Investment Implications of RPI to CPI
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

on

  • 120 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
120
Views on SlideShare
120
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Investment Implications of RPI to CPI Investment Implications of RPI to CPI Presentation Transcript

  • © 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukRobert Gardner, RedingtonJay Shah, Pension CorporationInvestment Implicationsof RPI to CPI4 October 2011
  • The Inflation basket1© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukRPI:+ Financial Services
  • What has happened2© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukLegislative changesProposed switch instatutory indexation:RPI to CPIImplementation8 December 2010Consultationlaunched8 July 2010 6 April 2011
  • RPI vs. CPI3© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukWhy it’s happened• CPI is BoE’sbenchmark for thewhole economy• Only 7% ofpensioners havean outstandingmortgage123Standard Deviation:•RPI 1.54•CPI 1.02Source: ONS• (Reduce public pension liabilities...)-2-10123456PercentageRPI (y/y) CPI (y/y)
  • How it’s happened4© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukPublic sector• Pensions in payment increases indexed to CPI,• capped at 5%Private• No mandatory statutory override• No enabling modification power• No CPI underpin required• New pension consultation requirement
  • Risk managementUK inflation – the long runLong run difference• Aggregate price changes• Mathematical formula• 2010 formula effect topersist• Permanent 0.3% differenceimplied• Long-run estimate of 1.2%“wedge”.5© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukFormula effectSource: ONS
  • Risk managementUK inflation - April 2011• CPI jumped from4% to 4.5% in April• Currently remainabove forecasts of4.1%• RPI floats around5.2%...6© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukCPI up, RPI downSource: ONS, Redington0123456PercentageRPI (y/y) CPI (y/y)
  • Risk managementHedging inflation7© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukFinding relative valueSource: Bloomberg, Redington-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.0030y Swap Real Yield 20y Gilt Real Yield 30y Swap Spread (Swap Yield - Gilt Yield)
  • Risk managementHedging CPI Swaps Pricing*8© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk• 20 year RPI 3.475% - 3.575%• (Mid – 3.525% and 5bp spread)• 30 Year RPI 3.927% - 3.655%• (Mid – 3.605% and 5bp spread)• Vs• 20 year CPI 2.852% - 3.252%• (Mid – 3.052% and 20bp spread)• 30 Year CPI 2.927% - 3.327%• (Mid – 3.127% and 20bp spread)RPI/CPI spread• 20 year CPI Mid – 3.052% and 20 year RPIMid – 3.525%• = -0.473% with at least 20bps spread.• 30 year CPI Mid – 3.127% and 30 year RPIMid – 3.605%• = -0.478% with at least 20bps spread.Source: RBS
  • Risk managementHedging inflation9© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukHedging CPIPhysical assets• CPI-linked gilts?• Flight PlanConsistent Assets(FPCA)• CPI bond market...?CPI
  • Risk managementAlternative Sources of CPI10© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk-6-4-2024680 5 10 15 20 25 30GBPMillionsYearsInitial investmentAttractive real returnsInflation-linked cashflowsProviding a match for liabilitiesInflowsOutflowsSource: RedingtonFlight Plan Consistent Asset – Example Cashflow Profile
  • Risk managementAlternative Sources of CPI11© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukMost RiskPricing mechanismLeast RiskSectorAvailability Regulatory Demand Economic PriceMost RiskLeast RiskSource: Evolution Securities, Redington
  • Recap of bulk annuity market growth12© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukColumn: Stack01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,0002004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010(£ million)Pension insurancebuyout / buy-inPension insurance buyout CAGR¹: 66%Longevity insuranceMarket growth maintained Transactions examples
  • Reaction of schemes looking to de-risk• How does this impact us?– In payment : RPI generally hard-coded– In deferment : reference to statutory revaluation• ETVs and PIE exercises put on hold• Buy-in / Buy-out decisions delayed13© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk
  • Pension scheme view of CPI vs. RPI14© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukRPI vs CPI Index: January 1988=10075100125150175200225198801198901199001199101199201199301199401199501199601199701199801199901200001200101200201200301200401200501200601200701200801200901201001RPI rebasedCPI rebased
  • Expectations of RPI to CPI gap15Party / Source RPI-CPI assumptionThe Office for Budget Responsibility, Economic andFiscal outlook of March 20111.2%FTSE350 Pension Fund accounting disclosures,Hymans Robertson’s 2011 survey0.7% to 2.8%Mercer briefing July 2011 0.5% to 0.8%Investment Bank instruments 0.1% to 0.2%Our survey See later slides
  • Insurer view of CPI vs. RPI16© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukRPI vs CPI year on Year since 1989-4.0%-2.0%0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%198909199009199109199209199309199409199509199609199709199809199909200009200109200209200309200409200509200609200709200809200909YoY % increase RPIYoY % increase CPI
  • RPI v CPI: Historic differences• The average annual RPI-CPI gap from May 1997 to July 2011was 0.88%• Annualised standard deviation of monthly observed RPI-CPI basis was1.27%• RPI was above CPI for 85% of the period– Main period of negative RPI-CPI due to rapid mortgage cost inflationreduction over 200817
  • RPI v CPI density function18Histogram of RPI-CPI since May 1997 and approximated density functionAbnormal – e.g. falling interest ratesmean of – 2.9% (CPI higher)Normal : mean of 1.1%(RPI higher)
  • RPI vs. CPI – stochastic simulation – nounderpin19© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukSource: Barrie and Hibbert
  • RPI vs. CPI – stochastic simulation – withunderpin!20© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukSource: Barrie and Hibbert
  • CPI, RPI and base rates21© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk
  • Hedge with RPI – implications for insurers• 1 in 200 year test – capital requirements– statistical variation– changes in the basket of goods– changes in calculation methodology– political influence• Shock effects if CPI market develops differently• Impact of caps and floors:– Volatility of CPI is lower than RPI– So floor and cap both less likely to bite? Net impact?22© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk
  • Hedge with CPI23© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk• Investment Bank A : CPI vs RPI = 0.1%• Investment Bank B : CPI v RPI = 0.2%• Capacity available : SmallInstrument Approx market sizeIndexed RPI gilts £270 bnIndexed RPI bonds £30 bnRPI Inflation swaps £100 bnCPI linked Virtually nil
  • Insurer solutions• Insure on CPI but no discount to RPI– Benefits indexed to CPI– Expected CPI under-run– Offset by cost of risk capital• Option to move from RPI to CPI in future– In anticipation of CPI market opening up in future– Part refund of premium– To whom – scheme or company– On a buy-in or buy-out?• Differential pricing?24© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk
  • But general market movements more significant25© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk• Affordability chart reflects approximate asset/liability mix ofthe Scheme (c70% equities and 80% non-pensioners)• Chart assumes scheme is fully funded initially – for anunderfunded scheme the volatility in the deficit will be muchlarger
  • Our survey says...© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk
  • Survey ResultsAudience1. What proportion of inflation-linked liabilities are matchedwith inflation hedging assets such as index-linked gilts,inflation swaps or buy-in insurance policies:27© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk16 participants0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%0% - 25% 25% - 50% 50% - 75% 75% - 100%Proportion of matching assets
  • Survey ResultsNationwide1. What proportion of inflation-linked liabilities are matchedwith inflation hedging assets such as index-linked gilts,inflation swaps or buy-in insurance policies:28© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk88 Actuaries, 19 Trustees0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%0% - 25% 25% - 50% 50% - 75% 75% - 100%Proportion of matching assetsActuaries Trustees
  • Survey ResultsAudience2. Broadly what proportion specify statutory minimumrevaluation/indexation, i.e. they could automatically moveto CPI:29© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk16 participants0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%<25% 25% - 50% 50%-75% >75%"Statutory minimum" specifiedRevaluation in deferment Benefit indexation in payment
  • Survey ResultsAudience3. For those that could automatically move to CPI, will thoseSchemes move to CPI (rather than retain RPI):30© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk16 participants0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Yes NoProportion of schemesYes No
  • Survey ResultsAudience4. In your view is it fair that schemes that can move to CPIshould move to CPI?31© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk15 participantsYes67%No33%
  • Survey ResultsNationwide4. In your view is it fair that schemes that can move to CPIshould move to CPI?32© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk70 Actuaries, 19 Trustees0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%Yes NoActuariesTrustees
  • Survey ResultsAudience5. What is your long term expectation for CPI inflationrelative to RPI inflation:33© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk16 participants0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Same as RPIc.0.5% p.a. less than RPIc.0.5% to 1% p.a. less than RPI1% to 2% less than RPI
  • Survey ResultsNationwide5. What is your long term expectation for CPI inflationrelative to RPI inflation:34© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk89 Actuaries, 19 Trustees0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Same as RPIc.0.5% p.a. less than RPIc.0.5% to 1% p.a. less than RPI1% to 2% less than RPIActuaries Trustees
  • Survey ResultsAudience6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following doyou think your schemes consider seriously over the next3 years:35© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Buy-in or buy-out Longevity swap LiabilityManagementexerciseNone OtherUnlikely Likely Almost certainly
  • Survey ResultsNationwide6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following doyou think your schemes consider seriously over the next3 years:36© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk87 Actuaries, 18 Trustees0%10%20%30%40%50%60%Unlikely Likely Almost certainlyLiability Management ExerciseActuariesTrustees
  • Survey ResultsNationwide6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following doyou think your schemes consider seriously over the next3 years:37© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk86 Actuaries, 13 Trustees0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%Unlikely Likely Almost certainlyLongevity SwapActuariesTrustees
  • Survey ResultsNationwide6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following doyou think your schemes consider seriously over the next3 years:38© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk87 Actuaries, 19 Trustees0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Unlikely Likely Almost certainlyBuy-in/Buy-outActuariesTrustees
  • Survey Results39© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk6. Other:“More direct investment in gilts rather than swaps”National responses“Journey planning / flight path / de-risking triggers”“Phased buy-in, via annuity purchase when members retire”“Closing to future accrual (for those few schemes still open)”“Increase in LDI assets”“Winding up”“More bonds”
  • Survey Results40© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.uk7. What impact has the CPI move had on schemesconsidering de-risking?“Little / None”“Potential reduction in Buy-out cost. Slightly more scope to exchangepension increases. Some offset CPI gains through lower risk investmentstrategy”“Caused delays to some looking at buy-in/out because insurers havebeen unable to provide CPI pricing”“As far as I am aware [public sector schemes] are not looking to derisk,other than via wholesale benefit changes following Huttons report”
  • Questions or comments?41© 2010 The Actuarial Profession  www.actuaries.org.ukJay Shah• Co-Head of Business Origination• Pension Corporation• shahj@pensioncorporation.com• Tel: + 44 20 7105 2111Robert Gardner• Co-Chief Executive• Redington• robert.gardner@redington.co.uk• Tel: + 44 20 7250 3416 In addition... http://twitter.com/robertjgardner http://uk.linkedin.com/in/robertjgardner