SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Download to read offline
How to Accomplish
         Practice Change in
      Behavioral Healthcare in
        Less Than One Year




                    Submitted by:

              Natalie S. Berger, Ph.D.
               Director, Adult Network
    Pikes Peak Mental Health, Colorado Springs, CO




                    Submitted to:

  2004 Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award
American College of Mental Health Administration
                  Foundation



            HONORABLE MENTION

                       3/11/04
HOW TO ACCOMPLISH PRACTICE
     CHANGE IN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE
          IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR


ABSTRACT :
This a challenging time in the field of public mental health. State and federal funding for public
behavioral healthcare is declining in a time when the demand for services is increasing.
Philosophical changes in mental health care service delivery, underscored by the tenants from the
President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, are creating additional challenges for
practitioners. The Adult Network of Pikes Peak Mental Health (PPMH) has developed a model
for providing behavioral healthcare that meets these challenges while providing greater access to
care, holistic care delivered in natural settings and, at the same time, maintaining the quality
clinical outcomes at reduced costs.




HOW TO ACCOMPLISH PRACTICE CHANGE                                           IN   BEHAVIORAL
HEALTHCARE IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR
Background

For more than six years this community mental health center in Colorado Springs tried to convert
its traditional behavioral healthcare system to a Recovery oriented system. Three different
directors had tried and failed to accomplish this. Like many mental health centers, staff knew the
language of recovery, they could talk the talk, but the elements of practice that would define a
Recovery oriented system of care were never implemented. As Jacobson and Curtis (2000) point
out: Some states simply rename their existing programs, failing to acknowledge the necessity for
a fundamental shift toward sharing both power and responsibility 1 .             The stakes for
accomplishing this change were increasing exponentially. Soon, incentives would be based upon
the recovery oriented performance measures for community mental health; funding for the
severe and persistently mentally ill (SPMI) was decreased 30% over a two year period with
further cuts expected; and accountability expectations were facing the public mental health field
across the nation, with numerous centers closing or being privatized or outsourced 2 . Time was
running short.

Our task was:

        1.   To define, develop and implement a service delivery model congruent with recovery
             principles;
        2.   To improve access to care from 40 days (time to first appointment) to within 7 days;


1   Jacobson and Curtis. (2000) Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal p. 335
2   David Lloyd (2002). How to Deliver Accountable Care

Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                         Page 1
3.   To increase staff productivity from 46% to 60%;
     4.   To reduce the no show rate from 30% to 10%;
     5.   To serve more consumers with fewer dollars without a reduction in the quality of
          outcomes; and
     6.   To improve staff job satisfaction from 2.1 to 3.0 on a 4.0 scale.


We achieved these results as identified in the table below. T tests and chi square tests of selected
data found the changes to be statistically significant at p<.01 levels. The story that follows is how
we accomplished all of this in less than one year.



             COMPARISON 2002 AND 2003 PERFORMANCE METRICS
                   Metric                                           2002                    2003
Ave. time to 1 st appt                                    40 days                 2 days
Consumers active in consumer driven
                                                          15 people               92 people
services
Cost to serve individuals with severe                     74% received >$500 of   61% received >$500 of
and persistent mental illness (SPMI)                      services/year           services/year
Clinical productivity                                     48%                     65%
Staff satisfaction                                        2.3 on a 4.0 scale      3.5 on a 4.0 scale
Average length of stay                                    1936 days               1840 days
Average cost of services/year                             $385                    $237
No show rate for ongoing appts.                           33%                     13%




The Transformation Process

New management was brought in with competency in change management. The Network
Director spearheaded sweeping changes in accountability, service delivery systems, philosophy
of care and team cohesion. One of the key principles in this change process was the belief that
the staff who had been serving individuals with severe and persistent mental illness for 10-20
years had deep expertise regarding the needs of this population. Their expertise w valued,
                                                                                       as
respected and integral to determining both what needed to be done and how it could be
accomplished given the corporate culture. Thus, the first steps in bringing this organization to a
new level of performance was to form focus groups of consumers and staff to identify what was
working and what was not, and to generate ideas regarding what needed to be done in order to
improve care, improve morale and be more productive and cost efficient.

This project had unwavering support from the Change Champions, our CEO and COO, and
followed the change management best practices as defined by Daryl Connor (1995). Connor
defines seven elements as critical in order to orchestrate a change initiative that achieves the
desired outcomes:

     ?    Burning Platform
     ?    Project Champion

Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                                   Page 2
?    Stakeholder Buy In
       ?    Expectation Setting
       ?    Incentivizing Change

       ?    Marketing and Communication
       ?    Project Planning


These elements guided the change process and provided the leadership team the vision they
needed to stay on course during the change process.

The focus groups produced a well-defined model for the needs of consumers at various stages in
their recovery based upon the Ohio Department of Mental Health (ODMH) consumer outcomes
initiative 3 The research from ODMH identified the stages of recovery, the needs of consumers
and the roles of providers during these different stages. While this model was widely publicized,
there was no known model identifying what programming should look like based upon the
ODMH research. The Adult Network designed our continuum of care based upon dose response
studies in traditional care settings and redefined these for application to a stepped care model of
treatment based upon Recovery Model principles.

Philosophical Changes

The Recovery Model: Tighter financial constraints occurred with capitated funding for mental
health in the 1980’s. This began a period of increasing accountability for monies spent in
community mental health care service delivery. Not long after this, the best practice guidelines
for treatment of SPMI began to recognize some changes in basic tenants away from a medical
model of treatment to a recovery model 4 .

       1.   Mental illness was no longer considered a terminal life sentence.

       2.   The provider was now viewed as a partner in care, not as directing treatment.
       3.   The treatment goal needed to be to help consumers develop meaningful roles in their
            communities, not to develop a long-term therapeutic relationship with the therapist.
       4.   Consumers would play a more active role in decision-making and responsibility for their
            recovery.
       5.   Delivering in-vivo care became the ideal, rather that treatment rendered within the
            mental health center
       6.   The importance of support systems, to include family, peers and community, became
            more and more central to attaining and maintaining recovery
All of these changes required a shift in philosophy and service delivery model for the Adult
Network. How could we change an institution that had built its operational systems and
business processes to support an office-based treatment delivery model to something that was
much more dynamic?




3   ODMH
4   www.mh.state.oh.us/initiatives/outcomes/resrecovprinc.html

Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                      Page 3
PHILOSOPHY CHANGES REQUIRED

           RECOVERY PRINCIPLES                             MEDICAL MODEL
                         Strength based                          illness focused

                           doing with                               doing for

                        integrated team                        individual provider

                 graduated disengagement                  long term therapy relationship

                       case management                          50 minute hours

                       community based                             clinic based

                        present focused                       focus on past traumas




The Service Delivery Model

The ODMH four-stage model of recovery - engagement / motivation / commitment / recovery
& rehabilitation - became the philosophical basis for our programming. Four different types of
service systems based upon evidenced-based treatment protocols were designed to be congruent
with the differing needs of consumers at each stage. These treatment options were aligned with
the four stages of recovery defined by ODMH.

     1.   Engagement: The CORE program (Community Outreach Recovery and Engagement)
          was designed around the needs of consumers at this bottoming-out stage of recovery.
          The assertive community treatment model was identified as the most appropriate for this
          level of care. Intensive case management of individuals who did not acknowledge their
          mental illness or who were resistive to treatment in a traditional setting were served by
          the CORE team.
     2.   Motivation: The Discovery team created a psychosocial rehabilitation model for
          consumers at this level of care. Consumers served by this team did not yet have the
          support systems in place to help them buffer routine life challenges and did not yet have
          confidence in the providers or themselves in terms of the ability or commitment to
          setting and attaining realistic goals. Therefore, community-based case management and
          psychoeducational groups became the model for treatment at this stage.
     3.   Commitment: The Passages team was designed to support the recovery process for
          consumers at this stage. Individuals served through this team received more standard
          in-clinic treatment such as cognitive behavioral therapy and dialectical behavioral group
          therapy. Individuals at this stage of recovery were not expected to require a significant
          amount of case management and would be able to keep regularly scheduled
          appointments.
     4.   Recovery and rehabilitation (medication-only treatment status): Individuals at this stage
          are fairly well integrated into the community and have adopted a life-long approach to
          wellness. They receive medication evaluations and may participate in the consumer
          driven clubhouse or drop-in groups at the mental health center.


Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                      Page 4
Community Integration

We developed a task force to seek out opportunities for our staff to work with consumers in their
communities and ways to create liaisons with other community agencies. We received great
corporate support from our community which is helping to break down stigma about mental
illness.

We designed a new intake model that allowed consumers to be scheduled within two days. We
implemented an electronic transfer system that created more fluidity for consumers to move
within the different levels of care, and we increased our available group programs to provide
more options for skill building, developing support systems and problem solving. Consumers
were encouraged to take our core curriculum, Recovery 101, to help understand illness
management and recovery principles and their role in the recovery process.

All of these service changes required new performance-based job descriptions so that staff would
know what their expectations were within this new system of care and so that we could identify
any new skill sets that we would need to develop to accomplish this new service model.

Facing the Hardest Challenges

Internal resistance: The new model was presented to the executive team of the mental health
center. The reaction was: “This is a great model, but we can’t do it because it would change the
whole way we do business.” In response to this, the CEO exercised his Change Champion role
by responding: “We will implement this model, and it i the role of the business systems to
                                                            s
support the service delivery model, not to drive it.” And so we proceeded to tackle the biggest
challenge of all: How to get a bifurcated system (clinical versus operational) to align with a new
service delivery structure.

Infrastructure Changes

 A year-long focus group at the Colorado State Mental Health Services division examined best
practice in providing evidenced-based care concluded: “We don’t know how to execute practice
change.” Well, at PPMH we do; and we have done it; and it works. Our challenges were:


                                                     CHALLENGES
          System                                      Existing State                  Desired State
Admissions                                   Individually scheduled appts.   Intake clinic model with 2
                                             with 50% no show rate and 40    days to first appointment
                                             days out
Medical records                              Request charts only two times   Records available on demand
                                             per day
Appointment scheduling                       Set by central scheduling       Dynamically set by providers
Groups                                       Only preassigned                Drop-in groups to meet
                                                                             dynamic needs of consumers
Reports                                      Standardized reports for        Tailored reports with targets
                                             measuring all clinical          for each different type of
                                             performance metrics             service delivery system
Human Resources                              Standardized job descriptions   New performance-based job
                                             for all clinicians              descriptions built upon
                                                                             different competencies
                                                                             required in each program
Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                               Page 5
System                                     Existing State                  Desired State
Information Systems                          Programmed to support 8          Reprogrammed to delineate 4
                                             teams, individual primary        teams and a therapeutic team
                                             therapist model                  treatment concept
Transfers of clinical                        A manual system with             Electronic transfer systems
responsibilities for cases                   centralized control that takes   managed at the local level that
between teams or between                     weeks                            takes minutes
clinicians

Change Model:

According to best practice guidelines for change management, the following principles need to be
kept in mind:

      ?   The #1 contributor to project success is strong, visible and effective sponsorship.
      ?   The top obstacle to successful change is employee resistance at all levels: frontline, middle
          managers, and senior managers.

      ?   Employees want to hear messages about change from two people:                   the CEO or their
          immediate supervisor (and these messages are not the same).
      ?   When asked what they would do differently next time, most teams would begin their change
          management activities earlier in their next project, instead of viewing it as an add-on or
          afterthought.

      ?   The top reasons for employee resistance are a lack of awareness about the change, comfort
          with the ways things are and fear of the unknown. Middle managers resist change because of
          fear of losing control and overload of current tasks and responsibilities 5 .
Key to success in accomplishing change at PPMH was recognizing the importance of the
executive champion, involving stakeholders from the grass roots level, developing a common
language about the changes and putting into place systems to reinforce the changes. It is also
important to provide an incentive system to ensure that changes implemented take root, thus, we
developed a variety of additional tools to help maintain the changes implemented.

Maintaining Change

Performance-based job descriptions: Performance management requires clear communication about
job role expectations. We invested time with our staff to define those skill sets that were essential
to being effective in our new team structure and service delivery model. Frontline staff
participated in defining those traits that they wanted in their teammates, and management
developed the performance targets and required skill sets for each service delivery type. All of
these were incorporated into performance-based job descriptions that are tailored for each
position. Supervisors use these as a tool in individual supervision sessions, and managers view
aggregated data on a monthly basis to ensure that each service delivery unit with fidelity to the
treatment model.

Performance data reporting: In an organization that had only measured productivity based upon
self-reported numbers of clients seen, we realized we needed reliable, valid measures of the
impact of our changes on both productivity and clinical outcomes. We had to develop new
reports and generate buy-in for management by data. Accountable care was an unfamiliar

5   http://www.prosci.com/benchmark.htm

Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                                Page 6
concept to staff and one that was quite scary at first. It took nine months of working with our
report writers and having staff scrub the data until we developed reports that were accurate and
useful to staff. They now clearly can view their own performance compared to goals. These
reports help staff stay on target for caseload management, which is critical to providing quality
care.

Developing staff incentives on a shoestring budget:   One of the basic tenants in performance
management is to reward those behaviors you wish to see maintained. Doing that on the typical
community mental health budget has always been challenging, and this last fiscal year even more
so. Our staff generated a list of low budget rewards that helped to bond us as a community and
recognize individuals who met performance targets.

                                  INCENTIVES ON A SHOESTRING
                   Incentive Program                                       Eligibility
Pancake breakfast served by management                    Everyone could attend
Training dollars awarded to those who met
                                                          Meeting 100% of performance targets
performance metrics
A special office supply product                           Meeting minimum performance standards
                                                          Two highest scorers on annual performance
Day off with pay to top two performers
                                                          evaluations
Summer perk of time off: four 9 hour days and
                                                          Meeting 100% of performance targets
every other Friday off
Breakfast brought to your door by the boss                Meeting minimum performance standards



Such efforts generated levity while at the same time underscoring the value of staying true to our
performance goals. The most privileged benefits, i.e., time off and professional development
funding, were reserved for those who demonstrated the strongest commitment to the goals of the
organization in serving consumers. The community celebrations shared by all helped builds
cohesiveness and a stronger sense of shared joy and spirit.

Outcomes

While budget cuts have required us to cut staff and some services, such as transportation, we
have seen morale rise and consumer satisfaction increase. This is a testimony to believing in the
wisdom of those on the frontline and providing them with the support and resources they need
to do their job. There are three statements that capture the heart of what we have accomplished
here: one from a consumer, one from clinical staff and one from support staff. These are a
testament to our success.

On the day of the launch of our Recovery Model, one of the consumers who was beginning her
first day with the Discovery Team sat in the waiting room and said:

                     “I feel so important now; look at all the things I can choose
                     from.”

One of our veteran clinical staff said recently:

                     “These are the good times now.”

One support staff that had been with the network nine years said:
Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                         Page 7
“This is the most fun I have had in my nine years with the
                     Center.”

Change can revitalize us even in these trying times.




Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                           Page 8
References

Beer, M., & Nohra, N., (2000). Cracking the Code of Change. Harvard Business Review 78(3),
        32-144.
Connor, D.R., (1992). Managing at the Speed of Change. New York: Villard Books.
http://www.mhrecovery.com/ (Ohio Dept of Mental Health)
http://www.prosci.com/benchmark.htm
http://www.state.h.us/initiatives/outcomes/resrecovprinc.html
        Jacobson, N & Curtis L (2000). Recovery as a Policy in Mental Health Services: Strategies
        Emerging Form the States. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 23(4), 333-341.
Lloyd, D. How to Deliver Accountable Care. (2002)




Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention                                    Page 9

More Related Content

What's hot

Advancing Transformational Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11
Advancing Transformational  Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11Advancing Transformational  Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11
Advancing Transformational Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11Brad Doebbeling
 
5.1 wrap up (t)
5.1 wrap up (t)5.1 wrap up (t)
5.1 wrap up (t)ubcchcm
 
Physician Compact
Physician CompactPhysician Compact
Physician Compactrweymier
 
Suzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health care
Suzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health careSuzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health care
Suzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health careNuffield Trust
 
