Defrag 08: Is that Good?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

3 comments

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 previous next Post a comment

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

4 Favorites

Defrag 08: Is that Good? - Presentation Transcript

  1. Is that good? Can Social Network Analysis Inform Community Management Paul Pedrazzi Vice President, Product Strategy, Oracle. 1
  2. A Tale of Two Networks Mix Connect Total Users 28,841 80,000 PageViews (monthly) 142,220 58,775 Unique Visits (monthly) 15,525 3,732 Sharing Activity (avg/user/month) 0.45 0.67 Connections (avg) 4.92 6.18 2
  3. A Simple Question... ...is that good? 3
  4. image credit: Amber in Norfolk 4
  5. image credit: David C. Foster 5
  6. What makes... ...a network healthy? and how do you diagnose and influence it 6
  7. 20 200 E 1 20 100 F P 2 20 70 T O Z 3 20 50 LPED 4 20 40 PECFD 5 20 30 E D F C Z P 6 20 25 F E L O P Z D 7 20 20 D E F P O T E C 8 9 20 15 L E F O D P C T 20 10 F D P L T C E O 10 20 5 P E S O L E F T D 11 photo credit: skyfaller 7
  8. Diagnosis Hubs: Connected to the most people. 8
  9. Diagnosis Hubs: Connected to the most people. Gatekeepers: Control access to the disconnected. 9
  10. Diagnosis Hubs: Connected to the most people. Gatekeepers: Control access to the disconnected. Monitors: Close(<3d) to the most people. 10
  11. Diagnosis Hubs: Connected to the most people. Gatekeepers: Control access to the disconnected. Monitors: Close(<3d) to the most people. Loners: Not connected within this network. 11
  12. Diagnosis Hubs: Connected to the most people. Gatekeepers: Control access to the disconnected. Monitors: Close(<3d) to the most people. Loners: Not connected within this network. Bridges: Span two communities. 12
  13. Ok, but... ...what is the treatment? 13
  14. It depends... ...on the patient (objectives) 14
  15. Treatments (Experimental) Objective: “Ensure my community is doing the right things for its members” Challenge: “Who do you ask for the best perspective?” Hypothesis: Reach out to the monitors as those most tapped in. 15
  16. Treatments (Experimental) Objective: “How can we get the best ideas out in the open?” Challenge: “Finding the innovators amongst the crowd.” Hypothesis: Entice bridges to join the conversations. 16
  17. Treatments (Experimental) Objective: “Bring in different voices to stimulate new conversations.” Challenge: “How can you tap the diversity beyond your network clique?” Hypothesis: Encourage loners to invite externally. 17
  18. Treatments (Experimental) Objective: “To increase the durability of our community.” Challenge: “Where is it strong and where is it weak?” Hypothesis: Create more hubs to minimize the points of failure. 18
  19. Treatments (Experimental) Objective: “To increase the flow of information to everyone.” Challenge: “Finding the bottlenecks and the isolated members” Hypothesis: Identify and circumvent the gatekeepers. 19
  20. Treatments (Experimental) Objective: “To increase the members feeling of belonging.” Challenge: “Shorten the paths between individuals (focus <3)” Hypothesis: Measure the paths and create more monitors. 20
  21. Summary Our measurement model is broken. Understanding social networks is mature in academia. Analysis can help community managers prioritize their efforts. 21
  22. References Dekker, Anthony, “Conceptual Distance in Social Network Analysis”, JoSS Volume 6,http:// www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume6/dekker/ Freeman, Linton (1979) “Centrality in Social Networks: I. Conceptual Clarification,” Social Networks 1:215-239 Krackhardt, David, Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990): 342-369 Krebs, Valdis “Social Networking Analysis a Brief Introduction” http://www.orgnet.com/ sna.html McCarty, Christopher, “Structure in Personal Networks”, JoSS 3, http://www.cmu.edu/joss/ content/articles/volume3/McCarty.html McGrath, Kathleen and Krackhardt, David (2003) “Network Conditions for Organizational Change”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol.39, No.3:324-336 22
  23. Q&A 23
  24. 24

+ Paul PedrazziPaul Pedrazzi, 2 years ago

custom

1287 views, 4 favs, 5 embeds more stats

Early thinking on how to apply social networking an more

More info about this document

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

Go to text version

  • Total Views 1287
    • 1181 on SlideShare
    • 106 from embeds
  • Comments 3
  • Favorites 4
  • Downloads 25
Most viewed embeds
  • 80 views on http://theappslab.com
  • 16 views on https://mix.oracle.com
  • 7 views on http://connect.oraclecorp.com
  • 2 views on http://sergiosaldia.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://connectsandbox.oraclecorp.com

more

All embeds
  • 80 views on http://theappslab.com
  • 16 views on https://mix.oracle.com
  • 7 views on http://connect.oraclecorp.com
  • 2 views on http://sergiosaldia.blogspot.com
  • 1 views on http://connectsandbox.oraclecorp.com

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories