Summit 2011 infra_storage

1,007 views
854 views

Published on

Storage update: storage growth, NAS, SAN, VTL, Dedup, vendors update

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,007
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Summit 2011 infra_storage

  1. 1. ; The Gap! Pini Cohen EVP pini@stki.infoPini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKIDo not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  2. 2. Agenda• Major Trends and Issues• Development and SOA• ESM BSM CMDB• DBMS and DATA• Platforms – Servers• Clients• Storage Source: http://astonguild.org.uk/files/NEW_MENU_FRONT_RGB%5B1%5D.jpg Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  3. 3. Technologies Maturity Model 2011 StorageBusiness Value Investment Sophisticated snaps for creatingto make money CDP environmentsCut costs, Increase Green Dedup for VTL Dedup Storage Primary productivity for Backup storage Storage Thin Virtualization ProvisioningCommodity IT NAS and FCOE Services SAN Flash Drives Cloud Email Email Storage Investment Archiving Archivingfor regulations as a service Using Implementing Looking Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  4. 4. Mini agenda- Storage• Storage growth• Storage protocols – FCOE• High density storage• RAM and SSD storage• Storage virtualization• VTL-Deduplication status• New type of storage vendors• SAN vs. NAS Highend vs. Midrange• Staffing ratios• Vendor ratings Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 4 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  5. 5. Storage growth – you have not seen nothing yet… Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 5 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  6. 6. Ubiquitous computing pervasive computing Audio-Video Cluster Computer as Hub of cluster Local Network User Interaction Internal Comms.Source: http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/people/stefan/ubicom/slides/ubicom-ch02-slides.ppt Processing: edit, annotate, compose Management: Resources & Content Storage Email Web Ubiquitous computing: smart devices, environments and inte Wide network Chat VoD Audio-Video Stream VoIP Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  7. 7. Video Video is a SCATTERED IT TECHNOLOGYPini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKIDo not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  8. 8. Age of Internet Video Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Source: Cisco VNI Usage, 2010 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  9. 9. Streaming Video is Gaining Market Share Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  10. 10. Storage Size and Growth in Selected IndustriesIndustry 2011 1Q 2010 1Q Planned Size RAW Size RAW Growth per yearDefense 500T-6P 500TB-4P 50%- 100%Finance 600T-1.3P 400TB-1P 40% - 75%Health 140T-550T 140TB-350TB 30%-50%Manufacturing – 100T-250T 40TB-200TB 20%-50%RetailTelco 2P-3P 900TB-2.5 30%-50% PETAGovernmental 100T-300T 10TB-30TB 25%-100%PublicHigh Tech 150T-550T 40TB-150TB 20%-30% Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  11. 11. Protocol Comparisons FC over Ethernet (no TCP/IP) App App Applications Applications SCSI SCSI SCSI SCSI iSCSI FC FC FC FC FC SRPEncapsulation Encapsulation iFCP FCIP TCP Layer Layer TCP TCP IP IP IP FCoE FCoE Base Base FC Infiniband Ethernet Ethernet Transport Transport Block storage FC replication New transport and with TCP/IP over IP FC management drivers Low latency, high Source: EMC http://www.google.co.il/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scalar.ca%2Fnewsevents%2Fdownload%2FFCOE- Aug7.ppt&rct=j&q=%22Data%20center%20Ethernet%22%20%20%22Converged%20Enhanced%20Ethernet%22%20%20FCOE%20filetype%3Appt&ei=cJt4TafEF8Kg8QOx883ABA&usg=AFQjCNEjDc bandwidth AKpuQjNVJ1-HfyhzhCGqmMcw&cad=rja Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  12. 12. Lossless Ethernet AKpuQjNVJ1-HfyhzhCGqmMcw&cad=rja Aug7.ppt&rct=j&q=%22Data%20center%20Ethernet%22%20%20%22Converged%20Enhanced%20Ethernet%22%20%20FCOE%20filetype%3Appt&ei=cJt4TafEF8Kg8QOx883ABA&usg=AFQjCNEjDc Source: EMC http://www.google.co.il/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scalar.ca%2Fnewsevents%2Fdownload%2FFCOE-• Limit the environment only to the Data Center – FCoE is Layer 2 only• IEEE 802.1 Data Center Bridging (DCB) is the standards task group• Converged Enhanced Ethernet (CEE) is an industry consensus term which covers three link level features – Priority Flow Control (PFC, IEEE 802.1Qbb) – Enhanced Transmission Selection (ETS, IEEE 802.1Qaz) – Data Center Bridging Exchange Notification (DCBX, currently part of IEEE 802.1Qaz, leverages 802.1AB (LLDP))• Data Center Ethernet is a Cisco term for CEE plus additional functionality including Congestion Notification (IEEE 802.1Qau) Enhanced Ethernet provides the Lossless Infrastructure which will enable FCoE and augment iSCSI storage traffic . Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  13. 13. RT storage• Users are certain that FCOE will change dramatically the storage landscape and the relationship between Storage and Networking• However users believe that FCOE will mature only in about 2-3 years or more Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 13 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  14. 14. High density- low electricity• MAID - Many Array of Idle Disks (SGI) Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 14 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  15. 15. FCoE Extends FC on a Single NetworkServer sees storage traffic as FC Network FC Ethernet Driver Driver Network FCoE SW Stack Standard Converged 10G NIC Network Adapter FC storage 2 Lossless Ethernetoptions Links FC network Ethernet Converged FC Network Switch Source: EMC http://www.google.co.il/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scalar.ca%2Fnewsevents%2Fdownload%2FF COE- Aug7.ppt&rct=j&q=%22Data%20center%20Ethernet%22%20%20%22Converged%20Enhanced%20Ethernet%22%20%20FCOE%20filetype%3A ppt&ei=cJt4TafEF8Kg8QOx883ABA&usg=AFQjCNEjDcAKpuQjNVJ1-HfyhzhCGqmMcw&cad=rja Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic SAN sees host as FC
  16. 16. GS: Price gap is closing. We expect 80GB-100GB SSDs to be within $100 of a HDD in the next 24 months. Source: GS http://bg.panlv.net/file/2010/01/10/087c22dd5c96e25f.pdf Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  17. 17. Kaminario K2- DRAM Storage Appliance Most demanding business application Up to 25x performance Less than 1 day deployment Kaminario K2• Performance – eliminate the I/O bottleneck! Enables millions of IOPS, 10s GB/s, low latency• High Availability – data protection, no SPoF• Scalability – start small and grow• Easy – any application, no tuning
  18. 18. Kaminario K2 Capabilities - Performance • Eliminates I/O bottlenecks • Millions of IOPs – 300K to 1.5M IOPs • high throughput – 3.2GB/S to 16GB/S • Application performance – 2x - 25x improvement • Consistent performance for any workload, and with no degradation over timePage 18
  19. 19. Storage virtualization- the next big thing?!• We have expected many years? Will it ever come?!• Looks like it is progressing (abroad) Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 19 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  20. 20. RT storage – VTLDedup• VTL Dedup has matured a lot this year• There are occasionally Dedup product and Backup software compatibility issues. In many cases license update for the backup SW is needed.• Also the integrator should have good knowledge both in the Backup SW and the DedupVTL solution• Accessing the VTL directly (without the backup SW) might be very useful in call center environments for recording hearing• Currently not all source type are appropriate for Dedup. Example of problematic situations – DBMS log files, Exchange EDB, etc.• Users believe that one algorithmmethod should be used for all Dedup purposes – both source and target Dedup. Symantec is leading the pack in this area. Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 20 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  21. 21. RT VTL DEDUP• Actual Dedup ratio in Backup environment is about 1 to 10. Vendors claim much more…• The solution throughput and scalability is also an issue• Some clients has discontinued physical tapes completely! But most clients to backup to physical tapes once in a while. Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 21 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  22. 22. RT VTL cont.• Backup of virtual server environment is still an issue. Backing up with traditional agents on each guest might cause issues (CPU, network overloaded)• Users are implanting VMware Data Recovery (VDR) orwith Dedup products (Avanar , Puredisk). Backup with storage snaps is also an option used• Who is responsible to the virtualization storage needs? The System or Storage groups ? Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 22 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  23. 23. Production Dedup and Compression• Backup of Prod data is promising technology. Currently users are using mainly Netapp and to some extend EMC’s technologies• Users have witnesses even 35% reduction of space in NAS environments• The combination of production Dedup and Snaps is not always appropriate. Dedup and compression might work better.• IBM purchase of Storwize is also a sign for the importance of these technologies Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 23 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  24. 