Organizing Resources on Tagging Systems using T-ORG

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Today I am going to present T-org, which is a system for organizing resources on a tagging system. The co-authors of this research are Steffen Staab from University of Koblenz-Landau, and Philipp Cimiano from University of Karlsruhe.

    2 Favorites

    Organizing Resources on Tagging Systems using T-ORG - Presentation Transcript

    1. Organizing Resources on Tagging Systems using T-ORG Rabeeh Abbasi Steffen Staab (University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany) Philipp Cimiano (University of Karlsruhe, Germany) Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0 Innsbruck, Austria June 07, 2007
    2. Overview
      • Social Tagging Systems
      • Browsing a Tagging System
      • T-ORG
        • T-KNOW
      • Experiments
      • Results
      • Conclusion and Future Work
    3. Social Tagging Systems / Folksonomies
      • In a social tagging system, people add keywords (called tags ) to their resources and share these resources with others
      • Advantages
        • low-cost classification, improve search, reputation systems, personal organization, no fixed vocabulary, collaboration…
    4. Social Tagging Systems – Browsing?
      • I want to “ browse ” vehicle images!!!
        • how can I do it?
          • can I do it using a Tag Cloud?
      • Perhaps I need to structure the tags and resources!
        • how can I do it?
          • Put them into categories (like Vehicles, People, etc)!
            • Do it Manually or with Training?
              • Might not be possible on a large scale!
            • Automatically and without any training!
              • Using T-ORG!
    5. T-ORG – Classification
      • Organize resources by putting their tags into categories depending upon their context
      • Users can browse categories to retrieve required resources
      President Gerald Ford Nixon Pardon Group 2 Group 1 Eiffel Eiffel tower Big Eyeful Paris France Miniatures Singen Cars Motors Ford 1955 Person Location Vehicle Categories User A User B
    6. T-ORG
      • Tag Organization using T-ORG
      Select ontologies related to the categories (e.g. Vehicle, People, etc.) Prune and refine these ontologies according to the desired categories (add missing concepts, filter existing concepts) Apply the classification algorithm T-KNOW to classify the tags and resources Browse the categories to explore the tags and resources
    7. Classifying the tags using T-KNOW Use well-known linguistic patterns to generate queries Search these patterns on Google and download search results Compare each Google search result with the context of the tag and extract the concept Select the concept which has the highest similarity with the context of the tag
    8. T-KNOW – Computing Similarity
      • Compute similarity using cosine measure between Bag of Words (BOW) representation of “Tag Context” and “Search Result”
      1955 = 1 as = 0 cars = 1 ford = 1 foundation = 0 international = 0 motors = 1 organizations = 0 singen = 1 such = 0 1955 = 0 as = 1 cars = 0 ford = 1 foundation = 2 international = 1 motors = 0 organizations = 1 singen = 0 such = 1 Tag Context singen cars motors ford 1955 cos( ĉ,â ) = ĉ x â / |ĉ||â| = 0.15 ĉ â
      • Only consider the results having similarity above a certain Threshold
        • Result having the highest similarity is considered as final
      Search Result BOW
    9. T-KNOW – Computing Similarity – Resource Context
      • Getting the context of the tag “Ford” from middle image using
        • Resource Context
          • Select all tags of the current resource
            • President, Gerald, Nixon, Pardon
      President Gerald Ford Nixon Pardon Eiffel Eiffel tower Big Eyeful Paris France Miniatures Singen Cars Motors Ford 1955
    10. T-KNOW – Computing Similarity – Tag Context
      • Getting the context of the tag “Ford” from middle image using
        • Tag Context
          • Select all tags of all the resources having this tag “Ford”
            • President, Gerald, Nixon, Pardon, Singen, Cars, Motors, 1955
      President Gerald Ford Nixon Pardon Eiffel Eiffel tower Big Eyeful Paris France Miniatures Singen Cars Motors Ford 1955
    11. T-KNOW – Computing Similarity – User Context
      • Getting the context of the tag “Ford” from middle image using
        • User Context
          • Select all tags of all the resources from the user who use this resource
            • President, Gerald, Nixon, Pardon, Eiffel, Eiffel tower, Big, Eyeful, Paris, France, Miniatures
      President Gerald Ford Nixon Pardon Eiffel Eiffel tower Big Eyeful Paris France Miniatures Singen Cars Motors Ford 1955 User A User B
    12. T-KNOW – Computing Similarity – Group Context
      • Getting the context of the tag “Ford” from middle image using
        • Group Context
          • Select all tags of all the resources present in the group to which this resource belong
            • President, Gerald, Nixon, Pardon, Eiffel, Eiffel tower, Big, Eyeful, Paris, France, Miniatures, Singen, Cars, Motors, Ford, 1955
      President Gerald Ford Nixon Pardon Group 2 Group 1 Eiffel Eiffel tower Big Eyeful Paris France Miniatures Singen Cars Motors Ford 1955
    13. Experimental Setup Person Location Vehicle Organization Other Author, Singer, Human, … Country, District, City, Village,… Vehicle, Car, Truck, Motorbike, Train, … Company, Organization, Firm, Foundation, … 4+1 Categories 932 Concepts 189 random Images from 9 Flickr groups 1754 Tags
    14. Experimental Setup – Classifiers
      • Two human classifiers: K (gold standard) and S
      • T-KNOW
    15. Experimental Setup – Evaluation
      • F-Measure
          • A = set of correct classification by test (user S or T-KNOW)
          • B = set of all classification by Gold Standard (user K)
          • C = set of all classifications by test
        • Precision = A / C
        • Recall = A / B
        • F-Measure = 2 * Precision * Recall / (Precision + Recall)
      • Cohen’s Kappa
        • Considers classification done by chance
        • Used to measure classifiers reliability
          • P 0 = observed agreement between classifiers
          • P c = agreement occurred due to chance
    16. Results – F-Measure - Results comparable to Human Classification 51% 79%
    17. Results – Cohen’s Kappa - Might be a good measure when there is a chance of classification by chance 0% 53%
    18. Conclusion and Future Work -Austria -Germany -Pakistan -USA +Animals +Cameras +Colours +Events +Languages +People +Places +Programming +Resources +Cities +Countries +Lakes +Markets +Universities
    19. Questions/Comments? Q & A
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Rabeeh AbbasiRabeeh Abbasi Nominate

    custom

    360 views, 2 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    This presentation describes the T-ORG system, used more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 360
      • 360 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 10
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories