ENTERPRISE PROGRAMMING Distributed DBMSs - Concepts and Design

DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS Concepts. Advantages and disadvantages of distributed databases. Functions and architecture for a DDBMS. Distributed database design. Levels of transparency. Comparison criteria for DDBMSs.

Concepts.

Advantages and disadvantages of distributed databases.

Functions and architecture for a DDBMS.

Distributed database design.

Levels of transparency.

Comparison criteria for DDBMSs.

Concepts Distributed Database A logically interrelated collection of shared data (and a description of this data), physically distributed over a computer network. Distributed DBMS Software system that permits the management of the distributed database and makes the distribution transparent to users.

Distributed Database

A logically interrelated collection of shared data (and a description of this data), physically distributed over a computer network.

Distributed DBMS

Software system that permits the management of the distributed database and makes the distribution transparent to users.

Concepts Collection of logically-related shared data. Data split into fragments. Fragments may be replicated. Fragments/replicas allocated to sites. Sites linked by a communications network. Data at each site is under control of a DBMS. DBMSs handle local applications autonomously. Each DBMS participates in at least one global application.

Collection of logically-related shared data.

Data split into fragments.

Fragments may be replicated.

Fragments/replicas allocated to sites.

Sites linked by a communications network.

Data at each site is under control of a DBMS.

DBMSs handle local applications autonomously.

Each DBMS participates in at least one global application.

CONCEPTS LOCAL APPLICATION Those that do not require data from other sites. GLOBAL APPLICATION Those that do require data from other sites.

LOCAL APPLICATION

Those that do not require data from other sites.

GLOBAL APPLICATION

Those that do require data from other sites.

STRUCTURE OF DISTRIBUTED DATABASE A distributed database system consists of a collection of sites, each of which maintain a local database system. Each site is able to process local transactions, those transactions that access data only in a single site In addition a site may participate in the execution of global transactions, those transaction that access data in several sites. The execution of global transactions requires communication along the sites.

A distributed database system consists of a collection of sites, each of which maintain a local database system.

Each site is able to process local transactions, those transactions that access data only in a single site

In addition a site may participate in the execution of global transactions, those transaction that access data in several sites. The execution of global transactions requires communication along the sites.

STRUCTURE OF THE DISTRIBUTED DATABASES The sites in the system can be connected physically in a variety of ways. The major differences among these configurations involve: Installation cost: The cost of physically linking the site Communication Cost : - The cost in time and money from sending a message from site A to site B Reliability : The frequency with which a link or site fails Availability : The degree to which data can be accessed despite the failure of some links or sites.

The sites in the system can be connected physically in a variety of ways.

The major differences among these configurations involve:

Installation cost: The cost of physically linking the site

Communication Cost : - The cost in time and money from sending a message from site A to site B

Reliability : The frequency with which a link or site fails

Availability : The degree to which data can be accessed despite the failure of some links or sites.

Distributed DBMS © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005

Illustration of concepts Consider Stanchart banking system consisting of four (4) branches located in Accra, Takoradi, Kumasi and Sunyani. Each branch has its own computer with a database consisting of accounts maintained at that branch. Each such installation is a site. There exists one single site (headquarters, ACCRA) which maintains information about all branches.

Consider Stanchart banking system consisting of four (4) branches located in Accra, Takoradi, Kumasi and Sunyani.

Each branch has its own computer with a database

consisting of accounts maintained at that branch.

Each such installation is a site.

There exists one single site (headquarters, ACCRA) which maintains information about all branches.

Illustration of concepts Each branch maintains (among others) a relation deposit ( Deposit-Scheme ) where: Deposit-Scheme = (branch-name, account- number, customer-name, balance) The site containing information about the four branches maintains the relation branch (Branch-scheme), where: Branch-scheme = (branch-name, assets, branch-city) There are other relations which are ignored for purposes of our example.

Each branch maintains (among others) a relation deposit ( Deposit-Scheme ) where:

Deposit-Scheme = (branch-name, account- number, customer-name, balance)

The site containing information about the four branches maintains the relation branch (Branch-scheme), where:

Branch-scheme = (branch-name, assets, branch-city)

There are other relations which are ignored for purposes of our example.

Illustration of concepts Consider the transaction to add GHC 50 to account number 177 located at Kumasi. If the transaction was initiated at Kumasi branch, then it is considered local; otherwise, it is considered global. A transaction to transfer GHC 50 from account 177 to account 305 , which is located at Takoradi Branch, is a global branch, since accounts in two different sites are accessed as a result of its execution.

Consider the transaction to add GHC 50 to account number 177 located at Kumasi. If the transaction was initiated at Kumasi branch, then it is considered local; otherwise, it is considered global.

A transaction to transfer GHC 50 from account 177 to account 305 , which is located at Takoradi Branch, is a global branch, since accounts in two different sites are accessed as a result of its execution.

Illustration of concepts What makes the example a distributed database system ? The four sites are aware of each other Each branch provides an environment for executing both local and global transactions. For now assume that each site is running the same distributed database management software.

What makes the example a distributed database system ?

The four sites are aware of each other

Each branch provides an environment for executing both local and global transactions.

For now assume that each site is running the same distributed database management software.

OBJECTIVES OF DISTRIBUTED DATABASE A major objective of distributed databases is to provide ease of access to data for users at many different locations. The distributed database system must provide what is called location transparency :- a user (or user program) using data need not know the location of the data. Ideally the user is unaware of the distribution of data, and all data in the network appear as single logical database stored at one site. In ideal case, a single query can join data from tables in multiple sites as if the data were all in one site.

A major objective of distributed databases is to provide ease of access to data for users at many different locations.

The distributed database system must provide what is called location transparency :- a user (or user program) using data need not know the location of the data.

Ideally the user is unaware of the distribution of data, and all data in the network appear as single logical database stored at one site. In ideal case, a single query can join data from tables in multiple sites as if the data were all in one site.

OBJECTIVE OF DISTRIBUTED DATABASE A second objective of distributed database is local autonomy. This is the capability to administer a local database and to operate independently when connection to other nodes have failed. Each site has the ability to control local data, administer security, log transactions, recover when local failures occur ad provide full access to local data to local users when any central or coordinating site cannot operate. There is no reliance on central site.

A second objective of distributed database is local autonomy. This is the capability to administer a local database and to operate independently when connection to other nodes have failed.

Each site has the ability to control local data, administer security, log transactions, recover when local failures occur ad provide full access to local data to local users when any central or coordinating site cannot operate.

There is no reliance on central site.

Distributed Processing A centralized database that can be accessed over a computer network.

A centralized database that can be accessed over a computer network.

Parallel DBMS A DBMS running across multiple processors and disks designed to execute operations in parallel, whenever possible, to improve performance. Based on premise that single processor systems can no longer meet requirements for cost-effective scalability, reliability, and performance. Parallel DBMSs link multiple, smaller machines to achieve same throughput as single, larger machine, with greater scalability and reliability.

A DBMS running across multiple processors and disks designed to execute operations in parallel, whenever possible, to improve performance.

Based on premise that single processor systems can no longer meet requirements for cost-effective scalability, reliability, and performance.

Parallel DBMSs link multiple, smaller machines to achieve same throughput as single, larger machine, with greater scalability and reliability.

Parallel DBMS Main architectures for parallel DBMSs are: Shared memory: Tightly coupled architecture in which multiple processors within a single system share system memory Shared disk: Is a loosely-coupled architecture optimized for applications that are inherently centralized and require high availability and performance. Shared disks are sometimes referred to as clusters. Shared nothing: Often known as massively parallel processing (MPP), is a multiple processor architecture in which each processor is part of a complete system, with its own memory and disk storage. The database is partitioned among all disks on each system associated with the database, and data is transparently available to users on all systems.

Main architectures for parallel DBMSs are:

Shared memory:

Tightly coupled architecture in which multiple processors within a single system share system memory

Shared disk:

Is a loosely-coupled architecture optimized for applications that are inherently centralized and require high availability and performance. Shared disks are sometimes referred to as clusters.

Shared nothing:

Often known as massively parallel processing (MPP), is a multiple processor architecture in which each processor is part of a complete system, with its own memory and disk storage. The database is partitioned among all disks on each system associated with the database, and data is transparently available to users on all systems.

Parallel DBMS (a) shared memory (b) shared disk (c) shared nothing © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005

(a) shared memory

(b) shared disk

(c) shared nothing

Advantages of DDBMSs Reflects organizational structure Improved shareability and local autonomy Improved availability Availability is the probability that the system is continuously available during a time interval. Improved reliability The probability that a system is running (not down) at certain point in time.

Reflects organizational structure

Improved shareability and local autonomy

Improved availability

Availability is the probability that the system is continuously available during a time interval.

Improved reliability

The probability that a system is running (not down) at certain point in time.

Advantages of DDBMS Improved performance Data is kept closer to where it is needed most. Data localization reduces the contention for CPU and I/O services and simultaneously reduces access delays involved in wide area networks. Smaller databases exist at each site. As a result, local queries and transactions accessing data at a single site have better performance because of the smaller databases. Interquery and intraquery parallelism can be achieved by executing multiple queries at different sites.

Improved performance

Data is kept closer to where it is needed most. Data localization reduces the contention for CPU and I/O services and simultaneously reduces access delays involved in wide area networks.