24. New type of vendors• Local, Agile, Knowledgeable, Hands on and Brave!• Example: OpenStorage representing many small vendorssolutions such as Nexenta, Arkeia, Gluster, SANS DIGITAL and also established solutions such as HP and EMC• Assembling locally storage solution Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  25. 25. Users perspective: Should we differentiate SAN and NAS? Source: STKI Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 25 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  26. 26. Next-Generation Unified StorageOptimized for today’s virtualized IT EMC Unisphere VNXe3100 VNXe3300 VNX5100 VNX5300 VNX5500 VNX5700 VNX7500 Affordable. Simple. Efficient. Powerful.© Copyright 2011 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 26
  27. 27. Users perspective: Should we differentiate Highend and Midrange Storage? Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Source: STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  28. 28. Which vendors are considered as Highend storage vendors? Source: STKI Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 28 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  29. 29. High End Storage vs. Midrange Storage• The majority of IT organizations differentiate High End and Midrange Storage solutions. What differentiate according to users: – Performance (example: “500 to 900 MB per second is HIGHEND”) – Availability – Reliability – Higher risk – Upgrade firmware without downtime – Functionality (number of copies, failback, etc.) – Price – More difficult to manageoperate Source: http://blog.oregonlive.com/clackamascounty_impact/2009/07/large _Worthington-Testifies.JPG• Big storage shops tend to differentiate• Higher level managers tend not to differentiate• New argument this year “Do not need midrange storage – we can use SATA in highend”! Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  30. 30. STKI’s take• VTLDedup is maturing fast and can bring real benefit now.• Soon we will have “general storage” category. Specialized “HighEnd” or NAS will be a niche.• Managing the storage will be key priority• Automation Automation Automation (which also means standardization)• Users should have established storage metrics such as: – Storage managed per administrator – Storage in inventory - unused storage divided by total storage – Data multiplier (number of copies made of primary data ) – Data availability (number of hours storage is – Mean time to recovery (MTTR)• IAAS (Storage services) will become mainstream for long term data retention needs in about 5 years Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 30 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  31. 31. Competition in Storage is the toughest!• User to STKI “I am in shock. From 60% price reduction in two months!” Source: http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRry6HPDj21W6jLMe6hIeJFDJtuA0JLGJFIah_GGbelxmC5DNCL Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 31 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  32. 32. Historical Cost of Memory and Storage http://organdi.net Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 32 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  33. 33. Storage Ratios• Number of Raw TB and Usable TB per Storage Staff Member FTE (including backup and DRP of storage): Per FTE RAW Storage Usable Storage 25 percentile 97TB 42TB Median 225TB 150TB 75 percentile 350TB 238TB• Moderate 25% increase from last years data Source: STKI Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  34. 34. Usable/Raw storage ratio• Net Storage in this research – usable for applications: – After Raids – After replication to DRP – Without VTL’s NETRAW Ratio – The term “Usable storage” is 25 percentile 50% tricky since with snapshots Median 60% application can see more 75 percentile 71% storage then “Raw storage” Source: STKI Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  35. 35. Market Status and Trends• Survey has shown that these integrators are used: (providers – from service point of view) in Storage area:• EMC• Netapp• HP IBM Hilan (WE+Ankor)• Malam-Team Emet• HDS Matrix Bynet Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  36. 36. Market Status and Trends• Survey has shown that these integrators are used: (providers – from service point of view) in backup area:• GlassHouse• IBM• HP• Emet• Team RealNetworks Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  37. 37. Israel Market Positioning High-end Storage (total including MF) EMCLocal Support IBM HDS HP This analysis should be used with its supporting documents Israeli Market Presence Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  38. 