Evaluating technology-, information literacy-, and content-related learning outcomes among undergraduate students in face-to-face and social networking environments

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Evaluating technology-, information literacy-, and content-related learning outcomes among undergraduate students in face-to-face and social networking environments - Presentation Transcript

    1. Evaluating technology-, information literacy-, and content-related learning outcomes among undergraduate students in face-to-face and social networking environments1 Phillip M. Edwards2, Evelyn Daniel, Claudia J. Gollop, Stephen Seiberling and Alan S. Weakley Michael Shoffner Jane Greenberg, Jacob Kramer-Duffield, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI) Hill Taylor, and David Woodbury University of North Carolina Herbarium Chapel Hill, NC, USA University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC, USA School of Information and Library Science Chapel Hill, NC, USA The Bot 2.0 project is an innovative technological approach to Focus group responses enhance student interest in the biological and botanical sciences. The project attempts to addresses the lack of 2008 Appreciation for botanical concepts in everyday life diversity among the population of students who ultimately Student A, FG#1: “I thought it was really cool, ‘cause Student E, FG#2: “I think for me [the most helpful pursue advanced education and careers in these fields. The I’m not really an outdoor person. I spend most of aspect] was stopping every so regularly to have main activity for this project is BotCamp, a hybrid curriculum my time indoors, so I thought it was really cool to stuff pointed out because if not, you really don’t actually get out there, and get out, outside, and look around and notice stuff until it’s pointed out based on field exercises, communal learning, and reflection. look at plants that I never would have looked at, you, and after that, you start noticing your but I know, probably just walked past and, like, surroundings more and wondering, “I’ve always ‘okay, who cares?’, but actually got me in there and just passed by this, but I never actually knew what Bot 2.0 project goals got me interested. I actually walked past, like, it was,” and now, y’know, you have some some trees on campus, on Chapel Hill’s campus, knowledge and tools to help you, y’know, learn Use social software to connect students to the natural world and was like, ‘Oh, that has some cool fruit on there, more about your surroundings and, uh, [that] has and botanical science and I wonder what that is?’” been one of the best things about it. Study how students organize information 2009 Uses of social tagging and taxonomic labeling Examine the role and potential use of the memex framework to facilitate learning of science, technology, Student C, FG#1: “Well, I sort of went more toward the Student F, FG#2: “I thought the tags were useful when scientific side [of tagging photographs] because if we were trying to identify our group’s, um, [photos]. engineering, and mathematics (STEM) topics somebody just searches ‘tall tree’, they’re going to If they had tagged ‘alternate’ or ‘opposite’, we’d be Recruit students from diverse and underrepresented get tall trees, not specifically one type of tall tree, able to go through d-, the dichotomous key and be but if they search, maybe, serrate leaves, they’ll get able to identify [the tree] easier. So I mean, I populations to the field of botany trees with serrate leaves, or something like that…like thought that part was pretty useful.” they search in a specific family of tree. Student G, FG#2: “And you can even try to create a Student D, FG#1: “Yeah, yeah, I’d agree. The more dichotomous key with the tags, because if you click BotCamp 2008 cohort and curriculum scientifical [sic] term[s] are specific, so it’s easier. I on ‘serrate’, then you just get all the plants that Undergraduate students from a range of colleges and mean, if you don’t know what it is, then I guess, were, er, trees that were serrate, and then it can go y’know,…it’s a little easier to do the more casual further than that so you click on the tags of the universities in the Piedmont region of North Carolina [tags].” serrate plants, and then… Student H, FG#2: “That’s how I did my, my tags: what I Residential instruction followed by online activities clicked to, well, when I had kind of, like, identified it Incorporated Web 2.0 technologies such as social software already, I, and I was, like, pretty sure it was going to be, y’know, a red maple and then I used those tags.” and cell phones to facilitate student engagement with the Focus group questions disciplinary content of the course What are some of the challenges you've encountered when studying science and/or botany? Challenges from a fragmented online learning environment Botcamp 2009 modified curriculum How important is science, especially of plants, in your daily life? Student A, FG#1: “I think the Flickr thing was a little bit different, I guess. It would have been kind of easier if we could have maybe put the pictures on Two periods of residential instruction (start and end) with On a typical day, what do you think scientists do? the Facebook group or something and then commented through that…It online activities in the interim just, it just seemed like were going to like ten different websites…just for What do you see yourself doing in your career or working life? one…program, whereas everything could have been, like, all Facebook or What technologies have been useful to you in your social life (e.g., something like that, [it] would have been a little bit easier.” Curriculum evaluation methods when you’re out with your friends, when you’re spending time Student B, FG#1: “‘Cause we were, I mean, we’re getting emails, we’re doing Facebook, and we’re doing Flickr.” Baseline survey of experiences with botany, metadata with your family)? Student A, FG#1: “And then, y’know, the key website too, so it was, it was a concepts, and technological tools What technologies have been useful to you in your academic life? lot of stuff. I have like five windows open one time, sometimes.” Plant identification experiment How would you describe the relationship between academic and social technologies? Small group interviews Notes Do you think of yourself any differently than you did when you began 1 This project is funded under award #0737466 from the National Science Focus groups BotCamp? If “yes”, How? Foundation; Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI)- Phase 1 (Exploratory), Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, Summative evaluation in the form of a survey and Mathematics (S-STEM). 2 Email: phillip.m.edwards@unc.edu

    + Phillip EdwardsPhillip Edwards, 3 months ago

    custom

    189 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    The Bot 2.0 project is an innovative technological more

    More info about this presentation

    © All Rights Reserved

    • Total Views 189
      • 175 on SlideShare
      • 14 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 14 views on http://pmedward.blogspot.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 14 views on http://pmedward.blogspot.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags