ‘anti-whaling’ told EIA that all Icelandic fin whale was European Union); he suggested that if imported by the same company. Marugei the trade became bigger then Kyodo started selling Icelandic fin whale in Senpaku would be “the most proper 2010 and was selling frozen red meat company” to manage everything. and bacon products. Marugei showed EIA a supply form detailing the various Tokyo different cuts available for sale, Toshoku is Japan’s largest whale including 24,081 boxes of H2 (fatty meat middle trader, with an estimated 30-40 off the bone), 11,891 boxes of R2 (red per cent share of the ¥5,000 million meat) and 7,170 boxes of R1 (red meat, ($60 million) whale meat wholesale premium grade) – each box containing business. Sales of the company are 15kg of product. Blubber was also on about ¥1.1 billion ($13 million). The the list of available products. sales director with whom EIA spoke in Tsukiji fishmarket described them as The President of Marugei predicted “Japanese number one”. When EIA visited that sales of Icelandic fin whale could Toshoku in March 2011 it was selling increase given that the Antarctic fleet Icelandic fin whale. had just returned with fewer than 200 whales. He said Icelandic whale meat Like other traders, Toshoku said the was cheaper than Japanese whale meat, quality of Icelandic fin whale was bad there were fewer costs associated with and that the whale meat was cheaper whaling in Iceland than in Japan and many than Japanese whale meat. Toshoku shops were already selling the product. sources its Icelandic fin whale from Kyodo Senpaku, not directly from the The President said the quality of the importer. The trader mentioned that Icelandic whale meat was “very, very bullets had been found in the Icelandic low” and that he didn’t pay for it when fin whale meat when it was being cut. 8
  • MISAKA TRADING – CREATED Directors, he is routinely consulted on the company’s decisions, including theTO IMPORT AN ENDANGERED price at which it sells the fin whaleSPECIES products. He said: “The price cannot be decided without talking to KristjánDuring its investigation, EIA was told Loftsson”. The Director also said finby the President of Marugei that the whale meat was becoming popular andimporting company connected to the mentioned that the Antarctic fleet’sHvalur whale trade was Misaka Shoji early return meant that the amount of(Misaka Trading), a small company with whale meat in Japan was reduced, whichfour or five people based in Yokohama. had a positive effect on his sales.His associate telephoned a representativeof Misaka Trading, Mr Tejima, asking Mr Sakaguchi said that setting up hadhim to speak with the EIA investigators. been challenging as his company had toMr Tejima was unwilling to speak over get permission from the Fisheriesthe telephone, and the President of Agency, the Ministry of Economy, TradeMarugei later explained that Mr Tejima and Industry and from Customs in additionhad received negative publicity in to numerous expensive whale productthe past and was unlikely to talk to tests (e.g. DNA, mercury, PCBs, bacteria)any media. and a five per cent customs tax. Later, during a call in May 2011, the DirectorAccording to records held by the of Misaka Trading stated that theMinistry of Justice in Yokohama, Misaka Icelandic company [Hvalur] paid forTrading Co. Ltd. was established on all the import costs and sold on aJune 5, 2009 with capital of ¥2.5 million consignment basis. He said: “until the($30,000) in order to carry out the products are sold, everything is belongingimport and export of seafood and to Iceland. The meat and everything”. BELOW:domestic sales. It has two Board Office of Misaka Trading.Directors with two further Directors In March 2011 Mr Sakaguchi confirmedwho resigned in April 2010. Although that Misaka Trading had imported about BOTTOM:Mr Tejima is not listed on the company 700 tonnes, but “many more is coming”. Icelandic whale export statisticsrecords, he is listed as a Director of Asia He said there was approximately 250 in March and April 2011.Trading Company, which was previously tonnes stockpiled in Japan, with aidentified by Greenpeace as the company further 2,500 tonnes in Iceland. Thiswhich imported about 80 tonnes of indicated to EIA that approximately 450Icelandic fin whale in 2008. It appears tonnes had already been sold. In Maythat Mr Tejima has continued his 2011, Mr Sakaguchi confirmed it hadinvolvement with the importation of sold roughly 500 tonnes of fin whaleIcelandic fin whale, but the operation meat to the Japanese market.has moved to a new set up. Accordingto the President of Marugei, Mr Tejima Mr Sakaguchi estimated Misakawas “working substantially like the Trading is making a profit ofcompany representative”. approximately one to 1.5 million yen per tonne of fin whale productEIA visited the registered address of (US$12,320 – $18,480 per tonne).Misaka Trading, a small residential Taking the average of these twoproperty in a suburb of Yokohama, figures, this would equate to a profitbut was unable to speak with any of US$7.7 million from the 500 tonnesrepresentative of the company. sold so far, with a potential profit ofEventually EIA was able to hold a $38.7 million from the estimated © EIAseries of telephone calls with Mr 2,500 tonnes stockpiled in Iceland.Sakaguchi, a Director of MisakaTrading, from which it received thefollowing information.Mr Sakaguchi said that he and fourfriends had set up the company in June2009 to import fin whale because hewas asked to by Kristján Loftsson. Oneof his friends had previously worked forMaruha – Japan’s largest whalingcompany before the ban on whaling –and had been involved in the Icelandictrade. Mr Sakaguchi said that KristjánLoftsson helped financially withoperating costs and he confirmed thatMisaka Trading was the only companyimporting whale meat from Iceland. © HagstofaThe Director said that although KristjánLoftsson is not on the Board of 9
  • number are now using the internet to promote the sale of a variety of products, from whale kebabs to minke whale carpaccio.52 HVALUR’S AMBITIONS FOR NEW WHALE PRODUCTS AND MARKETS With a population of just over 300,000, Iceland’s domestic market for whale meat is small and it has always been a major exporter of whale meat and other whale products, mainly to Japan. Today its commercial ambitions are expanding; Hvalur hf, which produced and exported WHALE SALES ONLINE whale meal (for animal feed), whale oil, meat and blubber throughout the 1980s,© EIA began contemplating a return to large scale whaling and trade in whale products Prior to the investigation, EIA Japanese well in advance of its rejoining the IWC. ABOVE: researchers looked at the accessibility Hvalur first applied for permission to Canned Icelandic fin whale, of Icelandic fin whale online in Japan operate a cold storage food facility in sold online by Amazon Japan. and found wide availability through a Hafnarfjõrður in 2000 and permission number of online shopping and auction was granted by the town council some sites, including Yahoo! and Amazon, as six years in advance of Iceland’s return well as via websites of known whale to commercial fin whaling.53 traders. A variety of products were available, mostly red meat and bacon. The company also applied for and was Companies selling Icelandic fin whale granted permits in 2007 to expand its were predominantly based in Osaka, whaling operations, including the Tokyo and Wakayama. construction of a boiler house at its Hvalfjörður whaling station. A further A comparison of costs at the retail end Hvalur application to health authorities is difficult because prices for whale meat was submitted in June 2009 for a license vary greatly depending on the different for the operation of meat cutting,packaging parts of the whale. Although most traders and storage of food. This license was said it was being sold cheaply, it is not approved for a 12-year period.54 clear if the low prices are being passed Managing Director Kristján Loftsson has onto customers in Japan, although indicated an interest in processing both Icelandic fin whale is often sold in whale oil and ground bone into meal55 mixed product offers