38. Israel Market Positioning Midrange Storage SCSI EMC Vendors to Watch: NETAPP IBM XIV N DS DataDirectLocal Support Networks HP Midrange storage share is rising on the expenses of highend storage HDS This analysis should be used with its supporting documents Israeli Market Presence Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  39. 39. Israel Market Positioning General Storage Solution – starting point for general use Leaders EMC NETAPP HPLocal Support IBM XIV N DS HDS This analysis should be used with its supporting documents Israeli Market Presence Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  40. 40. Israel Market Positioning Storage NAS NETAPPLocal Support EMC This analysis should be used with its supporting documents Israeli Market Presence Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  41. 41. Israel Market Positioning (Enterprise Backup SW) Backup to Symantec Cloud is an option: example AsigraLocal Support EMC IBM HP This analysis should be used with its supporting documents Israeli Market Presence Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  42. 42. Selected Installations 2010-1Q11 Partial List of selected wins –StorageEMC- IDF, Hot, Teva, Partner, Cellcom, Bezeq, Pelephone, 012,Yes, ITEAM, VISA CAL, Discount, Clal, Comverse, Amdocs, IEC,Zim, MotorollaNETAPP (some via IBM) – Clalit, IAI, Elbit, Postil, Rafael,Pelephone (upgrade), Cellcom (upgrade) , Clal, Ministry ofTransportation, NetafimHDS:HDS: Walla, Kul Al Arab, H&M, Aeroscout, Office Core,DIDWW, Shararey Zedek hospital, Mataf(upgrade),Poalim(upgrade), Igud (upgrade), Bezeqint (Upgrade), BituachLeumi (updrade), Shaam(upgrade), Ministry of Social Affairs(Revaha) upgrade, Migdal (upgrade), Teva (upgrade), TASE(upgrade), Clalit (upgrade) Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 42 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  43. 43. Selected Installations 2010-1Q11 Partial List of selected wins –StorageIBM – IAA (DS), Ayalon (DS), Menora (DS). Isracard (DS)Poslim (DS), IEC (XIV) , Mn. Of Education (XIC), Mn. OfTransportation (XIV), Hotzaa Lapoal (XIV), CentralStatiscial Bereau (XIV), LivePerson (XIV) Pointis (XIV),Hachsharat Hayeshuv (XIV), 012 (XIV) Bank Leumi (XIVupgrade) Leumit (XIV upgrade), MeuchededKaminario – Digitaltrowel, other installations Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 43 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  44. 44. Selected Installations 2010-1Q11 Partial List of selected wins –Storage• HP (wins and upgrades and customers) Kenshoo ; ECI ; Amdocs; Assaf Harofeh ; Bank- Hapoalim ; Bank- Yahav ; Bank of Palestine ; Bezeq International ; Bezeq, Brom ; Dead Sea Works ;Egged;Elisra ; Flextronics ; Hadassah Hospital ; Haaretz ; Hillel Yaffe ; Intel Israel Police ; JaJah ; Keter-Plastic ; Logic ; Microsoft ; Maccan Ericson ; Mifal HaPais ; Ministry of Justice ; Ministry of Finance ; Nilit ; Nice ; Osem ; Strauss-Elite ; Peker Plada ; Zoglovek ; TOTO ; JCE; Big ; Fox ; Rami-Levi ; Tuttnauer ; Ramat- Gan Municipality ; Ministry of Interior ; Altshuler Shaham;Migdal ; Shirionit- Hosem ; Haifa Municipality ; Ruppin Collage ; Ministry of Health ; Flying Cargo ; Tamnun ; Bakara- Geva ; Shagrir ; Tel Aviv Municipality ; Jerusalem Municipality Comverse ; Star-Home ; Sapir Collage ; Amiad; RH Electronics ; Orbotech ; Random Logic ;Numonix ; Sintecmedia ; Carmel Olefins ; Maman Cargo ; Hillel Yafe Hospital ; Ziv Hospital ; Hadasa Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 44 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  45. 45. Selected Installations 2010-1Q11 Partial List ofselected wins –VTLsource-target DEDUPBackupEMC – Datadomain – Orbotech, Pelephone, Discount,Harel, Asuta, Clal, Migda, Yad Vashem, ITEAM, MODEMC – Avamar –Visa Cal, Clal, Bezeq, Intel, NDS, Coca-Cola, Co-Op, ComverseIBM – Protectier - IEC, Mataf (updrage), AmdocsEMC – Mirs, Partner (major upgrade)Symantec (NB) – Nice, Isracard, Hani (Israel ports),Israel Foreign Affairs (Puredisk), 888, Liveperson,Diplomat, Exlibris , Bezeq ing. Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 45 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  46. 46. Storage Selected Vendors TEAM / M alam/ Bezeq omnitech/ Glass Int. netcom WE House CCC M atrix Bynet EM ET ONE1 Taldor SGI Kavey ZahavEM C x x x x xIBM x x x x x xHP x x xNETAPP x x x x x x x HDS x x x DDN x Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  47. 47. Selected Vendors and SI’s in Israel – Enterprise B/R Glass T eamVendor EMET House Malam CCC Matrix Yael ANKOR One1 (we) T errasky SimplimentiaHP DP x xEMC Legato x X x xSymantec (NB) x x x x x xBM TSM X x Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic
  48. 48. Thank you Pini Cohen Pini Cohen’s work Copyright 2011 @STKI 48 Do not remove source or attribution from any graphic or portion of graphic

×