Hanson, Kurland top Wojtas for Chelmsford selectmen
Askenburg joins Thoren on School Committee
By Rita Savard, firstname.lastname@example.org
CHELMSFORD -- It was an election night to remember
for the new kids on the block as political hopefuls Matt
Hanson and Janet Askenburg topped the ticket in each of
the town's nine precincts to win seats on the Board of Se-
lectmen and School Committee.
In his second bid for selectman, Hanson cruised to victory
with 3,221 votes. And Jon Kurland ousted incumbent Pat
Wojtas, earning 2,651 votes to Wojtas' 2,309.
Askenburg swept up the popular vote in the School Com-
mittee's first contested race in six years, leading the field
with 3,269 votes. Incumbent Evelyn Thoren was re-
elected to her fifth term with 2,483 votes and candidate
Jack Wang trailed with 2,105 votes.
History was also made last night as Hanson, 21, became the
youngest member to serve on the town's governing body.
"My cheeks are sore from smiling," Hanson said. "I'm so
honored that the voters put their faith in me. My cam -
paign was really about listening to their concerns and
ideas. Now I'm going to work hard for them to help keep
our town moving forward."
Hanson's mother, Margaret, said her son worked hard to earn every
"He knocked on a lot of doors and met a lot of people,"
she said. "Meeting Matt in person really helps. Once you
have a conversation with him, you know you can put
your confidence in him."
On the campaign trail, Hanson, who works as a full-time substitute
teacher in Chelmsford and is finishing his master's degree at
UMass Lowell, has said what he lacks in years, he makes up for in
drive and commitment to serving the town he grew up in.
All three selectmen candidates live in Precinct 5. When Wojtas' supporters discovered
she came in last in her own precinct, hopes of a victory began to fade.
"It's a surprise, but the voters have spoken," said Wojtas, who was seeking a
second term. "I'll have to accept the results."
Wojtas came under fire from challenger Kurland during the earliest debates for a vote
she took that prevented an in-house ambulance discussion from going to Town Meeting.
But a gracious Wojtas last night said she felt the campaign was a civil one, and that she
has no regrets.
"I'd answer every one of the questions the same way," she said. "In hind -
sight, you could always work harder, but I'm proud of the work I did and I
will continue to serve the town in every way I can."
For Kurland, who started his campaign by asking selectmen to send a Department of
Public Works debt exclusion to voters, it was a double win as he and the DPW ballot
question earned voters' approval.
Walking into Town Offices with his wife, Sara, Kurland was welcomed with a round of
"I'm very humbled, just grateful really, that the voters in Chelmsford are
giving me the opportunity to serve them," he said. "I feel badly that all three
of us couldn't win. Pat really has the best interest of the town at heart,
and I'm sure she'll continue to serve the residents in every way she can.”
A newcomer to local politics, Askenburg thanked her supporters for the push to victory in the
school race. Her husband, Bill, she added, led the way.
"It was kind of like that Verizon commercial," Askenburg joked. "You see that one
guy and then there's 50 people behind him. Well, that was my husband in this
Askenburg, who campaigned on creating a five-year plan for the school district, as well as
transparency in government and pay for performance, said her lead in the three-way race for
two seats showed that people responded to her message.
"I got a lot of hugs from strangers today," she said. "I knew that was a good
sign. I look forward to working for the voters and being held accountable for
Thoren, a 12-year-veteran when it comes to serving Chelmsford schools,
said it takes a team to win, and thanked her supporters for propelling her
to another term. She said one of her first orders of business will be deal-
ing with the district's unfunded mandates at the state level.
"During the campaign I told voters I'm not done yet, and I'm
not," Thoren said. "I'm honored to be chosen to serve
Jack Wang, a financial adviser, admitted that he might have made a couple of mistakes
during his campaign.
"I won't ever be allowed on the campaign trail again until I take a course
on how to order lawn signs," said Wang, whose name during the election was
barely visible around town.
Yesterday, Wang spent some time standing at the Westlands School polls holding a
homemade sign that simply read "WANG" in red letters. Still, he trailed Thoren by
about 378 votes.
"At the end of the day, I can hold my head high," he said. "I got into the
race late, but it was a good race. The issues affecting our schools got
aired and that's a good thing."
Both incumbents David Braslau and Lisa Daigle were re-elected to the Board of Library
Trustees, with Rick Mahoney trailing just 90 votes behind Braslau in a tight race.
Photos by Tom Christiano and Roy Earley
Reversal of fortunes for DPW
Chelmsford voters approve plan to repair facility, prepare for move
By Rita Savard, email@example.com
CHELMSFORD -- The second time proved to be a charm for the Department of Public Works in yesterday's election, as voters passed a $5
million debt exclusion to fix the aging facility.
After a $13 million proposal to relocate the DPW was shot down by voters last October, a less-expensive and scaled-down version sailed
through last night, with 2,460 in favor and 1,806 opposing.
The measure will put the first phase of the project into motion, including the $3.5 million purchase of a building at 9 Alpha Road and another
$1.5 million in renovations.
By approving the first phase, the average tax bill is expected to rise by $28 in fiscal 2011. But with declining debt service on the town's sewer
and school construction projects, officials say taxpayers will see a net increase of $14 in fiscal 2011 and $7 in fiscal 2012, and will see the
debt decline in 2014.
"I didn't support it last year, but the town downsized the cost," said Larry Ellis, who voted in favor last night. "I don't like to in -
crease taxes, but this is something we need."
Town officials said moving to a larger facility will also save the town $70,000 a year that the Sewer Department now pays to rent space in a
separate building. In addition, it will cancel the possibility of another lawsuit with the North Chelmsford Water District. The town has already
spent about $100,000 in legal fees over the DPW's proximity to North Chelmsford's drinking-water supply.
While candidates running for School Committee and the Board of Selectmen campaigned to set themselves apart in the 2010 election, all had
voiced their support for the DPW project.
"I'm very happy this passed," said Jon Kurland, who won a seat on the Board of Selectmen last night along with candidate Matt Hanson .
"It's such a major win for the town."
Despite cheers at Town Offices over the DPW victory, some voters who exited the polls yesterday felt differently.
"We can't afford it," Laurie Corbett said. "I'd rather put the money toward our schools."
Jeff Apostollakes said he would have supported the project but had to cast a "no" vote on the grounds that some in town aren't picking up their
fair share of the tab.
"No matter how you look at it, it's a tax increase," he said. "I know we need this, but it's tough to keep forking over money
when some of the town's unions won't help out by making some sacrifices of their own. We're paying a lot of money for
town employee health insurance and benefits. It doesn't seem fair for the rest of us to pay more money until everybody
is pitching in."
Former Selectman Clare Jeannotte, whose first term came to an end last night, called the project a "good deal."
"I think the second time around, voters felt this was a good, frugal solution to solve the problem
of an antiquated facility," she said.
Planning Board member Colleen Stansfield echoed the sentiment.
"This vote is a huge investment in the future," Stansfield said. "It's an opportunity taken, not lost."
The DPW's current Richardson Road facility will remain open until the second phase, which Town Manager Paul Cohen estimated would
begin in 2015. The total project is expected to cost $11 million.
Mailings 'purely propaganda'
Chelmsford resident hopes missives will affect election
By Rita Savard, firstname.lastname@example.org
CHELMSFORD -- Another letter blasting town officials landed in mailboxes Saturday, three days before today's
This time, there's no mistaking who the author is.
Asking residents to "vote no to every incumbent on the ballot Tuesday," Chelmsford resident Roland
Van Liew announced he's launching a campaign called "Better Not Bigger" in a mailing marked with his pho-
His goal, Van Liew said, is to promote good government by eliminating what he calls "corruption and crony - Van Liew
ism" in Town Hall.
Van Liew, who also co-founded and pumped about $500,000 into the anti-40B group Slow Growth Initiative, said this new endeavor is
his own -- separate from SGI, which is led by Craig Chemaly.
During the past couple of years, SGI has sent out its own mailings alleging that town officials are destroying Chelmsford's character.
Van Liew has been called out by several people for writing those letters but has denied the allegations.
A couple of weeks ago, Chemaly publicly offered an olive branch to the town, adding that SGI would cease its negative mailings nam-
ing town officials but he couldn't be responsible for what Van Liew might do on his own.
In his 10-page letter, Van Liew targets Town Manager Paul Cohen and several people serving on town boards and committees, includ-
ing Philip Eliopoulos, members of the Planning Board and Selectman Pat Wojtas.
Van Liew states that Chelmsford officials have supported a "knee-jerk growthist mentality" for decades. Wojtas declined to com-
ment on the letter yesterday, only to say that she received it but hadn't read it.
Paul Cohen Cohen called the mailing "just sad."
"By now, I think voters have seen enough of these mailings to read between the lines," Cohen
said. "It stretches the realm of credibility when you accuse everybody serving on town
boards and committees of being corrupt. It's purely propaganda, and I believe people will
see it for what it is."
Chemaly said yesterday that the mailing should prove Van Liew is a man who acts on his own accord.
"We appreciate his support, but we've decided to take a different approach in working with
the town," Chemaly said. "SGI can't be held responsible for the actions of a donor."
Last month, Attorney General Martha Coakley issued SGI a cease-and-desist order to stop taking donations because the organization
had failed to register with the state as a nonprofit organization. Chemaly said the group has gathered all of its financial records for
Coakley's office and hopes to be soliciting donations again soon.
Eliopoulos, whose family was highlighted in the letter as being the "dominant clan" of the town's "oligarchy," said yesterday that a
public debate would be the best way to settle this issue.
"It's just unsubstantiated personal attacks against people who donate their time to the community," he said. "I think
a debate, with an impartial moderator, would show the community what the truths are."
Van Liew told The Sun yesterday that he will not debate Eliopoulos.
Van Liew, who owns and operates Hands On Technology Transfer Inc. at 1 Village Square, declined to say how many of the missives
were sent to Chelmsford homes.
"It's a small test mailing to help me gauge what kind of effect it will have on election results," he said. "I've already
gotten some positive feedback, and just one letter asking me to move away. So I'll take that as a positive."
Another election season, another mailing
By Chloe Gotsis, Staff Writer
GateHouse News Service
Apr 09, 2010
Chelmsford residents can set their calendar by the political mailings: Each year they arrive a few days before the election, each one designed
to reassure decided voters and entice the undecided. If they happen to change a few minds, so much the better for the author.
Last Saturday, the latest installment began arriving. The author calls on residents to “vote to eliminate corruption and cronyism in
The author is Roland Van Liew, a Chelmsford resident whose name has been mentioned frequently by critics of the earlier mailings, sent by the
Slow Growth Initiative.
In his letter, bearing the name of a 1998 book by Eben Fodor, “Better not Bigger,” Van Liew calls on residents to “Vote ‘no’ every incumbent
on the ballot on Tuesday and help make Chelmsford better, not bigger.”
While previous mailings sent out by the Slow Growth Initiative have not mentioned Selectman Pat Wojtas, who lost her re-election bid this
week, Van Liew’s mailing is critical of Wojtas for being pro Chapter 40B.