alongside minke, and in 2010, Hvalur admitted processing Bryde’s and sei whale from Japan’s whale oil into shipping fuel for its whaling and therefore at the same price. whaling vessels.56 Icelands whaling In large quantities (5kg plus), fin whale industry still has both the knowledge was selling as cheaply as ¥210/100g and infrastructure needed to (($26/kg), while the price for normal manufacture animal feed from whale products. An April 2010 presentation consumers (100-400g) tended to be on regional development by the Icelandic higher, at about ¥1000/100g for lean Government suggested developing meat and ¥1,400/100g for bacon "whale products" including whale meat, ($125-175/kg). The best cuts, such as meal, oil and blubber,57 and recommended marbled meat, sell for more than the formation of an industrial park in ¥4000/100g ($500/kg).48 Hvalfjörður where the fin whaling station is located. Icelands Statistical Whale meat sales have also recently Bureau reported two exports of almost taken to the internet in Iceland. Pickled 23 tonnes of whale meal to Denmark in fin whale meat in 300g cans is being 2009 although the Icelandic Fisheries offered for sale via the internet site Ministry swiftly characterised the report of the Icelandic Minke Whalers as a “clerical error”.58 Association (Hrefnuveiðimanna ehf) at a cost of 2998 ISK/kg (US$25.87/kg). In March of 2011, the Norwegian The site advertises minke whale steaks Fishery and Aquaculture Industry and smoked minke whale meat.49 Research Fund (FHF) published a Iceland’s second minke whaling company, notification of a project entitled Útgerðarfélagið Fjörður ehf, also ‘Improved utilisation of marine advertises whale meat,50 while other resources: testing of back and belly companies which have sold whale meat blubber from minke whales for the online in Iceland include Esja Kjötvinnsla production of omega-3 oils.’ The and Kjarnafædi.51 A recent WDCS survey notification speaks of the commercial of Icelandic restaurants, shops and potential for whale oil, and states, “In catering firms showed that an increasing addition, there is a possibility to source10
  • blubber from the Icelandic and Faroese years, with exports of hundreds offleet if this is of interest. Some simple tonnes of whale meat to Japan, Latviacalculations estimate that the minimum and the Faroe Islands, in addition tocritical size of a facility for crude oil several shipments of whale oil toproduction and refining should have a Norway and Belarus, and ‘other frozencapacity of approximately 500 tonnes products’ to Japan. Using its reservationper day.”59 to the CITES Appendix I listing of whales, Iceland has engaged in legalLACK OF OVERSIGHT FOR whale product trade with non-Parties to CITES,61 and with Parties to CITESICELAND’S WHALING which also have reservations to the Appendix 1 listing of fin and minkePROGRAMME whales,62 but it has also traded illegally.While HAFRO has taken biological In 2004, an Icelandic company soughtsamples from the whales hunted, an initial export permit for ten tonnes ofinspectors from Iceland’s Directorate sei, fin and minke whale products to beof Fisheries (Fiskistofa) were present on sent to China via both Hong Kong andonly two minke whaling and four fin Macau. A subsequent permit, apparentlywhaling trips in 2010 and directly requested after Iceland revised itsobserved only the killing of three out of special permit whaling plan, sought to60 minke whales and six out of 148 fin export 10 tonnes of minke whalewhales (the killing of a further two products to China. The Icelandicminke whales and three fin whales were company Pelastikk hf was initiallyobserved by NAMMCO inspectors). granted the permit, but because ChinaFisheries inspectors only visited does not hold CITES reservations forIceland’s fin whaling station to observe whales, permission was rescinded.compliance with whaling regulations This resulted in a court case in whichtwice in 2010 and it is not known Pelastikk successfully sued the Icelandicwhether inspectors visited minke Government, winning 1.5 million ISKwhaling landing locations and processing (US$19,349) in compensation in 2008.63facilities at all.60 Although this case should have sensitised the Government to CITESICELAND’S EXPANDING rules, Iceland has subsequentlyINTERNATIONAL TRADE exported whale products (meat and oil) in violation of CITES to both LatviaIceland’s trade in whale products has (minke) and Belarus (species notincreased dramatically in the past three known), neither of which hold TABLE 4. Iceland fin whale products on sale in Japan Product name Product Quantity Price Species Company name selling price (¥) (g) (¥/100g) product and weblink Whales lean meat 1,155 100 1,155 Fin Whale from Iceland. 有限会社 高木 (Takagi) Whales mixed meat 5,980 500 1,196 Fin Whale from Iceland. 有限会社 高木 (Takagi) Whales bacon 9,450 700 1,350 Fin Whale from Iceland. 株式会社 はなまる生活 (Hanamaru-Seikatu Co., Ltd.) Whales tail meat 10,500 300 3,500 Minke, Sei and Bryde’s Whale 株式会社ルイアンヌ(Ruiannu Co., Ltd.) in research whaling in Japan. tsuhan-o/t82131.html Fin Whale from Iceland. Whales lean meat 10,500 5000 210 Fin Whale from Iceland. 株式会社ルイアンヌ(Ruiannu Co., Ltd.) Whales marbled meat 4,200 100 4,200 Fin Whale from Iceland 株式会社 日野商店 (Hino-shoten Co., Ltd.) toku-2/#nagasu-onomi-toku-2 Whales bacon 4,725 320 1,477 Fin Whale from Iceland. 株式会社マルヒロ (Maruhiro Co., Ltd.) Whales breast meat 8,980 3000 299 Minke, Sei and Bryde’s Whale 株式会社 守破理 (Syuhari Co., Ltd.) in research whaling in Japan. Fin Whale from Iceland. Whales lean meat 1,155 100 1,155 Fin Whale from Iceland. 有限会社 高木 (Takagi) Whales bacon 9,800 500 1,960 Minke, Sei and Bryde’s Whale 有限会社 (ARC) in research whaling in Japan. Fin Whale from Iceland. 11
  • “as the whale meat had not yet been sold it was removed from shop counters.”67 The Latvian export, reported under the Icelandic code for frozen whale meat (Icelandic code 02084001) took place in January of 2010, and coincides with the export of 134 tonnes of ‘other frozen whale products’ (Icelandic code 02084002) to Japan. Icelandic exports of frozen whale meat (believed to be minke) to the Faroe Islands, part of the Danish Kingdom but treated as a non-Party to the CITES Convention, took place in August 2010© WDCS (250kg) and October 2010 (400kg).68 This also coincided with the exports of ABOVE: reservations to the CITES Appendix 1 ‘other frozen whale products’ to Japan. HB Grandi fish meal silos, Akranes. listings. These exports are therefore Also in October 2010, an illegal export illegal. The export of 250kg of frozen of 889kg of ‘hvallýsi’ or whale oil whale meat to Latvia in January 201064 (Icelandic code 15043001) to Belarus raises particularly important questions was reported.69 as to the control of trade in whale products in the European Union (EU). Iceland reported several exports of A spokesperson for the Latvian Food whale oil to Norway in 2008 (totalling 105kg) and 2009 (totalling 303kg). and Veterinary Authority (PVD) stated However a search of the Norwegian that as Iceland is a European Free Statistic Bureau (SSB) database for the Trade Association (EFTA) member, the years 2007 onward showed no imports PVD does not have to carry out cargo of either whale meat or whale oil from checks and as such was “not aware of Iceland. The SSB did, however, record whether and how much whale meat from imports of ‘marine mammal oils, Iceland had entered Latvia.”65 excluding sperm oil, not for animal feed’ from Iceland under the HS code Iceland’s Ministry of Fisheries admitted 15043099 in February 2010 (169kg) that the Icelandic company involved and April 2010 (30kg). “had shipped 250 kilos of minky [sic] whale meat to Latvia along with the The SSB database also shows a large required official CITES export certificate import of marine mammal products from Iceland,” and that it would be from Iceland in October 2010 under “illegal for Latvian authorities to issue the code 15043021 (‘Fat of marine required CITES import certificate for the mammals and fractions thereof, not for shipment.”66 Rita Jakoleva, a spokesperson animal feed’). The quantity given was a for the Latvian Nature Conservation substantial 22,360kg,70 however no Authority (Dabas aizsardziības parvalde, corresponding export of any whale or DAP), said that DAP had granted marine mammal product to Norway has permission to a company to import and as yet been found in Iceland’s statistical sell the whale meat from Iceland, and database. It is unclear if this export is that the trade had gone ahead, but that whale-related. REQUIRED ACTIONS BY THE US AND EU In December 2010, a petition filed by WDCS on behalf of 19 conservation and animal welfare groups representing millions of citizens, urged US authorities to bring into force conservation legislation known as the Pelly Amendment against Iceland. This would authorise the President to impose trade sanctions against Iceland for undermining the effectiveness of recognised international conservation agreements. The petition exposed the Hvalur company’s ties via complex shareholdings, board memberships and investments to some of Iceland’s leading companies, and provided the US Government with the information necessary to implement targeted sanctions. By taking strong action against Iceland, not only will the Obama Administration live up to its promises to strengthen the commercial whaling moratorium, but it will also help to ensure a real future for the IWC. In 2009, following the collapse of its economy, Iceland applied to join the EU. Iceland’s EU accession negotiations provide a unique opportunity to end Iceland’s whaling and trade in whale products for good. Although EU Directive 92/43/EEC (the Habitats Directive) prohibits “all forms of deliberate capture or killing” of whales, as well as sales of whale products in the EU, it provides an opportunity for member states to ‘derogate’, under defined conditions, from the Directive’s prohibitions. It is therefore crucial that EU Member States take a zero-tolerance position to Iceland’s whaling and trade in the negotiation of its accession, to ensure that Iceland does not take a derogation. WDCS and EIA commend the Dutch and German Parliaments for passing Resolutions in 2010 stating that Icelandic whaling would be unacceptable under EU law, and urge all other EU countries that are members of the IWC to take similar action.12
  • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis report provides an overwhelming case for a further export took place in April 2011, after theimmediate and decisive action to stop Iceland’s tsunami. Even without setting sail this summer,whaling and trade. EIA’s investigation has shown that Hvalur is sitting on a 2,500 tonne stockpile inIceland’s fin whaling company, Hvalur, has overcome Iceland for which it continues to seek new marketsinitial suspicion from Japanese traders and now has a and new products.relatively strong Japanese distribution network forfin whale products, in part through Kyodo Senpaku It is too soon to tell how the tsunami and itswhich has started to sell Icelandic fin whale to some consequences will impact Japan’s whaling in themajor traders. While there are clearly problems with long-term, but it is clear that Japan’s Antarcticthe quality of Iceland’s fin whale meat, it is still being whaling is at its lowest point for decades and itdistributed and sold. This is predominantly due to low remains unclear whether it will be revived in theprices set by Kristján Loftsson, because fin whale is short-term. Although demand for whale meat isseen as special by Japanese traders and customers, falling overall in Japan, the fin whale continues toand because Japan has not realised its own be the most sought-after species. Even if demandself-allocated quota of fin whales in recent years. remains low by historical standards, the market forSeveral major whale traders in Japan predicted that whale meat in Japan remains large enough to absorbKyodo Senpaku could get further involved in the several hundred or more fin whales from IcelandIcelandic trade and may even begin to import whale each year.meat directly from Iceland. It is clear that Kristján Loftsson is intent on securingIn March 2011, Japan suffered a terrible earthquake a market for an endangered species in Japan,and