• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel
 

Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel

on

  • 1,470 views

Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel: Missile Fire on Tel Aviv and Conquest of the Galilee

Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel: Missile Fire on Tel Aviv and Conquest of the Galilee

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,470
Views on SlideShare
1,470
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel Document Transcript

    • Vol. 11, No. 18 2 November 2011 Hizbullah Discusses Its Operational Plan for War with Israel: Missile Fire on Tel Aviv and Conquest of the Galilee Shimon Shapira  In recent weeks Hizbullah leader Hasan Nasrallah held a series of meetings with his top- level military command as well as field commanders responsible for preparing for war with Israel. According to a source close to Hizbullah, Nasrallah’s operational directive was that in the next military conflict with Israel, Hizbullah will hit Tel Aviv with missiles at the outset of the war, while also dispatching forces to conquer the Galilee.  Hizbullah forces are being trained to fire at least ten thousand missiles, right at the war’s outset, at military and strategic targets such as airfields, military camps, and vital facilities including maritime ones, followed by the firing of rockets from launch sites whose location will come as a surprise to Israel.  The operational plan was formulated in tandem with senior Iranian strategic experts and will include a force of five thousand fighters who have recently trained in Iran, tasked with taking over designated zones in northern Israel including Nahariya, Shlomi, and Carmiel.  It was said that engineering units of the Iranian army had mined areas in the eastern Bekaa Valley that were seen as possible landing sites for Israeli special forces, and that Hizbullah had equipped itself with “smart" Iranian anti-tank missiles that can disrupt the defensive systems of Israels Merkava tanks.  Nasrallah’s recent escalation of public statements stems from heightened fear in Hizbullah that an Israeli and/or American attack on Iran is drawing nearer. As a strategic arm of Iran, Hizbullah sees itself as Iran’s first line of defense against Israel.
    • On 27 October 2011 the Lebanese newspaper Al Joumhouria reported that in recent weeks theleader of Hizbullah, Hasan Nasrallah, held a series of meetings with the organization’s highestlevel military command, as well as field commanders and operational-level commandersresponsible for preparing Hizbullah’s military force for war with Israel. Nasrallah updated hiscommanders on regional developments, the situation in Lebanon, and on Hizbullah’s internaland organizational affairs. Nasrallah emphasized the supreme importance of maintaining theorganization’s field security, given U.S. and Israeli intelligence organizations’ successes inpenetrating Hizbullah and recruiting individuals holding sensitive posts. The exposure of agentswithin Hizbullah was profoundly unsettling to Nasrallah and the other leaders.According to a source close to Hizbullah, Nasrallah’s operational directive to the commanderswas to prepare for the fact that in the next military conflict with Israel, Hizbullah will hit Tel Avivwith missiles at the outset of the war, while also dispatching forces to conquer the Galilee. Thesource stressed that this is an operational directive and not a matter of psychological warfare.Hizbullah’s conclusion from the lessons of the Second Lebanon War is that, next time, Israel willhave no red lines in waging all-out war against Lebanon and Hizbullah. Hence, Hizbullah isplanning “many surprises” that will change the force equation with Israel both at the start ofthe conflict and during its operational phase. 1The Operational PlanThe operational plan to conquer the Galilee was first aired in Nasrallah’s announcement on 16February 2011, as part of events marking the third anniversary of the assassination of Hizbullahcommander-in-chief Imad Mughniyeh. Nasrallah told his fighters to be prepared for the factthat, should Israel launch a war against Hizbullah, they will be conquering the Galilee. Since thatannouncement, Hizbullah forces have been training and preparing to carry out Nasrallah’sorder. This preparation includes:  Identifying landing sites for Israeli helicopters where explosive charges have been laid and dispersed.  Deploying substantial rocket and artillery firepower in areas Hizbullah does not see as suitable for guerrilla warfare, mainly in parts of the Bekaa Valley.  Visits by commanders to the front, which have included delegations of military experts headed by Haj Zu Alfikar. He is none other than Mustafa Badr Aldin, Mughniyeh’s replacement as the most senior security-military figure in Hizbullah, who is continuing to act despite an extradition order against him for the murder of Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. The senior military delegation visited the Bekaa Valley and southern Lebanon. 2
    •  The end of a series of intensive training sessions for some 727 fighters in Iran, who learned new combat methods for guerrilla and special commando units.  