Manajemen Pembangunan (Welfare state target vs corruption phenomenon)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Manajemen Pembangunan (Welfare state target vs corruption phenomenon)

on

  • 238 views

Last Minute,,, Mudah-mudahan Bermanfaat,,, :)

Last Minute,,, Mudah-mudahan Bermanfaat,,, :)

Statistics

Views

Total Views
238
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
238
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Manajemen Pembangunan (Welfare state target vs corruption phenomenon) Manajemen Pembangunan (Welfare state target vs corruption phenomenon) Presentation Transcript

    • MANAJEMEN PEMBANGUNAN (WELFARE STATE TARGETS VS CORRUPTION PHENOMENON) R A JA A B U M A N S H U R M AT R I D I
    • WELFARE STATE CONCEPT STANDART OF LIVING Income Quality and availability of employment Class disparity Poverty rate Quality and affordability of housing hours of work required to purchase necessities Gross domestic product (GDP) Inflation rate Number of paid vacation days per year Affordable access to quality health care Quality and availability of education Life expectancy Incidence of disease Cost of goods and services Infrastructure National economic growth Economic and political stability Political and religious freedom environmental quality Climate Safety QUALITY OF LIFE Freedom from slavery and torture Equal protection of the law Freedom from discrimination Freedom of movement Freedom of residence within one's home country Presumption of innocence unless proved guilty Right to marry Right to have a family Right to be treated equally without regard to gender, race, language, religion, political beliefs, nationality, socioeconomic status and more Right to privacy Freedom of thought Freedom of religion Free choice of employment Right to fair pay Equal pay for equal work Right to vote Right to rest and leisure Right to education Right to human dignity Amy Fontinelle, 2011
    • CONT... If you go for quality of life first, you will ultimately enjoy a higher standard of living, but if you go for and concentrate on standard of living first, there is no guarantee that your quality of life will improve. (Ziglar, 2013) What Standard of Living and Quality of Life is
    • QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX Purchasing Power Index Safety Index Health Care Index Consumer Price Index Property Price to Income Ratio Traffic Commute Time Index Pollution Index 27.50 51.42 58.33 38.96 19.82 41.38 78.69 Quality of Life Index: 13.42 NUMBEO, 2013
    • QUALITY OF LIFE MAP
    • INDONESIA INC. Multi-Sinergy Government sector and Company sector (both of National Private or SOE’s) accelerate development in various sector and economic especially for infrustructure trhought MP3EI (Masterplan Percepatan dan Perluasan Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia Reducing of sectoral egoism
    • Syarat Utama Ind. Inc Sayidiman Suryohadiprojo, 2012 Masyarakat Jepang berlaku sikap hidup atas dasar solidaritas Kelompok Kelompok bersaing dengan kelompok lain tapi pada saat yang sama bergabung menjadi kelompok lebih besar. (Ichiban atau number one) tetapi mereka akan bersatu dalam kelompok jepang utk menjadi number one di dunia internasional
    • HDI (UNDP, 2013)
    • HDI (UNDP, 2013)
    • CPI in The World
    • CORRUPTION PHENOMENON
    • What was the most common reason for paying the bribe(s)? Averages across the 107 countries included in the index. % of responses
    • FHENOMENON OF INDONESIA INDONESIA was among the worst performers in the Asia-Pacific region. 89 per cent of respondents said they thought the parliament was affected by corruption, 91 per cent said the police were affected. 75 per cent of respondents said they, or someone in their household, had paid a bribe to the police in the last 12 months.
    • MANAJEMEN PEMBANGUNAN Thank you