“She continues to defend the Town Manager’s incompetent performance, contending problems are not his fault because
the issues are complex,” said Van Liew in the mailing. “Indeed, they are complex. That is precisely why we need a competent
Town Manager. The Board of Selectmen with Wojtas as chief apologist, refuses to hold Town Manager Cohen account -
able for multiple acts of malfeasance and obviously corrupt decision-making.”
On Monday afternoon, Wojtas said she could not comment because she had not yet read the mailing and didn’t expect she would have time to
before election day.
Van Liew had no qualms about identifying his motive behind sending the mailings out last weekend.
“One objective is to let residents of Chelmsford know that it’s important to continue to send a message at the ballot box,”
he said in an e-mail. If we don’t like cronyism, the only alternative is to ‘vote the bums out,’ as they say.”
Van Liew said he was also provoked by the idea that the mailings may incite some residents to run in the next election and to let other officials,
who are not up for re-election know that they are being monitored.
The mailing largely focuses around the proposed two-story office building on North Road put forth by the Eliopoulos family.
Van Liew charges that the Eliopoulos family, whom he calls “the dominant clan,” in the town’s “oligarchy,” have steered the proposal for
the development through local town boards illegally. He calls the recent Planning Board approval, “breathtaking in its combination of audacity
Van Liew charges that the proposed development will interfere with the town’s open space and greenery on Center Park. In a recent interview
he said officials have no consideration for the town’s greenery.
But former Selectman Philip Eliopoulos, who is representing his father’s company and the building’s owner Epsilon Group LLC, said these
statements are blatant lies.
“Roland has put himself out there now as someone who is willing to spread lies about people who do a lot of good things
for the town,” said Eliopoulos. “What Roland has put in that letter is nothing but out and out lies. It’s almost laugh -
able to some extent. ”
Eliopoulos’ answer to exposing what he calls are Van Liew’s lies is to organize a debate between with Van Liew and Slow Growth Director Craig
Chemaly against town officials.
Van Liew attributes the fact that the Eliopoulos’ proposed office building is still tied up in town boards and in court to the vocal opposition of the
Slow Growth Initiative.
“If it wasn’t for the Slow Growth Initiative, the shovels would be in the ground for that thing,” he said at a recent interview at
his Village Square office.
Van Liew contends that since he began sending the mailings last weekend he has received favorable feedback from town residents.
“Longtime residents whom I don’t know personally are contacting me by phone and by e-mail and letting me know they
think ‘it’s about time’ that the cronyism is challenged,” he said, yet he admitted receiving one message from an unidentifiable sender
telling him to feel free to move away.
Town Manager Paul Cohen, whom Van Liew repeatedly calls incompetent, said he wasn’t surprised when he heard about the weekend mailing.
“The pattern has always been to do a mailing last minute before the election so no one has the ability to respond to the
misinformation,” he said. “Clearly, given the content and the tone it is the same as what was in the Slow Growth mailings
and it sort of belies the fact that he has nothing to do with the Slow Growth Mailings.”
Cohen said he doubts that the mailing will have an impact on the outcome of Tuesday’s election.
“I respect the intelligence of the voters in town,” he said, adding that he is concerned that the mailings will sway residents against vol-
unteering on town boards.
Cohen said Van Liew enjoys the spotlight.
Note: Since the letter was sent out last weekend, incumbent Pat Wojtas lost her bid for re-election and Philip Eliopolous
came in last in his race town meeting representative. However, there were six candidates for six open seats in Precinct 5
and Eliopolous maintained his seat.
SGI fights bill collectors in court
By Rita Savard, email@example.com
LOWELL -- After collecting thousands of signatures for an effort to abolish the state's 40B affordable-housing law, a professional signa-
ture-gathering firm is suing the Chelmsford-based Slow Growth Initiative, Craig Chemaly, Roland Van Liew and John Belskis of the Coali-
tion to Repeal 40B for allegedly failing to pay nearly $80,000 for services rendered.
Rob and Dianne Wilkinson, owners of Worcester-based Freedom Petition Management, filed suit in Woburn District Court on April 6,
claiming the defendants violated a contractual agreement. The Wilkinsons' attorney and a lawyer representing the defendants argued
their cases before Lowell Superior Court Judge Christine McEvoy yesterday.
The lawsuit seeks to stop SGI, the Coalition to Repeal 40B and the New Hampshire-based New England Coalition for Sustainable Popu-
lation from gathering any further signatures for their ballot initiative until Freedom Petition management is paid. The suit also seeks to put
an injunction on the bank accounts of Van Liew, Chemaly, Belskis SGI, NECSP and Repeal 40B, to prevent any transferring of assets until
the signature gatherers are paid.
"In an e-mail Roland Van Liew writes that he's taking personal responsibility for the debt owed ... but payments have
fallen through every time," said Anthony McGuinness, who represents the Wilkinsons.
John Gallant, who represents the defendants, argued that his clients were making regular payments before the Wilkinsons asked for more
than what the nonprofit agencies could pay at once.
"The clients don't deny that there is some debt but we don't know how much that is," Gallant told the judge. "My clients
have paid over $220,000 over the past year. We haven't received an account of how (the Wilkinsons) arrived at an -
Rob Wilkinson confirmed that SGI has paid more than $200,000, but alleges that the defendants owed nearly $300,000 for about 91,000
signatures collected last year, as well for consulting services on how to gather signatures.
The Wilkinsons' lawyer also told McEvoy that Craig Chemaly signed the contractual agreements and a series of payments was sporadic,
coming in by wire transfer and by check. One payment was made by Van Liew directly, another by NECSP and SGI, and another was
signed by Chemaly from the Coalition to Repeal 40B. Although an agreement was made to make payments of about $20,000 a week, the
defendants were not able to meet that, McGuinness said.
Gallant argued that payments made are based on fundraising activities, and the high lump sum that the plaintiffs were seeking would pre-
vent SGI from paying its five employees.
McGuinness said his clients were also worried about getting paid due to a cease-and-desist order issued by Attorney General Martha
Coakley last month that blocked SGI and NECSP from soliciting donations in Massachusetts because each organization failed to register
with the state as a nonprofit.
Gallant said SGI has submitted the necessary documents to the state and should be able to take donations again soon.
SGI hired Freedom Petition Management last year to help gather signatures with the goal of placing a question to repeal 40B on this fall's
state election ballot. Similar efforts, led by Belskis and the Repeal 40B Ballot Question Committee, were derailed in 2008 when the com-
mittee was unable to gather enough signatures.
Chemaly said the support to take 40B off state law books was there, but that Massachusetts makes it very tough to get a question on the
Before an initiative appears on the Massachusetts ballot, applicants must receive approval from the attorney general and secretary of
state and collect more than 75,000 supporting signatures.
If the state Legislature does not approve the 2010 40B ballot initiative in May, proponents will have little more than a month to collect
11,000 additional signatures. The Wilkinsons said they'd like to receive the rest of their money before SGI, Repeal 40B or NECSP can col-
lect any more signatures on their own.
"They were supposed to pay us in full in December," Rob Wilkinson said. "They didn't, so then we made an agreement to
receive payments of $20,000 a week based on what Roland Van Liew said he could do. They didn't make one of
those payments until they received a demand letter from an attorney."
Freedom Petition Management has been gathering signatures for ballot questions in Massachusetts since 1999. The company obtained
signatures for all three questions that appeared on the 2008 state election ballot.
Last year marks the first time they've had a problem with a client, Dianne Wilkinson said.
"We've done all the work and invested our own money to pay our people and get (the defendants) exactly what they
asked for," Dianne Wilkinson said. "Now we're in the hole and we just want to get paid."
McEvoy told both attorneys, "if you don't resolve it by noon (today), I'll resolve it."
“No set plans for SGI Still working on payment deal ” CLICK HERE
LOWELL SUN POLITICAL COLUMN
By Rita Savard
ASKenburg and you shall receive.
Less than 24 hours after Janet Askenburg was elected to the Chelmsford School Committee with the high-
est number of votes in all the town’s contested races, she was already breaking “tradition”.
During the Wednesday meeting to reorganize the committee, Askenburg asked
for a copy of the school district’s budget, which Superintendent Donald Yeoman
said traditionally goes out the Friday before a meeting. But since the budget was
ready on Wednesday, Askenburg said, why wait?
When Yeoman said he’d need to see who was available to make a copy.
Askenburg said she would be happy to make her own copy if necessary. Within an hour, copies of the
budget were presented to all members of the School Committee two days ahead of schedule.
Tuesday’s election also brought a reorganization of the Board of Selectmen with George
Dixon becoming chair, Eric Dahlberg taking over the vice-chair seat and newly elected
Matt Hanson sliding into the role of clerk. Hanson did not make Thursday’s reorganiza-
tion meeting , but wrote a letter expressing his interest in becoming clerk.
Hanson, 21 , will also be absent for the board’s first meeting Monday night , while visiting
New Zealand where his girlfriend , Town Meeting Representative , Anna Graves ,who is
The ousting of former Selectmen Pat Wojtas came as a surprise to some who thought
the incumbent would be re-elected without a hitch. Wojtas did take some heat during her
campaign from challenger Jon Kurland, who was elected to the board.
Kurland asked Wojtas more than once about a vote she took that prevented an in-house
ambulance discussion from reaching the floor of town meeting in 2008. Kurland said the
issue should have been debated by the townspeople.
Before the election, some also questioned Wojtas’ role as the board’s liaison to
the Chelmsford Housing Authority. Her brother, Charlie Wojtas, owns the land at 9
Manahan St., which the Housing Authority is trying to purchase for $200,000 with
community preservation funding to build affordable housing for veterans. However,
Pat Wojtas has said she contacted the state Ethics Commission and was told
there would be no conflict as long as she did not vote on the proposal at Town
Another question that surfaced during the race was, what on Earth happened to Jack
Wang? The School Committee candidate, who seemed to start out strong, failed to show up
to campaign. Yet he only trailed incumbent Evelyn Thoren by 378 votes.
Wang who was spotted at the polls with one homemade sign that simply read, WANG, ad-
mitted Tuesday night that he could have campaigned harder. He joked that he wouldn’t be
allowed back trail until he takes a course on ordering signs.
Former Selectman Philip Eliopoulos earned the least number of votes among the six
candidates running for Town Meeting rep seats in Precinct 5.
Eliopoulos, whose family plans to construct an office building on North Road, said he
didn’t think the controversy surrounding the project had anything to do with his sixth-
place finish in the non-contested race.
Because he faced no competition, Eliopoulos said he put his efforts into campaigning
for the town’s only ballot question instead – a $5 million DPW debt exclusion – which
the voters passed Tuesday
CLICK HERE for Show
with Tom Christiano
The panelists on the
APRIL 13, 2010
Annual Post Election
(l to r) Sam Chase, Colleen
Stansfield, Bob Joyce, Tom
Christiano, Chloe Gotsis
& Alex Buck.
with Tom Christiano
Chelmsford Selectman & current State Senate Candidate Eric Dahlberg was recently a guest on the "Po-
litical Junkies Show with Tom Christiano." Eric's wife, Suzanne Dahlberg, was also on the show to
speak about the charity walk/run she is organizing. This 5K walk/run will take place on Sunday, Septem-
ber 26, 2010, in Chelmsford, and will benefit the National Lung Cancer Partnership. Should you wish to
participate in this fundraiser, either as a walker, or to make a pledge, please check out the website at
freetobreathe.org...or please contact either Suzanne Dahlberg or Tom Christiano, who will be doing the
charity walk on September 26th.
The topics discussed with
CLICK HERE Eric on the Show included
for Show Why Eric decided to run
for the State Senate this
year...his most significant
accomplishments, thus far,
as a Selectmen
..the State Income and
Sales Tax Rates
the 40B Law...
Casinos in MA...
why repeal the Pacheco
Eric's term limit pledge.
SPRING TOWN MEETING
for Spring Town Meeting Warrant book
It’s your town
and it’s your Town Meeting
You do not need to be a Town Meeting
Representative to have a say at Town Meeting!
If you have questions about the Town and School budgets,
the two Town Hall restoration projects or
the Veteran’s housing proposal in the Westlands
or any other matter that comes up at Town Meeting,
come and get involved.
April 26th 7:30 pm
Chelmsford Senior Center
75 Groton Road, North Chelmsford
Let The People Speak!
Battle lines form on vets housing
By Rita Savard, firstname.lastname@example.org
CHELMSFORD -- A proposal to build veterans housing near the Chelmsford Mall
has stirred concerns over the project's size and scale.
Neighbor Neal Lerer, who lives at 4 Manahan St., across the road from the proposed
site, said the 17,000-square foot lot seems too small for a duplex.
"There used to be a single-family home on that lot," Lerer said.
"I suggested that they build another single-family home instead for a
veteran and his family."
Resident Laurie Myers, who also lives in the Westlands neighborhood on Pine Hill
Avenue, said she supports having veterans housing in the area, but doesn't want to
see it turned into a "rooming house."
Chelmsford Housing Authority Director Executive David Hedison, who's seeking
$400,000 in Community Preservation funds to make the proposal at 9 Manahan St.
a reality, said the site remains a blank canvas.
"This is a project that we want the community to help design," Hedison said. "It's going to be part of the community so it
won't be planned without public input."
Hedison mailed information about the proposal -- which seeks to house some of the 18 Chelmsford veterans now on a waiting list for affordable
housing -- to Town Meeting representatives yesterday.
Hedison said some residents might have gotten the wrong impression that a building was already designed due to rough sketches the CHA
had to provide the Community Preservation Committee at a recent meeting. Plans that showed three different buildings on the site were pre-
sented to give the committee an idea of what a building on the parcel might look like.
Hedison said CHA just brought on Boston-based architects, Mostue and Associates.
"We don't have anything designed yet," Hedison stressed, but added that
the CHA will be holding public meetings for input from residents to make sure the
building's aesthetics fit in with the neighborhood. In the meantime, the CHA
wanted to get more information out to Town Meeting representatives and abutters.
There are 150 local veterans on a waiting list for affordable housing. Eighteen are
single individuals from Chelmsford. And as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan con-
tinue, more veterans will surely be added to the list, Hedison said.
The Manahan Street site was chosen for its proximity to community services, in-
cluding bus transportation, grocery and department stores. The proposed project
would create a first- and second-floor unit, each with four bedrooms and a shared
living space. The first floor would be handicapped accessible.
Some veterans that live in the housing units could have physical disabilities, in-
cluding missing limbs from the war, but other than that, all residents of the house
would "be living independently just like you and me," Hedison said.
"People have had concerns about the type of people that might be liv -
ing there," Hedison said. "These will be people that served our country. They're not going to be hanging around outside
pushing shopping carts."
The residents moving into the development will look like the ones Chelmsford has been housing for three decades inside the town's three
affordable housing developments -- McFarland Manor, Delaney Terrace and Chelmsford Arms.
There are about 12 to 20 affordable units that open up in Chelmsford each year, Hedison explained. More than half have gone out to local vet-
erans. Creating housing specifically for veterans will free up more of the existing units for other residents in need, including the elderly.
The CHA will ask Town Meeting representatives to appropriate $400,000 in
Community Preservation funds to help build the duplex at Town Meeting on
April 26. If approved, the CPA money would be matched by nearly $1 million
in state and federal funding to make the project a reality.
Jeff Hardy, a Town Meeting representative who lives in the Westlands neigh-
borhood, said he understands some of his neighbors' concerns, but has
faith in the CHA proposal.
"It's hard to sit there and say you don't want to help our veter -
ans," Hardy said.
"If the (CHA) makes a mistake with this proposal, they'll have a
hard time working with the town again so they're going to work
hard to get it right. I see more of an
upside than a down side here."
Taken from the mailing that went out to the Town Meeting Representatives
This site is in a great location for residents to access an array of community services, such as bus trans-
portation, grocery stores and department stores. These amenities are easily reached by walking or a short
drive. The neighborhood is rich in diversity and features duplexes, a multifamily dwelling with over 30 units,
a shopping mall across the way and commercial businesses next door.
This neighborhood is currently zoned for commercial use. Some have raised concerns that if this project
moves forward their own home may be torn down for the same purpose. You may rest assured that this will
not be the case. This site was selected for its unique location within a commercial zone, the acquisition
price of $200,000, and the commitment of the seller to see this built as Veteran’s Housing. The seller,
Charlie Wojtas, and his two siblings are all veterans and he agreed to sell the land if we focused on helping
The residents moving into this development will look like the ones we have been housing for three decades
at our existing buildings. We are proposing long-term housing and NOT a shelter. The building will be two
stories and look like a home. There will be a front and side doors and each floor will have four bedrooms.
As there will be a mix of ages, we anticipate that on-site service delivery similar to the ones we provide in
our existing buildings will support our frail elderly veterans or those who may have mobility issues and are
We are committed to helping our veterans live independently and be part of our community. As such, this
will not be a site that has support staff living there or providing 24-hour care. It will be like a regular home
where people may receive a variety of supportive services, such as transportation to doctor’s appointments,
home health care and home-making. We will reach out to local service agencies to provide these services
on an as-needed basis.
We have hired an architect that will be designing the Chelmsford Manahan Street site along with the West-
ford Carlisle Road site. Both buildings are being designed to provide housing opportunities to the veterans
that have served our country. The Carlisle Road Project was well-received at the Westford Town Meeting,
where they unanimously voted to support $400,000 for their Veteran’s Project. We are kindly asking for
your support at Town Meeting for the Chelmsford Veteran’s Project.
There will be a local process to accept input from neighbors, various boards, veterans and other interested
parties. We will be using CHA funds currently on hand to purchase the land and hope that you will join us
in support of this valuable project. The $400,000 will be more than matched with State funds. We will have
a public process to solicit input on the design of the building to make sure that it fits within the scale and
look of the neighborhood.
If you have specific questions, please email me at email@example.com. I welcome your input and the
opportunity to address any future concerns that may arise.
For more info Click Here http://www.chelmsfordha.com/297/proposal-for-veterans-housing/
Also for questions concerning veterans specificly contact
Regina Jackson●Veterans Agent
phone # 978-250-5238
April 22, 2010
Letter to the Editor
Please allow me the privilege of including this letter to the editor in your in town report.
Notwithstanding the Lowell Sun Article, many individuals are unaware of the warrant and
issue concerning housing on 9 Manahan Street.
I have lived at 4 Manahan Street virtually all my life. My family is in favor of the concept
of Veterans’ housing. I have a nephew presently serving in Afghanistan.
The issue that I and many neighbors on Manahan Street have is that the proposed
project is too big for the space and overly congested. The lot is undersized at 17,600
square feet and historically had a one-family house. The present proposal, which I hope
will change, provides for a doubling of the housing area and eight unrelated people living
together, not a single family. It is my hope and that of many of my neighbors that the
project be limited to four or, at the most, six people. After the addition of a driveway and
parking, precious little open space will be left for the prospective tenants to garden,
have a barbecue, or set up a hammock if housing is provided for eight unrelated adults.
I understand that there is some marginal economic advantage in economies of scale,
but eight is too many and congested for this lot. In my view, value to the neighborhood
as opposed to cost should be paramount. If the cost of the project is the most important
factor, then Town Meeting should not support using public money to pay for private land.
The CHA or its affiliate is paying $200,000 for land without a house on it.
Based on the assessor’s record, it was purchased for $179,000 with a house on it in November
2008. The house alone, which was appraised at between $146,000 and over $151,000, was
declared a total loss after a fire and presumably some fire insurance recovery was obtained by
the owner. The land only appraised value is now $177,100, although $201,500 is the total
appraised parcel value; so $200,000 is not a bargain price based on the parcel’s original sale
value if cost is the main factor in this project.
Consequently, absent some firm agreement to limit the congestion and size of the group
home project to preferably four or, at most, six individuals, I request that the
warrant be defeated.
9 Manahan Street
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
North Town Hall (NTH) was built in 1853 to serve the Chelmsford community. It is Chelmsford’s first Town
Hall. NTH is the cornerstone of the largest collection of mill related buildings in Massachusetts.
Many residents worked hard this year developing a proposal that will enhance our community and not
pose a financial burden to the town. The Town Halls Utilization Study Committee (THUSC) was formed
in the spring to recommend long term viable uses for Chelmsford’s Town Halls. THUSC presented their rec-
ommendations in October and the Permanent Building Committee (PBC) proceeded with cost-estimations
for the renovations.
There will be no additional costs to taxpayers to renovate the Town Halls. Ten years ago residents voted
to approve the Massachusetts Community Preservation Act. This act created a fund which can only be
used for historical preservation, open space or affordable housing. Only 8% of the account has been spent
on historical preservation. The Community Preservation Committee (CPC) has funds available to renovate
both Town Halls. Importantly, the PBC developed a “not to exceed” cost estimate; there are many ways the
cost can be decreased and anticipated excess funds will be returned to CPC.
THUSC determined the proposed use for NTH will cover the operating expenses of the building.
The proposed use, a Community Center, will provide a welcoming space with events meeting the needs of
all ages. It will provide much needed meeting space for local organizations, contain historical displays and
be available for private function rental. It will also host an after school program for middle school students,
meeting an important need for this at-risk population.
For more than 150 years, NTH has served Chelmsford well as a Town Hall, a community center, school
administrative offices and more. It is important that we preserve this historical treasure for future genera-
9 Washington St.
History of North Town Hall
History of North Town Hall
Chelmsford began as a bustling rural community in the colonial times. The village of North Chelmsford hosted travelers
along the Middlesex Turnpike before the Revolutionary War. The mill buildings were built at the start of the industrial revo-
lution and created a vibrant economic village in North Chelmsford. Food and goods were shipped to Boston via the Mid-
dlesex Canal and the village served as a popular stop for passengers and freight during the railroad years.
In 1853, the townspeople recognized the need for a gathering place dedicated solely to civic purposes. As a result, North
Town Hall was constructed to serve as the town's first civic building. The land was generously donated by two local resi-
dents, Benjamin and Thomas Adams. Remarkably, this mill community still stands today: the mills, the canals, the mill
owners’ houses, the row houses, the shops, the forge, the common, the park, the churches, the library and the town hall.
