• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Client-side Website Optimization
 

Client-side Website Optimization

on

  • 4,752 views

Did you know that 80% to 90% of the user's page-load time comes from components outside the firewall? Optimizing performance on the front end (e.g. from the client side) can enhance the user ...

Did you know that 80% to 90% of the user's page-load time comes from components outside the firewall? Optimizing performance on the front end (e.g. from the client side) can enhance the user experience by reducing the response times of your web pages and making them load and render much faster.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,752
Views on SlideShare
4,751
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
82
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Client-side Website Optimization Client-side Website Optimization Document Transcript

    • Client-side Website Optimization Client-side Website Optimization Realizati un studiu privind performanta aplicatiilor Web la nivel de client. Se vor lua in consideratie optimizarea codului -sursa, performanta programelor JavaScript, instrumentele de monitorizare si de testare la nivel de client (e.g., extensii Firefox precum Firebug, Selenium, Y! Slow). Motivation Did you know that 80% to 90% of the user's page-load time comes from components outside the firewall? Optimizing performance on the front end (e.g. from the client side) can enhance the user experience by reducing the response times of your web pages and making them load and render much faster. Why you might need it: Although your site's response time may appear quick when it is accessed via an internet connection from a location close to the data center, you should also consider the experience for other users: Any mobile users accessing your site have to rely on relatively slow connections with high latency. Other people may be traveling, frustrated while they're waiting for the site to load because of an overcrowded wireless connection in the airport or a slow mobile phone connection. People accessing web site from more remote locations throughout the world inevitably suffer from increased connection latency and often high packet loss. In addition, render time can be very long even on a fast network connection. The page design and the way you use CSS, JavaScript and other technologies can delay rendering much longer than necessary. The result is a poor user experience. Extensive testing has confirmed the relationship between this and the site's financial performance. By examining log files, we can identify what the user experience is for your site. Front end optimization can help reduce the amount of traffic required; and thus, reduce hosting charges. An optimized system also means you can use less hardware for serving the traffic both on front end/cache servers as well as back end servers. 1|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization Tools 2.1 Firebug - Firebug integrates with Firefox to put a wealth of web development tools at your fingertips while you browse. You can edit, debug, and monitor CSS, HTML, and JavaScript live in any web page. Evaluating download speed The Net tab graphs the request times for all http requests that make up a page. Network monitoring must be turned on for the Net Tab to work, but it’s on by default (the options drop down on the right hand side of the firebug panel allows you to toggle this feature off and on). This is a handy way to test (and prove) that putting your javascript files at the bottom of your files, especially for javascript heavy pages, improves perceived download time. Total download time will be the same, but since browsers stop loading pages when they hit scripts until the scripts have been downloaded, the page will appear to download faster, which is a better user experience. By left clicking on the plus sign to the left of the file name, Firebug displays the HTTP headers of each file that was downloaded. In the 1.0..5 version of Firebug you can see how long it takes for HTML files only to be downloaded, CSS files only, images only, etc., or all files. YSlow, Yahoo!s performance tool, should be available as a plug in for Firefox by the end of the summer. In the meantime, Firebug’s Net tab is the next best thing. AJAX As mentioned above, Firebug captures dynamic content and other DOM changes made to your webpage. If you view the source via Firebug, Firebug reflects changes made to the DOM, and includes the “Hello World” content. This is one of the core strengths of Firebug: without Firebug, AJAX requests and responses are invisible. With it, you can view the sent and received text as well as the headers that went along with it. You can also monitor how long it took for each request/response with the Net tab. You can see XHR response by clicking on the Net tab, and then the XHR tab in the sub navigation that opens up when you are in the Net view. While the All Net tab is like yslow, the XHR focuses on the AJAX only. If you click on the plus sign to the left of the response file, you can see both the headers and the content of the response. 