Applying positive ethics to difficult patient
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Applying positive ethics to difficult patient

on

  • 2,283 views

This presentation stemmed from a book chapter authored by Sam and John.

This presentation stemmed from a book chapter authored by Sam and John.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,283
Views on SlideShare
2,283
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
17
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Applying positive ethics to difficult patient Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Applying Positive Ethics to Difficult Patients Sam Knapp, Ed.D. John Gavazzi, Psy.D.
  • 2. Who are “difficult” patients?
    • High risk for failure
    • Emotionally draining
    • Increased legal and ethical risks
  • 3. Multiple Dimensions
    • Patient Characteristics
    • Context of Treatment
    • Psychologist factors and resources
  • 4. Patient Factors
    • Intense Negative Affect
    • Difficulty forming and maintaining relationships
    • Limited insight
  • 5. Avoid overemphasis on diagnosis
    • Patients may be difficult even if they do not meet specific DSM category
    • Some patients with complex DSM diagnoses may be successful patients
    • Avoid labeling or blaming patient
  • 6. Intense Negative Affect
    • Emotionally and intellectually draining
    • Vicarious PTSD
    • Recognition of the process of therapy
  • 7. Relationship deficits
    • Difficulty building a working relationship with the psychologist
    • May be direct or indirect issues
    • May also report deficient social support systems outside of therapy
  • 8. Lack of insight
    • Inability of patient to reflect upon his/her behaviors and how these influence consequences of actions or beliefs
    • Inability to understand the severity of their situation
    • If patient cannot understand the complexity and seriousness of emotional and behavioral issues, less likely to work toward change
  • 9. Context of Therapy
    • Ambivalence
    • Lack of motivation
    • Pressured into treatment
    • Current litigation
  • 10. Psychologist Factors
    • Skills and knowledge with particular populations
    • Emotional resources at this time
    • External resources, such as consultation
  • 11. Self-Protection
    • Office layout
    • Supportive staff nearby
    • Safety plan
    • Other resources
  • 12. Early Screening
    • Extensive psychiatric history
    • At risk factors: childhood abuse, criminal record, troubled work history
    • Impaired relationships
  • 13. Focus on the relationship
    • Failure to develop a working relationship within a few session is cause to reconsider the treatment plan
  • 14. Alliance ruptures and repairs
    • Alliance ruptures do happen in psychotherapy
    • Handling the rupture and the repair takes additional skills
  • 15. Ethical Issues Additional attention to ethical principles with high risk patients
  • 16. Boundary issues
    • Boundary crossings have a greater chance of becoming more problematic
    • Lower threshold for clinical contraindicated boundary crossing
    • Pay extra attention to self-disclosure
  • 17. Informed Consent
    • Not a once and done process
    • May need to revisit multiple times for high risk patients
    • Increased collaboration related to goals
    • More structured treatment plan
  • 18. Quality Enhancing Strategies Consultation Empowered Collaboration Documentation Redundant Protections
  • 19. Quality Enhancing Strategies
    • As the legal risks, the possibility of treatment failure, or patient complexity increases,
    • the greater the level of attention should be given to quality enhancing strategies.
  • 20. Consultation
    • Technique oriented information
    • Emotional reactions (countertransference)
    • Reduction of emotional turmoil
    • Thinking through solution together
  • 21. Consultation
    • Write down issues in advance
    • Need to be open and honest
    • Be willing to admit mistakes or clinical errors
  • 22. Empowered Collaboration
    • Empowered collaboration builds upon informed consent and attempts to maximize patient involvement in all essential elements of treatment
    • The patient becomes more actively involved in the process of psychotherapy. Greater commitment leads to better outcomes.
  • 23. Empowered Collaboration
    • Empowering psychologists respect a patient’s autonomy and decision making skills about the goals of treatment, process of treatment, and life choices.
    • Examples of tough decisions and ambivalent patients
  • 24. Documentation: Legal Purposes
    • Required by insurers, State Board of Psychology, APA Ethics Code, etc.
    • A record of treatment for future providers
    • Useful risk management tool
  • 25. Documentation: Quality Enhancing
    • Dialogue with self and patient regarding process and goals of treatment
    • Means to identify pertinent clinical issues
    • Procedure to document progress
  • 26. Redundant Protections
    • Additional source of information for a difficult patient
    • Routine procedure with high risk patients
  • 27. Transparency
    • General Rule: Implement quality enhancing strategies with as much transparency as possible.
  • 28. Questions, answers and more discussion
  • 29. Vignettes Looking the exercise what you have learned Not looking for the “correct” answer
  • 30. Important Issues
    • What factors make this a potentially difficult patient for you?
    • What would your emotional reaction be to the content of this scenario?
  • 31. Important issues
    • How would you use a consultation?
    • In what ways would empowered collaboration be of use?
    • Are there any issues related to documentation?
    • Can you think of any redundant protections?