take over defenses
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

take over defenses

on

  • 11,455 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
11,455
Views on SlideShare
11,410
Embed Views
45

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
369
Comments
0

1 Embed 45

http://www.slideshare.net 45

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

take over defenses take over defenses Presentation Transcript

  • Take Over defenses MERGER AND ACQUISITION
  • Introduction
    • Not all mergers are welcome
    • During the 1980s, a variety of devices were developed to defend firms from unwelcome takeover proposals
    • Anti take over defenses
      • Preventive measures
      • Active measures
    Chapter 19-
    • Poison Pill
    • Flip in plan
    • Flip over plan
    • Back end plans
    • Voting plans
    • People pill
    Preventive measures
    • Greenmail
    • Standstill agreement
    • White knights
    • White squire
    • Pac man defense
    • Restructuring
      • Active measures
  • Memorandum Article of Association Corporate charter amendments Shark Repellant Legal existence Corporation’s name Existence purpose Authorized Share Identity of Directors Rules governing the internal management
  • Corporate charter amendments
    • Common types
      • Classified boards
      • Super majority provisions
      • Fair price amendment
      • Dual Capitalization
  • Classified boards
    • Divided into different classes
    • One class to be reselected each year
    • Delays effective transfer of control in take over
    • Example
      • Suppose twelve members in a group
      • Divided into group of three
      • Hostile bidder has to wait two more annual meetings inspite of holding majority of stocks
  • Super majority provisions
    • Approval by large number of votes
    • 2/3 rd or 80% votes for merger approval
    • Board out clause
      • Give up the super majority provision
    • Interested directors cannot participate in voting on issue of merger
  • Fair price amendments
    • Acquirer to pay fair price to shareholders of the firm
    • State in form of minimum price or P/E multiple
    • Use at two tiered bid by the acquirer
  • Dual capitalization
    • New class of securities with voting rights
    • To friendly stockholders
    • Stock holders prefer special voting stocks
      • Increase dividend and power
    • Management retains the voting power
  • Active Anti-takeover defenses
  • Greenmail
    • Buying back of share at premium
    • Signing a Standstill Agreement
    Standstill Agreement
    • Not to increase holdings for particular period
    • Accompanied by target’s agreement
      • Acquirer's refusal
      • Prevents falling into hands of another bidder
  • White Knights
    • Another company more acceptable
    • More favorable terms than original bidders
    • Terms required
    • Not to disassemble
    • No layoffs
  • White squire
    • Target sells only a block of its stock to third party it considers to be friendly
    • In return, white squire may receive: board seats, dividend, discounted shares
    • Preferred stock usually used in white squire transactions because it enables board to tailor characteristics of stock as described
  • Pac-Man Defense
    • Highly aggressive defense technique
    • Counter tender offer in response
    • Possible only if financial resources
    • May result into
      • May defend
      • May end up extremely destructive
      • High debts
  • Restructuring
    • Going private
      • Buying bulk of the shares
    • Sales of attractive assets
      • Making less attractive
    • Undertaking major acquisitions
      • Draining its excess cash balance
    • Liquidating the firm
      • When liquidation is better than the bid