Arlington Mill Group Social Media Governance Linked In

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Arlington Mill Group Social Media Governance Linked In - Presentation Transcript

    1. Balancing
Empowerment
and
Accountability
 Social
Media
Governance
in
the
Enterprise
 June
2009
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC

    2. Social
media
offer
the
poten6al
to
add
value
at
every
stage
of
the
customer
 experience.
 Benefits
of
Social
Media
in
the
Enterprise
 Fulfillment
and
 Product
Development
 MarkeDng
and
Sales
 Support
 •  Crowd
sourcing
of
new
ideas
 •  Improved
targeDng
 •  New
opportuniDes
for
self‐ from
exisDng
and
potenDal
 capabiliDes
 serve
and
lower
cost‐to‐ customers
 serve
channels
 •  New
channels
for
markeDng
 •  Efficient
access
to
qualified

 and
distribuDon
 •  Greater
depth
and
breadth
 test
subjects
 of
customer
interacDons
 •  Viral
mechanisms
that
 •  Increased
ability
to
leverage
 increase
acquisiDon
 •  Greater
opportunity
for
 experDse
and
source
ideas
 efficiency
and
penetraDon
 personalizaDon
 across
the
organizaDon
 rates
 •  Fewer
and
more
efficient
 •  New
revenue
models
and
 handoffs
 payment
mechanisms
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 2

    3. Organiza6ons
using
social
media
quickly
encounter
lots
of
important
ques6ons,
 whose
owners
lie
throughout
the
organiza6onal
func6ons.

 Organiza6onal
Ques6ons
Triggered
by
Social
Media
 Create
and
Deliver
the
Customer
Experience
 Fulfillment
and
 Product
Development
 MarkeDng
and
Sales
 Support
 Enable
the
Enterprise
 Finance
and
 Customer
 IT
 HR
 Legal
and
 Partners
and
 AccounDng
 Insight
 Regulatory
 Vendors
 •  Do
I
get
value
 •  How
can
we
 •  How
do
we
 •  How
can
we
 •  How
do
we
 from
social
 leverage
data
to
 ensure
 ensure
 balance
 media?
 create
value?
 informaDon
 consistent
 empowerment
 •  What
is
the
 •  How
should
we
 security?
 customer
 with
risk?
 business
case?
 partner
with
 •  How
do
we
help
 experiences?
 •  Which
 •  How
will
we
 firms
like
 the
business
 •  How
do
we
 regulaDons
are
 measure
 Facebook
and
 choose
among
 scale
social
 relevant,
and
 performance?
 TwiZer?
 emerging
tools?
 media?
 how
will
we
 •  How
can
we
 •  How
do
we
 •  How
will
we
 comply?
 •  How
will
we
 ensure
an
 idenDfy
and
 train
our
people
 manage
the
 •  What
policies
 integrated
view
 promulgate
best
 to
effecDvely
 brand
in
all
of
 make
sense,
 of
the
 pracDces?
 use
social
 this?
 and
how
do
we
 customer?
 media?
 manage
them?
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 3

    4. These
cross‐func6onal
ques6ons
can
be
especially
challenging
because
social
media
 are
rela6vely
immature
and
change
constantly.
 Challenges
in
the
Current
State
of
Social
Media
 Risk
 •  Brand
and
regulatory
risk
 •  Ownership
of
data
created
within
social
media
is
o^en
unclear
 •  Your
commitment
to
privacy
may
be
different
than
your
social
media
partners
 •  Absence
of
service
level
agreements
from
social
media
partners
 •  But
if
you
don’t
start
learning
now,
you
may
fall
behind!!
 Ease
of
Entry
 •  Social
media
tools
are
usually
free
or
very
cheap
to
use
 •  Technical
requirements
are
usually
very
low
to
begin,
as
most
uDliDes
and
tools
are
 delivered
via
web
browser
 •  Your
employees
are
probably
already
interacDng
with
your
customers
within
social
media
 Unclear
 •  Lots
of
people
have
relevant
experDse
(PR,
SEO,
MarkeDng,
IT,
etc.)
 Ownership
 •  Social
Media
is
new,
cool
and
geeng
investment
dollars
 Implied
 •  Once
customers
become
accustomed
to
interacDng
with
you
via
social
media,
stopping
risks
 Commitment
 damage
to
your
customer
relaDonships
 Con6nual
 •  Your
team
must
conDnually
update
their
knowledge
of
available
tools
and
evolving
features
 Evolu6on
 •  The
fact
that
informaDon
is
so
readily
available
means
that
informaDon
assets
decay
nearly
 as
rapidly
as
they
accumulate.
 Distributed
 •  More
employees
will
interact
with
customers
–
probably
more
frequently
 Par6cipa6on
 •  The
goal
is
to
achieve
consistent
behavior,
linked
back
to
the
business
vision,
while
 empowering
creaDvity.
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 4