IBI White Paper: Beyond Competition -- Beyond Outcomes
IBI White Paper: Beyond Competition  -- Beyond OutcomesIBI White Paper: Beyond Competition  -- Beyond Outcomes
IBI White Paper: Beyond Competition -- Beyond OutcomesIntegrated Benefits Institute
 
QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009
QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009
QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009jponao
 
RecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynes
RecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynesRecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynes
RecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynesBarry Duncan
 
PCOMS in New Zealand
PCOMS in New ZealandPCOMS in New Zealand
PCOMS in New ZealandBarry Duncan
 
Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...
Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...
Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...Joel Bennett
 
Collaborative healthcareleadership
Collaborative healthcareleadershipCollaborative healthcareleadership
Collaborative healthcareleadershipCarlo Favaretti
 
LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3
LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3
LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3Ikwo Oka
 
PDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariations
PDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariationsPDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariations
PDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariationsMichael van Duren
 
Improvement
ImprovementImprovement
Improvementprimary
 
R4H Priority Setting
R4H Priority SettingR4H Priority Setting
R4H Priority Settingcohred_web4d
 
Implementing ebp in community corrections the principles of effective interv...
Implementing ebp in community corrections  the principles of effective interv...Implementing ebp in community corrections  the principles of effective interv...
Implementing ebp in community corrections the principles of effective interv...sevans-idaho
 
Catching up with Rong Yi
Catching up with Rong YiCatching up with Rong Yi
Catching up with Rong Yirongyi
 
Sustainable Businesses
Sustainable Businesses Sustainable Businesses
Sustainable Businesses Grant Thornton
 
Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...
Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...
Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...allansmofsky
 
OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)
OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)
OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)Numan Aly
 
Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)
Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)
Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)Joel Bennett
 

What's hot (20)

Advancing Transformational Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11
Advancing Transformational  Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11Advancing Transformational  Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11
Advancing Transformational Science Doebbeling Cpmrc 1.22.11
 
5.1 wrap up (t)
5.1 wrap up (t)5.1 wrap up (t)
5.1 wrap up (t)
 
Physician Compact
Physician CompactPhysician Compact
Physician Compact
 
Suzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health care
Suzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health careSuzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health care
Suzanne Robinson: Priority setting and rationing in health care
 
IBI White Paper: Beyond Competition -- Beyond Outcomes
IBI White Paper: Beyond Competition  -- Beyond OutcomesIBI White Paper: Beyond Competition  -- Beyond Outcomes
IBI White Paper: Beyond Competition -- Beyond Outcomes
 
QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009
QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009
QualityMetric and Magellan Presentation at AHIP Conference 2009
 
RecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynes
RecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynesRecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynes
RecoveryToPracticeMaryHaynes
 
PCOMS in New Zealand
PCOMS in New ZealandPCOMS in New Zealand
PCOMS in New Zealand
 
Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...
Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...
Three Approaches to Workplace Alcohol, Drug, and Rx Prevention: 20 Years of R...
 
Collaborative healthcareleadership
Collaborative healthcareleadershipCollaborative healthcareleadership
Collaborative healthcareleadership
 
LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3
LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3
LBS- DISSERTATION PROPOSAL (Ikwo) 3
 
PDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariations
PDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariationsPDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariations
PDF WorkingInConcertReducingVariations
 
Improvement
ImprovementImprovement
Improvement
 
R4H Priority Setting
R4H Priority SettingR4H Priority Setting
R4H Priority Setting
 
Implementing ebp in community corrections the principles of effective interv...
Implementing ebp in community corrections  the principles of effective interv...Implementing ebp in community corrections  the principles of effective interv...
Implementing ebp in community corrections the principles of effective interv...
 
Catching up with Rong Yi
Catching up with Rong YiCatching up with Rong Yi
Catching up with Rong Yi
 
Sustainable Businesses
Sustainable Businesses Sustainable Businesses
Sustainable Businesses
 
Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...
Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...
Generating &amp; Measuring Healthy Workplace Outcomes Peel Network Pres June2...
 
OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)
OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)
OD Techqnies To Improve The Quality Of Education (Nouman Ali)
 
Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)
Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)
Wisdom of Well-Being (Joel Bennett, Mim Senft, John Weaver)
 

Similar to Practice Change

PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part II
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean,"  Part IIPFCC Methodology Meets "Lean,"  Part II
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part IIEngagingPatients
 
Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles
 Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles
Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articlesAmbika Rai
 
Assessing Organizational Change
Assessing Organizational ChangeAssessing Organizational Change
Assessing Organizational Changeddh1002
 
If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.
If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.
If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.Rami Okasha
 
CHernandez DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptx
CHernandez  DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptxCHernandez  DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptx
CHernandez DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptxCamilleHernandez24
 
Week 2 project revision Discussion.pdf
Week 2 project revision Discussion.pdfWeek 2 project revision Discussion.pdf
Week 2 project revision Discussion.pdfsdfghj21
 
Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd
Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd
Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd Healthcare consultant
 
Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...
Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...
Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...Healthcare consultant
 
LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015
LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015
LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015Dr Kieran Mervyn
 
V2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptx
V2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptxV2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptx
V2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptxmeseprod
 
What Is Client Directed Outcome Informed
What Is Client Directed Outcome InformedWhat Is Client Directed Outcome Informed
What Is Client Directed Outcome InformedScott Miller
 
Comments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done a
Comments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done aComments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done a
Comments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done aLynellBull52
 