The completion of courses for operators of advanced missiles and anti-tank weapons. Here it was said that Hizbullah had equipped itself with “smart" Iranian anti-tank missiles that can disrupt the defensive systems of Merkava tanks on the way to striking them.The military scenario for which Hizbullah forces trained is the firing of at least ten thousandmissiles, right at the war’s outset, at military and strategic targets such as airfields, militarycamps, and vital facilities including maritime ones, followed by the firing of rockets from launchsites whose location will come as a surprise to Israel.The Operational Plan to Conquer the GalileeThe source said that the operational plan Hizbullah has formulated in tandem with seniorIranian strategic experts is based on using a force of five thousand fighters who have recentlytrained in Iran, particularly in the context of this plan. Another report said that in recent weeksHizbullah forces had completed intensive training in Iran and had been deployed in southernLebanon and the Bekaa Valley. It was further reported that in the area of Maydon in thewestern Bekaa Valley, Hizbullah engineering units had finished excavation work and theimprovement of positions, while engineering units of the Iranian army had mined areas in theeastern Bekaa Valley that were seen as possible landing sites for Israeli special forces taskedwith attacking Hizbullah’s missile and artillery deployment.2The source close to Hizbullah said its fighting force would number five brigades, each consistingof a thousand fighters. Each brigade has a designated combat zone in northern Israel that it istasked with taking over. Each brigade is familiar with the layout and special topographicalconditions of its sector and has trained to conquer it.  Brigade 1 will take over the town of Nahariya or parts of it, after crossing the border in the area of Rosh Hanikra. According to Hizbullah information, means of protection in that area are meager, the distance is small (seven kilometers), and there are no military capabilities or special topography that will retard the unit in achieving its goal. Concurrently, a force of 150 fighters from the first brigade will reach Nahariya by sea in speedboats that Hizbullah already possesses. This force’s mission is to take as many hostages as possible so as to prevent Israel from bombing the Hizbullah forces in this sector.  Brigade 2 will take over the town of Shlomi, which has 6,500 residents and is about 300 meters from the border. The aim is to cut the IDFs supply lines and force it to send reinforcements from the east. 3
    •  Brigade 3 was ordered to reach the town of Carmiel and conquer areas south of it with the aim of blocking traffic from Acre, on the Mediterranean coast, to Safed.  Brigade 4 will take over the communities of Malkiya, Ramot Naftali and Yiftach in order to prevent the IDF from firing from these areas into southern Lebanon.  Brigade 5 will serve as a strategic reserve force for special missions.SyriaHizbullah is discussing the question of whether Bashar Assad will take part in the war, and is notexcluding this possibility, particularly in light of Syria’s domestic situation. On 27 October 2011the newspaper Al Akhbar, which is close to Hizbullah, disclosed that Nasrallah had met withAssad a few days earlier in Damascus. It said Nasrallah had come to explain to Assad whyHizbullah insists that the Lebanese government stop contributing to the funding of theinternational investigatory commission (the STL) on former Lebanese premier Hariri’s murder.Assad, according to the paper, did not give a clear answer on the issue and only emphasized theneed to maintain the Lebanese government’s representation. If such a Nasrallah-Assad meetingindeed occurred, it can reasonably be assumed that the subject of a military conflict with Israelwas central to it.3A day after the article appeared in Al Akhbar, the paper published a correction saying theNasrallah-Assad meeting had not occurred and apologizing for the error. 4 It should be stressedthat the paper is very close to Hizbullah and not infrequently serves as Nasrallah’s mouthpiece.It is hard to imagine that it would publish a detailed report of this meeting, including specificquotations, against Hizbullah’s wishes. It could be that, on second thought, Hizbullah decidedthe timing of the article was unwise. As Assad kills his people, Hizbullah faces bitter criticism forsupporting him and is losing its standing in the Arab street. Indeed, since the reports in theLebanese press on Hizbullah’s operational plan and preparations to implement it, Hizbullah hasin no way related to these matters either directly or indirectly.SummaryNasrallah’s recent escalation of public statements on concrete targets for the next war – rocketfire on Tel Aviv at its outset and the conquest of the Galilee, along with the completion ofmilitary preparations – do not come in a vacuum. They stem from heightened fear in Hizbullahthat an Israeli and/or American attack on Iran is drawing nearer. Hence, as a strategic arm ofIran that sees itself as Iran’s first line of defense against Israel, Hizbullah is seeking, with Iran’shelp, to deter Israel. This explains Nasrallah’s care in emphasizing that he is not referring to anoffensive thrust by Hizbullah but, rather, a harsh response to an Israeli move that would engulfLebanon in war. But even if what is envisaged is a reaction by Hizbullah, let alone a surprisemove by Nasrallah, it is important to see the picture as reflected in Hizbullah’s vision. 4
    • * * * Notes1. Al Joumhouria, 72 October 7111.2. Al Shiraa, 72 October 7111.3. Al Akhbar, 72 October 2001.4. Al Akhbar, 72 October 7111. * * *Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Dr. Shimon Shapira is a senior research associate at the Jerusalem Center forPublic Affairs. This Jerusalem Issue Brief is available online at: http://www.jcpa.org Dore Gold, Publisher; Alan Baker, ICA Director; Mark Ami-El, Managing Editor. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (Registered Amuta), 13 Tel-Hai St., Jerusalem, Israel; Tel. 972-2-561-9281, Fax. 972-2-561-9112, Email: jcpa@netvision.net.il. In U.S.A.: Center for Jewish Community Studies, 7 Church Lane, Suite 9, Baltimore, MD 21208; Tel. 410-653-7779; Fax 410-653-8889. Website: www.jcpa.org. © Copyright. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Board of Fellows of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. The Institute for Contemporary Affairs (ICA) is dedicated to providing a forum for Israeli policy discussion and debate. To subscribe to the Jerusalem Issue Brief list, please go to link: http://www.list-jcpa.org/brief-sub.html To unsubscribe from the Jerusalem Issue Brief list, go to link: http://www.list-jcpa.org/mail-brief/forms/optoutform.asp 5