2|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization 2.2 Yahoo! Yslow - YSlow analyzes web pages and suggests ways to improve their performance based on a set of rules for high performance web pages. YSlow is a Firefox add-on integrated with the Firebug web development tool. YSlow grades web page based on one of three predefined ruleset or a user-defined ruleset. It offers suggestions for improving the page's performance, summarizes the page's components, displays statistics about the page, and provides tools for performance analysis, including Smush.it™ and JSLint. 3|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization 2.3 Uitest.com - UITest.com: Web Development Tools Uitest.com is a site which gathers several tools for website optimization. You can check multiple aspects of your website with only a click. Among the tools there are links to markup validation, website anatomy and load times on different connection speeds. 4|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization 5|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization Results Using the metioned tools we could summary up some of the best practices for front-end (client) optimization and group them by category. Minimizing HTTP Requests 80% of the end-user response time is spent on the front-end. Most of this time is tied up in downloading all the components in the page: images, stylesheets, scripts, Flash, etc. Reducing the number of components in turn reduces the number of HTTP requests required to render the page. This is the key to faster pages. One way to reduce the number of components in the page is to simplify the page's design. But is there a way to build pages with richer content while also achieving fast response times? Here are some techniques for reducing the number of HTTP requests, while still supporting rich page designs. Combinined files are a way to reduce the number of HTTP requests. This way we could combine multilple CSS files in only one file, we could use CSS sprites (using only one image for multiple pictures and then splitting them by using CSS background-image and background-position properties) or we could combine multiple javascript files in one. Image maps is another technique for merging multiple images in one but is recommended only for navigation bars as defining the coordinates of image maps can be tedious and error prone. 6|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization Using a Content Delivery Network The user's proximity to your web server has an impact on response times. Deploying your content across multiple, geographically dispersed servers will make your pages load faster from the user's perspective. But where should you start? Remember that 80-90% of the end-user response time is spent downloading all the components in the page: images, stylesheets, scripts, Flash, etc. This is the Performance Golden Rule. Rather than starting with the difficult task of redesigning your application architecture, it's better to first disperse your static content. This not only achieves a bigger reduction in response times, but it's easier thanks to content delivery networks. Add an Expires or a Cache-Control Header There are two things in this rule:  For static components: implement "Never expire" policy by setting far future Expires header  For dynamic components: use an appropriate Cache-Control header to help the browser with conditional requests Web page designs are getting richer and richer, which means more scripts, stylesheets, images, and Flash in the page. A first-time visitor to your page may have to make several HTTP requests, but by using the Expires header you make those components cacheable. This avoids unnecessary HTTP requests on subsequent page views. Expires headers are most often used with images, but they should be used on all components including scripts, stylesheets, and Flash components. Gzip Components The time it takes to transfer an HTTP request and response across the network can be significantly reduced by decisions made by front-end engineers. It's true that the end-user's bandwidth speed, Internet service provider, proximity to peering exchange points, etc. are beyond the control of the development team. But there are other variables that affect response times. Compression reduces response times by reducing the size of the HTTP response. Starting with HTTP/1.1, web clients indicate support for compression with the Accept-Encoding header in the HTTP request.  Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate If the web server sees this header in the request, it may compress the response using one of the methods listed by the client. The web server notifies the web client of this via the Content-Encoding header in the response.  Content-Encoding: gzip Gzip is the most popular and effective compression method at this time. It was developed by the GNU project and standardized by RFC 1952. The only other compression format you're likely to see is deflate, but it's less effective and less popular. 7|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization Put Stylesheets at the Top While researching performance at Yahoo!, we discovered that moving stylesheets to the document HEAD makes pages appear to be loading faster. This is because putting stylesheets in the HEAD allows the page to render progressively. Front-end engineers that care about performance want a page to load progressively; that is, we want the browser to display whatever content it has as soon as possible. This is especially important for pages with a lot of content and for users on slower Internet connections. The importance of giving users visual feedback, such as progress indicators, has been well researched and documented. In our case the HTML page is the progress indicator! When the browser loads the page progressively the header, the navigation bar, the logo at the top, etc. all serve as visual feedback for the user who is waiting for the page. This improves the overall user experience. Put Scripts at the Bottom The problem caused by scripts is that they block parallel downloads. The HTTP/1.1 specification suggests that browsers download no more than two components in parallel per hostname. If you serve your images from multiple hostnames, you can get more than two downloads to occur in parallel. While a script is downloading, however, the browser won't start any other downloads, even on different hostnames. In some situations it's not easy to move scripts to the bottom. If, for example, the script uses document.write to insert part of the page's content, it can't be moved lower in the page. There might also be scoping issues. In many cases, there are ways to workaround these situations. Make JavaScript and CSS External Many of these performance rules deal with how external components are managed. However, before these considerations arise you should ask a more basic question: Should JavaScript and CSS be contained in external files, or inlined in the page itself? Using external files in the real world generally produces faster pages because the JavaScript and CSS files are cached by the browser. JavaScript and CSS that are inlined in HTML documents get downloaded every time the HTML document is requested. This reduces the number of HTTP requests that are needed, but increases the size of the HTML document. On the other hand, if the JavaScript 8|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization and CSS are in external files cached by the browser, the size of the HTML document is reduced without increasing the number of HTTP requests. Minify JavaScript and CSS Minification is the practice of removing unnecessary characters from code to reduce its size thereby improving load times. When code is minified all comments are removed, as well as unneeded white space characters (space, newline, and tab). In the case of JavaScript, this improves response time performance because the size of the downloaded file is reduced. Two popular tools for minifying JavaScript code are JSMin and YUI Compressor. The YUI compressor can also minify CSS. Obfuscation is an alternative optimization that can be applied to source code. It's more complex than minification and thus more likely to generate bugs as a result of the obfuscation step itself. In a survey of ten top U.S. web sites, minification achieved a 21% size reduction versus 25% for obfuscation. Although obfuscation has a higher size reduction, minifying JavaScript is less risky. Optimize Images After a designer is done with creating the images for your web page, there are still some things you can try before you FTP those images to your web server.  You can check the GIFs and see if they are using a palette size corresponding to the number of colors in the image. Using imagemagick it's easy to check using identify -verbose image.gif When you see an image useing 4 colors and a 256 color "slots" in the palette, there is room for improvement.  Try converting GIFs to PNGs and see if there is a saving. More often than not, there is. Developers often hesitate to use PNGs due to the limited support in browsers, but this is now a thing of the past. The only real problem is alpha-transparency in true color PNGs, but then again, GIFs are not true color and don't support variable transparency either. So anything a GIF can do, a palette PNG (PNG8) can do too (except for animations). This simple imagemagick command results in totally safe-to-use PNGs: convert image.gif image.png "All we are saying is: Give PiNG a Chance!"  Run pngcrush (or any other PNG optimizer tool) on all your PNGs. Example: pngcrush image.png -rem alla -reduce -brute result.png  Run jpegtran on all your JPEGs. This tool does lossless JPEG operations such as rotation and can also be used to optimize and remove comments and other useless information (such as EXIF information) from your images. jpegtran -copy none -optimize -perfect src.jpg dest.jpg Optimize CSS Sprites  Arranging the images in the sprite horizontally as opposed to vertically usually results in a smaller file size.  Combining similar colors in a sprite helps you keep the color count low, ideally under 256 colors so to fit in a PNG8.  "Be mobile-friendly" and don't leave big gaps between the images in a sprite. This doesn't affect the file size as much but requires less memory for the user agent to decompress the 9|Page