Chelmsford’s North Town Hall is the cornerstone of the largest collection of mill related buildings in the Commonwealth of
In its 156 years, this Chelmsford gem has served its people well. During the early years, Town Meetings alternated be-
tween the Center and North Town Halls. In later years, North Town Hall functioned as the gathering place for numerous
municipal events including High School graduations and receptions, proms, classroom space, school administration offices,
and a polling place among other things. It has also strengthened the community’s bond by providing countless public
events like plays, stage shows, movies, social outings and scout troop meetings to name a few. Dancing and elocution les-
sons were available to residents. For a time, the American Legion gave out Halloween candy from this historic building.
And another notable fact to take pride in, Spaldings' Light Calvary, a very well respected and decorated Civil War unit chose
our North Town Hall as its home. Clearly, this Chelmsford gem has served its people well over its lifetime. This historic
masterpiece ought to be brought back to its original splendor and, once again, serve the residents of Chelmsford.
The vision of the 1997 North Town Hall Committee to re-establish North Town Hall as a welcoming and vibrant Community
Center after its brief period of vacancy should move forward. The top floor boasts a 40 foot stage, a gallery and beautiful
birch wood floors. The ground floor, in traditional New England style, features meeting rooms’ space, a dining hall and a
kitchen area. Townspeople could once again gather for social events including potluck dinners, dances, movie nights, small
and large group events, seasonal festivities and much more determined by the needs of our residents. Local organizations
and clubs could once again schedule their events or meetings at North Town Hall.
Just as our forefathers understood, so much would be gained by a town building dedicated for municipal and civic pur-
poses. Current residents of Chelmsford would benefit from the use of a local community center and the legacy of our his-
toric North Town Hall would carry on into future generations.
Milestones in the life of Two New England Town Halls
Chelmsford Center Town Hall
1873 – The Town voted not to build a “Town House” in the “Cen-
tre Village” primarily due to objections from North Chelmsford
residents who already had a Town Hall facility.
1879 – The Town votes to build a Town Hall to replace the Uni-
tarian Church basement which had been used for Town business
since 1842, sometimes alternating with North Town Hall.
1880 – The Town voted not to lay a concrete floor and build
horse stalls in the basement. A horse shed was authorized and
built out back in 1881.
1888 – Two toilet rooms were constructed in the basement along
with access stairs from the vestibule.
1893 to 1895 – The Chelmsford Free Public Library operated on
the first floor.
1908 to 1923 – Volunteer fire department apparatus was housed in the rear.
1921 – The Town Accountant, first of many officials to follow, moved his office into Town Hall.
1923 – The Village Improvement Association donated the first fire whistle mounted atop the tower.
1937 to 1938 – The building underwent a major reconditioning as a WPA project, with offices temporarily moved to North Town Hall.
A part of this project was to lower the basement floor by two feet so the kitchen and dining room could be moved there from the first
1956 – An addition was built on the rear of Town Hall to provide three rooms for the Police Department, with offices for the Highway
Department in the basement. There was no lock-up or investigation room.
1959 – A new garage was constructed in back of Town Hall for the Highway Department. Their old garage was converted by volun-
teers for use by the Auxiliary Police in 1960.
1960 – The rear entrance hall was relocated to create space for the Assessor’s office.
1961 – The second floor stage was removed to make room for two more offices.
1964 – The back stairway to the upper hall was removed to make room for the Town Clerk’s office.
1965 – The Police Department moved out of Town Hall to a new facility on North Road.
1966 – Additional fire proof vault space was built for important Town records.
1977 – A “Town-wide Cultural Council” was appointed to find appropriate uses for Town Hall in the event a move of Town offices to
the vacant McFarlin School was approved.
1980 – A State grant was approved to fund both the office move to McFarlin and Town Hall restoration.
1985 – A Preservation Restriction was placed on the now completed restoration work to insure the future architectural and historical
integrity of Town Hall.
2008 – After a relatively stable period of community use by the Cultural Council and Recreation Commission, the changing economy
left Town Hall nearly abandoned.
2009 – A plan by the Chelmsford Housing Authority to convert the building to affordable housing focused the Town’s attention on this
endangered historical treasure. A pilot program to restart the building as the “Chelmsford Center for the Arts” has succeeded beyond
2010 – At Spring Annual Town Meeting next week the TM Representatives have an opportunity to review and approve a Warrant Arti-
cle to set in motion a restoration program to bring Town Hall into the twenty first century as an accessible and functional public facility
that would make the original planners, builders and residents proud. Funding for this Town Hall project is to be drawn from the Mas-
sachusetts Community Preservation Trust Fund and the local Community Preservation Fund at the discretion of the Chelmsford
Community Preservation Committee, and will not affect local real estate taxes in any way.
North Chelmsford Town Hall
1851 – North Chelmsford businessmen petitioned the State legislature for a division of the North and Centre sections of Chelmsford,
due to the inconvenience of travel to the Centre. The petition failed.
1852 – The Town voted to build a “Town House” in the North section not to exceed the cost of the present town house.
1853 – The Town House is completed as a large one story meeting hall. Annual Town Meetings are held alternately at the Centre
and North villages for a number of years.
1871 – The Town agrees to hold all intermediate or special meetings alternately at Centre and North.
1884 – Town Meeting votes to enlarge the building.
1885 to 1886 – North Town Hall is lifted 10 feet and the foundation
dropped 1 foot, and a new first floor is inserted. The front of the building is
extended by 20 feet and the interior is refinished.
1921 to 1965 – North Town Hall is used as a polling place for Precinct 2.
1967 to 1981 – The Chelmsford School Department was granted full use
of the building, and a number of historically incompatible changes were
made to create serviceable office space. The School Department moved
their administrative offices to Parker School in 1981.
1981 – The Chelmsford Pop Warner organization hires North Town Hall for
seasonal equipment storage.
1986 – The Board of Selectmen granted the Chelmsford Housing Authority
ownership of the building.
1987 – The Executive Office of Communities and Development, and the Chelmsford Housing Authority decided to withdraw a plan
to reduce the size of the building and convert it to four units of housing because state grant requirements were not met. The deed to
the property was returned to the Board of Selectmen. The Massachusetts Historical Commission recommends that any re-use
scheme should preserve the historic building’s character defining features.
1988 – The Masons made an unsolicited offer to purchase the building for $1, do a $40,000 to $50,000 renovation and allow Town
use of the building. This offer stood for five years.
1990 – A Town Meeting vote authorized the Selectmen to sell North Town Hall, leaving the minimum bid up to the discretion of the
Selectmen. Initial thinking was a sale price of $100,000.
1992 – The building was offered for sale at $75,000. The Boston Globe accidentally ran their ad with a photo of Center Town Hall,
which generated some confusion and amusement, but there was still no interest.
1993 – The Mason’s withdrew their $1 offer. The building was offered for sale with a minimum bid of $50,000. There were no bids.
1996 – A feasibility study was prepared by Belanger and Foley, Inc. to estimate the minimum cost required to re-open the now unin-
habitable North Town Hall. There were no construction funds available.
1997 – The North Town Hall Committee was formed to renovate the building with
the intention of returning it to use for the community. The Committee gutted the
building at no cost to the town and prepared it for renovation.
2004 - $50,000 appropriated from the Community Preservation Fund to stabilize
the North Town Hall building in preparation for a future restoration. The roof was
replaced in 2004 and windows repaired. The total expended was substantially less
than the original estimate and the balance (approx $22,000) has been returned to
the originating account.
2009 – A second plan by the Chelmsford Housing Authority to convert this building
to affordable housing focused the Town’s attention on a forgotten community
treasure. Investigations into its utilization as the “Chelmsford Community Center”
have shown solid promise.
2010 – At Spring Annual Town Meeting next week the TM Representatives have an opportunity to review and approve a Warrant Ar-
ticle to set in motion the resurrection of North Town Hall as an accessible and functional twentieth century public facility with ample
new parking constructed on the other side of the Fire Station. This facility was lost to Chelmsford residents in 1967, but now has a
chance of becoming a crown jewel in historic Vinal Square.
Funding for this Town Hall project is also to be drawn from the Massachusetts Community Preservation Trust Fund
and the local Community Preservation Fund, and will not affect local real estate taxes in any way.
These “milestones” were compiled from Chelmsford Historical Commission files by Fred Merriam to raise public aware-
ness of the Town Halls. The restoration project was initiated by Town Manager Paul Cohen and the Board of Selectmen,
and is a joint effort of the Town Halls Utilization Study Committee, the Permanent Building Committee, and the Community
Preservation Committee with help from very active Town Halls citizen interest groups.
An IN-TOWN REPORT Note to our Fellow Town Meeting Representatives.
We will all be asked to vote on two very important Warrant Articles at our upcoming Town Meeting.
Those two articles concern the Restoration of our Old Town Halls…one in the center of Chelmsford,
and one in the center of North Chelmsford.
Both of these buildings are important historical structures. The North Town Hall is 157 years old and the Old Center Town
Hall is approximately 130 years old.
We have financial resources in our town’s Community Preservation Fund which are supposed to be used for historical
preservation projects such as these two old town halls. They both are an important part of our town’s history and charac-
They are the iconic images of our town, which artists and photographers have been using to depict our town for decades.
Tom Christiano has personally created many pieces of art depicting the Old Town Hall, and they hang throughout his
home. I’m sure many of you have similar types of pictures.
These old Town Halls should be preserved for future generations. Rest assured, however, that they will not just be two
pretty buildings that we can look at and admire once they are fully restored.
The Old Center Town Hall will continue to be a vibrant part of our arts community and an important gathering place for
town events, celebrations and shows. During the past year, the community came out and packed this venue on many oc-
casions. We will be able to do that even more often once the building is completely restored and handicapped accessible.
The Old North Town Hall will be used as a community center for the entire town to enjoy. Some of the activities which are
planned for the refurbished Old North Town Hall are as follows, as expressed in a recent preservation committee mailing:
“The emphasis will be to provide a location to foster town, community and family relationships as the “Chelmsford Com-
Activities would include but not be limited to:
Afterschool program for Middle School students
Volunteer tutors, WiFi capabilities, games, arts & crafts, music, etc.
Rental space for community based organizations
Rental space for private functions
Rental space for small business owners
Space available for arts & crafts, fitness and hobby groups
North Chelmsford Historical Exhibits
Family Movie & Game Nights
Community Holiday Events
Children’s Theme Parties
MacKay Library Programs and Concerts
Men’s & Women’s Clubs
Historical Programs and Displays
Dances for All Ages
Girl Scout and Boy Scout Events
Hobby Clubs and Classes “
As you can clearly see upon reading the above list, there are many uses for the Old North Town Hall which will enrich the
lives of all of our citizens.
It is well worth the investment of our Community “Preservation” Funds to actually “PRESERVE” both of these historic town
buildings. “Let the Children Guard what the Sires have Won” should not be an empty slogan.
Let’s all vote next week to do exactly that….preserve what previous generations have won for us…so that we can do the
same for those who follow in our footsteps.
