• Save
Dr Google
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Dr Google

on

  • 3,369 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,369
Views on SlideShare
1,312
Embed Views
2,057

Actions

Likes
10
Downloads
0
Comments
0

7 Embeds 2,057

http://rafabravo.wordpress.com 1118
http://www.scoop.it 780
http://www.ticasalud.org 138
http://www.enfermeriadigital.com 17
https://rafabravo.wordpress.com 2
https://twitter.com 1
http://news.google.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NoDerivs License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Dr Google Dr Google Presentation Transcript

  • Dr. Google Rafael Bravo Toledo Centro de Salud Linneo Madrid, 17 de Enero de 2013.
  • Internet como fuente de información 2
  • Internet como fuente de información 3
  • The online conversationabout health is being drivenforward by two forces:1) the availability of social tools2) the motivation, especially among people living with chronic conditions, to connect with each other. 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Trasladando el valor deeste indicador al total dela población,29,9% de losciudadanosutilizaría Internetcomo fuente deinformación en elámbito sanitario 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • Thirty‐five percent of U.S.adults say that at onetime or another they havegone online specifically totry to figure out whatmedical condition they orsomeone else might have 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • Eight in 10 online health inquiries start at a search engine 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • IPEX (immunodeficiency, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked). Immunodeficiency, polyendocrinopathy, N Engl J Med. 2005; 353 (19): 2089-2090 enteropathy, X-linked). 22
  • casi 2000 páginas 23
  • BMJ. 2006;333 (7579): 1143–1145. 24
  • espectacular Percentage of correct diagnoses from Google searches (compared with the diagnoses as published in the New England Journal of Medicine). Google searches revealed the correct diagnosis in 15 (58%) 25
  • ….y los profanos 26The average diagnostic success of non-physicians was 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-39.7%).
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • Bouwman M G et al. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:642-644 The authors present two cases in which concerned parents made a correct diagnosis of a lysosomal storage disorder in their child by searching the internet after a long doctor’s delay. These cases illustrate the utility of publicly available internet search engines in diagnosing rare disorders and in addition illustrate the lengthy diagnostic odyssey which is common in these disorders 32
  • Bouwman M G et al. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:642-644 Bouwman M G et al. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:642-644 Patient A: angiokeratoma on the palmar side of the hands. Right hand ulnar side and left hand ulnar side and thenar. Patient B Bowed fingers on both hands on patient B. .©2010 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 33
  • Postgrad Med J 2010;86:459-465 34
  • 35
  • no es oro todo lo que reluce 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • West J Emerg Med. 2011; 12(4): 442–447 39
  • West J Emerg Med. 2011; 12(4): 442–447 40
  • West J Emerg Med. 2011; 12(4): 442–447 41
  • 42
  • Cyberchondria When the Patient Is a Googler 43
  • Cyberchondria Utilizamos el término cyberchondria para referirse a la escalada infundada de preocupaciones sobre sintomatología común, basado en la revisión de resultados de búsqueda en la Web 44
  • 45
  • 46