tsunami, with unprecedented suffering, loss of gambling on the potential of huge long-term and damage to coastal infrastructure. At least two The consequences could be disastrous for fin whaleswhale trading companies based in Iwate and Miyagi in the North Atlantic.which were identified in the EIA investigation as keyto Loftsson’s operation were irreparably damaged. Given the ever-increasing hunts and expanding ´After a trip to Japan in April, Kristjan Loftsson international trade, it is unacceptable that the IWCreported that he would postpone the whaling season. has no stated position on Iceland’s fin and minke whaling. The time for silence and appeasementWhile the fin whale hunt may have been delayed this has passed. WDCS and EIA look to the IWC, and to © WDCS/Nicola Hodginsseason, Hvalur’s exports of whale products continue. the US and EU in particular, to make the end of allThe single largest export since the commercial Icelandic whaling and whale trade a political prioritywhaling ban was imposed occurred in March 2011 and in 2011. 13
  • REFERENCES1. Altherr, S. (2003) Iceland’s Whaling Comeback: 27. 43. Icelandic codes: Preparations for the Resumption of Commercial 28. 02084001 - frozen whale meat (fryst hvalkjöt) Whaling. Report for Pro Wildlife, Whale and Dolphin daily_news/Japan_Crisis_Disrupts_Iceland%E2% 02084002 – other frozen whale products (aðrar Conservation Society and Humane Society of the frystar hvalaafurðir) United States. 16 pp. 29. Ástand nytjastofna á Íslandsmiðum 2010/2011A 02084003 Fresh whale meat (nýtt hvalkjöt) og2. EIA (1985): “Pirate whaling 1985 and a history of flahorfur fiskveiðiárið 2011/2012: Hvalir at adrar hvalaaf the subversion of international whaling In addition ´ 15043001 - whale oil (hvallysi) regulations”, London. to a quota of minke whales in Icelandic waters, 23011001 - whale meal (hvalamjöl).3. Blue, fin, sei, Bryde’s, minke, sperm, gray, right, there is a reference to a possible kill of minke Japanese codes: humpback and bowhead whales. whales off Jan Mayen in the NorthEast Atlanric. 020840011 – meat & edible meat offal, fresh, chilled4. Japan later withdrew its objections. (the CM area). or frozen – whales5. Article VIII, International Convention for the 30. Day, David (1987) The Whale War. Taylor & Francis, 150430010 – fats & oils and their fractions of Regulation of Whaling pp. 29–32 and Hvalur hf. Ársreikningur1/10 2008 - marine mammal - whale oil6. Marine Research Institute (1985): “Introductory 30/9 2009 150430090 – fats & oils and their fractions of meeting on whale research in Iceland and plans for 31. Eigið fé Hvalssamstæðunnar 13 milljarðar króna. marine mammal – other intensified research in the period 1986 to 1989”, Vidskiptabladid.19.06.10. and Hrunið hafði lítil áhrif 44. Anon Pers. Comm. with Fisheries Agency of Japan, 16th August, Reykjavik. á Hval, Vidskiptabladid 01.07.2010. June 2011.7. see supranote 1 and Table 1. 32. 45. IWC 1986-Appendix 2. Resolution on Special Permits omxinews/?NewsID=33105&orderbookid=35457 data/i201104e_15.htm and confirmed by face to face for Scientific Research meeting of EIA with Tokyo customs officials9. Ros Reeve, 1991. Icelandic Pirate Whaling 1991 – profile/?id=24826#korta 46. Bjarni Sverrisson, Tollfulltrúi, Tollstjóri, pers. Illegal whale meat exports and history of Iceland’s 33. Hampidjan hf. Samandreginn árshlutareikningur Comm. 8 February 2011. pirate whaling record. Report by the Environmental samstæðu 30. júní 2010 48 Tilkynning útgefanda 47. Teikoku Databank, corporate report on Toshukuryo Investigation Agency. verðbréfa um fruminnherja. Hampidjan. skil nr. Service Kabushiki Kaisha10. see for example 6349. 25 November 2010. FME: The Financial 48. See Table 4 in document for references 1989-01-19/news/8901200070_1_burger-king- Supervisory Authority of Iceland. 