Quality improvement and patient safety in anesthesia
Quality improvement and patient safety in anesthesiaQuality improvement and patient safety in anesthesia
Quality improvement and patient safety in anesthesiaDr. Ravikiran H M Gowda
 
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docx
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docxNCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docx
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docxvannagoforth
 
Increasing Capacity for Meaningful Engagement
Increasing Capacity for Meaningful EngagementIncreasing Capacity for Meaningful Engagement
Increasing Capacity for Meaningful EngagementCFHI-FCASS
 

Similar to Practice Change (20)

PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part II
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean,"  Part IIPFCC Methodology Meets "Lean,"  Part II
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part II
 
team-based-care_final_print
team-based-care_final_printteam-based-care_final_print
team-based-care_final_print
 
Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles
 Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles
Critique on ''translating Vision into Practice'' articles
 
Assessing Organizational Change
Assessing Organizational ChangeAssessing Organizational Change
Assessing Organizational Change
 
Colorado Beacon Annual Report 2011
Colorado Beacon Annual Report 2011Colorado Beacon Annual Report 2011
Colorado Beacon Annual Report 2011
 
If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.
If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.
If inspection is the enemy of improvement, someone's not doing it right.
 
CHernandez DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptx
CHernandez  DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptxCHernandez  DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptx
CHernandez DNP Essentials & Organization Systems Leadership.pptx
 
Week 2 project revision Discussion.pdf
Week 2 project revision Discussion.pdfWeek 2 project revision Discussion.pdf
Week 2 project revision Discussion.pdf
 
Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd
Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd
Chocking the Barriers to Change in Healthcare System.By.Dr.Mahboob ali khan Phd
 
Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...
Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...
Overcoming Challenges in implementation of Quality Process in Healthcare By D...
 
Enhanced accessreport final
Enhanced accessreport finalEnhanced accessreport final
Enhanced accessreport final
 
Enhanced accessreport final
Enhanced accessreport finalEnhanced accessreport final
Enhanced accessreport final
 
LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015
LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015
LIQH-Evaluation-Report-January-2015
 
V2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptx
V2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptxV2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptx
V2 hospitals-care-systems-of-future.pptx
 
What Is Client Directed Outcome Informed
What Is Client Directed Outcome InformedWhat Is Client Directed Outcome Informed
What Is Client Directed Outcome Informed
 
Sharing what works in the UK
Sharing what works in the UKSharing what works in the UK
Sharing what works in the UK
 
Comments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done a
Comments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done aComments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done a
Comments by the professorWeek 1 Weekly Summary You have done a
 
Quality improvement and patient safety in anesthesia
Quality improvement and patient safety in anesthesiaQuality improvement and patient safety in anesthesia
Quality improvement and patient safety in anesthesia
 
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docx
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docxNCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docx
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine,.docx
 
Increasing Capacity for Meaningful Engagement
Increasing Capacity for Meaningful EngagementIncreasing Capacity for Meaningful Engagement
Increasing Capacity for Meaningful Engagement
 

More from philhickmon

Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)
Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)
Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)philhickmon
 
Technological Innovation Intervention Fact Sheet
Technological Innovation Intervention Fact SheetTechnological Innovation Intervention Fact Sheet
Technological Innovation Intervention Fact Sheetphilhickmon
 
HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....
HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....
HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....philhickmon
 
Synergy-Strategic Planning
Synergy-Strategic PlanningSynergy-Strategic Planning
Synergy-Strategic Planningphilhickmon
 
Boardroom Navigation
Boardroom NavigationBoardroom Navigation
Boardroom Navigationphilhickmon
 
The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;
The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;
The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;philhickmon
 
Mental Health Services Guide
Mental Health Services GuideMental Health Services Guide
Mental Health Services Guidephilhickmon
 
March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011
March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011
March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011philhickmon
 
Cir Policy Brief Ensuring Quality Workforce March 2011 Final
Cir Policy Brief   Ensuring Quality Workforce   March 2011 FinalCir Policy Brief   Ensuring Quality Workforce   March 2011 Final
Cir Policy Brief Ensuring Quality Workforce March 2011 Finalphilhickmon
 
Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008
Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008
Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008philhickmon
 
Slowing Cost Growth In Medicaid
Slowing Cost Growth In MedicaidSlowing Cost Growth In Medicaid
Slowing Cost Growth In Medicaidphilhickmon
 
Rotc Leadership Class
Rotc Leadership ClassRotc Leadership Class
Rotc Leadership Classphilhickmon
 
Supervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied Llc
Supervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied LlcSupervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied Llc
Supervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied Llcphilhickmon
 
Mapping Out Strategies Supplement
Mapping Out Strategies SupplementMapping Out Strategies Supplement
Mapping Out Strategies Supplementphilhickmon
 
Drucker By Pearson
Drucker By PearsonDrucker By Pearson
Drucker By Pearsonphilhickmon
 
CEO_Road To Empowerment
CEO_Road To EmpowermentCEO_Road To Empowerment
CEO_Road To Empowermentphilhickmon
 

More from philhickmon (20)

Morgan Gareth
Morgan GarethMorgan Gareth
Morgan Gareth
 
Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)
Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)
Social Intelligence And The Biology Of Leadership (Dragged)
 
Technological Innovation Intervention Fact Sheet
Technological Innovation Intervention Fact SheetTechnological Innovation Intervention Fact Sheet
Technological Innovation Intervention Fact Sheet
 
HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....
HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....
HealthLeaders - Looking Ahead.....
 
