SONA Q4 :January- March “ Health  + Performances = Success"
PARAMETERs: <ul><li>PERFORMANCEs : -  Exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Exchange + Leadership  </li></ul><ul><li>- Leadership R...
Modality of Evaluation: <ul><li>Each Parameter has a score </li></ul><ul><li>I define the total score for performance and ...
LC’s SITUATION for Q1
RANKING Q1
What is the “ indice ” <ul><li>It is the indicator of the best situation that each area has to have in the Best LC. </li><...
ANCONA
BARI
BOLZANO
CATANIA:
GENOVA
MILANO CATTOLICA
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
PALERMO
PAVIA
PISA
ROMA SAPIENZA
ROMA TRE
TORINO
TRENTO
TRIESTE
VENEZIA
CLUSTERs Q1
Explenation: <ul><li>In order to allocate each LC in clusters I took in consideration the average of each LC based on perf...
Average of LCs: 1,765 2,13 1,4 Venezia 0,65 1,3 0 Trieste 1,17 1,54 0,8 Trento 1,82 2,04 1,6 Torino 2,06 2,32 1,8 Roma Tre...
1st Cluster 15 X 3 x+l 8 LR 40 M 18-24 H   AVERAGE < 2,30 Also for Q1 none LC is  in this cluster   You have last quarter...
2nd Cluster 8X 2X+L 6 LR 30 M 12-17 H   AVERAGE 1,51 – 2,30  <ul><li>LC: </li></ul><ul><li>Ancona  </li></ul><ul><li>Bari ...
3th Cluster 5 X 1 X+L 2  LR 15 M 6-11 H   AVERAGE 1 – 1,50 LCs Napoli Federico II Pavia Roma Sapienza Trento Genova**
Clarification <ul><li>*For  Pisa ,  Bolzano  and  Trieste : their performance in this quarter have an average of “Zero” so...
CONGRATULATION TO:  <ul><li>Catania </li></ul><ul><li>Venezia </li></ul><ul><li>Milano Cattolica </li></ul><ul><li>For the...
Italians Do it Better… <ul><li>For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project </li></ul><ul><li>s [email_add...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Presentation sona q1

427 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
427
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
131
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Presentation sona q1

  1. 1. SONA Q4 :January- March “ Health + Performances = Success&quot;
  2. 2. PARAMETERs: <ul><li>PERFORMANCEs : - Exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Exchange + Leadership </li></ul><ul><li>- Leadership Role </li></ul><ul><li>- Members </li></ul><ul><li>- n° of member for each X realized </li></ul><ul><li>HEALTH : - corporate relation </li></ul><ul><li>- Exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Communication </li></ul><ul><li>- Talent Management </li></ul><ul><li>- Finance </li></ul><ul><li>- Organizational Structure </li></ul>
  3. 3. Modality of Evaluation: <ul><li>Each Parameter has a score </li></ul><ul><li>I define the total score for performance and health </li></ul><ul><li>I calculate an average between performance and health </li></ul><ul><li>The average is the indicator for the status of each LC </li></ul>
  4. 4. LC’s SITUATION for Q1
  5. 5. RANKING Q1
  6. 6. What is the “ indice ” <ul><li>It is the indicator of the best situation that each area has to have in the Best LC. </li></ul><ul><li>In this way you can understand in which situation are your areas comparing these </li></ul><ul><li>with the “ indice ” </li></ul>
  7. 7. ANCONA
  8. 8. BARI
  9. 9. BOLZANO
  10. 10. CATANIA:
  11. 11. GENOVA
  12. 12. MILANO CATTOLICA
  13. 13. NAPOLI FEDERICO II
  14. 14. NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
  15. 15. PALERMO
  16. 16. PAVIA
  17. 17. PISA
  18. 18. ROMA SAPIENZA
  19. 19. ROMA TRE
  20. 20. TORINO
  21. 21. TRENTO
  22. 22. TRIESTE
  23. 23. VENEZIA
  24. 24. CLUSTERs Q1
  25. 25. Explenation: <ul><li>In order to allocate each LC in clusters I took in consideration the average of each LC based on performance and health. </li></ul><ul><li>In the next slide you can discover the average of each LCs. </li></ul><ul><li>Average = (Perf. + Heal.) / 2 </li></ul>
  26. 26. Average of LCs: 1,765 2,13 1,4 Venezia 0,65 1,3 0 Trieste 1,17 1,54 0,8 Trento 1,82 2,04 1,6 Torino 2,06 2,32 1,8 Roma Tre 1,18 1,56 0,8 Roma Sapienza 0,5 0,8 0,2 Pisa 1,375 1,75 1 Pavia 1,685 1,97 1,4 Palermo 2,2 2,6 1,8 Napoli Parthenope 1,2 1,4 1 Napoli Federico 2 1,7 2,2 1,2 Milano Cattolica 1,64 2,28 1 Genova 1,615 1,63 1,6 Catania 0,79 1,18 0,4 Bolzano 1,89 1,98 1,8 Bari 1,975 1,75 2,2 Ancona TOT HEALTH PERF. LC name
  27. 27. 1st Cluster 15 X 3 x+l 8 LR 40 M 18-24 H AVERAGE < 2,30 Also for Q1 none LC is in this cluster  You have last quarter in order to achieve this cluster….
  28. 28. 2nd Cluster 8X 2X+L 6 LR 30 M 12-17 H AVERAGE 1,51 – 2,30 <ul><li>LC: </li></ul><ul><li>Ancona </li></ul><ul><li>Bari </li></ul><ul><li>Napoli Parthenope </li></ul><ul><li>Palermo </li></ul><ul><li>Roma Tre </li></ul><ul><li>Torino </li></ul><ul><li>Catania </li></ul><ul><li>Venezia </li></ul><ul><li>Milano Cattolica </li></ul>
  29. 29. 3th Cluster 5 X 1 X+L 2 LR 15 M 6-11 H AVERAGE 1 – 1,50 LCs Napoli Federico II Pavia Roma Sapienza Trento Genova**
  30. 30. Clarification <ul><li>*For Pisa , Bolzano and Trieste : their performance in this quarter have an average of “Zero” so they can not be ranked in any cluster </li></ul><ul><li>** For Genova , in according with the average it has to be in the second cluster, but also if Genova in this quarter realized nice internal activities, like PBoX and events, the organization of these was not focused on EXCHANGE that is the core activity of AIESEC. </li></ul>
  31. 31. CONGRATULATION TO: <ul><li>Catania </li></ul><ul><li>Venezia </li></ul><ul><li>Milano Cattolica </li></ul><ul><li>For their new position in Cluster 2 </li></ul>
  32. 32. Italians Do it Better… <ul><li>For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project </li></ul><ul><li>s [email_address] </li></ul><ul><li>Good Work… </li></ul>

×