Anti wiretapping-act


Published on

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Prohibits any person tapping any wire or cable or using any other device or arrangement to secretly overhear, intercept or record a private communication or spoken word. Even a (person) privy to a communication who records his private conversation with another without the knowledge of the latter (will) qualify as a “violator”. (Sec. 1)Prohibits possessing any tape, wire, disc or other record, or copies, of an illegally obtained recording of a private communication, knowing that it was illegally obtained.
  • The penalties of perpetual or temporary absolute disqualification for public office shall produce the following effects:1. The deprivation of the public offices and employments which the offender may have held even if conferred by popular election.2. The deprivation of the right to vote in any election for any popular office or to be elected to such office.3. The disqualification for the offices or public employments and for the exercise of any of the rights mentioned.In case of temporary disqualification, such disqualification as is comprised in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this article shall last during the term of the sentence.4. The loss of all rights to retirement pay or other pension for any office formerly held.
  • Commonwealth Act No. 616, an act to punish espionage and other offenses against the national security.Disallow any of peace officers violating provisions of RA 4200 on the proper procedure for securing and implementing a court order authorizing the wiretapping of a private communication. (Sec. 3)Espionage or spying involves a government or individual obtaining information that is considered secret or confidential without the permission of the holder
  • It does not prohibit the recording of all private communications, but provides a limited and narrowly drawn exception for law enforcers. (Sec. 3)It does not prohibit the recording of private communications that are authorized by all parties.
  • Any wiretapped materials or any information secured by any person in violation of the Act shall not be admissible in evidence in any judicial, quasi-judicial, legislative or administrative hearing or investigation (illustration of the doctrine of “fruit of poisonous tree”).Fruit of the poisonous treeevidence discovered due to information found throughillegal means may not be introduced in any proceeding.
  • Anti wiretapping-act

    1. 1. ANTI-WIRETAPPING ACT Republic Act 4200 by: Relea Grace B. Salak
    2. 2. Policy An act to prohibit and penalize wiretapping and otherrelated violations of the privacy of communication, and for other purposes.Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, not beingauthorized by all the parties to any privatecommunication or spoken word, to tap any wire orcable, or by using any other device or arrangement, tosecretly overhear, intercept, or record suchcommunication or spoken word by using a devicecommonly known as a dictaphone or dictagraph ordetectaphone or walkie-talkie or tape recorder, orhowever otherwise described:
    3. 3. Policy (cont…)It shall also be unlawful for any person, be he a participantor not in the act or acts penalized in the next precedingsentence, to knowingly possess any tape record, wirerecord, disc record, or any other such record, or copiesthereof, of any communication or spoken word securedeither before or after the effective date of this Act in themanner prohibited by this law; or to replay the same forany other person or persons; or to communicate thecontents thereof, either verbally or in writing, or to furnishtranscriptions thereof, whether complete or partial, to anyother person: Provided, That the use of such record or anycopies thereof as evidence in any civil, criminalinvestigation or trial of offenses mentioned in section 3hereof, shall not be covered by this prohibition.
    4. 4. Policy (cont…)Section 2. Any person who willfully or knowinglydoes or who shall aid, permit, or cause to bedone any of the acts declared to be unlawful inthe preceding section or who violates theprovisions of the following section or of any orderissued thereunder, or aids, permits, or causessuch violation shall, upon conviction thereof, bepunished by imprisonment for not less than sixmonths or more than six years and with theaccessory penalty of perpetual absolutedisqualification from public office if the offenderbe a public official at the time of the commissionof the offense, and, if the offender is an alien heshall be subject to deportation proceedings.
    5. 5. Policy (cont…)Section 3. Nothing contained in this Act, however,shall render it unlawful or punishable for any peaceofficer, who is authorized by a written order of theCourt, to execute any of the acts declared to beunlawful in the two preceding sections in casesinvolving the crimes of treason, espionage,provoking war and disloyalty in case of war, piracy,mutiny in the high seas, rebellion, conspiracy andproposal to commit rebellion, inciting to rebellion,sedition, conspiracy to commit sedition, inciting tosedition, kidnapping as defined by the Revised PenalCode, and violations of Commonwealth Act No. 616,punishing espionage and other offenses againstnational security.
    6. 6. Provided, That such written order shall only be issued or granted upon written application and the examination under oath or affirmation of the applicant and the witnesses he may produce and a showing:(1) that there are reasonable grounds to believe thatany of the crimes enumerated hereinabove has beencommitted or is being committed or is about to becommitted: Provided, however, That in cases involvingthe offenses of rebellion, conspiracy and proposal tocommit rebellion, inciting to rebellion, sedition,conspiracy to commit sedition, and inciting to sedition,such authority shall be granted only upon prior proofthat a rebellion or acts of sedition, as the case may be,have actually been or are being committed;
    7. 7. (2) that there are reasonable grounds tobelieve that evidence will be obtainedessential to the conviction of any personfor, or to the solution of, or to theprevention of, any such crimes; and(3) that there are no other means readilyavailable for obtaining such evidence.
    8. 8. The order granted or issued shall specify:(1) the identity of the person or personswhose communications, conversations,discussions, or spoken words are to beoverheard, intercepted, or recorded and, inthe case of telegraphic or telephoniccommunications, the telegraph line or thetelephone number involved and itslocation;
    9. 9. (2) the identity of the peace officerauthorized to overhear, intercept, or recordthecommunications, conversations, discussions, or spoken words;(3) the offense or offenses committed orsought to be prevented; and
    10. 10. (4) the period of the authorization. Theauthorization shall be effective for theperiod specified in the order which shallnot exceed sixty (60) days from the date ofissuance of the order, unless extended orrenewed by the court upon being satisfiedthat such extension or renewal is in thepublic interest.
    11. 11. • All recordings made under court authorization shall, within forty-eight hours after the expiration of the period fixed in the order, be deposited with the court in a sealed envelope or sealed package, and shall be accompanied by an affidavit of the peace officer granted such authority stating the number of recordings made, the dates and times covered by each recording, the number of tapes, discs, or records included in the deposit, and certifying that no duplicates or copies of the whole or any part thereof have been made, or if made, that all such duplicates or copies are included in the envelope or package deposited with the court. The envelope or package so deposited shall not be opened, or the recordings replayed, or used in evidence, or their contents revealed, except upon order of the court, which shall not be granted except upon motion, with due notice and opportunity to be heard to the person or persons whose conversation or communications have been recorded.
    12. 12. • The court referred to in this section shall be understood to mean the Court of First Instance within whose territorial jurisdiction the acts for which authority is applied for are to be executed.
    13. 13. Policy (cont…)Section 4. Any communication or spokenword, or theexistence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of the same or any partthereof, or any information therein containedobtained or secured by any person in violationof the preceding sections of this Act shall notbe admissible in evidence in anyjudicial, quasi-judicial, legislative oradministrative hearing or investigation.
    14. 14. Policy (cont…)Section 5. All laws inconsistent with theprovisions of this Act are hereby repealed oraccordingly amended.Section 6. This Act shall take effect upon itsapproval.
    15. 15. Purpose/Rationale• authored by by Senator Lorenzo Tañada.• passed in the Congress in 1965.• Approved: June 09, 1965• enacted in consonance with the constitutionally guaranteed right of privacy of communication.• intends to stop the practice by officers of the government of spying on one another
    16. 16. RESTRICTIONS• The law does not prohibit the recording of all private communications, but provides a limited and narrowly drawn exception for law enforcers.• The law does not prohibit the recording of private communications that are authorized by ALL parties.
    17. 17. Jurisprudence“Hello Garci” Case• On June 6, 2005, Sec. Ignacio Bunye made known to the public the existence of wiretapped recordings of alleged cellphone conversations between Pres. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and Comelec Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano.
    18. 18. • Sec. Bunye violated RA 4200 because… – he knowingly possessed illegally wiretapped recordings of the Commander in Chief and a Comelec Commissioner; – he played it for many persons in the Mass Media; and – he allowed the reporters and journalists to make digital copies of the two CDROMs.