ELESIG
Evaluation of Learners’ Experiences of e-Learning Special Interest Group
MINIMUM STANDARDS / BASELINE
Peter Reed
Un...
Minimum Standards
@ Liverpool
Sector-wide
Subscription
SECTOR-WIDE
SUBSCRIPTION
COMPARING STAFF & STUDENT RESPONSES
(n=102 & n=840)
24 Responses
Received
Aberystwyth
Bath
Bristol
Durham (Physics and Arts & Humanities)
Edge Hill
Exeter
Goldsmiths
Greenwic...
Dedicated VLE Area
Staff Profiles
Module Description / Outline
Recommended Reading
Assessment Requirements
Lecture Handout...
MINIMUM
STANDARDS @ LIV
COMPARING STAFF & STUDENT RESPONSES
(n=102 & n=840)
Drivers
LGoS
TEL Strategy
A three phase ‘audit’ of TEL
across ILT provision.
Staff & Students
were provided a list
A Welcome to the area
Contact details for Leader
Contact details for others
Module S...
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
95%
93%
88%
87%
84%
54%
71%
79%80%
69%
44%
75%
79%
Student suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standa...
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
72%
47%
65%
59%
71%
27%
37%
38%
43%
59%
47%
58% 58%
Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standar...
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Student v Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
95%
93%
88%
87%
84%
54%
71%
79%80%
69%
44%
75%
79%
Student vs Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minim...
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
95%
93%
88%
87%
84%
54%
71%
79%80%
69%
44%
75%
79%
Student vs Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minim...
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Criteria with largest staff/student difference in Minimum standards
37%
46%
41%
34%
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
95%
93%
88%
87%
84%
54%
71%
79%80%
69%
44%
75%
79%
Student vs Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minim...
Demo PSYC310
CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
Demo
CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
Demo
CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
Demo
CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
Demo
CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
Demo
CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
Agreement thus far
Criteria to be included automatically…
1. Module Ti...
Next Steps
Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors
Focus groups
Next Steps
Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors
Focus groups
Next Steps
Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors
Focus groups
Peter Reed
Lecturer (Learning Technology)
Institute of Learning & Teaching
Faculty of Health & Life Science
peter.reed@liv...
Presentation of work around VLE Minimum Standards at the North West ALT SIG (7/5/14)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Presentation of work around VLE Minimum Standards at the North West ALT SIG (7/5/14)

776

Published on

Presentation of work around VLE Minimum Standards at the North West ALT SIG (7/5/14)
Work covers data captured from across the sector in relation to subscription to minimum standards, as well as internal research and progress/practice at the University of Liverpool

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
776
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
15
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Presentation of work around VLE Minimum Standards at the North West ALT SIG (7/5/14)

  1. 1. ELESIG Evaluation of Learners’ Experiences of e-Learning Special Interest Group MINIMUM STANDARDS / BASELINE Peter Reed University of Liverpool A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP
  2. 2. Minimum Standards @ Liverpool Sector-wide Subscription
  3. 3. SECTOR-WIDE SUBSCRIPTION COMPARING STAFF & STUDENT RESPONSES (n=102 & n=840)
  4. 4. 24 Responses Received Aberystwyth Bath Bristol Durham (Physics and Arts & Humanities) Edge Hill Exeter Goldsmiths Greenwich Institute of Education University of London Kent Leeds Liverpool London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Newcastle Nottingham Northampton Salford Southampton Solent Swansea York St. John Warwick Univ. of Malta University College London
  5. 5. Dedicated VLE Area Staff Profiles Module Description / Outline Recommended Reading Assessment Requirements Lecture Handouts Schedule/Brief Announcements Timetable Grading Criteria Forums Sample Q’s / Past Papers Plagiarism Key teaching materials LIbrary info My Grades / Gradebook Student Expectations Turnitin Report an issue Weekly problems PDF formats Suggestion box THEY IDENTIFIED
  6. 6. MINIMUM STANDARDS @ LIV COMPARING STAFF & STUDENT RESPONSES (n=102 & n=840)
  7. 7. Drivers LGoS TEL Strategy A three phase ‘audit’ of TEL across ILT provision.
  8. 8. Staff & Students were provided a list A Welcome to the area Contact details for Leader Contact details for others Module Specification Timetable / Schedule Learning Outcomes Assessment Strategy Further Reading Lecture notes/handouts Past Exam Papers Online submission Formative feedback on draft Online discussion forums
  9. 9. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 95% 93% 88% 87% 84% 54% 71% 79%80% 69% 44% 75% 79% Student suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards * * ** ** *
  10. 10. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 72% 47% 65% 59% 71% 27% 37% 38% 43% 59% 47% 58% 58% Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards
  11. 11. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Student v Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards
  12. 12. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 95% 93% 88% 87% 84% 54% 71% 79%80% 69% 44% 75% 79% Student vs Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards 72% 47% 65% 59% 71% 27% 37% 38% 43% 59% 47% 58% 58%
  13. 13. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 95% 93% 88% 87% 84% 54% 71% 79%80% 69% 44% 75% 79% Student vs Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards 72% 47% 65% 59% 71% 27% 37% 38% 43% 59% 47% 58% 58% Statistical Tests Positive correlation between staff & students (r=0.560) Some significant differences between staff and student responses (p=0.0002) Significant difference between number of items selected (p=0.0001) - m Staff=9.32: Students=10.91 Significant difference between number of items selected by male and female students (p=0.0012)
  14. 14. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Criteria with largest staff/student difference in Minimum standards 37% 46% 41% 34%
  15. 15. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 95% 93% 88% 87% 84% 54% 71% 79%80% 69% 44% 75% 79% Student vs Staff suggestions for inclusion in Minimum standards 72% 47% 65% 59% 71% 27% 37% 38% 43% 59% 47% 58% 58% Questions Which criteria do we include? How much of the student voice is enough?
  16. 16. Demo PSYC310 CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
  17. 17. Demo CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
  18. 18. Demo CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
  19. 19. Demo CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
  20. 20. Demo CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP
  21. 21. Demo CSD Automation of Minimum Standards from TULIP Agreement thus far Criteria to be included automatically… 1. Module Title & Module Code 2. Module Co-ordinator (name and email address) 3. Aims 4. Learning Outcomes 5. Syllabus 6. Teaching & Learning Strategy 7. Assessment requirements 8. Contact hours 9. Disclaimer
  22. 22. Next Steps Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors Focus groups
  23. 23. Next Steps Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors Focus groups
  24. 24. Next Steps Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors Focus groups
  25. 25. Peter Reed Lecturer (Learning Technology) Institute of Learning & Teaching Faculty of Health & Life Science peter.reed@liverpool.ac.uk @reedyreedles #54332
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×