• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Aect 2013   in search of quality mooc presentation
 

Aect 2013 in search of quality mooc presentation

on

  • 685 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
685
Views on SlideShare
409
Embed Views
276

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

2 Embeds 276

http://patricklowenthal.com 275
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Aect 2013   in search of quality mooc presentation Aect 2013 in search of quality mooc presentation Presentation Transcript

    • In Search of Quality: An analysis of MOOC course structure & design Charles Hodges & Patrick Lowenthal slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • MOOCs & Education What’s the first thing you think of when you think of MOOCs??? slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • General Feeling???
    • News Headlines
    • What is a MOOC? •  Large, open, online course •  Vary in size and openness •  Typically non-credit •  Low completion rates (see Rosen, 2012) •  Many faculty remain skeptical students are learning
    • Background of MOOCs •  Past 18 months, MOOCs dominate discussions of changes in education (e.g. EDUCAUSE, 2012; Markoff, 2011, Rushkoff, 2013) •  2012 was described as the year of the MOOC (Watters, 2012) slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Online Course Quality •  Despite continual growth, faculty, are skeptical of online learning (Allen & Seaman, 2013; Gabriel, 2011; Lytle, 2012) •  Questions of quality, integrity •  Intent to save $$ vs. improve learning slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Online Course Quality Popular strategies to assess & improve online course quality •  •  •  •  Sloan-C pillars of quality Quality Matters iNACOL standards Cal. State – Chico Rubric slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Driving Question Are MOOCs high quality online courses deserving college credit? slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Method ❏  Six MOOCs ❏  2 from: Coursera, EdX, & Udacity ❏  Identified STEM courses ❏  Randomly selected ❏  3 experienced QM reviewers slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Preliminary Results Course Percent Pass Coursera 1 82% No Coursera 2 51% No EdX 1 83% No EdX 2 68% No Udacity 1 43% No Udacity 2 44% No
    • Preliminary Results Standards Always Met 1.2 Introduced to the purpose and structure of the course. 1.7 Appropriate self-introduction by the instructor. 3.1 Assessments measure learning objectives and consistent with course activities 3.5 Multiple opportunities to measure learning progress 4.3 All materials are appropriately cited. 4.4 Instructional materials are current. 4.5 Instructional materials present a variety of perspectives. 5.2 Activities provide opportunities for interaction that support active learning. 6.2 Course tools / media support engagement & guide student to become active learners. 6.3 Navigation is logical, consistent, and efficient. 6.4 Students can access the technologies in the course. 6.5 Technologies are current. 8.1 Employs accessible technologies and guidance on how to obtain accommodation. 8.2 Contains equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual content. 8.3 Design facilitates readability and minimizes distractions. 8.4 Design accommodates assistive technologies.
    • Preliminary Results Standards Never Met 2.2 Module learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable & consistent with the course-level objectives. 7.2 Instructions articulate institution’s accessibility policies & services. 7.3 Instructions articulate institution’s academic support services and how students can access the services. 7.4 Instructions articulate institution’s student support services and how students can access the services. slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Without Standard Seven Results Course Percent Pass Coursera 1 91% Yes Coursera 2 48% No EdX 1 92% Yes EdX 2 52% No Udacity 1 49% No Udacity 2 72% No
    • Discussion •  MOOC’s can be high “quality” (based on QM standards) •  MOOC’s aren’t inherently bad •  Self-paced MOOCs use different strategies •  MOOCs rely heavily on recorded lectures & quizzes •  Many in this study could easily be updated to meet QM standards •  QM rubric relies heavily on clear and measurable objectives slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Implications •  MOOCs are an opportunity to rethink how we design / teach online courses •  MOOCs spark technological innovation •  Limitations of Quality Matter’s standards / rubric slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Limitations • Small sample • Selected only MOOCx--no MOOCc • Used QM rubric for courses; they have one for professional development slides @ patricklowenthal.com
    • Questions / Comments So what do you think? ??? slides @ patricklowenthal.com