Synergy-Strategic Planning
Synergy-Strategic PlanningSynergy-Strategic Planning
Synergy-Strategic Planning
 
Boardroom Navigation
Boardroom NavigationBoardroom Navigation
Boardroom Navigation
 
The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;
The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;
The Most Important Thing - &quot;Milieu&quot;
 
Mental Health Services Guide
Mental Health Services GuideMental Health Services Guide
Mental Health Services Guide
 
March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011
March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011
March 2011 Hcahps Introduction Training Slides Session I 2 28 2011
 
Cir Policy Brief Ensuring Quality Workforce March 2011 Final
Cir Policy Brief   Ensuring Quality Workforce   March 2011 FinalCir Policy Brief   Ensuring Quality Workforce   March 2011 Final
Cir Policy Brief Ensuring Quality Workforce March 2011 Final
 
The New CEO
The New CEOThe New CEO
The New CEO
 
Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008
Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008
Thought Leaders Forum White Paper 2008
 
Slowing Cost Growth In Medicaid
Slowing Cost Growth In MedicaidSlowing Cost Growth In Medicaid
Slowing Cost Growth In Medicaid
 
Rotc Leadership Class
Rotc Leadership ClassRotc Leadership Class
Rotc Leadership Class
 
Chaos
ChaosChaos
Chaos
 
Supervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied Llc
Supervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied LlcSupervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied Llc
Supervisory Leadership Training 2007 Synergy Allied Llc
 
Budget Resource
Budget ResourceBudget Resource
Budget Resource
 
Mapping Out Strategies Supplement
Mapping Out Strategies SupplementMapping Out Strategies Supplement
Mapping Out Strategies Supplement
 
Drucker By Pearson
Drucker By PearsonDrucker By Pearson
Drucker By Pearson
 
CEO_Road To Empowerment
CEO_Road To EmpowermentCEO_Road To Empowerment
CEO_Road To Empowerment
 