Smaller databases exist at each site. As a result, local queries and transactions accessing data at a single site have better performance because of the smaller databases.

Interquery and intraquery parallelism can be achieved by executing multiple queries at different sites.

Advantages of DDBMS Economics Modular growth Expansion of system in terms of adding more data, increasing database sizes or adding more processors is much easier.

Economics

Modular growth

Expansion of system in terms of adding more data, increasing database sizes or adding more processors is much easier.

Disadvantages of DDBMSs Complexity Cost Security Integrity control more difficult Lack of standards Lack of experience Database design more complex

Complexity

Cost

Security

Integrity control more difficult

Lack of standards

Lack of experience

Database design more complex

Types of DDBMS Homogeneous DDBMS Heterogeneous DDBMS

Homogeneous DDBMS

Heterogeneous DDBMS

Homogeneous DDBMS All sites use same DBMS product. Much easier to design and manage. Approach provides incremental growth and allows increased performance.

All sites use same DBMS product.

Much easier to design and manage.

Approach provides incremental growth and allows increased performance.

Heterogeneous DDBMS Sites may run different DBMS products, with possibly different underlying data models. Occurs when sites have implemented their own databases and integration is considered later. Translations required to allow for: Different hardware. Different DBMS products. Different hardware and different DBMS products. Typical solution is to use gateways .

Sites may run different DBMS products, with possibly different underlying data models.

Occurs when sites have implemented their own databases and integration is considered later.

Translations required to allow for:

Different hardware.

Different DBMS products.

Different hardware and different DBMS products.

Typical solution is to use gateways .

Open Database Access and Interoperability Open Group formed a Working Group to provide specifications that will create a database infrastructure environment where there is: Common SQL API that allows client applications to be written that do not need to know vendor of DBMS they are accessing. Common database protocol that enables DBMS from one vendor to communicate directly with DBMS from another vendor without the need for a gateway. A common network protocol that allows communications between different DBMSs.

Open Group formed a Working Group to provide specifications that will create a database infrastructure environment where there is:

Common SQL API that allows client applications to be written that do not need to know vendor of DBMS they are accessing.

Common database protocol that enables DBMS from one vendor to communicate directly with DBMS from another vendor without the need for a gateway.

A common network protocol that allows communications between different DBMSs.

Open Database Access and Interoperability Most ambitious goal is to find a way to enable transaction to span DBMSs from different vendors without use of a gateway. Group has now evolved into DBIOP Consortium and are working in version 3 of DRDA (Distributed Relational Database Architecture) standard.

Most ambitious goal is to find a way to enable transaction to span DBMSs from different vendors without use of a gateway.

Group has now evolved into DBIOP Consortium and are working in version 3 of DRDA (Distributed Relational Database Architecture) standard.

Multidatabase System (MDBS) DDBMS in which each site maintains complete autonomy. DBMS that resides transparently on top of existing database and file systems and presents a single database to its users. Allows users to access and share data without requiring physical database integration. Unfederated MDBS (no local users) and federated MDBS . © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005

DDBMS in which each site maintains complete autonomy.

DBMS that resides transparently on top of existing database and file systems and presents a single database to its users.

Allows users to access and share data without requiring physical database integration.

Unfederated MDBS (no local users) and federated MDBS .

Overview of Networking Network - Interconnected collection of autonomous computers, capable of exchanging information. Local Area Network (LAN) intended for connecting computers at same site. Wide Area Network (WAN) used when computers or LANs need to be connected over long distances. WAN relatively slow and less reliable than LANs. DDBMS using LAN provides much faster response time than one using WAN.

Network - Interconnected collection of autonomous computers, capable of exchanging information.

Local Area Network (LAN) intended for connecting computers at same site.

Wide Area Network (WAN) used when computers or LANs need to be connected over long distances.

WAN relatively slow and less reliable than LANs. DDBMS using LAN provides much faster response time than one using WAN.

Overview of Networking

Functions of a DDBMS Expect DDBMS to have at least the functionality of a DBMS. Also to have following functionality: Extended communication services. Extended Data Dictionary. Distributed query processing. Extended concurrency control. Extended recovery services.

Expect DDBMS to have at least the functionality of a DBMS.

Also to have following functionality:

Extended communication services.

Extended Data Dictionary.

Distributed query processing.

Extended concurrency control.

Extended recovery services.

Reference Architecture for DDBMS Due to diversity, no accepted architecture equivalent to ANSI/SPARC 3-level architecture. A reference architecture consists of: Set of global external schemas. Global conceptual schema (GCS). A logical description of the whole database as if it were not distributed. Corresponds to the conceptual schema in the ANSI-SPARC architecture. Contains definitions of entities, relationships, constraints , securities and integrity information. Fragmentation schema and allocation schema. Description of how data is to be logically partitioned Set of schemas for each local DBMS conforming to 3-level ANSI/SPARC. Each local DBMS has its own set of schemas. Some levels may be missing, depending on levels of transparency supported.

Due to diversity, no accepted architecture equivalent to ANSI/SPARC 3-level architecture.

A reference architecture consists of:

Set of global external schemas.

Global conceptual schema (GCS).

A logical description of the whole database as if it were not distributed. Corresponds to the conceptual schema in the ANSI-SPARC architecture. Contains definitions of entities, relationships, constraints , securities and integrity information.

Fragmentation schema and allocation schema.

Description of how data is to be logically partitioned

Set of schemas for each local DBMS conforming to 3-level ANSI/SPARC. Each local DBMS has its own set of schemas.

Some levels may be missing, depending on levels of transparency supported.

Reference Architecture for DDBMS

Reference Architecture for MDBS In DDBMS, GCS is union of all local conceptual schemas. In FMDBS, GCS is subset of local conceptual schemas (LCS), consisting of data that each local system agrees to share. GCS of tightly coupled system involves integration of either parts of LCSs or local external schemas. FMDBS with no GCS is called loosely coupled .

In DDBMS, GCS is union of all local conceptual schemas.

In FMDBS, GCS is subset of local conceptual schemas (LCS), consisting of data that each local system agrees to share.

GCS of tightly coupled system involves integration of either parts of LCSs or local external schemas.

FMDBS with no GCS is called loosely coupled .

Reference Architecture for Tightly-Coupled FMDBS

COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE FOR A DBMS Consist of 4 major components Local DBMS (LDBMS) Standard DBMS responsible for controlling the local data at each site that has a database. Has its own system catalog that stores information about data held at that site. DATA COMMUNICATION COMPONENT (DC) The DC component is the software that enables all the sites to communicate with each other. Contains information about links and sites. GLOBAL SYSTEM CATALOGUE (GSC) Same functionality as the system catalogue of a centralized system. GSC holds information specific to the distributed nature of the system, such as fragmentation, allocation, replication and allocation schemas. A fully replicated GSC compromises site autonomy as every modification to the GSC has to be communicated to all other sites. A centralized GSC also compromises site autonomy and is vulnerable to failure of the site. DISTRIBUTED DBMS COMPONENT This is the controlling unit of the entire system.

Consist of 4 major components

Local DBMS (LDBMS)

Standard DBMS responsible for controlling the local data at each site that has a database. Has its own system catalog that stores information about data held at that site.

DATA COMMUNICATION COMPONENT (DC)

The DC component is the software that enables all the sites to communicate with each other. Contains information about links and sites.

GLOBAL SYSTEM CATALOGUE (GSC)

Same functionality as the system catalogue of a centralized system. GSC holds information specific to the distributed nature of the system, such as fragmentation, allocation, replication and allocation schemas. A fully replicated GSC compromises site autonomy as every modification to the GSC has to be communicated to all other sites. A centralized GSC also compromises site autonomy and is vulnerable to failure of the site.

DISTRIBUTED DBMS COMPONENT

This is the controlling unit of the entire system.

Components of a DDBMS

Distributed Database Design Three key issues: Fragmentation, Allocation, Replication.

Three key issues:

Fragmentation,

Allocation,

Replication.

Distributed Database Design Fragmentation Relation may be divided into a number of sub-relations, which are then distributed. 2 types:-Horizontal are subsets of tuples and vertical are subsets of attributes Allocation Each fragment is stored at site with “optimal” distribution. Replication Copy of fragment may be maintained at several sites.

Fragmentation

Relation may be divided into a number of sub-relations, which are then distributed. 2 types:-Horizontal are subsets of tuples and vertical are subsets of attributes

Allocation

Each fragment is stored at site with “optimal” distribution.

Replication

Copy of fragment may be maintained at several sites.

Fragmentation Definition and allocation of fragments carried out strategically to achieve: Locality of Reference. Improved Reliability and Availability. Improved Performance. Balanced Storage Capacities and Costs. Minimal Communication Costs. Involves analyzing most important applications, based on quantitative/qualitative information. © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005

Definition and allocation of fragments carried out strategically to achieve:

Locality of Reference.

Improved Reliability and Availability.

Improved Performance.

Balanced Storage Capacities and Costs.

Minimal Communication Costs.

Involves analyzing most important applications, based on quantitative/qualitative information.

Fragmentation Quantitative information may include: frequency with which an application is run; site from which an application is run; performance criteria for transactions and applications. Qualitative information may include transactions that are executed by application, type of access (read or write), and predicates of read operations.

Quantitative information may include:

frequency with which an application is run;

site from which an application is run;

performance criteria for transactions and applications.

Qualitative information may include transactions that are executed by application, type of access (read or write), and predicates of read operations.

Data Allocation Four alternative strategies regarding placement of data: Centralized, Partitioned (or Fragmented), Complete Replication, Selective Replication.

Four alternative strategies regarding placement of data:

Centralized,

Partitioned (or Fragmented),

Complete Replication,

Selective Replication.

Data Allocation Centralized : Consists of single database and DBMS stored at one site with users distributed across the network. Partitioned : Database partitioned into disjoint fragments, each fragment assigned to one site. Complete Replication : Consists of maintaining complete copy of database at each site. Selective Replication : Combination of partitioning, replication, and centralization.

Centralized : Consists of single database and DBMS stored at one site with users distributed across the network.

Partitioned : Database partitioned into disjoint fragments, each fragment assigned to one site.

Complete Replication : Consists of maintaining complete copy of database at each site.

Selective Replication : Combination of partitioning, replication, and centralization.

Comparison of Strategies for Data Distribution

Why Fragment? Usage Applications work with views rather than entire relations. Efficiency Data is stored close to where it is most frequently used. Data that is not needed by local applications is not stored.

Usage

Applications work with views rather than entire relations.

Efficiency

Data is stored close to where it is most frequently used.

Data that is not needed by local applications is not stored.

Why Fragment? Parallelism With fragments as unit of distribution, transaction can be divided into several subqueries that operate on fragments. Security Data not required by local applications is not stored and so not available to unauthorized users.

Parallelism

With fragments as unit of distribution, transaction can be divided into several subqueries that operate on fragments.

Security

Data not required by local applications is not stored and so not available to unauthorized users.

Why Fragment? Disadvantages Performance, Integrity.

Disadvantages

Performance,

Integrity.

Correctness of Fragmentation Three correctness rules: Completeness, Reconstruction, Disjointness.

Three correctness rules:

Completeness,

Reconstruction,

Disjointness.

Correctness of Fragmentation Completeness If relation R is decomposed into fragments R 1 , R 2 , ... R n , each data item that can be found in R must appear in at least one fragment. Reconstruction Must be possible to define a relational operation that will reconstruct R from the fragments. Reconstruction for horizontal fragmentation is Union operation and Join for vertical .

Completeness

If relation R is decomposed into fragments R 1 , R 2 , ... R n , each data item that can be found in R must appear in at least one fragment.

Reconstruction

Must be possible to define a relational operation that will reconstruct R from the fragments.

Reconstruction for horizontal fragmentation is Union operation and Join for vertical .

Correctness of Fragmentation Disjointness If data item d i appears in fragment R i , then it should not appear in any other fragment. Exception: vertical fragmentation, where primary key attributes must be repeated to allow reconstruction. For horizontal fragmentation, data item is a tuple. For vertical fragmentation, data item is an attribute.

Disjointness

If data item d i appears in fragment R i , then it should not appear in any other fragment.

Exception: vertical fragmentation, where primary key attributes must be repeated to allow reconstruction.

For horizontal fragmentation, data item is a tuple.

For vertical fragmentation, data item is an attribute.

Types of Fragmentation Four types of fragmentation: Horizontal, Vertical, Mixed, Derived. Other possibility is no fragmentation: If relation is small and not updated frequently, may be better not to fragment relation.

Four types of fragmentation:

Horizontal,

Vertical,

Mixed,

Derived.

Other possibility is no fragmentation:

If relation is small and not updated frequently, may be better not to fragment relation.

Horizontal and Vertical Fragmentation

Mixed Fragmentation

Horizontal Fragmentation Consists of a subset of the tuples of a relation. Defined using Selection operation of relational algebra:  p (R) For example: P 1 =  type=‘House’ (PropertyForRent) P 2 =  type=‘Flat’ (PropertyForRent)

Consists of a subset of the tuples of a relation.

Defined using Selection operation of relational algebra:

 p (R)

For example:

P 1 =  type=‘House’ (PropertyForRent)

P 2 =  type=‘Flat’ (PropertyForRent)

Horizontal Fragmentation This strategy is determined by looking at predicates used by transactions. Involves finding set of minimal ( complete and relevant ) predicates. Set of predicates is complete , if and only if, any two tuples in same fragment are referenced with same probability by any application. Predicate is relevant if there is at least one application that accesses fragments differently.

This strategy is determined by looking at predicates used by transactions.

Involves finding set of minimal ( complete and relevant ) predicates.

Set of predicates is complete , if and only if, any two tuples in same fragment are referenced with same probability by any application.

Predicate is relevant if there is at least one application that accesses fragments differently.

Fragmentation Example In the PropertyForRent table If the only requirement is to select tuples from PropertyForRent based on the property type, the set {type = ‘House’, type=‘Flat’} is complete. The set {type = ‘House’} is not complete With this requirement, the predicate (city=‘Aberdeen’) would not be relevant.

In the PropertyForRent table

If the only requirement is to select tuples from PropertyForRent based on the property type, the set {type = ‘House’, type=‘Flat’} is complete.

The set {type = ‘House’} is not complete

With this requirement, the predicate (city=‘Aberdeen’) would not be relevant.

Vertical Fragmentation Consists of a subset of attributes of a relation. Defined using Projection operation of relational algebra:  a1, ... ,an (R) For example: S 1 =  staffNo, position, sex, DOB, salary (Staff) S 2 =  staffNo, fName, lName, branchNo (Staff) Determined by establishing affinity of one attribute to another.

Consists of a subset of attributes of a relation.

Defined using Projection operation of relational algebra:

 a1, ... ,an (R)

For example:

S 1 =  staffNo, position, sex, DOB, salary (Staff)

S 2 =  staffNo, fName, lName, branchNo (Staff)

Determined by establishing affinity of one attribute to another.

Mixed Fragmentation Consists of a horizontal fragment that is vertically fragmented, or a vertical fragment that is horizontally fragmented. Defined using Selection and Projection operations of relational algebra:  p (  a1, ... ,an (R)) or  a1, ... ,an (σ p (R))

Consists of a horizontal fragment that is vertically fragmented, or a vertical fragment that is horizontally fragmented.

Defined using Selection and Projection operations of relational algebra:

 p (  a1, ... ,an (R)) or

 a1, ... ,an (σ p (R))

Example - Mixed Fragmentation S 1 =  staffNo, position, sex, DOB, salary (Staff) S 2 =  staffNo, fName, lName, branchNo (Staff) S 21 =  branchNo=‘B003’ (S 2 ) S 22 =  branchNo=‘B005’ (S 2 ) S 23 =  branchNo=‘B007’ (S 2 )

S 1 =  staffNo, position, sex, DOB, salary (Staff)

S 2 =  staffNo, fName, lName, branchNo (Staff)

S 21 =  branchNo=‘B003’ (S 2 )

S 22 =  branchNo=‘B005’ (S 2 )

S 23 =  branchNo=‘B007’ (S 2 )

Derived Horizontal Fragmentation A horizontal fragment that is based on horizontal fragmentation of a parent relation. Ensures that fragments that are frequently joined together are at same site. Defined using Semijoin operation of relational algebra: R i = R F S i , 1  i  w

A horizontal fragment that is based on horizontal fragmentation of a parent relation.

Ensures that fragments that are frequently joined together are at same site.

Defined using Semijoin operation of relational algebra:

R i = R F S i , 1  i  w

Example - Derived Horizontal Fragmentation S 3 =  branchNo=‘B003’ (Staff) S 4 =  branchNo=‘B005’ (Staff) S 5 =  branchNo=‘B007’ (Staff) Could use derived fragmentation for Property: P i = PropertyForRent branchNo S i , 3  i  5

S 3 =  branchNo=‘B003’ (Staff)

S 4 =  branchNo=‘B005’ (Staff)

S 5 =  branchNo=‘B007’ (Staff)

Could use derived fragmentation for Property:

P i = PropertyForRent branchNo S i , 3  i  5

Derived Horizontal Fragmentation If relation contains more than one foreign key, need to select one as parent. Choice can be based on fragmentation used most frequently or fragmentation with better join characteristics.

If relation contains more than one foreign key, need to select one as parent.

Choice can be based on fragmentation used most frequently or fragmentation with better join characteristics.

Distributed Database Design Methodology Use normal methodology to produce a design for the global relations. Examine topology of system to determine where databases will be located. Analyze most important transactions and identify appropriateness of horizontal/vertical fragmentation. Decide which relations are not to be fragmented. Examine relations on 1 side of relationships and determine a suitable fragmentation schema. Relations on many side may be suitable for derived fragmentation.

Use normal methodology to produce a design for the global relations.

Examine topology of system to determine where databases will be located.

Analyze most important transactions and identify appropriateness of horizontal/vertical fragmentation.

Decide which relations are not to be fragmented.

Examine relations on 1 side of relationships and determine a suitable fragmentation schema. Relations on many side may be suitable for derived fragmentation.

Transparencies in a DDBMS Distribution Transparency Fragmentation Transparency Location Transparency Replication Transparency Local Mapping Transparency Naming Transparency

Distribution Transparency

Fragmentation Transparency

Location Transparency

Replication Transparency

Local Mapping Transparency

Naming Transparency

Transparencies in a DDBMS Transaction Transparency Concurrency Transparency Failure Transparency Performance Transparency DBMS Transparency DBMS Transparency

Transaction Transparency

Concurrency Transparency

Failure Transparency

Performance Transparency

DBMS Transparency

DBMS Transparency

Distribution Transparency Distribution transparency allows user to perceive database as single, logical entity. If DDBMS exhibits distribution transparency, user does not need to know: data is fragmented (fragmentation transparency), location of data items (location transparency), otherwise call this local mapping transparency. With replication transparency, user is unaware of replication of fragments .

Distribution transparency allows user to perceive database as single, logical entity.

If DDBMS exhibits distribution transparency, user does not need to know:

data is fragmented (fragmentation transparency),

location of data items (location transparency),

otherwise call this local mapping transparency.

With replication transparency, user is unaware of replication of fragments .

Naming Transparency Each item in a DDB must have a unique name. DDBMS must ensure that no two sites create a database object with same name. One solution is to create central name server. However, this results in: loss of some local autonomy; central site may become a bottleneck; low availability; if the central site fails, remaining sites cannot create any new objects.

Each item in a DDB must have a unique name.

DDBMS must ensure that no two sites create a database object with same name.

One solution is to create central name server. However, this results in:

loss of some local autonomy;

central site may become a bottleneck;

low availability; if the central site fails, remaining sites cannot create any new objects.

Naming Transparency Alternative solution - prefix object with identifier of site that created it. For example, Branch created at site S 1 might be named S1.BRANCH. Also need to identify each fragment and its copies. Thus, copy 2 of fragment 3 of Branch created at site S 1 might be referred to as S1.BRANCH.F3.C2. However, this results in loss of distribution transparency.

Alternative solution - prefix object with identifier of site that created it.

For example, Branch created at site S 1 might be named S1.BRANCH.

Also need to identify each fragment and its copies.

Thus, copy 2 of fragment 3 of Branch created at site S 1 might be referred to as S1.BRANCH.F3.C2.

However, this results in loss of distribution transparency.

Naming Transparency An approach that resolves these problems uses aliases for each database object. Thus, S1.BRANCH.F3.C2 might be known as LocalBranch by user at site S 1 . DDBMS has task of mapping an alias to appropriate database object.

An approach that resolves these problems uses aliases for each database object.

Thus, S1.BRANCH.F3.C2 might be known as LocalBranch by user at site S 1 .

DDBMS has task of mapping an alias to appropriate database object.

Transaction Transparency Ensures that all distributed transactions maintain distributed database’s integrity and consistency. Distributed transaction accesses data stored at more than one location. Each transaction is divided into number of subtransactions, one for each site that has to be accessed. DDBMS must ensure the indivisibility of both the global transaction and each of the subtransactions.

Ensures that all distributed transactions maintain distributed database’s integrity and consistency.

Distributed transaction accesses data stored at more than one location.

Each transaction is divided into number of subtransactions, one for each site that has to be accessed.

DDBMS must ensure the indivisibility of both the global transaction and each of the subtransactions.

Example - Distributed Transaction T prints out names of all staff, using schema defined above as S 1 , S 2 , S 21 , S 22 , and S 23 . Define three subtransactions T S3 , T S5 , and T S7 to represent agents at sites 3, 5, and 7.

T prints out names of all staff, using schema defined above as S 1 , S 2 , S 21 , S 22 , and S 23 . Define three subtransactions T S3 , T S5 , and T S7 to represent agents at sites 3, 5, and 7.

Concurrency Transparency All transactions must execute independently and be logically consistent with results obtained if transactions executed one at a time, in some arbitrary serial order. Same fundamental principles as for centralized DBMS. DDBMS must ensure both global and local transactions do not interfere with each other. Similarly, DDBMS must ensure consistency of all subtransactions of global transaction.

All transactions must execute independently and be logically consistent with results obtained if transactions executed one at a time, in some arbitrary serial order.

Same fundamental principles as for centralized DBMS.

DDBMS must ensure both global and local transactions do not interfere with each other.

Similarly, DDBMS must ensure consistency of all subtransactions of global transaction.

Classification of Transactions In IBM’s Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA), four types of transactions: Remote request Remote unit of work Distributed unit of work Distributed request.

In IBM’s Distributed Relational Database Architecture (DRDA), four types of transactions:

Remote request

Remote unit of work

Distributed unit of work

Distributed request.

Classification of Transactions

Concurrency Transparency Replication makes concurrency more complex. If a copy of a replicated data item is updated, update must be propagated to all copies. Could propagate changes as part of original transaction, making it an atomic operation. However, if one site holding copy is not reachable, then transaction is delayed until site is reachable.

