Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Implications of writing, reading, and tagging on the web

1,228

Published on

More provocative variation of my ECTEL08 presentation on tagging and social navigation.

More provocative variation of my ECTEL08 presentation on tagging and social navigation.

Published in: Education, Technology
1 Comment
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,228
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
30
Comments
1
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Christian Glahn OpenUniversiteitNederland CELSTEC Colloquium Implications of writing, reading, and tagging on the web for reflection support in self-directed learning
  • 2. Readers and Contributors
  • 3. Reading and Writing
  • 4. Tagging
  • 5. OTHER RESEARCH
  • 6. Social (makro) Dimensions http://www.delicious.com (Millen & Feinberg, 2006; Millen, Feinberg, & Kerr, 2006)
  • 7. Aesthetics Wordle.net cloud for ECTEL08 tweets http://www.flickr.com/photos/27692232@N04/2869229742/
  • 8. Interactions Elastic Tag Cloud (Stefaner, 2007) http://well-formed-data.net/experiments/tag_maps/
  • 9. OPEN QUESTIONS
  • 10. Information Quality?
  • 11. Personal Benefit?
  • 12. Effects on Learning?
  • 13. IS TAGGING WHAT WE REALLY WANT?
    • Critical
  • 14. Recall what it is that we are dealing with!
  • 15. Taggers Are Evil!
  • 16. TAGGING IS VANDALISM AND THE DESTRUCTION OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY .
    • Official Definition
  • 17. City of Santa Ana http://www.woostercollective.com/Tagger.jpg
  • 18. IF YOU THINK THAT THE DIGITAL SPACE IS SAVE ...
  • 19. USB 2.5” Harddisk for sharing large chunks of information Linux Laptop – not for home work and gaming .... Bluetooth GPS Receiver for WAR Driving and Geo tagging Pre-paid Phone for making phone calls untraceable Tiny USB Sticks for keeping the hard drive clean of dubious information iPhone , for ubiquitous connections to friends, twitter and the Internet Ergonomic Laptop Backpack for computer equipment and quick location changes
  • 20. Taggers Are Evil!
  • 21. META-DATA IS NOT WHAT YOU GET FROM TAGGERS
    • Forget about Folksonomies
  • 22. MORE THEN 840 TAGS USED OVER 3000 TIMES ON OVER 1400 RESOURCES
    • If you take 12 average taggers, within 3 months you get ...
  • 23. LESS THEN 240 TAGS ARE SHARED (28%), BUT 79% ARE SHARED BY LESS THEN 4 USERS
    • Of the 840 tags
  • 24. Taggers Are Evil!
  • 25. TAGGERS HARDLY READ
    • They create a huge ontological mess, but ..
  • 26. 330 RESOURCES WERE ACCESSED (< 23%) WITH 366 TAGS ASSIGNED (< 44%) 390 FILTERS APPLIED ON 133 TAGS
    • Same time period, same set of resources, same taggers
  • 27. TAGGERS READ CONTRIBUTIONS OF OTHERS
    • At least ...
  • 28. OVER 60% OF THE TAGS ON ACCESSED RESOURCES ARE NOT FROM THE USER OVER 50% ARE SHARED TAGS
  • 29. TAGGING CAN HELP SOCIAL NAVIGATION
    • Conclusion I
  • 30. TAGS OF WEB-READINGS LEAD TO RICHER INFORMATION ABOUT A USER’S INTERESTS
    • Conclusion II
  • 31. CAREFUL SELECTION OF TAGGING INFORMATION IS NEEDED FOR SUPPORTING REFLECTION
    • Conclusion III
  • 32. NEVERTHELESS, TAGGERS DO NOT MAKE OUR LIVES’ EASIER ...
  • 33. http://lo-f.at/glahn/blog/ http://twitter.com/phish108 http://lnx-otecexp-005v.ou.nl/rescope/

×