Practice Change

  • 1. How to Accomplish Practice Change in Behavioral Healthcare in Less Than One Year Submitted by: Natalie S. Berger, Ph.D. Director, Adult Network Pikes Peak Mental Health, Colorado Springs, CO Submitted to: 2004 Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award American College of Mental Health Administration Foundation HONORABLE MENTION 3/11/04
  • 2. HOW TO ACCOMPLISH PRACTICE CHANGE IN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR ABSTRACT : This a challenging time in the field of public mental health. State and federal funding for public behavioral healthcare is declining in a time when the demand for services is increasing. Philosophical changes in mental health care service delivery, underscored by the tenants from the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, are creating additional challenges for practitioners. The Adult Network of Pikes Peak Mental Health (PPMH) has developed a model for providing behavioral healthcare that meets these challenges while providing greater access to care, holistic care delivered in natural settings and, at the same time, maintaining the quality clinical outcomes at reduced costs. HOW TO ACCOMPLISH PRACTICE CHANGE IN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR Background For more than six years this community mental health center in Colorado Springs tried to convert its traditional behavioral healthcare system to a Recovery oriented system. Three different directors had tried and failed to accomplish this. Like many mental health centers, staff knew the language of recovery, they could talk the talk, but the elements of practice that would define a Recovery oriented system of care were never implemented. As Jacobson and Curtis (2000) point out: Some states simply rename their existing programs, failing to acknowledge the necessity for a fundamental shift toward sharing both power and responsibility 1 . The stakes for accomplishing this change were increasing exponentially. Soon, incentives would be based upon the recovery oriented performance measures for community mental health; funding for the severe and persistently mentally ill (SPMI) was decreased 30% over a two year period with further cuts expected; and accountability expectations were facing the public mental health field across the nation, with numerous centers closing or being privatized or outsourced 2 . Time was running short. Our task was: 1. To define, develop and implement a service delivery model congruent with recovery principles; 2. To improve access to care from 40 days (time to first appointment) to within 7 days; 1 Jacobson and Curtis. (2000) Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal p. 335 2 David Lloyd (2002). How to Deliver Accountable Care Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 1
  • 3. 3. To increase staff productivity from 46% to 60%; 4. To reduce the no show rate from 30% to 10%; 5. To serve more consumers with fewer dollars without a reduction in the quality of outcomes; and 6. To improve staff job satisfaction from 2.1 to 3.0 on a 4.0 scale. We achieved these results as identified in the table below. T tests and chi square tests of selected data found the changes to be statistically significant at p<.01 levels. The story that follows is how we accomplished all of this in less than one year. COMPARISON 2002 AND 2003 PERFORMANCE METRICS Metric 2002 2003 Ave. time to 1 st appt 40 days 2 days Consumers active in consumer driven 15 people 92 people services Cost to serve individuals with severe 74% received >$500 of 61% received >$500 of and persistent mental illness (SPMI) services/year services/year Clinical productivity 48% 65% Staff satisfaction 2.3 on a 4.0 scale 3.5 on a 4.0 scale Average length of stay 1936 days 1840 days Average cost of services/year $385 $237 No show rate for ongoing appts. 33% 13% The Transformation Process New management was brought in with competency in change management. The Network Director spearheaded sweeping changes in accountability, service delivery systems, philosophy of care and team cohesion. One of the key principles in this change process was the belief that the staff who had been serving individuals with severe and persistent mental illness for 10-20 years had deep expertise regarding the needs of this population. Their expertise w valued, as respected and integral to determining both what needed to be done and how it could be accomplished given the corporate culture. Thus, the first steps in bringing this organization to a new level of performance was to form focus groups of consumers and staff to identify what was working and what was not, and to generate ideas regarding what needed to be done in order to improve care, improve morale and be more productive and cost efficient. This project had unwavering support from the Change Champions, our CEO and COO, and followed the change management best practices as defined by Daryl Connor (1995). Connor defines seven elements as critical in order to orchestrate a change initiative that achieves the desired outcomes: ? Burning Platform ? Project Champion Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 2
  • 4. ? Stakeholder Buy In ? Expectation Setting ? Incentivizing Change ? Marketing and Communication ? Project Planning These elements guided the change process and provided the leadership team the vision they needed to stay on course during the change process. The focus groups produced a well-defined model for the needs of consumers at various stages in their recovery based upon the Ohio Department of Mental Health (ODMH) consumer outcomes initiative 3 The research from ODMH identified the stages of recovery, the needs of consumers and the roles of providers during these different stages. While this model was widely publicized, there was no known model identifying what programming should look like based upon the ODMH research. The Adult Network designed our continuum of care based upon dose response studies in traditional care settings and redefined these for application to a stepped care model of treatment based upon Recovery Model principles. Philosophical Changes The Recovery Model: Tighter financial constraints occurred with capitated funding for mental health in the 1980’s. This began a period of increasing accountability for monies spent in community mental health care service delivery. Not long after this, the best practice guidelines for treatment of SPMI began to recognize some changes in basic tenants away from a medical model of treatment to a recovery model 4 . 1. Mental illness was no longer considered a terminal life sentence. 2. The provider was now viewed as a partner in care, not as directing treatment. 3. The treatment goal needed to be to help consumers develop meaningful roles in their communities, not to develop a long-term therapeutic relationship with the therapist. 4. Consumers would play a more active role in decision-making and responsibility for their recovery. 5. Delivering in-vivo care became the ideal, rather that treatment rendered within the mental health center 6. The importance of support systems, to include family, peers and community, became more and more central to attaining and maintaining recovery All of these changes required a shift in philosophy and service delivery model for the Adult Network. How could we change an institution that had built its operational systems and business processes to support an office-based treatment delivery model to something that was much more dynamic? 3 ODMH 4 www.mh.state.oh.us/initiatives/outcomes/resrecovprinc.html Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 3
  • 5. PHILOSOPHY CHANGES REQUIRED RECOVERY PRINCIPLES MEDICAL MODEL Strength based illness focused doing with doing for integrated team individual provider graduated disengagement long term therapy relationship case management 50 minute hours community based clinic based present focused focus on past traumas The Service Delivery Model The ODMH four-stage model of recovery - engagement / motivation / commitment / recovery & rehabilitation - became the philosophical basis for our programming. Four different types of service systems based upon evidenced-based treatment protocols were designed to be congruent with the differing needs of consumers at each stage. These treatment options were aligned with the four stages of recovery defined by ODMH. 1. Engagement: The CORE program (Community Outreach Recovery and Engagement) was designed around the needs of consumers at this bottoming-out stage of recovery. The assertive community treatment model was identified as the most appropriate for this level of care. Intensive case management of individuals who did not acknowledge their mental illness or who were resistive to treatment in a traditional setting were served by the CORE team. 2. Motivation: The Discovery team created a psychosocial rehabilitation model for consumers at this level of care. Consumers served by this team did not yet have the support systems in place to help them buffer routine life challenges and did not yet have confidence in the providers or themselves in terms of the ability or commitment to setting and attaining realistic goals. Therefore, community-based case management and psychoeducational groups became the model for treatment at this stage. 3. Commitment: The Passages team was designed to support the recovery process for consumers at this stage. Individuals served through this team received more standard in-clinic treatment such as cognitive behavioral therapy and dialectical behavioral group therapy. Individuals at this stage of recovery were not expected to require a significant amount of case management and would be able to keep regularly scheduled appointments. 4. Recovery and rehabilitation (medication-only treatment status): Individuals at this stage are fairly well integrated into the community and have adopted a life-long approach to wellness. They receive medication evaluations and may participate in the consumer driven clubhouse or drop-in groups at the mental health center. Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 4