    • Client-side Website Optimization image into a pixel map. 100x100 image is 10 thousand pixels, where 1000x1000 is 1 million pixels Browser Benchmarks JavaScript continues to grow in importance as a browser benchmark, because it's the backbone of no-reload interfaces like Gmail, Facebook, and lots of other webapps. Once again I used Sean Patrick Kane's revised JavaScript speed tests and averaged out three results to measure the browsers: 10 | P a g e
    • Client-side Website Optimization Firefox bests Chrome in this test by a handy lead, while IE 8 takes nearly twice as long (in milliseconds, of course) to perform all the actions Sean runs it through. In the CSS test, as you can see, Chrome takes a commanding lead, Firefox doesn't lag too far behind, and IE 8 actually stalled and froze on just about one of every two loads I ran. When it came out of memory freeze, it did report consistent times, though—consistently behind. One could hand the Dynamic Web Performance title to Firefox for the probably weightier JavaScript test, but Chrome also shows a notable grace in running down the type frequently found on blogs. Let's call this a tie. 11 | P a g e
    • Client-side Website Optimization There sure are a lot of browsers to choose from these days. Peacekeeper is a free service that lets you quickly and easily find out which one works best on your PC. If you're interested in how Peacekeeper works read our FAQ for more information, or to get started, click on the "Benchmark your Browser" button now. The test only takes a few minutes but if you're an impatient type you can see the average results from thousands of users here. What is the best browser? Well that depends on how you define best? We can’t tell you which browser has the best features for example. Most of the internet would disagree with us on principle, so we’re not even going to try. You should though. You should try all the browsers. They all have something unique and interesting to offer that could enhance your web experience. At Futuremark, we like measuring and comparing things so our Peacekeeper service is designed to measure a browser’s JavaScript performance. This is important because many modern dynamic websites make extensive use of JavaScript to provide navigation, forms and other features. Changing browsers to one with a high Peacekeeper score could make these sites faster and more responsive. Peacekeeper measures your browser's performance by testing its JavaScript functionality. JavaScript is a widely used programming language used in the creation of modern websites to provide features such as animation, navigation, forms and other common requirements. By measuring a browser’s ability to handle commonly used JavaScript functions Peacekeeper can evaluate its performance. To create the tests we used a profiler to analyze JavaScript usage while browsing popular websites such as YouTube, Facebook, GMail and Meebo. The profiler collected data on the frequency in which different JavaScript functions were called on these sites and we used this data to create specific weighted tests for each function. In some situations the profiler is not able to collect accurate data 12 | P a g e
    • Client-side Website Optimization and for these, we implemented the tests using common techniques and components to simulate the requirements of a typical webpage. 13 | P a g e
    • Client-side Website Optimization References http://www.percona.com/services/front-end-performance-optimization.html - Motivation http://www.slideshare.net/craigwalker/client-side-performance-xero - Client-side Performance comparison http://www.die.net/musings/page_load_time/ - Page Load Optimization http://www.cssdrive.com/index.php/main/csscompressor/ - CSS Compressor http://getfirebug.com/docs.html - Firebug documentation http://www.crockford.com/javascript/jsmin.html - javascript minifier 14 | P a g e
    • Client-side Website Optimization http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/ - yahoo yslow extension http://uitest.com/en/specials/ - website special tools http://uitest.com/en/analysis/ - website analysis tools http://uitest.com/en/check/results/?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infoiasi.ro – infoiasi.ro on uitest.com http://validator.w3.org/checklink/checklink?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infoiasi.ro&summary=on&hid e_redirects=on&hide_type=all&recursive=on&depth=500&check=Check – infoiasi.ro w3c validation http://wave.webaim.org/report?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infoiasi.ro – infoiasi.ro accessibility http://analyze.websiteoptimization.com/wso - website optimization tips http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.infoiasi.ro&treeview=0&column=objectID &order=1&type=0&save=true – infoiasi.ro component load times http://www.sitonomy.com/?url=www.infoiasi.ro – infoiasi.ro Anatomy http://www.evotech.net/blog/2007/06/introduction-to-firebug/ - firebug Introduction http://www.infoiasi.ro/bin/Main/ - Website chosen for tests http://encosia.com/2007/03/06/debug-and-explore-aspnet-ajax-with-firebug/ - firebug AJAX debugging http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html - Yahoo Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site http://www.webpagetest.org/result/091018_2J3S/ - Webpagetest.org on infoiasi.ro http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/faq.action - Peacekeeper FAQ Mazilu Liviu-Andrei, Pintilie Radu-Stefan - ISS 15 | P a g e