Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Dr. Patrick Treacy lecture on Radiesse to IMCAS 2008

2,012

Published on

Lecture about the benefits of the dermal implant Radiesse given at IMCAS Paris 2008 by Dr. Patrick Treacy. Learm more at http://www.ailesburyclinic.ie/

Lecture about the benefits of the dermal implant Radiesse given at IMCAS Paris 2008 by Dr. Patrick Treacy. Learm more at http://www.ailesburyclinic.ie/

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology
1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,012
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
42
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Transcript

    • 1. Clinical Research Data vs. vs.
    • 2. Medical Disclosure <ul><li>Dr. Patrick J. Treacy is a Cosmetic Dermatologist presently on the Specialist Register in Ireland </li></ul><ul><li>I have purchased my own Radiesse product in Ailesbury Clinic. </li></ul><ul><li>I have no financial interest or stock in BioForm nor do I receive any additional remuneration or other compensation for product bought by you as a result of your attendance at this IMAS lecture . </li></ul>
    • 3. Multi-Centre Research Data vs. vs. <ul><li>Multi Centre </li></ul><ul><li>Randomised </li></ul><ul><li>Blinded </li></ul><ul><li>Comparative Study </li></ul>Results published in the Dec 2007 Journal of Dermatological Surgery
    • 4. Comparative Study Radiesse vs Perlane vs Juvederm 24/24HV (N=205) <ul><li>Comparison of efficacy, durability, and patient satisfaction variables </li></ul><ul><li>Treatment of Nasolabial Folds </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Month 0 and 4. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Results at 4, 8, and 12 month post 2 nd injection </li></ul>
    • 5. Head to Head Studies <ul><li>Radiesse vs. Restylane Trial Design (2 sites) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Split face study, n=60 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>GAIS, WSRS, and Injection Volume </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Live Blinded Evaluator and patient satisfaction questionnaires </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Radiesse vs. Juvederm & Perlane Trial Design (5 sites) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Patients randomized to one of three treatments (both NL-folds), n=205 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>GAIS, WSRS, and Injection Volume </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Live Blinded Evaluator and patient satisfaction questionnaires </li></ul></ul>6 Months 9 Months 3 Months 0 Months 12 Months 8 Months 4 Months 0 Months
    • 6. Results after 1 st treatment Less volume
    • 7. vs Restylane
    • 8. vs Restylane
    • 9. Comparative Study: Radiesse vs Restylane GAIS 3 Months 6 Months 9 Months 79% 44% More Patients improved with Radiesse than with Restylane Time post 2nd Injection % of Patients Improved or better (n=60 Split Face)
    • 10. WSRS = Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale 5 Extreme Extremely deep and long folds, detrimental to facial appearance. 2-4mm Visible V-shaped fold when stretched Unlikely to have satisfactory correction with injectable implant alone. 4 Severe Very long and deep folds; prominent facial feature. Less than 2mm visible fold when stretched. Significant improvement is expected from injectable implant. 3 Moderate Moderately deep folds. Clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Excellent correction is expected from injectable implant. 2 Mild Shallow but visible fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature. Implant is expected to produce a slight improvement in appearance. 1 Absent No visible fold, continuous skin line. 1 5 4 3 2
    • 11. GAIS = Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Very Much Improved Optimal cosmetic result for the implant in this patient. Much Improved Marked improvement in appearance but not completely optimal for this patient. A touch-up would slightly improve the result. Improved Obvious improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but a touch-up or re-treatment is indicated. No Change The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition. Worse The appearance is worse than the original condition.
    • 12. Comparative Study Radiesse vs Perlane vs Juvederm 24/24HV (N=205) <ul><li>Comparison of efficacy, durability, and patient satisfaction variables </li></ul><ul><li>Treatment of Nasolabial Folds </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Month 0 and 4. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Results at 4, 8, and 12 month post 2 nd injection </li></ul>
    • 13. Comparative Study Radiesse vs Perlane vs Juvederm 24/24HV GAIS 4 Months 8 Months 12 Months More Patients improved with Radiesse than with Perlane & Juvederm Time post 2nd Injection 62% 50% 48% 88% 53% 64% % of Patients Improved or better (n=205)
    • 14. One fold (split face) (touch up at 3 Months) Both folds (touch up at 4 Months) Radiesse 0.89 Restylane 1.26 Radiesse 2.21 Perlane 2.89 Juvederm HV 2.94 cc - including touch up Volume Comparison Syringes needed for 2 Folds Full Correction 1.4 2.5 1.7 2.9 3.7 % of Optimal Correction w/ One Syringe 70% 40% 60% 34% 27%
    • 15. <ul><li>More patients were Satisfied with Radiesse than with Restylane , even at 6 Months </li></ul>Comparative Study: Radiesse vs Restylane Patient Satisfaction Time post 2nd Injection % of Patients That are Satisfied & Extremely Satisfied* Radiesse Restylane
    • 16. Comparative Study Radiesse vs Perlane vs Juvederm 24/24HV Patient Satisfaction More patients were Satisfied with Radiesse than with Perlane or Juvederm Time post 2nd Injection % of Patients That are Satisfied & Extremely Satisfied
    • 17. Comparative Study: Radiesse vs Restylane Patients likely to return % of Patients who say that they are Likely or Extremely Likely to return for future treatments Patients are 3 times more likely to return for re-treatments with Radiesse Time post 2nd Injection Radiesse Restylane
    • 18. Comparative Study Radiesse vs Perlane vs Juvederm 24/24HV Patients likely to return Patients are much more likely to come in for re-treatments with Radiesse Time post 2nd Injection % of Patients who say that they are Likely or Extremely Likely to return for future treatments
    • 19. <ul><li>Radiesse treated patients are more satisfied compared to hyaluronic acid treated patients </li></ul><ul><li>Radiesse delivers better correction at 3 months & beyond </li></ul><ul><li>Radiesse delivers longer-lasting correction </li></ul><ul><li>Radiesse requires less volume to achieve the same immediate correction </li></ul><ul><li>Radiesse patients are more likely to return for future treatments </li></ul>Comparative Studies with Radiesse SUMMAY FINDINGS
    • 20. Acknowledgements and Participating Centers Marion Moers-Carpi , Munich, Germany Stephan Vogt , Hanover, Germany Jaime Opi Tufet , Barcelona, Spain Begonia Martinez Santos , Barcelona, Spain Jorge Planas , Barcelona, Spain Sonia Rovira Vallve , Barcelona, Spain
    • 21. Calcium Hydroxylapatite Gel carrier (~70%) Sodium-CarboxyMethylCellulose Glycerine H 2 O <ul><li>Structural component (~30%) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ca 2+ PO 4 3- ions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 ) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Natural mineral </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(identical to teeth & bone) </li></ul></ul>
    • 22. Calcium Hydroxylapatite Macrophages dissolve gel carrier & fibroblasts form new collagen. Natural mineral non-antigenic, non-irritant, non-toxic metabolizes via homeostatic mechanisms
    • 23. Facial Augmentation Nasolabial Fold Mental crease Jaw Line Chin Post-rhinoplasty Marionette Line Cheek Malar Radial Lip Lines
    • 24.  

    ×