Tom Christiano Roy Earley
Town Meeting Representative Town Meeting Representaive
Rev. Ventura arrested
By Chloe Gotsis, Staff Writer
GateHouse News Service
Apr 14, 2010
A Chelmsford priest was among eight people arrested in association with a prostitution sting at a New
Hampshire hotel last week.
The Boston Archdiocese announced yesterday that Rev. William Venutra, who was serving as the parochial
vicar at St. John’s The Evangelist Church in Chelmsford, has voluntarily accepted a leave of absence from
public ministry as a result of his arrest. The leave of absence will remain in effect while the case is investi-
Nashua police conducted the sting on Friday, April 9, after learning the suspects had responded to a post-
ing on Craigslist.
"They all paid money, and the cash was exchanged before the arrest were made," Nashua
Police Department Capt. Scott Lowe said to the Boston Channel.
Ventura is charged with one count of prostitution.
The church said Ventura's leave of absence will remain in effect while the case is investigated.
"He is absolutely one of the best people, the kindest, most giving people I have ever met,
and that is all I have to say," one parishioner said.
George Dixon, the chairman of Selectmen and a parishioner at St John’s, said he is very surprised by the
news, but he considers the priest a friend. Dixon recalls that he and Ventura have talked about numerous
topics including Frank Sinatra since they met after Ventura arrived at St John’s straight after the seminary.
“I’ve never heard one person say a bad thing about him,” said Dixon, who is an altar server at the
church. “He is just a wonderful person. Everyone makes mistakes and I hope that this is an
A long-time member of St. John’s, Dixon said Ventura was doing commendable work with his programs at
“I would feel comfortable inviting him over to my house,” he said. “He loved his line of
On it’s Web site, St John’s has posted an announcement about Ventura’s leave of absence and says that it
“prays for all who are impacted by this matter.”
Ventura writes a twice-monthly column for the Independent.
His last column appeared April 8.
Efforts to reach him via phone and e-mail were unsuccess-
ful by press time.
Ventura was released on bail and is scheduled to be
arraigned on April 22.
The Boston Channel contributed to this story.
WBZ REPORTS :
Chelmsford Priest Charged In An official photo of Rev. William Ventura, left
and his mug shot (right)
Craigslist Sex Sting
CLICK HERE FOR NEWS CLIP
Priest pleads not guilty in Nashua sting
By Lisa Redmond, firstname.lastname@example.org
NASHUA -- A Chelmsford priest allegedly nabbed in a Craigslist prostitution sting by Nashua police waived his appearance in district court
yesterday, pleading innocent to one count of prostitution.
READ MORE CLICK HERE
Billboard site tests performed
Capital Advertising LLC sent a balloon 60 feet up into the
air at CHS. (Courtesy photo)
Kevin Zimmerman/Staff Reporter
• Fri, Apr 09, 2010
Capital Advertising LLC sent a red balloon into the air Thursday morning at Chelmsford High School and Oak Hill to deter-
mine how high billboards at those locations need to be in order to be visible to motorists.
"This was the billboard company doing a test to develop an accurate submission to the Planning Board," said Town Man-
ager Paul Cohen.
At CHS, the balloon was sent up 42 feet and then 60 feet. The goal is to ensure a sign is above the tree line but not higher
than it needs to be.
Capital Advertising was the high bidder for both town-owned sites. It agreed to pay the town $72,000 a year for the CHS
parcel and $60,000 annually for the Oak Hill land. It was also the high bidder for another sign at Oak Hill on land owned by
the Congregational Church in North Chelmsford.
The Planning Board would need to approve all three signs. It can also require Capital Advertising to perform another bal-
loon test, said Cohen.
Sewer rate hike on tap for July 1
Kevin Zimmerman/Staff Reporter
• Wed, Apr 14, 2010
Beginning July 1 every time you flush, you'll pay a little bit more.
The Department of Public Works plans to raise sewer rates 25 cents per 1,000 gallons, which will be the single-largest in-
crease in the system’s history.
As the sewer construction project nears completion, more houses are added to the system, requiring additional pump sta-
tions. The additional customers also mean more waste is being shipped to the Lowell system.
"Our percentage of the flow is getting larger," said DPW Director Jim Pearson. "Nine to 10 cents of that 25
cents is going to go to Lowell."
Other factors driving the costs include an increase in leaking pipes and illegal hookups, which Pearson said accounts for 42
million gallons lost to the system.
Because the system is operated through an enterprise fund, it needs to charge customers enough to cover all its expenses.
Currently there is about $1 million in the sewer's reserve fund, which Pearson plans to dip into for the first time this year.
He needs to purchase a truck designed specifically for cleaning the hundreds of miles of pipe beneath the town's streets.
The truck comes with a price tag between $300,000 and $375,000.
Also this year the sewer budget incorporates a full-time employee who collects sewer payments in the tax collector's office.
Previously, that person was included in the collector's personnel budget.
Although Sewer Commission Chairman Barry Balan expects Pearson to appear before the commission with his budget re-
quest, the rate hike does not need the commissioners OK.
"Town Meeting votes on the Sewer Enterprise Fund and that's what sets the sewer rates,"
said Town Manager Paul Cohen.
By Chloe Gotsis/Staff Writer
GateHouse News Service
Apr 19, 2010
In a fiscal year when many school districts across the Bay State are making cuts to staffing
and programs, Chelmsford is presenting a level-service budget for fiscal 2011.
At the April 13 School Committee budget hearing, School Business Manager Kathy McWilliams
presented a level-service budget of $45 million, which will provide no new cuts to services or
programs and no salary increases outside of step increases. The next fiscal year’s budget in-
cludes $2 million in additional spending over the fiscal 2010 budget that covers increases in
five fixed costs, including special education tuition, most of which are related to special educa-
“I’m so happy we’re able to have a level-serviced budget,” said School Committee
Chairwoman Kathy Duffett. “It sounds funny to say that’s a good place to be, but it
The budget includes a $588,000 shortfall based on the past five-year budget forecast. The fiscal 2010 budget shows a base projection of $43.5
million for fiscal 2011. McWilliams said if the school department followed through with its forecasted budget it would’ve increased more.
But with the current economy, the department is lucky to have a small shortfall based on the projections.
In August 2009 the town was forced to reduce the fiscal 2010 budget by $397,000 at a special Town Meeting due to mid-year state aid cuts.
The fiscal 2011 budget allots for 639.5 full time equivalent employees, or FTEs. The breakdown of full-time equivalent employees allows for the
fact that not all employees in schools work a full 40-hour work week. While the school district has lost a total of 51.2 full-time-equivalent employ-
ees, McWilliams pointed out that over the past 10 fiscal years the rate has flat lined.
The district saw a drop of 124 students in fiscal 2010 and is expected to drop by 37 more in fiscal 20011.
In fact, Chelmsford’s declining enrollment could serve as a benefit to its state aid, Williams said.
“A lot of districts like Westford had significant enrollment increases in enrollment and their Chapter 70 aid went up. But
Chelmsford’s is flat, but that’s good because your Chapter 70 stays the same,” she said.
In comparison with the state average Chelmsford schools fall below spending levels in all categories including administration, retirement, opera-
tions, maintenance and pupil spending, except for special education. The district spends about 138 percent above the state average on special
education, according to information from the district.
Williams said that while special education costs are rising in the district, it is not a significant increase. In fiscal 2009, 25 percent of the budget
was spent on special education and in fiscal 2010 27 percent was devoted to special education costs and in fiscal 2011 28 percent of the
budget will go to special education costs.
Chelmsford resident Brian Latina, a parent of five children, including a 26-year-old with special needs, commended the School Committee for its
presentation of special education funding.
“I was happy to see it tonight not be used in an adversarial way,” he said.
But School Superintendent Don Yeoman and McWilliams have consistently said that Chelmsford tests far above the state average and is
ranked among the top school districts in the commonwealth for its Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System testing or MCAS re-
“Considering how much you are spending you get you get a great value for your dollar,” said McWilliams. “You are number
two on MCAS. You even beat Brookline.”
School Committee Angie Taranto said its evident in the classrooms how hard teachers and staff are working with so little money.
“We’re getting a lot of bang for our buck,” he said. “You just can’t fathom what’s taking place in the classroom with what
little funding we have.”
The town’s mandated costs and contractual obligations, which are growing at a rate faster than Proposition 2 ½ allots for, will eventually cause
the district problems, Committee Member Nick DiSilvio pointed out. Municipalities can’t raise their property taxes by more than 2.5 percent per
year, which only allows budgets to grow by the confined amount. Declining state reimbursement and increasing special education tuitions will
also eventually cause problems for the district officials predicted.
“One of the issues we’re going to be running into very quickly is our fixed costs are going to be running into our Propo -
sition 2 ½ constraints,” said DiSilvio. “When that happens the only way we’re going to sustain it is reduce staff.” staff.
McWilliams cautioned that the district must begin to plan for long term stability and prepare for declining state aid, increasing special education
tuitions, diminishing reserves and the upcoming end of stimulus funding.
But she said it is continuing to work on negotiating with its employee unions on health insurance and looking at ways to cut utility costs.
Duffet also said she is concerned about the declining number of guidance staff available at the schools with rise in bullying at schools in the Bay
State. But Yeoman said he is hoping to put more guidance counselors back at the elementary schools.
But Finance Committee Chairwoman Mary Frantz reminded that while the School Budget is level-serviced, it allows for very little wiggle room
for employees and services.
"Let’s face it, we’ve been negotiating and our employees have a 0 percent costs of living increase for at least two years
now,” she said. “It contains no increases for inflation in paper costs. In that sense, it surprises me it’s only $500,000…we
can be glad we’re balanced but there are constraints.”
New Byam Principal: continually impressed with town
By By Chloe Gotsis, Staff Writer
GateHouse News Service
Apr 15, 2010
On Sept. 7 the some 500 students of the Byam Elementary School will have
a new face welcoming to school in the morning.
Kara Saranich, currently the assistant principal of Tynsborough Elementary
School, will take the reins from retiring school principal Jane Gilmore July 1.
Now after officially being hired by the school district last month to replace
the school’s 19-year leader, Saranich is eager to learn more about the
school’s history and its students.
The Independent talked with Saranich this week to learn more about her
background as a teacher in a bilingual special education classroom, her
hobbies and her favorite age to work with children.
Q What led you to apply for the position as the principal of the Byam? Kara Saranich will take over as the principal of
the Byam School on July 1. She is the current
A: I became familiar with Chelmsford over the past four years. I got to know assistant principal of Tyngsboro Elementary
some of the parents, teachers and administrators and it just seemed like School.
they were so committed to working for children and doing what’s best for
children. I’ve just been continually impressed with what I saw.
Q: What are you looking forward to with the new job?
A: Well, I’m really looking forward to meeting more parents and students. Since I accepted the position, I’ve met a num-
ber of people who went to Byam years ago and are educating their children there now. So I’m just really interested in
learning more about the school and getting to know more of the students.
Q Now, I’ve heard you mention that you have experience working in a bilingual inclusion classroom, how do you think
that will benefit you?
