Information Ecosystem Standards
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•279 views
The document proposes creating a working group within Pistoia to standardize terminology and data formats. The working group would first create a list of existing standards and define their coverage. It would then gather user requirements from Pistoia members and use these to prioritize areas for standardization. The working group would perform a gap analysis to anchor requirements to standards and develop criteria to evaluate and drive the development of standards.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Information Ecosystem Standards
Similar to Information Ecosystem Standards (20)
More from Pistoia Alliance
More from Pistoia Alliance (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Information Ecosystem Standards
- 1. PM 4: The Standards Landscape – Status, gaps, redundancies. What needs to be done? David Brown Ingrid Schmid Jesus del Valle Parthiban Srinivasan Michael Braxenthaler Todd Vision Susanna Sansone Vision: Pistoia’s rubberstamped standards - endorsed by Pistoia’s members, - used by Pistoia’s members internally, and - to influence adoption by vendors/suppliers How to implement this? - Create a Pistoia WG (extending the scope of VSI?), with all interested parties What are the first steps/tasks for this WG?
- 2. 1. Contribute to the creation/maintenance of a list of standards - What is out there: terminologies, file format, minimal requirements - Define their coverage 2. Gather concrete user requirements - Collect ‘case studies’, real needs from the diverse Pistoia’s members - Use them to drive priority areas, => e.g. this (break out) group’s members have already expressed an interest in contributing to the VSI synonyms dictionary (see Harland et al paper, DDT) 3. Anchor the requirements to standards - Gap analysis, area of overlaps and coverage etc…. 4. Develop criteria to evaluate standards and drive their developments - Metrics - Architecture criteria: versioning, backward compatibility, extendibility, coverage etc… - General criteria: size of the community, it stability, structure and funds, tool support, involvement of regulators (mainly in clinical but not/less in biological domains), documentation, ease of adoption etc… - Develop and assign KPIs - Manifesto - Agile development of standards, including best practices for the development, governance, rules of engagements etc.