  • 6. Community Integration We developed a task force to seek out opportunities for our staff to work with consumers in their communities and ways to create liaisons with other community agencies. We received great corporate support from our community which is helping to break down stigma about mental illness. We designed a new intake model that allowed consumers to be scheduled within two days. We implemented an electronic transfer system that created more fluidity for consumers to move within the different levels of care, and we increased our available group programs to provide more options for skill building, developing support systems and problem solving. Consumers were encouraged to take our core curriculum, Recovery 101, to help understand illness management and recovery principles and their role in the recovery process. All of these service changes required new performance-based job descriptions so that staff would know what their expectations were within this new system of care and so that we could identify any new skill sets that we would need to develop to accomplish this new service model. Facing the Hardest Challenges Internal resistance: The new model was presented to the executive team of the mental health center. The reaction was: “This is a great model, but we can’t do it because it would change the whole way we do business.” In response to this, the CEO exercised his Change Champion role by responding: “We will implement this model, and it i the role of the business systems to s support the service delivery model, not to drive it.” And so we proceeded to tackle the biggest challenge of all: How to get a bifurcated system (clinical versus operational) to align with a new service delivery structure. Infrastructure Changes A year-long focus group at the Colorado State Mental Health Services division examined best practice in providing evidenced-based care concluded: “We don’t know how to execute practice change.” Well, at PPMH we do; and we have done it; and it works. Our challenges were: CHALLENGES System Existing State Desired State Admissions Individually scheduled appts. Intake clinic model with 2 with 50% no show rate and 40 days to first appointment days out Medical records Request charts only two times Records available on demand per day Appointment scheduling Set by central scheduling Dynamically set by providers Groups Only preassigned Drop-in groups to meet dynamic needs of consumers Reports Standardized reports for Tailored reports with targets measuring all clinical for each different type of performance metrics service delivery system Human Resources Standardized job descriptions New performance-based job for all clinicians descriptions built upon different competencies required in each program Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 5
  • 7. System Existing State Desired State Information Systems Programmed to support 8 Reprogrammed to delineate 4 teams, individual primary teams and a therapeutic team therapist model treatment concept Transfers of clinical A manual system with Electronic transfer systems responsibilities for cases centralized control that takes managed at the local level that between teams or between weeks takes minutes clinicians Change Model: According to best practice guidelines for change management, the following principles need to be kept in mind: ? The #1 contributor to project success is strong, visible and effective sponsorship. ? The top obstacle to successful change is employee resistance at all levels: frontline, middle managers, and senior managers. ? Employees want to hear messages about change from two people: the CEO or their immediate supervisor (and these messages are not the same). ? When asked what they would do differently next time, most teams would begin their change management activities earlier in their next project, instead of viewing it as an add-on or afterthought. ? The top reasons for employee resistance are a lack of awareness about the change, comfort with the ways things are and fear of the unknown. Middle managers resist change because of fear of losing control and overload of current tasks and responsibilities 5 . Key to success in accomplishing change at PPMH was recognizing the importance of the executive champion, involving stakeholders from the grass roots level, developing a common language about the changes and putting into place systems to reinforce the changes. It is also important to provide an incentive system to ensure that changes implemented take root, thus, we developed a variety of additional tools to help maintain the changes implemented. Maintaining Change Performance-based job descriptions: Performance management requires clear communication about job role expectations. We invested time with our staff to define those skill sets that were essential to being effective in our new team structure and service delivery model. Frontline staff participated in defining those traits that they wanted in their teammates, and management developed the performance targets and required skill sets for each service delivery type. All of these were incorporated into performance-based job descriptions that are tailored for each position. Supervisors use these as a tool in individual supervision sessions, and managers view aggregated data on a monthly basis to ensure that each service delivery unit with fidelity to the treatment model. Performance data reporting: In an organization that had only measured productivity based upon self-reported numbers of clients seen, we realized we needed reliable, valid measures of the impact of our changes on both productivity and clinical outcomes. We had to develop new reports and generate buy-in for management by data. Accountable care was an unfamiliar 5 http://www.prosci.com/benchmark.htm Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 6
  • 8. concept to staff and one that was quite scary at first. It took nine months of working with our report writers and having staff scrub the data until we developed reports that were accurate and useful to staff. They now clearly can view their own performance compared to goals. These reports help staff stay on target for caseload management, which is critical to providing quality care. Developing staff incentives on a shoestring budget: One of the basic tenants in performance management is to reward those behaviors you wish to see maintained. Doing that on the typical community mental health budget has always been challenging, and this last fiscal year even more so. Our staff generated a list of low budget rewards that helped to bond us as a community and recognize individuals who met performance targets. INCENTIVES ON A SHOESTRING Incentive Program Eligibility Pancake breakfast served by management Everyone could attend Training dollars awarded to those who met Meeting 100% of performance targets performance metrics A special office supply product Meeting minimum performance standards Two highest scorers on annual performance Day off with pay to top two performers evaluations Summer perk of time off: four 9 hour days and Meeting 100% of performance targets every other Friday off Breakfast brought to your door by the boss Meeting minimum performance standards Such efforts generated levity while at the same time underscoring the value of staying true to our performance goals. The most privileged benefits, i.e., time off and professional development funding, were reserved for those who demonstrated the strongest commitment to the goals of the organization in serving consumers. The community celebrations shared by all helped builds cohesiveness and a stronger sense of shared joy and spirit. Outcomes While budget cuts have required us to cut staff and some services, such as transportation, we have seen morale rise and consumer satisfaction increase. This is a testimony to believing in the wisdom of those on the frontline and providing them with the support and resources they need to do their job. There are three statements that capture the heart of what we have accomplished here: one from a consumer, one from clinical staff and one from support staff. These are a testament to our success. On the day of the launch of our Recovery Model, one of the consumers who was beginning her first day with the Discovery Team sat in the waiting room and said: “I feel so important now; look at all the things I can choose from.” One of our veteran clinical staff said recently: “These are the good times now.” One support staff that had been with the network nine years said: Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 7
  • 9. “This is the most fun I have had in my nine years with the Center.” Change can revitalize us even in these trying times. Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 8
  • 10. References Beer, M., & Nohra, N., (2000). Cracking the Code of Change. Harvard Business Review 78(3), 32-144. Connor, D.R., (1992). Managing at the Speed of Change. New York: Villard Books. http://www.mhrecovery.com/ (Ohio Dept of Mental Health) http://www.prosci.com/benchmark.htm http://www.state.h.us/initiatives/outcomes/resrecovprinc.html Jacobson, N & Curtis L (2000). Recovery as a Policy in Mental Health Services: Strategies Emerging Form the States. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 23(4), 333-341. Lloyd, D. How to Deliver Accountable Care. (2002) Timothy J. Coakley Leadership Award – Honorable Mention Page 9