49. greenpeace-icelandic-fish 34. categoryid/45/default.aspx11. IWC Resolution 1995-9 ?grein_id=1139198 a full analysis of Hvalur/HB 50. Útgerðarfélagið Fjörður ehf12. IWC Resolution 1987-1 Grandi links available upon request 51. IWC Resolution 1987-1 35. In 2004, Hvalur Group’s Kristján Loftsson and Arni Product/766 and www.esja.is14. IWC Resolution 1995-9 Vilhjalmsson, in their capacities as HB Grandi 52. see as at supranote 3915. see supranote 1 representatives, hosted representatives of the 53. The following countries formally objected to Chilean company Friosur (Grandi has been associated fundargerd_nanar/?ec_item_9_id=2773dacb-e002- Icelands reservation by notifying the depository with Friosur since 1992). The meeting included a 422b-bd45-b2fc17a8b4fb government (USA): Argentina, Australia, Brazil, meal on board the Hvalur 9, one of the four 54. Chile, Finland, France, Germany, Monaco, Hvalur company vessels, where whale meat was ?id=1145132514&cat_id=1 Netherlands, Peru, Portugal, San Marino, Spain, served. “Samstarfsadsilar fra Chile I heimsokn”, 55. Sweden, UK, USA. Italy, Mexico and New Zealand Grandi news 28.07.04. &tre_rod=009%7C001%7C&tId=2&FRE_ID=85133 objected to the reservation and noted that they do islenska/Default.spsid_id=21907&tId=99&fre_ id= &Meira=1 not consider the Convention as being in force 14531&meira=1 56. between their countries and Iceland. 36. “Hvalur hf. Afli naudsynlegra vinnsluleya”, tilraunir_med_ad_nota_hvallysi_a_hvalveidiskipin/ Skessurhorn 19.10.06. Grandi confirmed the rental 57. of its processing facilities to Havlur in an interview 8-Vesturland.pdf articles/nr/143 with Intrafish on 12 April 2007. Leitt yfir mannskapnum 58. IWC Resolution 2003-2 í hvalkjötsvinnslu”, Visir. 2 July 2009 and the same articles/nr/999819. facility is mentioned as being used for the processing 59. articles/nr/808 of the fin whale meat in 2010: =prosjekter&subpage=&detail=1&id=1218&gid=120. IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. hvalveidarnar-hofust-i-nott/article/2010889431418. 60. Fiskistofa Starfsskýrsla 2010, pp 18-19 Version 2010.4. <>. 37. It is possible to view photos of the processing of fin CITES Notification No. 2006/062 whale meat at the website of the Akranes Trade 2010.pdf22. Iceland’s commercial and scientific whaling Union. In addition to the Hb Grandi logo in clear 61. The Faroe Islands programs overlapped in 2006 and 2007. view, in certain shots it is possible to see boxes 62. Japan and Norway23. Iceland was a member of a “Small Working Group labelled in Japanese; photos of these same boxes 63. on the Future of the IWC” that was established in can be seen on Japanese websites offering faer_baetur_vegna_hrefnukjots_sem_ekki_var_ June 2008 and charged with “assisting the Icelandic whale meat for sale, and the Hvalur name flutt_ut/ Commission to arrive at a consensus solution to the is visible. See 64. main issues it faces and thus to enable it to best Id=14282&tid=6&tre_Rod=010|&MpId=16816 65. fulfill its role with respect to the conservation of 38. latvija-ievesti-250-kg-vala-galas-219844 whale stocks and the management of whaling” as Grandi/Investors/Boardof-Directors-and- 66. see supranote 49 well as a smaller Support Group established in Management In addition to their links via Hvalur 67. 2009 charged with assisting the Chair in providing and HB Grandi, Loftsson and Vilhjalmsson are linked 68. direction to the reform process and in the preparation to Vogun 69. all Icelandic export information from of material for submission to the SWG. markets/omxinews/?NewsID=33105& screen shots of the information are available upon24. orderbookid=35457 and Venus request: Hagstofa appears to have removed the data articles/nr/9554 and http://eng.sjavarutveg pdf/XZ1055111.PDF the main shareholders inherited related to the Belarus 2010 export from its website the shares from their fathers, with no public explanation; the 2006 exports still25. Hafrannsóknastofnun, as for Table 1 39. remained, however, when accessed on 29 June 2011.26. hrefnuveidum_lokid/ ; and 70. all Norwegian data sourced at and 1063268512339.html ; screen shots are available upon request articles/2003/09/11/1063268512339.html ; visiting_iceland.php 40. MainBody,21160,en.htm and https://www.iceland ALeqM5iDeHrenc0y4OmXfZBhU6pQpzADHQ 41. WDCS_Governments_Call_On_Iceland_to_Stop_ trade/Exports 42.