2. Are poetry, drama, even opera
“museum-able” art forms?
The dash to digitization changes all
the rules…
Artifacts, documents, antelopes,
performances can all be housed
and stored for display and
research, provided they meet the
criteria.
3. Criteria for inclusion (6 of 8)
• Covers a significant period
or a significant artist’s
works
• Recorded archives of actual
readings/performance
• Real-time broadcasts,
podcasts downloadable
• Includes lectures,
conferences, and
symposium proceedings
• Contains on-going courses,
lectures, MOOC’s
• Integrates with social media
for access and sharing
• Patrons can subscribe to
periodic updates
• Searchability across
multiple platforms or
websites
4. A sampling of poetry archive websites
• PennSound (writing.upenn.edu/pennsound)
• UBUweb (ubu.com)
• Poets.org (www.poets.org)
• The Poetry Foundation (www.poetryfoundation.org)
• The Poetry Center (www.sfsu.edu/~poetry)
5. The proposed publication will consist of the following chapters:
1. Introduction.
2. Staffing and resource challenges in maintaining an on-line archive.
3. Archiving collaboration across many related agencies.
4. Pedagogy of using on-line archived material in teaching, esp., on-line
courses.
5. Archivist, curator, collaborator, performer: managing the poetry
archive.
6. Fundraising and marketing for poetry archiving organizations.
7. Poetry as a museum-able art.
8. Library directorship in the on-line archiving environment.
9. Conclusion.
6. The original paper from
LSC 834 Art and Museum
Librarianship can be found here:
http://raymmaxx.wordpress.com/2013/07/08/684-art-and-museumlibrarianship-research-proposal/