Replication makes concurrency more complex.

If a copy of a replicated data item is updated, update must be propagated to all copies.

Could propagate changes as part of original transaction, making it an atomic operation.

However, if one site holding copy is not reachable, then transaction is delayed until site is reachable.

Concurrency Transparency Could limit update propagation to only those sites currently available. Remaining sites updated when they become available again. Could allow updates to copies to happen asynchronously, sometime after the original update. Delay in regaining consistency may range from a few seconds to several hours.

Could limit update propagation to only those sites currently available. Remaining sites updated when they become available again.

Could allow updates to copies to happen asynchronously, sometime after the original update. Delay in regaining consistency may range from a few seconds to several hours.

Failure Transparency DDBMS must ensure atomicity and durability of global transaction. Means ensuring that subtransactions of global transaction either all commit or all abort. Thus, DDBMS must synchronize global transaction to ensure that all subtransactions have completed successfully before recording a final COMMIT for global transaction. Must do this in presence of site and network failures.

DDBMS must ensure atomicity and durability of global transaction.

Means ensuring that subtransactions of global transaction either all commit or all abort.

Thus, DDBMS must synchronize global transaction to ensure that all subtransactions have completed successfully before recording a final COMMIT for global transaction.

Must do this in presence of site and network failures.

Performance Transparency DDBMS must perform as if it were a centralized DBMS. DDBMS should not suffer any performance degradation due to distributed architecture. DDBMS should determine most cost-effective strategy to execute a request.

DDBMS must perform as if it were a centralized DBMS.

DDBMS should not suffer any performance degradation due to distributed architecture.

DDBMS should determine most cost-effective strategy to execute a request.

Performance Transparency Distributed Query Processor (DQP) maps data request into ordered sequence of operations on local databases. Must consider fragmentation, replication, and allocation schemas. DQP has to decide: which fragment to access; which copy of a fragment to use; which location to use.

Distributed Query Processor (DQP) maps data request into ordered sequence of operations on local databases.

Must consider fragmentation, replication, and allocation schemas.

DQP has to decide:

which fragment to access;

which copy of a fragment to use;

which location to use.

Performance Transparency DQP produces execution strategy optimized with respect to some cost function. Typically, costs associated with a distributed request include: I/O cost; CPU cost; communication cost.

DQP produces execution strategy optimized with respect to some cost function.

Typically, costs associated with a distributed request include:

I/O cost;

CPU cost;

communication cost.

Performance Transparency - Example Property( propNo , city) 10000 records in London Client( clientNo ,maxPrice) 100000 records in Glasgow Viewing( propNo , clientNo ) 1000000 records in London SELECT p.propNo FROM Property p INNER JOIN (Client c INNER JOIN Viewing v ON c.clientNo = v.clientNo) ON p.propNo = v.propNo WHERE p.city=‘Aberdeen’ AND c.maxPrice > 200000;

Property( propNo , city) 10000 records in London

Client( clientNo ,maxPrice) 100000 records in Glasgow

Viewing( propNo , clientNo ) 1000000 records in London

SELECT p.propNo

FROM Property p INNER JOIN

(Client c INNER JOIN Viewing v ON c.clientNo = v.clientNo)

ON p.propNo = v.propNo

WHERE p.city=‘Aberdeen’ AND c.maxPrice > 200000;

Performance Transparency - Example Assume: Each tuple in each relation is 100 characters long. 10 renters with maximum price greater than £200,000. 100 000 viewings for properties in Aberdeen. Computation time negligible compared to communication time.

Assume:

Each tuple in each relation is 100 characters long.

10 renters with maximum price greater than £200,000.

100 000 viewings for properties in Aberdeen.

Computation time negligible compared to communication time.

Performance Transparency - Example

Date’s 12 Rules for a DDBMS 0. Fundamental Principle To the user, a distributed system should look exactly like a nondistributed system. 1. Local Autonomy 2. No Reliance on a Central Site 3. Continuous Operation 4. Location Independence 5. Fragmentation Independence 6. Replication Independence

0. Fundamental Principle

To the user, a distributed system should look exactly like a nondistributed system.

1. Local Autonomy

2. No Reliance on a Central Site

3. Continuous Operation

4. Location Independence

5. Fragmentation Independence

6. Replication Independence

Date’s 12 Rules for a DDBMS 7. Distributed Query Processing 8. Distributed Transaction Processing 9. Hardware Independence 10. Operating System Independence 11. Network Independence 12. Database Independence Last four rules are ideals. END OF CLASS

7. Distributed Query Processing

8. Distributed Transaction Processing

9. Hardware Independence

10. Operating System Independence

11. Network Independence

12. Database Independence

Last four rules are ideals.

END OF CLASS