Energy Use In Post-harvest Technology

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

2 comments

Comments 1 - 2 of 2 previous next Post a comment

  • + bssnews bssnews 3 weeks ago
    http://www.reuterspost.com/2009/11/five-ways-to-save-money-towards-wealth.html
    (Five Ways to Save Money Towards Wealth Creation)
  • + dobran Francesco 5 months ago
    Good Morning,

    I am Manager of Italian firm specialized in post harvest technologies. since 1945 .
    I have now an my partner in Indian market :I will have pleasure contact you for collaboration to offer our innovation products and service.
    I suggest you to visit our web site: www.brancato.it

    Francesco Brancato.
    CEO Manager R.& D.
    DOMENICO BRANCATO SNC
    Ripening & Preserving facilities
    Z. I. ASI, 40
    Larderia- 98129 Messina
    ITALY
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Favorites, Groups & Events

Energy Use In Post-harvest Technology - Presentation Transcript

  1. Energy Use In Post-harvest Technology By: Dr Mahesh Kumar Punjab Horticultural Postharvest Technology Centre P u n ja b A g r ic u lt u r a l U n iv e r s it y L u d h ia n a
  2. Reasons 1 Post harvest behaviour of perishables  Respiration & transpiration - Temperature 7
  3. Reasons • Infrastructure for marketing of perishables  Primary grading/ collection centers - non existent  Warehousing and cold storage - inadequate  Cold chain - non existent  Quality certification system - non existent  Transportation for perishables - non existent  Rural markets - complete lack of infrastructure  Wholesale markets - in government control, lack modern facilities  Private / direct markets - limited
  4. What is cold chain It starts from farm level and cover up to consumer level Cold chain infrastructure consists of 1. Pre-cooling facilities 2. Cold store 3. Refrigerated carriers 4. Retail outlets 9
  5. The energy conservation opportunities can be explored in the followings  Field heat  Respiration of stored product (vital heat)  Transmission through roof and walls  Evaporator coil fans, Lights, air leakage
  6. Effect of Colour and Shade on the Temperature of Perishables Crop Temperature drop by Shading Ambient (oC) Temp(oC) Pulp Skin Brinjal (w) 8.1 12.3 30.5 8.1 12.3 Galgal 9.8 18.7 30.5 Banana 11.1 20.9 27.5 Guava 11.6 16.5 20.8 Mossami 9.2 18.5 20.8 10.4 18.7 Kinnow 8.4 16.0 20.8 8.4 16.0 Brinjal(S) 9.2 20.4 30.5 Brinjal(b) 10.6 20.6 30.5 Brinjal(L) 10.8 17.8 30.5 10.2 19.6
  7. Tomato R 12.7 17.5 30.5 S-beet 13.0 23.3 30.5 Apple 10.7 17.5 20.8 Carrot 5.1 7.0 20.8 Onion 11.8 17.5 20.8 12.1 19.0 ClocasiaL 13.9 23.2 30.5 R 11.7 22.6 30.5 Chikoo S 9.7 16.5 20.8 L 6.2 15.0 20.8 11.8 20.8 Ghia R 9.6 17.5 30.5 L 11.4 19.5 30.5 Cabbage 8.5 17.8 30.5 Guava S 10.6 16.5 20.8 G 8.1 15.5 20.8 Lemon 9.4 15.0 20.8 9.6 17.0 Mango 12 31.5 33.9 Tomato G 13.6 20.5 30.5 Cucumber 11.4 18.5 30.5 Bitter Guard 10.1 17.5 30.5 Banana G 12.7 21.5 27.5 Mossami G 12.2 20.5 20.8 Capsicum 12.2 23.0 20.8 12.0 21.9
  8. Summary : Colour effect Group Colour Average temp. drop (oC) No. Pulp Skin Pulp Skin I White 8.1 12.3 8.7 15.1 Orange 8.4 16.0 Light green 9.6 17.0 II Yellow 10.4 18.7 10.3 19.2 Violet 10.2 19.6 III Red 12.1 19.0 Blackish 11.8 20.8 12.0 20.6 Dark green 12.0 21.9
  9. Effect of size within same crop Crop Size Temp. drop(oC) Degree change(oC) Pulp Skin Pulp Skin Ghia 97.13 9.6 17.5 1.8 2.0 65.65 11.4 19.5 Clocasia 68.86 11.7 22.6 2.2 0.6 37.93 13.9 23.2 Guava 66.64 8.1 15.5 3.5 1.0 56.04 11.6 16.5 Chikoo 58.04 6.2 15.0 3.5 1.5 48.58 9.7 16.5 Note: Among different crops – erratic trend
  10. Ambient temperature effect Avg. ambient temp. Avg. temp. drop(oC) (oC) Pulp Skin 30.4 11.2 20.1 20.8 9.6 16.5 * Shaded produce w 100C low field tem ith er perature would save 17% - 28% refrigeration costs
