Myths & Evidence:    EFCA v. Canadian First Contract       Arbitration ExperienceExcerpts from presentation to 47th CIRA A...
First Contract Arbitration: Four Models & Two                    ApproachesExceptional Remedy”                            ...
First Contract Arbitration: Four ModelsModel                   Key characteristic            Used in“Exceptional Remedy”  ...
Development of FCA Models      1974          1978          1982    1984 1985 1986            1993 1994 1995 ... Prese     ...
First Contract ArbitrationJurisdiction                               Year in ForceBritish Columbia                        ...
Four Models:Detailed Summaries of FC Legislation   in Representative Jurisdictions
British Columbia: “Mediation Intensive”Apply To      Associate chair of Mediation Division.Screens       Yes (Associate Ch...
British Columbia: “Mediation Intensive”                Factors to decide whether to refer to FC arbitration (non-exhaustiv...
Manitoba: “Automatic Access”Apply To            BoardScreens             NoPre-Conditions      Appointed conciliator has n...
Quebec: “Exceptional Remedy”Apply To              MinisterScreens               Yes (Ministerial discretion)Pre-Conditions...
Ontario: “No-Fault”Apply To          BoardScreens           Yes (Board)Pre-Conditions    (1) parties unable to effect a co...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

First Contract Arbitration slideshow

1,286

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,286
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

First Contract Arbitration slideshow

  1. 1. Myths & Evidence: EFCA v. Canadian First Contract Arbitration ExperienceExcerpts from presentation to 47th CIRA Annual Congress / International CRIMT Conference, Quebec City, QC, June 2010 Sara Slinn, Osgoode Hall Law School Richard W. Hurd, ILR School, Cornell University
  2. 2. First Contract Arbitration: Four Models & Two ApproachesExceptional Remedy” Quebec - no prospect for settlement in reasonable Federaltime Newfoundland‘Automatic Access‘ Manitoba - Deadlines‘No Fault‘ Ontario - No ULP – but discrete reasons Saskatchewan‘Mediation Intensive‘ British Columbia - not remedy; support coll barg process
  3. 3. First Contract Arbitration: Four ModelsModel Key characteristic Used in“Exceptional Remedy” Available when no •Quebec prospect of settlement in a •Federal jurisdiction reasonable time •Newfoundland & Labrador“Automatic Access” Available when deadlines Manitoba pass“No Fault” Available when bargaining •Ontario fails due to one or more •Saskatchewan statutorily specified reasons“Mediation Intensive” Not regarded as a remedy; British Columbia intended to support the collective bargaining process
  4. 4. Development of FCA Models 1974 1978 1982 1984 1985 1986 1993 1994 1995 ... Prese nt MediationBC Exceptional Remedy IntensiveQU Exceptional RemedyFed Exceptional Remedy Except.MB Remedy Automatic AccessNF Exceptional RemedyON No-FaultSK No-Fault
  5. 5. First Contract ArbitrationJurisdiction Year in ForceBritish Columbia 1974Quebec 1978Federal 1978Manitoba 1982Newfoundland 1985Ontario 1986Saskatchewan 1994Prince Edward Island 1994**Provision passed, but has never been brought into force
  6. 6. Four Models:Detailed Summaries of FC Legislation in Representative Jurisdictions
  7. 7. British Columbia: “Mediation Intensive”Apply To Associate chair of Mediation Division.Screens Yes (Associate Chair Mediation Division)Pre- Certification granted;Conditions Parties have collectively bargained and failed to reach an agreement; and, Successful strike votePre- MediationArbitrationProcessesIssues FC Arbitrator or BoardTrigger for Recommendation of mediator and/ or Associate Chair if mediation fails mediationImposed FC If no FC within 20 d of mediator appointment: mediator report to the associate chair recommending either or both: (a) the terms of the first collective agreement for consideration by the parties; (b) a process for concluding the first collective agreement including one or more of : (i) mediation / arbitration (result in imposed FC if no agreement); (ii) arbitrator or Board impose FC. (iii) allow work stoppage. If no agreement w/in 20 d Associate Chair direction under (b)
  8. 8. British Columbia: “Mediation Intensive” Factors to decide whether to refer to FC arbitration (non-exhaustive): (a) bad faith or surface bargaining; (b) employer conduct shows refusal to recognize the union; (c) party adopts uncompromising bargaining position without reasonable justification; (d) party fails to make reasonable or expeditious efforts to conclude a CA; (e) unrealistic demands or expectations arising from either the intentional conduct of a party or from their inexperience; (f) a bitter and protracted dispute unlikely to be voluntarily settled.Decertification Not specified.treatmentWork stoppages Prohibited once a FCA application is filed, unless mediator or associate chair authorises.Considerations Guidelines for arbitrators to set FCA terms:in setting FC 1. no breakthrough or innovative clauses; 2. Employ objective criteria (e.g. comparable terms and conditions paid to similar employees performing similar work); 3. Must be internal consistency and equity amongst employees; 4. Employer’s financial state, if sufficient evidence, a critical factor; 5. The economic and market conditions of the sector or industry in which the employer competes must be considered (Yarrow Lodge, 1993).
  9. 9. Manitoba: “Automatic Access”Apply To BoardScreens NoPre-Conditions Appointed conciliator has notified Board or 120 d since appointment 90 d since certification (and any extension periods)Pre-Arbitration ConciliationProcessesIssues FC Arbitrator or if parties refuse to select an arbitrator, then BoardTrigger for 10d for parties to elect arbitration:Imposed FC -60 d from date parties notified the Bd of election for arbitrator award If not elect arbitration: - If no agreement within 60 d of FC application, then Bd has 3d to impose a first contract, OR decline to make an award if opinion that might agree within 30d alone or with conciliation officer. - If no agreement within 30d, then Bd issues FC within 30 daysFC Duration 1 yearDecertification Not specified.treatmentWork stoppages Must terminate when a FCA application filed.Considerations in Present evidence and make representations to the Board or arbitratorsetting FC Consider negotiated terms and conditions for comparable employment Consider other matters it considers “will assist in arriving at provisions of a first collective agreement …which are fair and reasonable in the circumstances” Can agree to amend FC in writing
  10. 10. Quebec: “Exceptional Remedy”Apply To MinisterScreens Yes (Ministerial discretion)Pre-Conditions Exhaust conciliationPre-Arbitration Conciliation; Conciliation officer may continue to assist the parties even after FCAProcesses application filed.Issues FC Arbitrator (or panel including assessors)Trigger for Imposed Minister’s discretion to send to arbitratorFC Arbitrator must impose a FC where opinion parties unlikely to reach a CA within “reasonable time”.FC Duration 1-3 yearsDecertification Not specified.treatmentWork stoppages Must end if and when arbitrator announces necessary to impose FCConsiderations in Parties may agree to amend FC termssetting FC Arbitrators must decide “according to equity and good conscience” May consider “conditions of employment that prevail in similar undertakings or similar circumstances and the conditions of employment that are applicable to the other employees of the undertaking” Parties may agree, at any time, on any of the issues in dispute, and any such agreed issues are to be included, without amendment, in FC
  11. 11. Ontario: “No-Fault”Apply To BoardScreens Yes (Board)Pre-Conditions (1) parties unable to effect a collective agreement; AND (2) MOL either issued a notice that it is not considered advisable to appoint a conciliation board or has released conciliation board reportPre-Arbitration Conciliation exhaustedProcesses Ministry may appoint a mediator to assist the partiesIssues FC Board of Arbitration OR LRB if parties agree within seven days of Board’s directionTrigger for Two-steps: (1) Find an obligation to bargain and, in totality of circumstances, the process ofImposed FC collective bargaining has been “unsuccessful`` (2) Failure due to one or more of: employer’s refusal to recognize the union’s bargaining authority; uncompromising nature of any bargaining position adopted by the respondent without reasonable justification; respondent’s failure to make reasonable or expeditious efforts to conclude a collective agreement; any other reason the Board considers relevant.FC Duration Two yearsDecertification Priority if filed before FC application decided.treatmentWork stoppages Prohibited where Board has directed FC arbitration.Considerations in Must accept, without amendment, matters parties agree to in writing.setting FC Any FC term except length, may be retroactive to a date not earlier than date of notice to bargain.

×