Kitchen appliance evaluation ia

Uploaded on

DP DT Evaluation IA

DP DT Evaluation IA

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Evaluation Internal AssessmentDesign ChallengeKitchen Appliances or Utensils can be useful practical and timesaving devices. Some however arebadly designed and impractical or even dangerous. Some devices are easy to identify and easy towork out how to use others not so.Task:Choose two appliances/utensils and evaluate their practicality, usefulness and overalldesign. Appliances can be electrical but don’t have to be.Eg Coffee Maker or a Can opener./ Chopping Board.etcSelect a focus for your investigation using a Design Brief and Design Specifications. Use a reportformat that highlights your information in each specific sub heading. Include references to eacharticle, statistic or data you source. Make sure you explain your methodology with reasoning andjustificationKitchen appliances or UtensilsTesting them or looking at a variety of them is a crucial evaluative task and will allow you toidentify design features that are good, bad or ugly……Consider alsoThe target Market of these utensils. Should they be redesigned with a consideration for other usergroups? Older people, younger people, disabled or other society groups that find using theseitems difficult.Could these items be redesigned with the potential to have other uses?Could these items be redesigned with the potential to be incorporated into another utensil?What about the disposal or recycling /reuse of the materials used in its construction?What ergonomic changes could be necessary?What aesthetic changes could be suggested?Examine them with a view to improving their design in some or as many ways as possible
  • 2. How will this be assessed?Each aspect will be awarded one of three levels:Complete You have met the criteria fully 2 marksPartial You have met some but not all of the criterion 1 markNot at all You haven’t met the criterion at all 0markAspect 1 ConclusionDevise a test or checks. Identify what sort of test or, checks are appropriate for the utensil you have chosen.You will specify at least 5 criteria that you are evaluating. Justify these. Why and How?What equipment, method or other information is relevant? See Topic 7.1.1 in your workbooks.How will you gauge the success and failures of the utensil? Consider all positive and negative aspects.Use a Design Brief and List Design Specifications you are evaluating. Use a grade system to record yourresults eg, tables, graphs etc You may also consider researching standards for the items you have chosenBSI, ISO etcCreate a short questionnaire 6-8 questions)and ask parents or brothers, sisters their interpretation of theutensil and record their comments or feedback for your evaluationAnalyse all your findingsTo achieve a 2 you need to provide clear evidence of a valid conclusion that addresses the brief orresearch questionAspect 2 ProcedureShow detailed photographic evidence of the appliance./ utensil you are evaluating and the target market oruser using the equipment.Test the product against a range of criteria specified by you in the previous aspect. Use photographicevidence to support your justifications and comments.This aspect is basically the summary/conclusions of your findings from the testing. Make sure you explaineach result and what it was you were testing. What you were hoping to find out. Ensure that you concludewith what you have found out. What works what doesn’t What was useful and how this information caninfluence design in the futureTo achieve a 2 you need to include comprehensive evaluation of procedure at each stage of thisinvestigation.Aspect 3 RecommendationsUsing your feedback and results explain how you could suggest modifications to the utensil/appliance toimprove it. You may need to improve it in several areas or just one. If possible annotate photographs or dosketches or models of these improvement suggestions.Explain all modifications with diagrams and clear design terminology (words) These are yourrecommendations for improvements. Try to keep your improvements realistic.A summary evaluation that compares the weaknesses in the first design and the advantages/improvements ofyour designs
  • 3. To achieve a 2 you need to make realistic recommendations for improvement of the utensil