A I think my experience working in an inclusion classroom has been helpful because I’ve worked with students in a vari-
ety of settings and I’m committed to working with parents to find the most appropriate placement for students. It’s defi-
nitely something that I love about education because every year we meet new students that have new unique needs that
have to be addressed. I think that’s what’s exciting is that every child has unique needs that have to be supported. I think
it’s important to continually assess what we’re doing with students because what was working in September may not be
working in January.
Q As an educator in a neighboring town, you must’ve heard about the controversy surrounding the PTO fundraiser last
year, the Byam Gift Room. What do you think about the situation and how are you prepared to address it?
A: To be honest, I think there’s issues at every school that are dealing with parents, who are passionate about their chil-
dren. This issues was one that escalated to national concern and that’s what’s unusual. My understanding is that the
PTO decided not to hold it again. I plan to meet with the PTO regularly over the course of the school year to talk about
what programs they want to put in place throughout the school year. I want to make sure we can continue to make it a
positive place for children and the staff. I’ve heard overwhelmingly positive things about the Byam. I think this is a small
brief episode in a long history of commitment to children.
Q Do you plan to meet with Dr. Gilmore and shadow her at school?
A We are starting by meeting this week and we are going to figure out the transition period and go from there. Certainly,
she has a long history there and I would love to hear more from her about the school.
Q What is your favorite age range to work with children at?
A I definitely love children at the elementary school age, whether it’s young children or children in upper elementary. I
love working with children learning their letters or working with children who are able to manipulate fractions.
Q What led you to become an educator?
A I've always loved working with children. Even as a young child I enjoyed teaching. I taught dance in high school. It was
just a natural fit for me. I think it’s the most rewarding career because we are able to have an impact on their future.
Chelmsford nonprofit aims to feed the masses
By Chloe Gotsis/staff writer
GateHouse News Service
Apr 16, 2010
Chelmsford resident Maureen McKeown says her personal mantra has always
been, “if you feed the body, you will feed the soul or the spirit.”
Now after a long career in charitable work, McKeown is hoping to feed the hungry
in Chelmford and other neighboring towns with the Chelmsford’s first community
supper, Table of Plenty. Spearheaded by McKeowan and 12 others from Chelms-
ford and New Hampshire, Table of Plenty is expected to begin serving weekly din-
ners to those in need at the First Parish Church in May.
Modeled after Concord’s 20-year-old community dinner program, Open Table, the
new nonprofit will seek to help both the hungry and residents who feel socially iso-
lated. McKeown, who has volunteered for numerous charitable organizations throughout her lifetime, including delivering Meals on
Wheels for AIDS patients, said she was inspired by the camaraderie she saw when she volunteered at Open Table with her grand-
“I was just inspired by the genuine caring bond that exists between the volunteers and the guests,” she said.
“Many of the volunteers have been doing it year after year. It’s clear that the volunteers know all the guests by
Looking around her own town, McKeown realized Chelmsford lacked a similar program in spite of a real need. According to the
North Middlesex Council of Government in Lowell, 1,502 workers were jobless in December. In 2007, some 621 households were
living below the federal poverty line and nearly 180 families were receiving food stamps. McKeown found that almost 3,500
Chelmsford residents are collecting Social Security checks.
Since developing the idea several months ago, McKeown has been meeting weekly with the directors to get the organization off the
ground and plan the first supper. With the help of the Chelmsford attorneys John Carroll and Kevin Sullivan as well as accountant
Jerry Paolilli, the directors have successfully filed their 501-c3 forms and achieved nonprofit status.
McKeown and her friend Debby Kendrick, a Chelmsford resident and member of the organization’s board of directors, have worked
together on numerous charitable organizations over the years including serving as youth ministers at St. Mary’s Church in Chelms-
“At Christmas there’s a group of us who adopt a family in town or surrounding neighborhoods,” said Kendrick.
“Mostly they are families with single moms.”’
With a wide array of talents on the board of directors including teachers in the Concord Public Schools, contractors and computer
programs, the women are predicting success.
“Maureen has a real talent for putting together groups of people,” said Kendrick, who is a dental hygienist.
The two women have been working with their 10 colleagues on the board to meet with the clergy in Chelmsford to secure a home
for the new community super. While they said all the clergy in town were overwhelmingly supportive they settled on the First Parish
Unitarian Universalist Church as the venue for Table of Plenty.
Rev. Ellen Spero said the congregation is elated to participate.
“Being the ‘home kitchen’ for Table of Plenty provides us an opportunity to show our gratitude for people help -
ing one another and to offer hospitality for both the volunteers and the guests,” she said in an e-mail. “It is a way
to put our faith into action, and we are honored to have the chance.”
As a house or worship, First Parish sees a strong connection between food and spirituality, Spero said.
“I believe there is something at the heart of our human species that realizes that not only do we need to eat to
survive, but we need to eat together and share the food we have with one another to make those crucial social
and spiritual relationships that ensure we can not only survive but thrive,” she said.
Meals at the Table of Plenty in Chelmsford will be open to all, said Kendrick and McKeown.
“There are no requirements,” said Kendrick. “It’s not for people who are strictly financially in need. They may
need social interaction. And no one will be questioned or turned away.”
With a projected yearly budget of $10,000, the directors are still looking for volunteers for food shopping and donors.
Changes in trash pickup on the way
Kevin Zimmerman/Staff Reporter
• Fri, Apr 16, 2010
When it comes to the new recycling regulations, Jennifer Almeida wants residents to
know if their current system isn’t broken don't fix it.
If, however, it is broken she wants them to know they don’t need to separate the
paper, metal, glass and plastic parts anymore.
Single-stream recycling – which means no more sorting paper from other material –
is just one of the changes coming to Chelmsford beginning July 1.
"You don't have to change anything you're doing now," now,
said Almeida, recycling/solid waste coordinator. "You can keep doing what you’re doing."
The move to single-stream recycling comes alongside drastic cuts in the amount of trash residents will be
allowed to put out each week.
Beginning July 1, residents will be limited to two 32-gallon barrels. That is down for the current four barrels
now allowed. Anything over the two-barrel maximum will have to be placed in a town bag that comes with a
$2-per-bag price tag.
The purpose behind the changes is to get more residents to recycle everything they can.
"A lot of people think it is too complicated and there are too many rules," said Almeida.
"Single-stream is the carrot."
Chelmsford pays a tipping fee – what the hauler charges to take trash to the incinerator – of $74.50 per ton.
The more residents recycle the less trash the hauler has to transport.
Almeida realizes most residents are not going to match the level of recycling in her four-person household.
Between composting, recycling and not purchasing items with non-recyclable packaging, the Almeida family
puts out one 13-gallon trash bag a week.
That is really the exception and Almeida realizes some residents – like those with household medical waste
– will not be able to adhere to the limits every week.
"We are going to have people with issues and we have sympathy," said Almeida.
"We want to make it work for everybody."
Town officials won't make exceptions to the rules when the new policies kick in, but Almeida encourages
residents to try and make it work before calling her office to try to seek relief.
Many residents may balk at the new system, but Almeida believes after it becomes their regular routine it
will become a non-issue.
"Once you make the change you’re going to forget what you used to do," she said.
TRAIL DEDICATED TO BILL TUCKER
by Tom Christiano
A walking trail at the George B.B. Wright Conservation Land was dedicated to Bill
Tucker on April 11, 2010. Mr. Tucker was one of the original four founders of the
Chelmsford Open Space Stewardship program in 2005. He spent many hours creat-
ing and grooming the trails at the Wright Conservation Land, which is located off of
Parker Road, in the Center/South section of Chelmsford.
Mr. Tucker's wife attended the trail dedication, along with many of their nine chil-
dren and grand children. The lead Open Space Steward, Phil Stanway, was the
main speaker at the ceremony, along with Stewards Scott & Amy Venier. After the
dedication, we took a walk along the perfectly groomed trails as we talked about Bill
Tucker and all the outdoor volunteer work he performed here in Chelmsford.
Photos by Tom Christiano
Kevin Zimmerman/Publisher • Tue, Apr 20, 2010
Kevin Zimmerman www.chelmsfordmassnews.com
That sucking sound you hear is the last shred of dignity evaporating from the Chelmsford Planning Board.
Board members are falling over themselves to get quoted in Lowell Sun reporter Rita Savard's story on
why Planning Board member Bob Joyce did not recuse himself from the latest special
permit hearing for Epsilon Group’s North Road
Joyce is co-owner of this website and has not attempted to hide that fact from any-
At the last Planning Board meeting, Joyce disclosed that Dr. Michael Sargent is now
advertising his practice on this website. Sargent's ad is also running in the Sun and
the weekly paper. Joyce said Dr. Sargent did not have a proposal before the board so
there was not a conflict with him sitting on the hearing.
After making that statement, Planning Board Chairman Ann McGuigan asked if Joyce Bob Joyce
Sargent is currently appealing the last round of special permits the Planning Board presented to
Epsilon. The board granted by a 5-to2 vote (Joyce and member Ed Roux voted no) those first
special permits during hearings that took place long before Sargent placed an ad on this site.
That lawsuit stems from the last hearing, not the current one before the board. So, unless the Planning
Board knows another lawsuit is coming, why the outrage?
We'll try to explain this so even Planning Board members can understand.
The applicant is Epsilon Group LLC, which is managed by Michael Eliopoulos. Its proposal is being pre-
sented by attorney Phil Eliopoulos. Phil is able to represent this plan even though he is a member of the
Master Plan Committee because the last Board of Selectmen voted to grant him (and the rest of the Master
Plan Committee) Special Employee status.
Phil didn't have to wait the usual one-year requirement that any other retiring selectmen (or elected offi-
cial) would have to before being allowed to represent a client before a town board.
Oh, and because everyone is hot to disclose everything, Phil sits on the Master Plan Committee with Plan-
ning Board Vice Chairman Jim Lane and past Chairman George Zaharoolis.
You with us so far?
Joyce made no secret that he didn't like the proposal throughout the initial hearing. Of course the other
five members had trouble hiding their eagerness to push this plan through.
Some Planning Board members expressed outrage that Joyce passed along information --
information sent via e-mail from the Community Development Office e.g. a public document --
that the original five special permits would not be enough to move on the project.
We're not sure if their anger came from Joyce leaking information to the media or the additional special
permits played right into those who argued Phil was getting special treatment.
If Sargent placed an ad on this site then attempted to propose a project that needed special permits to
pass and Joyce didn’t step down, we would be the first to call for his resignation.
However, Joyce already proved he would have done the right thing during a different hearing, which inter-
esting enough had the same lawyer presenting.
Café Madrid, this site's oldest advertiser, needed adjustments to its original site plan over seating and
When the business owner stepped up to the podium, Joyce announced he would not be sitting on the
hearings because Café Madrid advertised on this site and he promptly left the room.
If elected officials want to help out their friends they should have enough gravitas to say that instead of
trying to muddy the waters by accusing opponents of not being truthful.
There's no doubt this entire project and its time before the Planning Board will rack up its own roster of
winners and losers.
Unfortunately, fairness, honesty and transparency probably will end up in the losing column.
Chelmsford Planning Board member's blog work raises conflict questions
By Rita Savard, email@example.com
At the Planning Board meeting last Wednesday, member Bob Joyce broke from the agenda to make a special announcement.
Joyce, also the webmaster and director of advertising and promotions on a local news blog, Chelmsfordmassnews.com, told fellow board
members that he didn't see any reason to recuse himself from voting on a controversial building proposal for 9 North Road.
In the interest of full disclosure, Joyce told the board that local dentist Michael Sargent, who is also suing the Planning Board over its ap-
proval of a site plan and four special permits for a two-story office building proposed by the Eliopoulos family, advertises on his news
The Planning Board was discussing additional special permits for the project, including one to build within the aquifer protection and other
zoning permits required by the building inspector. Sargent and his attorney, former Chelmsford Selectman Peter Lawlor, attended the
hearing. "There's a great deal of noise on the Internet about my sitting on this," Joyce said at the meeting.
"I just want to disclose that Mr. Sargent, Dr. Sargent, is currently advertising on my website." Joyce said he previously
contacted the state Ethics Commission about whether he could take a vote on a different issue regarding a local restaurant, Cafe Madrid,
because that business also advertises on his website. Joyce said the Ethics Commission told him he didn't have to "step away" from the
Cafe Madrid issue, but he chose to recuse himself anyway.
"I just want to make it very clear that Mr. Sargent is not before us this evening, so I can sit in on this hearing with
no issues , " Joyce told the board.
After a brief pause, Planning Board Chairwoman Ann McGuigan asked Joyce, "Are you certain you want to do that?"
"Absolutely," Joyce said.
Sargent's attorney later told the board that it should not approve the special permits because they do not comply with the town's
zoning codes. McGuigan did not return repeated calls for comment, which began last Thursday, and the Planning Board's vice chairman,
Jim Lane, also declined to comment. All inquiries from the media must go through the chairwoman, Lane added.
Joyce also didn't return several phone calls seeking comment. But yesterday afternoon, Kevin Zimmerman, editor of the news blog, wrote
an editorial that falsely stated Planning Board members are "falling over themselves to get quoted" in The Sun.
Zimmerman also wrote that Joyce is "co-owner" of the website "and has not attempted to hide that fact from anyone."
Community Development Director Evan Belansky commented on a separate issue yesterday, calling Joyce's role as an elected official
and a member of the media "unique."
Belansky said he's changed the way he distributes "sensitive" information to the board, after a confidential e-mail to board members be-
came a news story on Joyce's website before the information was made public. Belansky originally sent members an e-mail giving them
a "heads-up" that the Eliopulos family would most likely be applying for two more special permits at an upcoming meeting.
"I've adjusted my means of communication on sensitive issues," Belansky said. "If I believe it falls in that category,
which usually regards a pending regulatory matter, I will send the information to the chair and vice chair. They can
then decide on how to distribute that information."
As a member of the Planning Board, Joyce had immediate access to the information. But according to the state's public record laws, as
soon as a document is received by a public agency, it becomes a public record unless there is a legislatively created exemption that
makes it confidential and not subject to disclosure.
According to the state Ethics Commission, municipal employees, which include elected officials, are prohibited from acting as a board
member in any matter where they might have a financial interest, or if they own or operate a business that has a financial interest.
If there is no financial interest, but a situation gives the appearance of an outside interest, the law requires a board member to give full
Planning Board members Lane and George Zaharoulis, who also serve on the town's Master Planning Committee with Philip Eliopoulos,
have also been called out for having a conflict of interest. When asked about allegations regarding his own possible conflict, Lane said he
has has received notification from the state Ethics Commission that there is no conflict by serving on a different board with Eliopoulos, as
Lane has no financial gain or vested interest in the North Road project.
On March 10, the same day the Planning Board voted on the project, Zimmerman wrote an opinion piece that urged the board to "Do
what's right for the town." "Five of the seven members need to approve the special permits, and it appears there are
at least five yes votes on the board," Zimmerman wrote.
Bob Joyce makes
Later that night, the board approved the project's site plan, 6 to 1, with Joyce op- a statement to the
posing. In a separate vote for four special permits, the board voted 5 to 2, with
Joyce and member Ed Roux opposing.
The Epsilon Group, which seeks to put up a 15,494-square-foot Colonial-style
structure behind the Center Fire Station, will go before the Planning Board for addi-
tional permits next Wednesday at 7p.m.
KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES
Pre-Town Meeting Support Our Town Coffee at
the Jones Farm Greenhouse Cafe 4/22/10
Photos by Tom Christiano
and Mary Gregoire
Former Selectman and current
Master Plan Vice-Chairman
Philip Eliopoulos discuss
the Eliopoulos project on North Road,
the Town Elections and the Master Plan
Chelmsford Independent Reporter Chelmsford Board of Selectmen
Chloe Gotis talks all things Vice-Chairman and Candidate for
Chelmsford with Dennis State Senate Eric Dahlberg talks
about the ongoing campaign
CLICK HERE and election.
On The Border
Westford Planning Board nixes asphalt plant
By Chloe Gotsis/ Staff Writer
Apr 21, 2010
GateHouse News Service
A split Westford Planning Board voted Tuesday night to deny the site plan permit and two special permits for the proposed controversial Gro-
ton Road asphalt plant on the town’s border with Chelmsford.
Citing concerns that the proposal was illegal under the town’s zoning bylaws because it is not is not a “light manufacturing” site, the board shot
down the proposal by a vote of 4-1 with member Kevin Borselli as the dissenting vote.
“For me what this comes down to is use allowed by our bylaw in this district,” said Planning Board member Andrea Peraner-
Sweet. “Our bylaws have a definition for light manufacturing. It does not have one for heavy manufacturing. I don’t think
that omission was accidental. A decision was made that we do not want heavy manufacturing in this town. For me this
is not light manufacturing.”
Planning Board member Dennis Galvin argued that while Newport Materials’ proposal was issued a permit from the Department of Environ-
mental Protection and the expected emissions of benzene, nitrogen dioxide and other particulates are within the allowable levels he is still not
convinced there is no risk with emissions.
“There is no question this will emit NO2, benzine, formaldehyde and particulate matter,” said Galvin. “Dr. Green likened the
levels to becoming an alcoholic after one drink. I think the bylaw directs us to be teetotalers. Although we may not
reach the DEP or EPA standard the level is not inconsequential. In regards to benzene there is still a risk.”
In addition to his belief that the proposal does not conform to the town’s zoning bylaw, Gavin said he was concerned about the impact the proj-
ect may have on the community.
“I was very surprised to find that area of town had an air quality issue,” he said, adding that he was also surprised to learn of the
high asthma rate at the Miller Elementary School, which is one mile away from the proposed site. “I would urge the board to reject the
Since it was first proposed a year ago, the Newport Materials project has generated concern from both Westford and Chelmsford residents liv-
ing in the area near the proposed plant, many of whom banded together to form the Route 40 Clean Air Coalition.
The group’s members packed the small room in the modular Millenium School Building on Tuesday night for the Planning Board vote and later
ushered out pleased that their voices were heard.
“We’re very pleased with the board’s consideration of the project’s impacts on our community,” said Alisa Nakashian-Hols-
berg, a member of the Route 40 Clean Air Coalition.
Marie Burnham, a Chelmsford resident who came to Westford for the vote, said she is pleased the board considered the project’s effects on
residents of both towns.
“I’m very appreciative that the Westford Planning Board took all the factors into consideration and respected their zon -
ing bylaw restrictions and the rights of all citizens,” she said.
Borselli, who voted in favor of the proposal, said he didn’t find the air quality findings as detrimental as his colleagues.
Both board member Fred Palmer and Chairman Mike Green cited concerns about the “light manufacturing” issue.
“I have a hard time envisioning that when the town approved this in 1953 they were envisioning a hot mix asphalt
plant,” said Palmer. “At this point I’ve got a showstopper with light manufacturing.”
Green said he also is concerned about the level of noise that will be emitted from the plant and the materials used.
“I have concerns with some of the materials,” he said. “The asphalt and the inability to control that.”
The Planning Board’s rejection of the project may
not be the end of the asphalt plant. The applicant
has 20 days from the signed date of the decision to
file an appeal.
Scott Tranchemontagne, a spokesperson for New-
port Materials, said he couldn’t say yet if his client
will choose to appeal the Planning Board’s decision.
“At this point we’re going to go back as a
team and review the decisions made here
tonight and review our options going for -
ward,” he said. “We appreciate that the
board put in a lot of time looking at all of
- STEADMAN STREET :The Sequel -
Some folks think sequels are never as good as the original,
but Frank O'Brien of 12 Steadman Street fame is out to prove them all wrong.
Frank has decided to test the old adage,
"If at first you don't succeed try,try again."
So Frank has reached out to his neighbors once again
hoping that another adage kicks into gear
"Absence makes the heart grow fonder."
CLICK HERE for Frank O’Brien’s outreach letter to his Steadman Street neighbors
Whats the latest scoop on Frank O'Brien
and O'Brien Compliance Management?
For some of our neighbors who didn't attend the hearings,
I asked them if they would sign a statement of support for any future appearance I might be afforded by the ZBA.
Whether I'll appear before the ZBA again, is up to the town. I think it's the best option, as it allows the town to settle what
should be a town issue. My first choice is not to force a Land Court (or alternative mediator decision) on the town. My bot-
tom line is ZBA must render a legally tenable decision to the criteria in bylaw 195-103(B). It's my view, ZBA was unduly in-
fluenced by neighbors, who had views more restrictive than town bylaws about allowance of home occupations.
I provided the town's attorney with attached proposed settlement letter. I'm awaiting a response.
(CLICK HERE for proposal)
What's different in this proposal from my application that was denied is:
- there's now 3 household member employees (rather than 2), and 1 non-household employee (rather than 2)
- I've added a list of additional limitations my home occupation will operate within, in order to control traffic and not establish
any precedent for what might be considered a less desirable home occupation.
What remains the same is there will be no visible indication that I'm operating a home consulting business. All activity you
see from my house will be consistent with that expected from any other 4 bedroom house in the neighborhood.
During the hearings there seemed to have been quite a bit of confusion about why we (Chelmsford) allow home occupa-
tions. The home occupation bylaws for Chelmsford, and the similar ones in Billerica, Westford, and Lowell, are trying to
nurture small businesses, that might someday become larger businesses that will benefit the town. They do not amount to
commercial zone creep, because they have controls that a home occupation respect the residential character of its sur-
roundings. The bylaws allow home occupations by right as long as they are wholly enclosed in the residence, don't disrupt
things anymore than a residence would, and have no outside employees, no visitors, and no signs. Once the business
grows to the point where an outside employee, customer visitor, or sign is desired, the bylaws require that the town issue a
Special Permit. This provides some control that the new growth isn't going to cause things to exceed normal residential
traffic and related issues. This is where my business is at. If things exceed normal residential limits, a business moves into
a commercial zone. I'm expecting that my business will be ready to move to a commercial zone in 2 years.consistent with
Remember that HP, Apple, Google, Facebook, and mFeel free to share this email in it's entirety with our neighbors, or for
use in your In Town Report.
any other companies started from people's homes or dorm rooms. My business is not likely to turn into the next Google,
but it's not outside the realm of possibilities that my business could someday hire your son or daughter, enabling them to
stay in town, rather than move to another town or state.
I very much desire my neighbors' support. I hope I can count on yours. In your case, I'd welcome your ambivalence. I'm
open to any additional conditions you feel should be imposed on my Special Permit that would address any remaining con-
cerns you might have. I'm still open to a dinner evening where all the neighbors might be able to look at this together. Of
course this will only make sense if the ZBA will want to look at this again. I think the ZBA will be interested in any resolution
that neighbors would not oppose.
O'Brien reaches out to Westlands neighbors
By Chloe Gotsis/ Staff Writer
GateHouse News Service
Apr 23, 2010
While he waits for word on his appeal in the state Land Court, local business owner Frank O’Brien is reaching out
to some of his neighbors in hopes they will support his home business.
O’Brien, who owns a medical equipment testing business, O’Brien Compliance Management, filed an appeal in
the state Land Court in February on the Zoning Board of Appeal’s decision to deny his request for a special permit
for home business. Since his business took a hit in his first quarter earnings after he rented out a commercial space
in Lowell, O’Brien said he is hoping he can reach a settlement with the ZBA.
O’Brien sent out a letter last week to five sets of neighbors, whom he said did not attend the hearing in opposi-
tion of him, requesting their support of changes he has made to his proposal. In the letter, dated April 15, O’Brien
outlines that his intent is to maintain the residential character of the neighborhood and not to establish a prece-
“As we all know I’ve appealed the decision. Those things take a long time. While you’re waiting with
the appeal there’s always a number of options that come up,” he said in a phone interview this week.
“Truthfully, I think that’d be best for all parties that it go before the ZBA again because that’s the town
making town decisions.”
His new proposal offers an expiration date on the special permit for two years, in the hopes that he will then be
able to afford to rent commercial space and puts a limit on visits from five customers a month at his 12 Stedman
St. home. Since O’Brien now has three employees living at his home, including himself, he is changing his pro-
posal for one non-household employee, as allowed by the special permit, if granted. Originally O’Brien sought to
have two non-household employees working at his home.
O’Brien said in January that his employee Pooja was living at his house as a boarder, but town officials have in-
formed him that is not allowed in the town as well.
But Town Manager Paul Cohen wants to ensure that all residents in O’Brien’s Westlands neighborhood are aware
that no resolution has been reached between the businessman and the town.
“The bottom line is he has filed the appeal,” he said. “I’m not aware of an immediate court date. But he
appears to be looking for some type of a settlement. Some of the residents are very sensitive and we
don’t want them to have any misinformation that there’s anything afoot. He has contacted the Board
of Appeals regarding a resolution. But there is no resolution.”
Cohen said if O’Brien and the town reach a resolution it could be presented to the judge in the Land Court.
Cohen said if there is request before the board for changes to O’Brien’s appeal all of the abutters will be notified
and a hearing would be reopened.
Since he was denied his appeal for his home business in January, O’Brien has been renting a small commercial
space on Stedman Street in Lowell. But he said it has not been as profitable as he had hoped.
“I’m finding it hard,” he said. “What are you going to do? I’m spending the money because I have to.
The problem is the space I’m renting is too small and I can’t afford a bigger space. If I get the bigger
space I’ve got to sell the house. That’s a path I might have to take but I’m trying to avoid.”
O’Brien ran his medical equipment testing out of his garage without permission from the town for about a year,
until signs for an open house raised the red flag with his neighbors. A concerned group of neighbors brought the
matter to town officials and Building Inspector Scott Hammond notified O’Brien he was in violation of zoning by-
laws last fall.
O’Brien had four employees, including himself, who were working at the business until October. Under the town’s
home occupation bylaw, O’Brien the only allowable employee. But according to Section 195-7 if granted a special
permit, he is allowed one additional employee.
O’Brien’s Westland area neighbors cited concerns over the increasing amount of traffic O’Brien’s home business
generates to the area. The Zoning Board voted 4 to 1 to deny his appeal.
On May 1st, census takers will begin going door-to-door to roughly 1/3 of households that did
not mail back their forms. They also will verify that housing units indicated as "unoccupied" to
us by the postal service or others are indeed unoccupied and vacant.
By being counted you are standing up for what your community's needs are. That's why cen-
sus takers are so important. A census taker is a person from your community who is hired by
the Census Bureau to make sure that your neighborhood gets represented as accurately as
possible. The census taker's primary responsibility is to collect census information from resi-
dences. Most of these residences have not sent back their 2010 Census form.
The Census Bureau provides the census taker with a binder containing all of the addresses
that didn't send back a filled out census form.
The census taker then visits all of those addresses and records the answers to the questions
on the form.
If no one answers at a particular residence, a census taker will visit a home up to three times
and attempt to reach the household by phone three times. The census worker will leave a dou-
ble-sided (English and Spanish) NOTICE of VISIT in the doorway that includes a phone num-
ber for the resident to schedule an appointment.
The census taker will ONLY ask the questions that appear on the census form.
Do I have to talk to the census taker?
Yes. Your participation in the 2010 Census is vital and required by law, (Section 221, of Title 13
of the U.S. Code). However, rather than rely on criminal charges, the Census Bureau is very
successful in getting participation by explaining the importance of the questions we ask and
how the information benefits our communities.
Your privacy and confidentiality is our priority:
The census taker who collects your information is sworn for life to protect your data under
Federal Law Title 13. Those who violate the oath face criminal penalties: Under federal law,
the penalty for unlawful disclosure is a fine of up to $250,000 or imprisonment for up to 5
years, or both.
More info at
From your Chelmsford Counts Census Committee
Broadway comes to the CCA!
Broadway comes to the CCA!
Are YOU 14-18 years old and looking for professional music theatre
Are YOU 14-18 years old looking for professional music theatre
coaching this summer? Do you want to polish your audition
coaching this summer? you want to polish your audition
skills? Do you want to try something new and fun? Chelmsford
skills? you want to try something new and fun? Chelmsford
Center for the Arts is presenting a two-week Welcome to Broadway
Center for the Arts is presenting two-week Welcome to Broadway
music theatre program, Monday through Friday, July 12 – 23, from
music theatre program, Monday through Friday, July 12 23, from
9 am to 3 pm.
Students will work on solo and ensemble pieces with voice
Students will work on solo and ensemble pieces with voice
teachers/coaches, Dr. Nancy Leinonen Howells, Mr. Rob Woodin,
teachers/coaches, Dr. Nancy Leinonen Howells, Mr. Rob Wo Woodin,
and Mr. Joe Rondeau. Prof. Alisa Bucchiere will be our pianist. This
M r. Rondeau. Prof. Alisa Bucchiere will pianist. This
program will teach basic musicianship, movement
program will teach basic musicianship, movement and performance. performance.
Students will work with all four instructors individually and in groups.
Students will work with all four instructors individually and groups.
The class will culminate in a Broadway revue at the CCA in Town Hall
class will culminate in Broadway revue the CCA Town Hall
on July 23. All students will audition for placement purposes April 25
July All students will audition for placement purposes April 25
at 2:00 pm at the CCA. Second audition date TBA. Cost for the two
2:00 the CCA. Second audition date TBA. Cost for the two
Questions? e-mail CCAatTownHall@gmail.com or call 978-250-9161
Questions? e-mail CCAatTownHall@gmail.com or call 978-250-9161 9161
Mail Registration Form and Check to: Chelmsford Center for the Arts
Mail Registration Form Check to: Chelmsford Center for the Arts
1A North Road
1A North Road
Chelmsford, MA 01824
Chelmsford, MA 01824
Student Name _______________________________ Age _____ Grade _____
Student Name _______________________________ Age
____________________ Grade _____
Address ______________________________________________________ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tel. e-mail _______________________________
_ _ _ _
Parent/Guardian Name ___________________________________________
Parent/Guardian Name ____________________________________________
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Enclose check payable to Chelmsford Center for the Arts
Enclose check Chelmsford Center for the Arts
CHELMSFORD STARS COME 4TH
MAY 20, 2010
Winner will sing the National Anthem at the opening of the 4th of July Parade!
CASH PRIZES WILL BE AWARDED
Application Deadline: April 23 4PM Town Offices
Auditions: May 5 7PM Old Town Hall
Dress Rehearsal: May 13 7PM Performing Arts Center
Stars Come 4th Event: May 20 7PM Performing Arts Center
Admission price for the Auditions will be $2.00 each and the Stars Come 4th Event will
be $5.00 each. Tickets will be available at the Town Offices, Enterprise Bank,
Harrington Liquors and Chelmsford Copy and Secretarial Center.
Dear Friends and Family,
It is that time of year!!!! Are you ready to celebrate your stripes again????
On Saturday, May 15th, we will be holding a wine tasting event, Promise of Hope, at Courtyard by Marriott in Billerica, MA from 6-9 p.m.
Last year was a HUGE success raising just over $11,000.00 for the Immune Deficiency Foundation! We are hoping that this year you'll join us
again and help us reach our goal of surpassing our amount raised last year!!!
We would like to extend an invitation to all of you to join us on this evening of giving and celebration of Hope. There will be wines of the world,
live/silent auctions, raffles, appetizers, cash bar, and music (event is 21+ with proper ID).
Please join us in supporting not only our cause, but also the children of Team Hope!
Tickets are on sale now ($30.00 in advance and $35.00 at the door), so please don’t hesitate to contact us to get your tickets early!
We are currently still looking for auction items and sponsors!
If you know of anyone who would be interested in attending, donating an auction item, or perhaps you or someone you know would be inter-
ested in becoming a sponsor for the event, call Stefani Bush at 978-808-6023 or Michelle Fox at 978-362-8195. 978-362-8195
We will be celebrating the "Think Zebra" theme again this year.
In the medical community, doctors are often taught that, 'When
you hear hoof-beats, think horses'- but sometimes, you have to
think outside the box and remember that not all of us are
'horses' - some of us are 'Zebras' and we each have our own
unique stripes! We ask you to 'show
your stripes' by wearing black and white to the event!
Last year, your stripes were seen and they were amazing!
Town Meeting-QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“I wouldn't give you two cents for
all your fancy rules if, behind
them, they didn't have a little bit
of plain, ordinary, everyday
kindness and a little looking
out for the other fella, too.”
- Jefferson Smith
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington - 1939
In-Town Report NEWS LINKS
Chelmsford Mass News
Click here for the In-Town Report on Facebook
Click here for the ITR archives
POLITICAL JUNKIES SHOW:
Thurs 7:30 PM
Sundays 9:30 AM & Mondays 8:30 PM.
Tues & Weds 8:30 PM;
Thurs 7:00 AM; Sundays 11:00 AM
Chelmsford Cable TV Channel 8
ROY EARLEY TOM CHRISTIANO
Town Meeting Representative Precinct 6 Town Meeting Representative Precinct 9
In-Town Report: In-Town Report:
Creator,Editor,compiler, Contributing writer,photographer,consultant
Designer,writer,photographer and In-Town distribution