Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
SONA Q3
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

SONA Q3

394
views

Published on

SONA Q3

SONA Q3

Published in: Business, Technology

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
394
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. SONA Q3 :July- September “Health + Performances = Success"
  • 2. PARAMETERs:  PERFORMANCEs: - Exchange - Exchange + Leadership - Leadership Role - Members - n° of member for each X realized  HEALTH : - costumers relation - Exchange - Communication - Talent Management - Finance - Organizational Structure
  • 3. Modality of Evaluation: 1. Each Parameter has a score 2. I define the total score for performance and health 3. I calculate an average between performance and health 4. The average is the indicator for the status of each LC
  • 4. LC’s SITUATION for Q3
  • 5. ANCONA ANCONA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 Customer Relation Exchange Organization alStructure Communicati on Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 6. BARI BARI 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 7. BOLZANO BOLZANO 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 8. CATANIA: CATANIA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 9. GENOVA GENOVA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 10. MILANO CATTOLICA MILANO CATTOLICA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 11. NAPOLI FEDERICO II NAPOLI FEDERICO II 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 12. NAPOLI PARTHENOPE NAPOLI PARTHENOPE 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 13. PALERMO PALERMO 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communication Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 14. PAVIA PAVIA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 15. PISA PISA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 16. ROMA SAPIENZA ROMASAPIENZA 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 17. ROMA TRE ROMA TRE 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 18. TORINO TORINO 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 19. TRENTO TRENTO 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 20. TRIESTE TRIESTE 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 21. VENEZIA VENEZIA 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 Customer Relation Exchange Organizational Structure Communicatio n Finance Talent Management Serie1
  • 22. RANKING Q3 LCs (30 Sept 2010) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ancona BariBolzanoCataniaGenova M ilano Cattolica NapoliFederico 2 NapoliParthenopePalerm o Pavia Pisa Rom a SapienzaRom a Tre Torino Trento TriesteVenezia Serie1
  • 23. Instructions for graphic  With the graphic you can identify the area that you have to improve  In the next slide you can see the best LCs for each subsystem  You have contact them in order to understand what they did and cover your gaps Try to be RESPONSIBLE
  • 24. Best LC for each subsystem  Costumer Relation: Torino, Palermo  Exchange: Napoli Federico II, Torino, Trieste  Organizational Structure:Torino  Communication: Milano Cattolica, Pavia  Finance:Venezia  Talent Management:Torino
  • 25. CLUSTERs Q3
  • 26. 1th Cluster 8 X 3 X+L 3 LR 15 M 18-24 H AVERAGE 8,9 – 12,6 No one LC is in this cluster for the 1th quarter
  • 27. 2th Cluster 3 X 2 X+L 1 LR 5 M 12-17 H AVERAGE 5,7 – 8,8 LC: -Milano Cattolica -Napoli Federico II -Torino
  • 28. 3th Cluster 1 X 1 X+L 0 LR 0 M 6-11 H AVERAGE 0 – 5,6 LCs Ancona Bari Bolzano Catania Genova Napoli Pathenope Palermo Pavia Pisa Roma Sapienza Roma Tre Trento Trieste Venezia
  • 29. Italian Do it Better… For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project Silvia.prastani@aiesec.net Good Work…