    5. Social
Media
Governance
can
help
organiza6ons
coordinate
cross‐func6onal
efforts
 and
maximize
business
value
from
social
media.
 Components
of
Social
Media
Governance
 Principles
and
 Process
Model
 Governance
 Responsibility
 Metrics
 Enablers
 Structure
 Matrix
 •  Model
that
 •  Processes
that
 •  Key
leaders
and
 •  Roles
and
 •  Business
 defines
and
 enable
effecDve
 parDcipants,
and
 responsibiliDes
of
 performance
 describes
inter‐ decisions
and
 their
primary
 primary
and
 metrics
that
 operaDon
of
 conDnual
 responsibiliDes
 supporDng
 inform
decisions
 processes,
 improvement
 with
respect
to
 parDcipants
across
 structure
and
 throughout
 social
media
 organizaDonal
 metrics
to
achieve
 design,
 funcDons
 business
goals
 development
and
 through
social
 operaDon
of
social
 media
 media
soluDons
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 5

    6. Each
component
of
Social
Media
Governance
supports
internal
champions
of
social
 media
by
helping
to
answer
the
ques6ons
triggered
by
social
media.
 Example
Ques6ons
Triggered
by
Social
Media
 Key
Issues
for
Social
 Relevant
Governance
 Media
Champions
 Components
 •  Do
I
get
value
from
Social
Media?
 How
is
social
media
 •  Governance
Principles
and
 •  Is
Social
Media
really
helping
my
business?
 aligned
to
the
business?
 Enablers
 •  How
will
we
ensure
an
integrated
view
of
the
customer?
 •  Process
Model
 •  How
can
I
get
this
key
iniDaDve
prioriDsed?
 How
should
social
media
 •  Process
Model
 •  How
can
I
ensure
appropriate
control
over
social
media
 decisions
be
made?
 •  Governance
Structure
 spend
and
risk?
 •  Responsibility
Matrix
 •  Are
we
invesDng
our
Dme
and
money
appropriately?
 •  What
should
be
the
social
media
spend
this
year?
 How
do
we
manage
social
 •  Process
Model
 •  Who
owns
social
media?

 media
investments?
 •  Governance
Structure
 •  Responsibility
Matrix
 •  How
do
I
get
funding
for
this
new
project?
 What
controls
do
we
 •  Process
Model
 •  Who
needs
to
approve
this
project?
 need
in
place?
 •  Responsibility
Matrix
 •  Who
is
accountable
for
social
media
results?
 •  What
happens
when
my
experiment
budget
runs
out?

 •  What
regulaDons
are
relevant
and
how
do
we
comply?
 •  Where
do
I
want
social
media
champions
to
focus?

 How
do
we
measure
and
 •  Performance
Metrics
 •  What
service
levels
should
I
expect
from
social
media
 reward?
 partners?


 •  What
areas
of
social
media
governance
should
I
approve?

 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 6

    7. For
example,
well‐defined
and
implemented
Social
Media
Governance
processes
can
 help
to
support
social
media
objec6ves
throughout
the
organiza6on.
 Social
Media
Governance
Processes
 Achieve
Business
Objec6ves
 IdenDfy,
PrioriDze
and
Plan
 Manage
Social
Media
 Social
Media
Investments
 Efforts
and
Track
Benefits
 Empower
and
Support
the
Business
 Establish
and
 Develop
Shared
 Manage
Social
 Measure
and
 Manage
Standards
 Service
Budgets
 Media
Partners
 Improve
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 7

    8. Organiza6ons
can
begin
by
determining
their
current
and
desired
level
of
social
 media
governance
capabili6es.
 Social
Media
Governance
Maturity
 Leading
 •  ProacDve
cross‐funcDonal
 engagement

 Sustained,
 Higher
Value
 •  Established
cross‐funcDonal
 decision
making
bodies
 •  Alignment
of
social
media
 Maturing
 investments
and
business
 prioriDes
 •  MarkeDng
and
IT
educate
business
 leaders
about
uses
and
benefits
of
 •  Business
value
(business
cases)
as
 Business
Value
 social
media
 primary
driver
 Created
 •  IniDal
formaDon
of
cross‐ •  Business
leaders
leverage
social
 funcDonal
decision
processes
 media
to
support
and
enhance
 their
business
strategies
 •  Defined
organizaDonal
roles
and
 Experimen6ng
 responsibiliDes
by
funcDon
or
 •  Joint
cross‐funcDonal
prioriDzaDon
 •  Informal
operaDng
processes
and
 major
group

 •  Social
media
governed
by
explicit
 model
 •  Established
social
media
decision
 performance
criteria
 •  Ad
hoc
decision
making
processes
 making
and
escalaDon
paths
 •  Rewards
Ded
to
value,
key
 •  Focus
on
delivering
short
term
 •  Internal
Service
Level
Agreements
 measures
consistently
applied
 resource
needs
 •  AcDvity‐based
measurements
and
 •  Service
Level
Agreements
with
key
 Inconsistent,
 Lower
Value
 •  Limited
performance
tracking
 limited
reporDng
capability
 social
media
uDliDes
 Basic
 Leading
 Social
Media
Governance
Capabili6es
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 8

    9. Selected
Clients
 Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 9

    10. Krim
Stephenson
 Chris
Boudreaux
 kstephenson@arlingtonmillgroup.com
 cboudreaux@arlingtonmillgroup.com
 415.730.5746
 773.580.8541
 San Francisco ● Washington, D.C. ● Seattle www.arlingtonmillgroup.com Copyright
©
2009
Arlington
Mill
Group,
LLC
 June
2009
 10


    + pmdohertypmdoherty, 5 months ago

    custom

    175 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 175
      • 164 on SlideShare
      • 11 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 11 views on http://arlingtonmillgroup.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 11 views on http://arlingtonmillgroup.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?