  11. Respiration rate at different temperatures (mg/Kg/hr) Crop Temperatures Respiration Increase 0 5 10 15 20 25 for 10oC rise in temp. Apples 3 6 9 15 20 - 2.22 Banana - 18 30 50 88 148 2.96 Cabbage 5 11 18 26 39 56 2.15 Cauliflower 18 21 34 46 81 112 2.43 Orange 4 6 8 19 28 33 1.74 Mangoes - 16 - 45 113 120 2.66 Mushroom 36 36 50 - 290 - 5.8 Onion 3 4 8 11 17 28 2.55 Okra - 56 91 146 261 345 2.36 Peach 5 8 16 38 81 102 2.68 Pear 5 8 15 38 50 - 3.33 Peas 39 66 93 191 303 360 1.88 Plum 3 7 9 12 22 50 2.44 Potatoes - 6 9 9 12 18 1.33 Tomatoes - 7 15 22 35 43 1.95
  12. Heat of respiration aat different temperatires (KJ/ ton/ day) Crop Temperatures (oC) 5 10 15 20 25 Okra 14349 23318 37411 66879 88403 Peas 16912 23830 48942 77641 92246 Banana 4612 7687 12812 22549 37924 Cauliflower 5381 8712 11787 20755 28699 Mango 4100 7943 11531 28955 30749 Peach 2050 4100 9737 20755 26136 Potato 1537 2306 3075 3844 4612 Tomato 1794 3844 5637 8968 11018 Onion 1025 2050 2819 4356 7175
  13. Refrigeration load in a cold store Crop Total heat load (KJ/day) Tons of refrigeration Saving in Refrigeration 35 25 Storage 35 25 Storage Okra 24346262 18328017 5429113 107 80 24 27 Peas 24781762 19455491 6198013 109 85 27 24 Banana 17735262 12331991 2508013 78 54 11 24 Cauliflower 16915262 12255091 2738713 74 54 12 20 Mango 17043362 12998191 2354413 75 57 10 18 Peach 16197762 9923891 1739413 71 44 8 27 Potato 13865962 9923391 1585513 61 44 7 17 Tomato 14660362 10589591 1662613 64 46 7 18 Onion 14096662 9948991 1431913 62 44 6 18
  14. Share of heat of respiration to total heat load Crop Share of heat of respiration to total refrigeration load (%) 35 25 Storage Okra 46 49 79 Peas 47 52 82 Banana 25 26 55 Cauliflower 22 24 59 Mango 23 28 52 Peach 19 25 35 Potato 5 6 29 Tomato 10 12 32 Onion 7 6 21
  15. Energy used in room cooling Heat Load at different temperatures Crop Saving (%) 25 35 Okra 9316 10953 14.9 Peas 9957 11551 13.8 Banana 7950 8491 6.4 Cauliflower 7893 8391 5.9 Mango 7879 8847 10.9 Peach 7779 8391 7.3 Potato 7409 7452 0.6 Tomato 7551 7736 2.4 Onion 7395 7480 1.1
  16. Energy used in package icing Quantity of ice needed for Saving in quantity Crop pre-cooling (lbs) of ice (lbs) 35 25 Banana 943 1007 64 Cauliflower 936 995 59 Mango 934 1049 115 Okra 1105 1299 194 Peach 923 995 73 Peas 1181 1370 189 Potato 879 884 5 Tomato 896 917 22 Onion 877 887 10
  17. Heat transmission and leakage  Insulation to walls & roofs 70% of total heat entering a cold store room comes through roof & 25% from walls  Painting the exterior walls and roofs painting light colour on walls can reduce wall temp. by 110C
  18. ACU Fin Evaporator v/s Old System
  19. 26
  20. Evaporator system  Discard bunker/ diffuser air-cooling unit  Large length of pipe required for cooling.  Saving in space (2-3%) compared to bunker/ diffuser (15-20%, Approx. 8 feet height)  Fin evaporators save 30% energy in cooling.  Uneven distribution of air  Bunker/ diffuser has less suction pressure (25- 27PSIG) to ammonia compressor compared to fin evaporator (35-37 PSIG)
  21. ACU Selection  For cooler 8’ width; shallow coil (1-2) ceiling/ wall mounted.  Storage installation (±1OC): 2-3 FPI  Higher temperature: 14 FPI  Optimum flow rate for efficient cooling  Coil should be 3“ away from ceiling  Use insulated coil decks
  22. Refrigerant fluid  Prefer ammonia based system over HCFC-22  Lower mass of ammonia  Lower pipe size and length  More tolerance of ammonia to water  Better thermal and transport properties  Higher refrigeration capacity – 2.5 times.
  23. Condenser System  Temperature of refrigerant fluid after cooling.  Economical ACC – 43OC  Heat exchange surface  ACC – smaller installation  Water cooled – large installation  Economical water flow rate – 2.5-3 gal/min/ton  Scaling load –inhibited solution of muriatic acid (18%)
  24. Compressor  Select compressor system that operates efficiently over required range of refrigerant flow.  Rotary compressor – less than 2 ton  Centrifugal compressor/ reciprocating compressors – 50 ton or above
  25. Quick Selection – Ammonia ACU with various compressors Frick/ Coil Super/ Sinco Capacity of Cold Estimated Ammonia Kirloskar Storage Compressor Compressor Ammonia Capacity Compressor 80Kg bag MT TR/hr 4x4 4 1/2 x 41/2 7500 600 12 5x5 51/2 x 51/2 12500 1000 20 6x6 6 1/2x 61/2 18750 1500 30 7x7 71/2 x 71/2 25000 2000 40 - 81/2 x 81/2 56250 4500 90 9x9 - 62500 5000 100 Selection: 1 TR/ hr. - 50 MT
  26. Pre-Cooling Units Selection of pre-cooling methods  Nature of product  Sensitivity to chilling and moisture  Packaging requirements  Volume of produce handled  Economic constraints
  27. Distribution of heat input in pre- Cooling Item Percent of total heat input Vacuum Hydro Forced air Product 100 54 47 Fan/ pumps 0 9 37 Leakage/startup, 0 37 7 conduction Lift tructs 0 0 8 Light/people etc. 0 0 1
  28. Typical Energy efficiency in pre- cooling operations Type of cooler Energy coefficients Vacuum cooler 2.5 – 1.5 Hydro cooling 2.3 – 0.7 Forced air cooling 1.5 – 1.4
  29. Pre-Cooling Times for 7/8th cooling of Pears Method of Cooling Cooling Time Room Cooling 16-24 hrs Forced air cooling 3-6 hrs Hydro-cooling 40-45 Min
  30. Hydro-cooler  1/3 heat input - Due to heat leakage - Heat conduction and - Cooling water reservoir start up each day How to improve energy efficiency  Minimized distance between shower pan and product top  Adding insulation, shading or painting light colour reduces heat conduction  Place hydro-cooler in refrigerated building – 30% energy saving
  31. Forced air cooler  Fan contributes 33 – 50% to total heat removed in addition to its own energy consumption  Use cartons with 5% vent area  Aligning pallets vents with cooler to reduce air flow resistance  Use variable frequency control fans to slow fans at the end of cooling cycle
  32. Guide table for cold store owners for knowing RH in the chambers RH at various DBT (%) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH WBT RH 0.1 85 0.1 77 0.1 70 0.1 63 0.1 56 0.1 50 0.2 45 0.2 40 0.2 35 0.4 90 0.3 80 0.5 75 0.2 64 0.4 61 0.5 55 0.5 50 0.6 45 0.6 40 0.7 95 0.6 85 0.8 80 0.6 70 0.7 65 0.8 60 0.6 51 1.0 50 1.0 45 1.0 100 0.9 90 1.0 84 0.9 75 1.0 70 1.2 65 0.9 55 1.3 55 1.4 50 1.2 95 1.4 90 1.2 80 1.4 75 1.5 70 1.2 60 1.7 60 1.7 55 1.5 100 1.7 95 1.6 85 1.7 80 1.8 75 1.6 65 2.0 65 2.1 60 2 100 1.9 90 2.0 85 2.2 80 1.9 70 2.4 70 2.5 65 2.2 96 2.4 91 2.5 85 2.0 71 2.7 74 2.8 70 2.5 100 2.7 95 2.8 90 2.3 75 3.1 80 3.2 75 3.0 100 3.2 95 2.6 80 3.4 85 3.6 80 3.2 96 3.0 85 3.8 90 3.9 85 3.5 100 3.3 90 4.1 95 4.3 90 3.7 95 4.5 100 4.6 95 4 100 5 100
  33. onclusions Harvest crop at night or keep harvested crop in shade during cooling delays. Save 30% energy by installing hydrocooler in a cold room. Provide R 60 PUF insulation for roof and R 40 for walls. Optimum flow rates of fan required are 1 litre/sec/kg of produce. Always provide vapour barrier coating on the hot side of insulation. Prefer finned coil evaporators over bunker or diffuser system for more efficiency and saving in storage space.
SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

+ push_shanpush_shan Nominate

custom

535 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

Energy Use In Post-harvest Technology

By:
Dr Ma more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 535
    • 535 on SlideShare
    • 0 from embeds
  • Comments 2
  • Favorites 0
  • Downloads 13
Most viewed embeds

more

All embeds

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories